Application and advantages of a joystick-controlled robotic scope holder in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a comparative study.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy has gained popularity due to its scarless nature, but the use of a handheld endoscope can lead to an unstable visual field. Soloassist II, a robotic scope holder, enables precise control using a joystick, ensuring stable vision. This study aims to evaluate the application and the advantages of Soloassist II in transoral thyroidectomy. Patients who underwent transoral thyroidectomy with Soloassist II or human assistance between June 2019 and May 2021 were reviewed. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were compared. The ergonomic stress of the assistant in both groups was also measured. A total of 100 consecutive patients were included: 32 were assisted by Soloassist II and 68 by humans. The Soloassist II group demonstrated significantly shorter operation times (median [IQR]) (165 [149,179] vs. 181 [165,204] min, P = 0.004) in unilateral lobectomy and less blood loss (median [IQR]) (2 [2,2] vs. 2 [2,3] ml, P = 0.002) than the human-assisted group. Postoperative course and complication rates were similar. The musculoskeletal pain of the assistant was significantly higher and involved more areas in the human-assisted group. The utilization of Soloassist II in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy is easy to set up and leads to shorter operation times, reduced blood loss, and decreased musculoskeletal pain compared to human handheld endoscope. These findings support the potential of Soloassist II in improving surgical outcomes and minimizing physical strain during transoral thyroidectomy.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Transoral Versus Open Thyroidectomy for Graves Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is a safe alternative to thyroidectomy for thyroid goiter and provides the benefit of being scarless. However, the data on the use of TOETVA in patients with Graves disease are limited. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of Graves disease patients who underwent TOETVA versus those who underwent open thyroidectomy (OT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Graves disease who received TOETVA or OT for bilateral total thyroidectomy between September 2017 and October 2022 were included. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, length of stay, and complications, were compared. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in each group. The mean age in the TOETVA group was 35.80±8.13 years, which was significantly younger than that in the OT group, which was 51.53±14.22 years. Females predominated in both groups. The other demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were also comparable. The postoperative stay and complications, including hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, surgical site infection, postoperative hemorrhage, and recurrence of hyperthyroidism, were not different between the 2 groups. There were 11 patients in the TOETVA group and 10 in the OT group who had thyroglobulin levels <0.1 ng/dL, indicating the completeness of total thyroidectomy in the 2 groups. There was no conversion of TOETVA to an open procedure. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected Graves patients, TOETVA offers a safe, scarless, and feasible alternative to conventional open thyroidectomy.

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: the mid-term oncological outcome.

BACKGROUND: Traditional open thyroidectomy is the surgical standard for thyroid cancer; however, it inevitably leaves a visible scar on the neck and affects the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to avoid making a neck incision, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) have been developed recently, and the surgical outcomes of these techniques are as favorable as open surgery for benign disease. Additionally, positive short-term surgical outcomes have also been achieved in a few patients with thyroid cancer. However, no data on the mid-to-long-term recurrence and survival rates of transoral thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer are available. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes and mid-term oncological results of the TOETVA and TORT in patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: We reviewed patients who had received TOETVA or TORT between July 2017 and November 2021 and followed up on their oncological outcomes until December 2022. Perioperative surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The 115 patients underwent 122 operations (57 TOETVAs and 65 TORTs), including seven complete thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), Stage I-II, including T1-T3, N0-N1a, and initial low- to high-risk groups. There was no conversion from transoral to open surgery. TORT required a longer operating time (median [interquartile range]) than TOETVA (lobectomy: 279 [250, 318] vs. 196 [173, 253] min, p < 0.001; bilateral total thyroidectomy: 375 [309, 433] vs. 279 [238, 312] min, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the two groups regarding perioperative complications. Complete thyroidectomy with a second transoral approach was safe. TOETVA and TORT achieved favorable oncological outcomes with 100% survival and 98.2% acceptable response (excellent and indeterminate response) during a mean 37.88 ± 12.42 months mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy was safe and achieved favorable mid-term oncological outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with early-stage DTC.

Should we change the treatment plan in early hepatocellular carcinoma with chronic kidney disease?

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been considered to be a poor prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few studies have focused on early HCC and the impact of CKD on survival, which should be considered in curative treatment for early HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with BCLC stage 0/A were enrolled from 2009 to 2019. A total of 383 patients were divided into Control group and CKD group, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of different treatments were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The Control group had a significantly better OS than the CKD group (72.6 months vs. 56.7 months; p = 0.003). DFS was similar between the groups (62.2 months vs. 63.8 months, p = 0.717). In the Control group, the surgically treated (OP) group had significantly superior OS (65.0 months vs. 80.0 months, p = 0.014) and DFS (50.9 months vs. 70.2 months, p = 0.020) than the radiofrequency ablation-treated group. In the CKD group, the OP group showed a survival advantage in OS (70.6 months vs. 49.2 months, p = 0.004), while DFS was similar between treatment groups (56.0 months vs. 62.2 months, p = 0.097). CONCLUSION: CKD should not be considered to be a poor prognostic factor in early HCC patients. Moreover, hepatectomy should be carried out in CKD patient with early HCC for better prognosis if feasible.

Laparoscopic vs. open feeding jejunostomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Feeding jejunostomy is a solid way for patients to maintain enteral nutrition. However, debate over the superiority of the laparoscopic vs. laparotomic method has raised concerns in recent years. This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between these two approaches. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from the date of inception to April 2022 for studies comparing laparoscopic and open feeding jejunostomy. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included articles. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of postoperative complications in each group. We also analyzed the major/minor complication rates and operations, excluding major concomitant procedures. The risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The certainty of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of seven retrospective studies with 1195 patients in total were included in this systemic review and meta-analysis. Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy carried a significantly lower postoperative complication rate (RR: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91, p = 0.02, low certainty of evidence) compared with laparotomy, and the heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 34%, p = 0.18). After excluding major concomitant procedures, the RR between the laparoscopic and open group was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.33-0.70, p < 0.001, low certainty of evidence), suggesting that the laparoscopic approach was superior in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy might reduce the postoperative overall complication rate compared with open feeding jejunostomy.