Anal Sphincteroplasty in the Minimally Invasive Era: Assessment of National Trends and Complications.

Fecal incontinence is a debilitating and underreported condition. Despite introduction of novel therapies in recent years, anal sphincteroplasty (AS) remains the surgical choice for certain patients. Previous reports have primarily focused on single-surgeon or single-center experience with AS. The purpose of this study was to assess patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of AS using a national cohort. Patients (n = 586) who underwent AS as a primary procedure between 2009 and 2015 were identified by the CPT code as recorded in the study and were evaluated and examined for association with 30-day complications. The number of sphincteroplasties performed decreased seven-fold between 2009 and 2015. Wound infection, wound dehiscence, and urinary tract infection were the most common complications, occurring in 30 (5.1%), 12 (2.1%), and 6 (1%) patients, respectively. Preoperative steroid use and surgeon specialty were associated with wound complications on multivariate analysis. We present the first national study of patients undergoing AS and identify factors that predispose to wound complications. In addition, we demonstrate that the number of anal sphincteroplasties performed in the United States is decreasing dramatically, likely because of novel therapy for fecal incontinence. We hope that this study will assist in patient counseling and call attention to preserving surgical training as utilization of AS rapidly declines.

Effectiveness of Assessing Ureteral Patency Using Preoperative Phenazopyridine.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of phenazopyridine when used intraoperatively to assess ureteral patency and to investigate factors that may influence its efficacy. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review performed at the Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, a Los Angeles County teaching hospital, from January 2014 through July 2016. Patients undergoing cystoscopy at the time of gynecologic surgery were identified via department case logs. All women receiving preoperative oral phenazopyridine were included. If ureteral flow was unable to be visualized with phenazopyridine alone, the medication was deemed ineffective, and sodium fluorescein was given intraoperatively. Patients were divided into a phenazopyridine effective or phenazopyridine ineffective group. Patient demographics, renal function, intraoperative fluids and urine output, estimated blood loss, timing and dose of medication administration, and complications were gathered from the chart and compared between groups using Fisher exact test, 2-sample t test, Wilcoxon test, and logistic regression for multivariable analysis. P < 0.05 was determined to be significant. RESULTS: Preoperative phenazopyridine was effective in 190 (91.8%) of 207 patients. It was ineffective in 17 patients who then required intraoperative sodium fluorescein. The group in which phenazopyridine was effective was more likely to have been given a 200-mg (vs 100-mg) dose (P = 0.02) and had lower intraoperative urine output (median, 450 vs 800 mL; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative oral phenazopyridine is effective in more than 90% of cases to detect during gynecologic surgery. A higher phenazopyridine dose and lower intraoperative urine output were associated with increased efficacy.

Complete Excision of Sacrocolpopexy Mesh With Autologous Fascia Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of complete sacrocolpopexy mesh excision with concomitant autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing complete sacrocolpopexy mesh excision and concomitant autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy from March 2013 to September 2016 was conducted. The primary objective was assessment of perioperative outcomes including complications within 60 days of surgery. The secondary outcome measure was surgical success defined as no need for retreatment by either surgery for apical prolapse or pessary. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified. Median patient age was 56 years old (range 35-78). Median time from mesh placement to surgical excision was 4.5 years (0-13). Indications for mesh excision included refractory pelvic pain in 18 patients (95%), symptomatic mesh exposure in 8 patients (42%), and bilateral ureteral obstruction with ureterovaginal fistula in 1 patient (5%). Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 228 minutes (133-362), 200 mL (50-1000), and 5 days (2-9), respectively. The rate of minor and major complications within 60 days was 36.8% and 5.3%, respectively. There were no cases of bladder or bowel injury. At a median follow-up of 9.9 months (2.4-39) no patient required secondary surgery for apical vaginal prolapse or retreatment with pessary. CONCLUSION: Complete sacrocolpopexy mesh excision with concomitant autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy can be accomplished safely with a low rate of major complications. These are short-term findings and longer follow-up of anatomic and functional outcomes is needed.

Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling.

BACKGROUND: The rates reported for postoperative urinary retention following midurethral sling procedures are highly variable. Determining which patients have a higher likelihood of failing a voiding trial will help with preoperative counseling prior to a midurethral sling. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify preoperative predictors for failed voiding trial following an isolated midurethral sling. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter, case-control study was performed by including all isolated midurethral sling procedures performed between Jan. 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015, at 6 academic centers. We collected demographics, medical and surgical histories, voiding symptoms, urodynamic evaluation, and intraoperative data from the medical record. We excluded patients not eligible for attempted voiding trial after surgery (eg, bladder perforation requiring catheterization). Cases failed a postoperative voiding trial and were discharged with an indwelling catheter or taught intermittent self-catheterization; controls passed a voiding trial. We also recorded any adverse events such as urinary tract infection or voiding dysfunction up to 6 weeks after surgery. Bivariate analyses were completed using Mann-Whitney and Pearson χ2 tests as appropriate. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to determine predictors of failing a voiding trial. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients had an isolated sling (70.9% retropubic, 28.4% transobturator, 0.6% single incision); 101 (21.8%) failed the initial voiding trial. At follow-up visits, 90.4% passed a second voiding trial, and 38.5% of the remainder passed on the third attempt. For the bivariate analyses, prior prolapse or incontinence surgery was similar in cases vs controls (31% vs 28%, P = .610) as were age, race, body mass index, and operative time. Significantly more of the cases (32%) than controls (22%) had a Charlson comorbidity index score of 1 or greater (P = .039). Overactive bladder symptoms of urgency, frequency, and urgency incontinence were similar in both groups as was detrusor overactivity in those with a urodynamic evaluation (29% vs 22%, P = .136), but nocturia was reported more in the cases (50% vs 38%, P = .046). Mean (SD) bladder capacity was similar in both groups (406 [148] mL vs 388 [122] mL, P = .542) as was maximum flow rate with uroflowmetry and pressure flow studies. Cases were significantly more likely to have a voiding type other than detrusor contraction: 37% vs 25%, P = .027, odds ratio, 1.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.00). There was no difference in voiding trial failures between retropubic and transobturator routes (23.1% vs 18.9%, P = .329). Within 6 weeks of surgery, the frequency of urinary tract infection in cases was greater than controls (20% vs 6%, P < .001; odds ratio, 3.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.82-6.75]). After passing a repeat voiding trial, cases were more likely to present with acute urinary retention (10% vs 3%, P = .003; odds ratio, 4.00 [95% confidence interval, 1.61-9.92]). For multivariable analyses, increasing Charlson comorbidity index increased the risk of a voiding trial failure; apart from this, we did not identify other demographic information among the patients who did not undergo urodynamic evaluation that reliably forecasted a voiding trial failure. CONCLUSION: The majority of women will pass a voiding trial on the first attempt after an isolated midurethral sling. Current medical comorbidities are predictive of a voiding trial failure, whereas other demographic/examination findings are not. Patients failing the initial voiding trial are at an increased risk of postoperative urinary tract infection or developing acute retention after passing a subsequent voiding trial.