Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock-A six-year service evaluation.

Only a small number of English hospitals provide postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and there are doubts about its efficacy and safety. The aim of this service evaluation was to determine local survival rates and report on patient demographics. This was a retrospective service evaluation of prospectively recorded routine clinical data from a tertiary cardiothoracic center in the United Kingdom offering services including cardiac and thoracic surgery, heart and lung transplantation, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for respiratory failure, and all types of mechanical circulatory support. In six years, 39 patients were supported with VA-ECMO for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS). We analyzed survival data and looked for associations between survival rates and patient characteristics. The intervention was venoarterial-ECMO in patients with PCCS either following weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass or following a trial of inotropes and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on the intensive care unit. 30-day, hospital discharge, 1-year and 2-year survivals were 51.3%, 41%, 37.5%, and 38.5%, respectively. The median (IQR [range]) duration of support was 6 (4-9 [1-35]) days. Nonsurvival was associated with advanced age, shorter intensive care length of stay, and the requirement for postoperative hemofiltration. Reasonable survival rates can be achieved in selected patients who may have been expected to have a worse mortality without VA-ECMO. We suggest postoperative VA-ECMO should be available to all patients undergoing cardiac surgery be it in their own center or through an established pathway to a specialist center.

Perioperative Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Defibrillator of the 21st Century?: A Case Report.

Veno-arterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECMO-CPR) has been recommended by new resuscitation guidelines in the United Kingdom. Our recently established yet unfunded ECMO-CPR service has thus far treated 6 patients, with 3 making a good recovery. One patient suffered a catastrophic perioperative complication through glycine absorption and we are in no doubt that she would not have survived without ECMO. We argue for a pragmatic approach to funding of ECMO-CPR because observational evidence suggests superiority over traditional resuscitation and there exists major methodological and ethical barriers to randomized controlled studies. We also call for high-quality observational evidence in the perioperative setting.

Postcardiotomy VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a rare but catastrophic syndrome that can occur following separation from cardiopulmonary bypass or at any time during the immediate postoperative course. The management of PCCS varies between clinicians, institutions and countries. The available evidence to guide this practice is limited. In their systematic review and meta-analysis, Khorsandi and colleagues report a synthesis of case-series pertinent to the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for PCCS. Whilst we acknowledge the potential survival benefit for carefully selected patients for what is ordinarily a condition with high mortality, we wish to comment on several aspects of the study in the context of its application to clinical practice.

Qualitative research in critical care: Has its time finally come?

As clinicians, we are well acquainted with using randomised controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies together with p-values, odds ratios and confidence intervals to understand and improve the way in which we care for our patients. We have a degree of familiarity, trust and confidence with well-performed scientific quantitative studies in critical care and we make a judgment about our practice based on their recommendations. The same cannot be said of qualitative research, and its use accounts for only a small proportion of published studies in critical care. There are many research questions in our environment that lend themselves to a qualitative research design. Our positivistic education as doctors potentially incites distrust towards such studies and, as such, they are seldom undertaken in our units. We aim to describe and discuss the differences between quantitative and qualitative research with focus being given to common misunderstandings and misconceptions. An overview of the methods of data collection and analysis is provided with references towards published qualitative studies in critical care. Finally, we provide pragmatic and practical instruction and guidance for those wishing to undertake their own qualitative study in critical care.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following oesophagectomy: Is it safe? A systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To find, critically appraise and synthesise all published studies so as to determine the safety and spectrum of use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following oesophagectomy. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched and the quality of the studies and any bias or confounding were rated according to established protocols. Outcomes extracted included re-intubation, anastomotic leakage, length of intensive care unit stay and mortality. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Pooling of outcomes was considered if appropriate. RESULTS: The search identified four papers, demonstrating the understudying/underreporting of the topic. Three were case-series and one was a conference abstract. The overall methodological quality was low. Design-specific biases and confounding were high. Despite this, the included studies conclude that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is safe and effective and that re-intubation rates, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality and anastomotic dehiscence is lower when it is used. Meta-analysis was deemed to be inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the conclusions and consensus of the included studies, there is no evidence to definitively conclude that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is either safe or dangerous following oesophagectomy and the current literary evidence is inadequate. Current practice varies and is based on opinion and consensus. As such, randomised controlled studies are urgently required as current practice may cause undue harm to patients. The incidence of anastomotic leakage with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use needs to be determined.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in delirious patients: understudied, underreported, or underappreciated? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the prevalence of delirium in patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for acute respiratory failure and to quantify the prognostic impact of delirium with respect to NPPV failure. METHOD: We searched the databases EMBASE (1996 to present), MEDLINE (1996 to present), PsycINFO(®) (2002 to present) and CINAHL (1992 to present). A Google™ search and hand searching of bibliographies or relevant articles were also performed. We searched for prospective observational studies conducted in a setting where patients with acute respiratory failure receiving NPPV were screened for delirium. All authors independently assessed references for inclusion and extracted data. Information was collated regarding study design, baseline characteristics of included patients, and the prevalence of delirium. Where prognostic information regarding NPPV failure was reported, a risk ratio for the association between delirium and NPPV failure was derived. These values were pooled in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three articles were retrieved by the search strategy. These included 239 patients receiving noninvasive ventilation who were assessed for delirium. The prevalence of delirium was recorded at between 33 and 38 % with a pooled prevalence of 37 %. Two studies reported prognostic data and the risk ratios for noninvasive ventilation failure in delirium were calculated as 1.79 (95 % CI 1.09-2.94) and 3.28 (95 % CI 1.60-6.73). A meta-analysis was performed and the pooled risk ratio was found to be 2.12 (95 % CI 1.41-3.18). CONCLUSIONS: The data in this context was scarce and of low quality. A diagnosis of delirium was made in 9 patients and inferred in 80. Despite the current lack of high-quality data and studies, the high reported prevalence of delirium and the association with noninvasive ventilation failure lends support for more awareness amongst health-care professionals and more routine screening. More focused primary research is necessary in this area. Adherence to NICE guidelines regarding delirium in these patients should be a standard of care.

Pancreatic lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: von Hippel-Lindau (vHL) disease is a rare condition that leads to characteristic lesions within many different body systems. Pancreatic manifestations of vHL cover a wide spectrum of pathologies, and thus, accurate characterization and management is critical. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic text word and MeSH search of the medical literature was performed to identify studies where information regarding the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management recommendations could be extracted. RESULTS: Eleven studies were identified but 2 studies utilized the same data set. Of the 10 remaining studies, a total of 1,442 patients with vHL were available for analysis. Four hundred and twenty patients were examined for any type of pancreatic lesion, 362 for simple cysts or serous cystadenomas (SCAs), and 1,442 for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Of the 420 assessed for any pancreatic manifestation of vHL, 252 (60%) had a pancreatic lesion identified. Simple cysts that present as the sole manifestation of pancreatic disease were common and found in 169 of 362 (47%) patients. These are usually asymptomatic and do not normally require intervention. SCAs were reported in 39 of 362 (11%) patients and followed a similar benign course; resection is acceptable in symptomatic patients. NETs were identified in 211 of 1,442 (15%) patients, and 27 of 1,442 (2%) lesions behaved malignantly. Management of NETs depends on size, doubling time, and underlying genetics. Renal cell carcinoma is a characteristic in vHL, but there were no cases of pancreatic metastases identified from the included studies. Adenocarcinomas of the pancreas are not pathogenically linked to vHL. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the wide spectrum and high prevalence of pancreatic lesions in vHL. Simple cysts and SCAs are benign, but NETs require careful observation due to their malignant potential.

High ureteric injury following multiorgan recovery: successful kidney transplant with Boari flap ureterocystostomy reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Despite increased utilization of marginal organs, there is still a marked disparity between organ supply and demand for transplantation. To maximize resources, it is imperative that procured organs are in good condition. Surgical damage at organ recovery can happen and organs are sometimes discarded as a result. We describe a damaged recovered kidney with high ureteric transection that was successfully transplanted using a primary Boari flap ureterocystostomy. CASE REPORT: The donor kidney was procured form a deceased donor and sustained damage by transection of the ureter just distal to the pelvi-ureteric junction at organ recovery. The recipient had been on the transplant waiting list for eight years and not accepting this kidney would have seriously jeopardized her chance of future transplantation. Several centers rejected the donor kidney. We assessed the kidney and decided to proceed with transplantation. The kidney was successfully transplanted. A primary Boari flap was constructed and the transplant ureter implanted onto the bladder. The post-operative course was complicated by urine leak that settled down after management by nephrostomy insertion and bladder catheterization. The patient made a good recovery and remained well at six monthly follow up with a serum creatinine of 1.7 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: Primary Boari flap ureterocystostomy is a viable option when the transplant surgeon is faced with a high ureteric injury in the procured kidney. Since most patients wait years for a suitable graft and some may never find an adequate match, every effort should be made to effectively utilize the scarce available resources to the fullest.