Oncolytic Reovirus (pelareorep) Induces Autophagy in KRAS-mutated Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the effects of pelareorep on autophagy in multiple models of colorectal cancer, including patient-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HCT116 [KRAS mutant (mut)] and Hke3 [KRAS wild-type (WT)] cells were treated with pelareorep (multiplicity of infection, 5) and harvested at 6 and 9 hours. LC3 A/B expression was determined by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry; five autophagic proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. The expression of 88 autophagy genes was determined by qRT-PCR. Syngeneic mouse models, CT26/Balb-C (KRAS mut) and MC38/C57B6 (KRAS WT), were developed and treated with pelareorep (10 × 106 plaque-forming unit/day) intraperitoneally. Protein and RNA were extracted from harvested tumor tissues. PBMCs from five experimental and three control patients were sampled at 0 (pre) and 48 hours, and on days 8 and 15. The gene expression normalized to "pre" was determined using 2-ΔΔC t method. RESULTS: Pelareorep induced significant upregulation of LC3 A/B in HCT116 as compared with Hke3 cells by immunofluorescence (3.24 × and 8.67 ×), flow cytometry (2.37 × and 2.58 ×), and autophagosome formation (2.02 × and 1.57 ×), at 6 and 9 hours, respectively; all P < 0.05. Western blot analysis showed an increase in LC3 A/B (2.38 × and 6.82 ×) and Beclin1 (1.17 × and 1.24 ×) at 6 and 9 hours, ATG5 (2.4 ×) and P-62 (1.52 ×) at 6 hours, and VPS-34 (1.39 ×) at 9 hours (all P < 0.05). Induction of 13 transcripts in cell lines (>4 ×; 6 and 9 hours; P < 0.05), 12 transcripts in CT26 (qRT-PCR), and 14 transcripts in human PBMCs (P < 0.05) was observed. LC3 A/B, RICTOR, and RASD1 expression was upregulated in all three model systems. CONCLUSIONS: Pelareorep hijacks host autophagic machinery in KRAS-mut conditions to augment its propagation and preferential oncolysis of the cancer cells.

Elucidation of Pelareorep Pharmacodynamics in A Phase I Trial in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal Cancer.

KRAS mutation is a negative predictive biomarker of anti-EGFR agents in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and remains an elusive target. Pelareorep, a double-stranded RNA virus selectively replicates in KRAS-mutated cells, and is synergistic with irinotecan. A dose escalation trial of FOLFIRI/bevacizumab [irinotecan (150-180 mg/m2) and pelareorep (1 × 1010 TCID50-3 × 1010 TCID50)] was implemented in adult patients with oxaliplatin refractory/intolerant, KRAS-mutant mCRC. Pelareorep was administered intravenously over 1 hour on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. Additional studies included pharmacokinetics, tumor morphology, and immune responses. Among FOLFIRI-naïve patients, the highest dose of FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (180 mg/m2 irinotecan) and pelareorep (3 × 1010 TCID50) was well tolerated, without a dose-limiting toxicity. At the recommended phase II dose, 3 of 6 patients (50%) had a partial response; the median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) were 65.6 weeks and 25.1 months, respectively. Toxicities included myelosuppression, fatigue, and diarrhea. Transmission electron microscopy revealed viral factories (viral collections forming vesicular structures), at various stages of development. Immunogold staining against viral capsid σ-1 protein demonstrated viral "homing" in the tumor cells. The nucleus displayed sufficient euchromatin regions suggestive of active transcription. Flow cytometry revealed rapid dendritic cell maturation (48 hours) with subsequent activation of cytotoxic T cells (7 days). The combination of pelareorep with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab is safe. The PFS and OS data are encouraging and deserve further exploration. Pelareorep leads to a clear recurrent immune stimulatory response with cytotoxic T-cell activation, and homes and replicates in the tumor.

Excision repair cross-complementing group-1 (ERCC1) induction kinetics and polymorphism are markers of inferior outcome in patients with colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin.

BACKGROUND: ERCC1, a component of nucleotide excision repair pathway, is known to repair DNA breaks induced by platinum drugs. We sought to ascertain if ERCC1 expression dynamics and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs11615 are biomarkers of sensitivity to oxaliplatin therapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Western blot and qPCR for ERCC1 expression was performed from PBMCs isolated from patients receiving oxaliplatin-based therapy at specified timepoints. DNA was also isolated from 59 biorepository specimens for SNP analysis. Clinical benefit was determined using progression free survival (PFS) for metastatic CRC. RESULTS: ERCC1 was induced in PBMC in response to oxaliplatin in 13/25 patients with mCRC (52%). Median PFS with ERCC1 induction was 190d compared to 237d in non-induced patients (HR 2.35, CI 1.005-5.479; p=0.0182). ERCC1 rs11615 SNP analysis revealed that 43.3% harbored C/C, 41.2%-T/C and 15.5%-T/T genotype. Median PFS was significantly lower with C/C or T/C (211 and 196d) compared to T/T (590d; p=0.0310). CONCLUSIONS: ERCC1 was induced in a sub-population of patients undergoing oxaliplatin treatment, which was associated with poorer outcome, suggesting this could serve as a marker of oxaliplatin response. C/C or C/T genotype in ERCC1 rs11615 locus decreased benefit from oxaliplatin.

Survival outcome and prognostic model of patients with colorectal cancer on phase 1 trials.

Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progress on standard therapies may be eligible for phase I trials. To better delineate the risk-benefit ratio, we assessed toxicities, clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Methods Records of mCRC patients on phase I trials at our institution over 18 years were reviewed. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were undertaken and a prognostic model developed. Results There were 187 enrollments on 37 phase I trials. Median age was: 59 (29-83) years and number of prior therapies: 3 (0-8). The clinical benefit rate (CBR): response (5.6%) + stable disease, was 43.1%. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 7.7 weeks and 43.7 weeks, respectively. The MVA identified age > 60 years (HR 1.63, p < 0.004), albumin<3.5 g/dL (HR 3.69, p < 0.001), direct bilirubin>ULN (HR1.69, p < 0.01), and WBC ≥ 5.2 k/uL (HR 1.97, p < 0.001) as negative prognostic factors. A risk score based on the MVA revealed that patients with a score of 0-1 had an improved OS (58.7 weeks) compared to a score of 2 (49.9 weeks, p < 0.01) and 3 (14.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Conclusions Phase 1 trials may offer similar or better clinical outcome for mCRC patients than standard third line therapies; the prognostic model could assist in selecting appropriate patients.

Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Impact of Biologic Agents in Ethnic Minorities With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents have improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the clinical trials included a predominately white population (85%), with Hispanic and black patients underrepresented. Thus, the real world benefit for the latter remains unknown. Comparative effectiveness research is a tool allowing for this exploration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated for mCRC from 2000 to 2011 were extracted from the medical records of Montefiore Medical Center. A semiparametric accelerated failure time model was used to assess the survival differences between patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) alone versus CT plus biologic agents (CBT). RESULTS: Of the 290 patients (black, 45.9%; Hispanic, 26.2%; and white, 27.9%), 53.8% received biologic agents. The median overall survival was 15.2 months in the CT-alone group and 25.6 months in CBT group (P = .004). On univariate analysis, a lower number of metastatic sites, carcinoembryonic antigen < 41 ng/mL, and more lines of CT were associated with improved overall survival. In a propensity score-based analysis of the entire cohort, CBT offered a survival benefit compared with CT alone (increased median survival, 1.44-fold; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.86; P = .038). The results of the subgroup analysis suggested a survival benefit for white patients (2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.23; P = .031) but not for Hispanic (1.42; 95% CI, 0.91-2.20; P = .370) or black (1.12; 95% CI, 0.76-1.66; P = .596) patients. CONCLUSION: In the present cohort, CBT was associated with longer survival, with the effect mainly driven by the outcomes for white patients, with black patients not appearing to benefit. These data are provocative and warrant further confirmation. Efforts to increase ethnic minority patients' enrollment in clinical trials is required to prospectively define the benefit from novel therapies.

Clinical outcome and prognostic markers for patients with gynecologic malignancies in phase 1 clinical trials: a single institution experience from 1999 to 2010.

OBJECTIVES: There is a scarcity of outcome data regarding phase 1 trials for patients with gynecologic malignancy. The objective of this study was to assess toxicity, clinical benefit and prognosticators in gynecologic oncology patients participating in phase 1 trials. METHODS: All phase 1 oncology trials conducted at Albert Einstein Cancer Center from 1999 to 2010 were reviewed and extracted for relevant demographic and clinical data concerning patients with gynecologic malignancy. Cox-proportional and logistic regression modeling were used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 120 distinct patients with gynecologic malignancy participated in 41 trials, constituting 30.6% of all phase 1 patients enrolled in the same time period. The median age is 59 years. Out of the 184 patients enrolled, 160 individual responses were evaluable. Seventeen DLT events (9.2%) occurred, including 1 (0.5%) treatment-related mortality. There were 27.2%≥ grade 3 hematologic and 24.4% non-hematologic toxicity. Eighty patients had stable disease (SD, 50%), including 21.9% with SD ≥ 4 months, 11 (6.3%) with partial response (PR), and 3 (1.9%) achieving complete response (CR). The clinical benefit rate (CBR=SD+CR+PR) was 58.1%. Albumin (Alb)≤ 3.5 g/dL and abnormal ANC were independent negative prognosticators of survival. We also found a continuous correlation between changes in Albumin (p=0.02) and LDH (p=0.02) and odds of achieving CBR≥4month. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical outcome and safety data suggested that phase 1 trials may be a reasonable option for patients with advanced and recurrent gynecologic cancer. The potential prognosticators identified should be further validated in larger trials.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of EZN-2208, a novel conjugate of polyethylene glycol and SN38, in patients with advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: EZN-2208 is a water-soluble, polyethylene glycol drug conjugate of SN38, which is the active moiety of irinotecan. In this study, the authors evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of EZN-2208 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients in sequential cohorts (3 + 3 design) received intravenous EZN-2208 at doses between 1.25 mg/m(2) and 25 mg/m(2) once every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients received EZN-2208. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 0-10 prior therapies). Seventeen patients received prior irinotecan. Two maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were defined: EZN-2208 with (16.5 mg/m(2)) and without (10 mg/m(2)) granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was febrile neutropenia. Two of 19 patients who were heterozygous for a polymorphism in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1) gene (UGT1A1*28) developed DLTs (dose, 25 mg/m(2) with G-CSF), and 2 patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 were treated without DLTs (dose, 5 mg/m(2)). PK analysis indicated a mean terminal half-life of 19.4 ± 3.4 hours. Sixteen patients (41%) achieved stable disease, including 6 of 39 patients (15%) who had stable disease that lasted ≥ 4 months. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma (no prior irinotecan) achieved a short-lived 32% tumor regression. Among 6 patients who had stable disease that lasted for ≥ 4 months, 3 had received prior irinotecan, and 1 had KRAS-positive colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: EZN-2208 was well tolerated and produced stable disease that lasted for ≥ 4 months/unconfirmed partial responses in 7 of 39 heavily pretreated patients (18%) with advanced solid tumors, including those who had failed prior irinotecan therapy.

Eribulin -- a review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane, structurally simplified, completely synthetic, halichondrin B derivative with an end poisoning, microtubule inhibitory action. Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity in various cancer cell lines and synergistic action with gemcitabine, epirubicin, trastuzumab, cisplatin, docetaxel and vinorelbine. Eribulin has recently been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration as a third line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients, who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. It has also advanced to phase II trials in non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic, prostate, bladder, head and neck cancers, sarcomas and ovarian and other gynecological tumors. Combination trials with carboplatin, gemcitabine, pemetrexed, cisplatin, and erlotinib are currently ongoing. Eribulin potentially has a low incidence of peripheral neuropathy. The predominant side effects are neutropenia and fatigue, which are manageable. This article reviews the available information on eribulin with respect to its clinical pharmacology, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Intravenous administration of Reolysin, a live replication competent RNA virus is safe in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Reolysin is reovirus serotype 3-Dearing strain, a double-stranded replication-competent RNA non-enveloped icosahedral virus. It induces cytopathic and anti-cancer effects in cells with an activated ras pathway due to inhibition of the dsRNA-activated protein kinase. METHODS: This was a single center dose escalation trial of Reolysin administered intravenously every 4 weeks in doses ranging from 1 x 10(8) to 3 x 10(10) tissue culture infective dose (TCID)(50). Serum for neutralizing antibody, and serum, stool, saliva, and urine for viral shedding were collected. Tumor samples were analyzed for activating mutations in the ras and braf oncogenes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received 27 doses of Reolysin in 6 dose cohorts accomplishing a 300 fold dose escalation without a protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity. Drug related grade 2 toxicities included fatigue and fever (1 patient each). All patients developed neutralizing antibody during the course of the study. Viral shedding was observed in 6 patients. One patient with anthracycline and taxane refractory breast cancer experienced a partial response (PR) and her tumor had a ras G12A mutation. Biopsy from her chest wall mass showed evidence of necrosis and viral replication by electron microscopy. Overall clinical benefit (1 PR + 7 stable disease) rate was 45%, and appeared higher in patients with viral shedding (67%) than those without (33%). CONCLUSION: Reolysin administered monthly as a one-hour infusion is safe and well-tolerated even in multiple doses. Reolysin has anti-tumor activity as a single agent warranting further evaluation, including in combination with chemotherapy. Viral shedding may suggest intrapatient replication yielding a benefit and should be studied carefully in future studies.

Alterations of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug-drug interactions.

BACKGROUND: Drug interactions in oncology are common place and largely ignored as we tolerate high thresholds of 'toxic' drug responses in these patients. However, in the era of 'targeted' or seemingly 'less toxic' therapy, these interactions are more commonly flagged and contribute significantly towards poor 'quality of life' and medical fatalities. OBJECTIVE: This review and opinion article focuses on alteration of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug interactions in the setting of polypharmacy. The assumption is that the drugs, with changes in their pharmacokinetics, will contribute towards changes in their pharmacodynamics. METHODS: The examples cited for such drug-drug interactions are culled from published literature with an emphasis on those interactions that have been well characterized at the molecular level. RESULTS: Although very few drug interaction studies have been performed on approved oncology based drugs, it is clear that drugs whose pharmacokinetics profiles are closely related to their pharmacodynamics will indeed result in clinically important drug interactions. Some newer mechanisms are described that involve interactions at the level of gene transcription, whereby, drug metabolism is significantly altered. However, for any given drug interaction, there does not seem to be a comprehensive model describing interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanisms based drug interactions are plentiful in oncology; however, there is an absolute lack of a comprehensive model that would predict drug-drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetic and safety study of weekly irinotecan and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced solid cancers.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and irinotecan have demonstrated in vitro synergistic anti-cancer activity, and both are substrates for carboxyl esterases (CES). We conducted a study to identify a safe dose and potential drug-drug interactions of this combination. METHODS: This was an open-label phase I dose escalation trial. Irinotecan was given as a 30 min infusion on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Plasma for pharmacokinetic analyses was drawn on days 1 and 8. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with advanced solid tumors received 202 cycles of chemotherapy in 6 dose cohorts. At the highest dose tested, 1 of 3 patients developed fatal neutropenia and gram-negative sepsis. At dose level 5 (100/2000), 2 of 28 patients developed cycle 1 DLT-grade 3 diarrhea/vomiting, and grade 3 diarrhea. Responses were observed in 9 of 35 (5 of 9 ovarian cancer) evaluable patients. The AUC((0-last)) of irinotecan, SN-38G, and APC were similar on days 1 and 8. However, SN-38 T(max) was longer on Day 8 (0.88 h vs. 1.23 h, p = 0.012). While SN-38 AUC((0-last)) was lower on day 8 by 35%, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine results in a significantly delayed conversion of irinotecan to SN-38, suggesting drug-drug interaction at the level of CES. This suggests caution should be used when irinotecan is combined with substrates of CES, and warrants further study. The combination of irinotecan and capecitabine is safe and well tolerated at 100/2000, and warrants further evaluation in ovarian and breast cancer.