A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches relative to cigarettes.

RATIONALE: Tobacco harm reduction (THR) involves encouraging adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke to transition to less harmful forms of nicotine delivery. These products must offer adult smokers reduced exposure to chemicals associated with tobacco combustion, satisfactory blood plasma nicotine levels and serve as an acceptable alternative. The most recent THR innovation is tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of two nicotine pouch variants (ZoneX #2 (5.8 mg nicotine/pouch); ZoneX #3 (10.1 mg nicotine/pouch)) with cigarette to assess the pouches' THR potential. METHODS: This was a controlled use, randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study with 24 healthy adult traditional tobacco users. Pharmacokinetic (plasma nicotine levels; up to 8 h post-use), pharmacodynamic (urge to smoke, product liking; up to 4 h post-use) and short-term safety and tolerability profiles were assessed. RESULTS: Distinct nicotine pouch pharmacokinetic profiles indicated nicotine absorption via the oral mucosa. Plasma nicotine levels were lower, and time to peak slower, for the nicotine pouches compared to cigarette (Cmax cigarette: 11.6 ng/ml vs. #2: 5.2 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; #3: 7.9 ng/ml, p < 0.0003) (Tmax cigarette: 8.6 min vs. #2: 26 min; #3: 22 min). All products effectively reduced subjects' urge to smoke and presented favourable product liking scores; nicotine pouches were also well tolerated following short-term use (no serious adverse events). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the assessed ZoneX nicotine pouches may offer an acceptable alternative for adult smokers to achieve satisfactory levels of nicotine delivery and, based on the pharmacokinetic parameters and under the study conditions, likely have a lower abuse liability and addictive potential for current adult smokers compared to continued cigarette smoking. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT04891406 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Reductions in biomarkers of exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents following exclusive and partial switching from combustible cigarettes to myblu™ electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS).

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) offer adult combustible cigarette smokers an alternative, potentially reduced harm, mode of nicotine delivery, attributed to fewer and reduced levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in their aerosols compared to cigarette smoke. These two identical, randomised, open label, two-part studies aimed to compare levels of 15 biomarkers of exposure (BoE) to selected HPHCs associated with tobacco smoking in healthy US adult smoker subjects (n = 72). Following 9 days of exclusive use of a range of allocated myblu™ ENDS variants, subjects' levels of 14 non-nicotine BoE were substantially reduced compared to baseline values (combustible cigarette use), in the range of 46-97%. BoE reductions were sustained in subjects who continued myblu use exclusively (n = 25) for a further 5 days, and returned to near baseline levels in subjects who returned to exclusive combustible cigarette use (n = 21). Dual users (n = 24) demonstrated reductions in BoE to a lesser extent than with exclusive myblu use. Measured nicotine equivalents did not significantly change throughout the study. These data suggest exclusive use of ENDS provides adult smokers seeking an alternative to combustible cigarettes with substantial reductions in HPHC exposures whilst achieving satisfying levels of nicotine delivery. Dual use involving substitution of cigarettes may also provide some of this advantage, but to lesser extent. Overall, the data contribute to the weight of evidence that ENDS are an important tool in tobacco harm reduction for adult smokers unwilling to or uninterested in quitting smoking. Study 1: NCT04430634, study 2: NCT04429932, clinicaltrials.gov (10-06-2020).

Mechanistic Evaluation of the Impact of Smoking and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on the Nasal Epithelium.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of chronic morbidity and mortality worldwide. The development of markers of COPD onset is hampered by the lack of accessibility to the primary target tissue, and there is a need to consider other sample sources as surrogates for biomarker research. Airborne toxicants pass through the nasal epithelium before reaching the lower airways, and the similarity with bronchial histology makes it an attractive surrogate for lower airways. In this work, we describe the transcriptomics findings from the nasal epithelia of subjects enrolled in a clinical study focusing on the identification of COPD biomarkers. Transcriptomic data were analyzed using the biological network approach that enabled us to pinpoint the biological processes affected in the upper respiratory tract in response to smoking and mild-to-moderate COPD. Our results indicated that nasal and lower airway immune responses were considerably different in COPD subjects and caution should be exercised when using upper airway samples as a surrogate for the lower airway. Nevertheless, the network approach described here could present a sensitive means of identifying smokers at risk of developing COPD.

Physiological and biological characterization of smokers with and without COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common inflammatory airway disease predominantly associated with cigarette smoking, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. According to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, spirometry is used to diagnose the disease. However, owing to its complexity, spirometry alone may not account for the multitude of COPD phenotypes or the early, asymptomatic lung damage seen in younger smokers. In addition, suitable biomarkers enabling early diagnosis, guiding treatment and estimating prognosis are still scarce, although large scale 'omics analyses have added to the spectrum of potential biomarkers that could be used for these purposes. The aim of the current study was to comprehensively profile patients with mild-to-moderate COPD and compare the profiles to i) a group of currently smoking asymptomatic subjects, ii) a group of healthy former smokers, and iii) a group of healthy subjects that had never smoked. The assessment was conducted at the molecular level using proteomics, transcriptomics, and lipidomics and complemented by a series of measurements of traditional and emerging indicators of lung health (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01780298). In this data note, we provide a comprehensive description of the study population's physiological characteristics including full lung function, lung appearance on chest computed tomography, impulse oscillometry, and exercise tolerance and quality of life (QoL) measures.

Alterations in the sputum proteome and transcriptome in smokers and early-stage COPD subjects.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most prevalent lung diseases. Cigarette smoking is the main risk factor for COPD. In this parallel-group clinical study we investigated to what extent the transitions in a chronic-exposure-to-disease model are reflected in the proteome and cellular transcriptome of induced sputum samples. We selected 60 age- and gender-matched individuals for each of the four study groups: current asymptomatic smokers, smokers with early stage COPD, former smokers, and never smokers. The cell-free sputum supernatant was analyzed by quantitative proteomics and the cellular mRNA fraction by gene expression profiling. The sputum proteome of current smokers clearly reflected the common physiological responses to smoke exposure, including alterations in mucin/trefoil proteins and a prominent xenobiotic/oxidative stress response. The latter response also was observed in the transcriptome, which additionally demonstrated an immune-cell polarization change. The former smoker group showed nearly complete attenuation of these biological effects. Thirteen differentially abundant proteins between the COPD and the asymptomatic smoker group were identified including TIMP1, APOA1, C6orf58, and BPIFB1 (LPLUNC1). In summary, our study demonstrates that sputum profiling can capture the complex and reversible physiological response to cigarette smoke exposure, which appears to be only slightly modulated in early-stage COPD.

A cross-sectional investigation of biomarkers of risk after a decade of smoking.

Two groups of 20 healthy volunteers with cigarettes of different tar yield were compared with a group of 20 never smokers over 24 h for several biomarkers. All groups were of similar mean ages and the smokers had smoked for a homogeneous period of approximately 10 yr. The groups were assessed using routine medical parameters as well as biomarkers of recent smoke exposure and other biomarkers that were under evaluation as possible markers of risk for smoking-associated diseases. All biomarkers of exposure-carbon monoxide, nicotine plus its five major metabolites, and 4-(methylnitrosamine)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL)-were significantly elevated in smokers. For biomarkers of potential risk evaluated in the blood, white cells and immunoglobulin (Ig) G showed a decrease related to smoking status (p < .01). Interleukin 6 levels were higher in smoker groups compared to never smokers, with a significant increasing trend across the groups (p < .05). Among the urinary biomarkers studied, 11-deydro-thromboxane B2, 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2, and thymidine glycol showed significant increasing trends across the groups (p < .01). The results suggest that after the first decade or less of smoking, changes in inflammatory, immunological, and cardiovascular function can be observed. However, further studies on larger groups will be required to better understand the kinetics of these subtle effects observed early in smokers and their relationship with the potential risk of subsequent smoking-associated disease.

Pharmacologic differentiation of inflammation and fibrosis in the rat bleomycin model.

RATIONALE: The model most often used to study the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibroses is the bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung fibrosis model. Several treatments have been efficacious in this model, but not in the clinic. OBJECTIVES: To describe the time course of inflammation and fibrosis in the BLM model and to study the effect of timing of antiinflammatory and antifibrotic treatments on efficacy. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Rats were given single intratracheal injections of BLM on Day 0. At specified time points, 10 rats were killed and their lungs studied for proinflammatory cytokines and for profibrotic growth factor mRNA. After a single intratracheal injection of BLM on Day 0, rats were treated from Day 1 or 10 daily with oral prednisolone (10 mg/kg) or oral imatinib mesylate (50 mg/kg) for 21 d. RESULTS: After BLM administration, the expression of inflammatory cytokines was elevated and returned to background levels at later time points. Profibrotic gene expression peaked between Days 9 and 14 and remained elevated till the end of the experiment, suggesting a "switch" between inflammation and fibrosis in this interval. Antiinflammatory treatment (oral prednisolone) was beneficial when commenced at Day 1, but had no effect if administered from Day 10 onward. However, imatinib mesylate was effective independently of the dosing regime. CONCLUSIONS: The response of the BLM model to antifibrotic or antiinflammatory interventions is critically dependent on timing after the initial injury.

Elevated expression of TARC (CCL17) and MDC (CCL22) in models of cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation.

TARC (CCL17) and MDC (CCL22) are well-known chemoattractants for Th2 cells. Here, we evaluated the role of both chemokines for cigarette smoke-induced airway inflammation. The expression profiles of MDC, TARC, and their receptor CCR4 were analyzed in models of acute and chronic cigarette smoke-induced airway inflammation that is characterized by a Th1 immune response. The results were compared to the expression of both chemokines in models of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and acute asthma, which are associated with a Th2 immune response. The expression of MDC and TARC was found to be elevated in all lung inflammation models. In contrast to the findings in the asthma and lung fibrosis models, the increased expression of MDC and TARC in the cigarette-smoke model was not associated with an increased infiltration of Th2 cells into smoke-treated lungs. Our data indicate that instead of Th2 cells, airway epithelial cells expressing CCR4 might be the principal targets for MDC and TARC released from alveolar macrophages during cigarette smoke-induced airway inflammation.