Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 36(3): 457-468, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31079610

RESUMO

Surgical bone reconstructive procedures of the foot and ankle in diabetic patients must be considered when performing evaluation of a diabetic foot for patients with preulcerative lesions and preexisting wounds. Preventive deformity correction can reduce the potential risk of ulceration, infection, and possible amputation in a patient with an at-risk foot type. It can also expedite wound healing and prevent further breakdown in a patient with lower extremity ulcerations. This article discusses different types of surgical bone reconstructive procedures as preventive and prophylactic deformity corrections to reduce osseous deformity, minimize preulcerative lesions, and increase limb-salvage rates in the compromised patient.


Assuntos
Pé Diabético/cirurgia , Ossos do Pé/cirurgia , Tendão do Calcâneo/cirurgia , Joanete do Alfaiate/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Humanos , Salvamento de Membro , Osteotomia
2.
J Wound Care ; 28(Sup5): S30-S40, 2019 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31067172

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess wound healing outcomes following direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement as a surgical adjunct for non-healing lower extremity wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing lower extremity wound treatment with direct, low-frequency (22.5 kHz), high-intensity (~60 W/cm2) ultrasonic debridement between January 2010 and January 2016. Clinical outcomes were assessed up to 180-days post-ultrasonic debridement. Descriptive statistics, cost and univariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 82 wounds in 51 patients were included. Mean age was 57.0 years (range: 32-69), and average body mass index (BMI) was 30.8 kg/m². Patient comorbidities consisted of smoking (47%; n=24), hypertension (75%; n=38), diabetes (45%; n=23), and peripheral vascular disease (51%, n=26). Average wound age at initial presentation was 1013 days (range: 2-5475 days) with an average wound size of 9.0cm x 7.4cm. At 180-days post-debridement, 60% (n=49) of wounds had completely healed. Readmission (47%; n=24) and reoperation (45%; n=23) rates were characterised by the reason for readmission and reoperation respectively. Readmission for wound healing (70%, n=39) was primarily for further debridements (41%; n=16). Wound infection (30%; n=7) was the most common readmission for wound complications (30%; n=17). Reoperations primarily consisted of treatments for further wound healing 96% (n=51). Cost analysis showed a lower total treatment cost for patients with improved healing ($78,698), compared with non-improved wounds ($137,707). CONCLUSION: In a complex, heterogeneous cohort of chronic extremity wounds, the use of direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement is a safe and reliable adjunctive therapy for the management of these wounds.


Assuntos
Desbridamento/economia , Traumatismos da Perna/terapia , Úlcera Cutânea/terapia , Ultrassom/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Traumatismos da Perna/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania , Estudos Retrospectivos , Úlcera Cutânea/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA