Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 22(5): e25304, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31148372

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are few data on adherence and low-cost measurement tools for children living with HIV. We collected prospective data on adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among a multinational cohort of children to evaluate an adherence questionnaire. METHODS: We enrolled 319 children ages 0 to 16 years on ART in Kenya (n = 110), South Africa (n = 109) or Thailand (n = 100). Children were followed up for six months of adherence monitoring between March 2015 and August 2016 using Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS® ) with at least one viral load measure. At month 3 and 6, children or their caregivers were administered a 10-item adherence questionnaire. Repeated measures analyses were used to compare responses on questionnaire items to external adherence criteria: MEMS® dichotomized adherence (≥90% of doses taken vs. <90%), 48-hour MEMS® treatment interruptions and viral suppression (<1000 copies/mL). Items associated with outcomes (p < 0.10) were coefficient-weighted to calculate a total adherence score, which was tested in multivariate regression against MEMS® and viral suppression outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean child age was 11 years and 54% were female. Children from Thailand (median age 14 years) were significantly older compared to Kenya (10 years) and South Africa (10 years). Prevalence of viral suppression was 97% in Thailand, 81% in South Africa and 69% in Kenya, while the prevalence of MEMS® adherence ≥90% was 57% in Thailand, 58% in South Africa and 40% in Kenya. Across sites, child-reported adherence using the questionnaire was significantly associated with dichotomized MEMS® adherence (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4), 48-hour treatment interruptions (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.6), and viral suppression (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.7). We did find, however, that different cut-points for the adherence score may be context-specific. For example, MEMS® non-adherent children in Kenya had a lower adherence score (0.98) compared to South Africa (1.77) or Thailand (1.58). CONCLUSIONS: We found suboptimal adherence to ART was common by multiple measures in this multi-country cohort of children. The short-form questionnaire demonstrated reasonable validity to screen for non-adherence in these diverse settings.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Quênia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Tailândia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA