Assessing the accuracy of pleural puncture sites in patients with pleural effusion as determined by clinical examination versus ultrasound-A single-centre prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to ascertain the accuracy of clinical examination for the determination of pleural puncture sites as compared to the use of ultrasonography in patients with pleural effusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, observational study was carried out amongst 115 patients with pleural effusion in a tertiary care hospital in western India. Patients were subjected to clinical assessment for determination of pleural puncture sites and the same were confirmed with ultrasonography. All physicians were blinded to the marking of the previous physician to prevent any influence on their assessment. RESULTS: The study had 345 physician observations. The overall accuracy of the clinical examination was 94.8%. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors responsible for the accuracy of clinical examination demonstrated a significant role of higher body mass index (BMI) (OR-1.19) and lower zone pleural effusions (OR-4.99) when adjusted for age, gender, side of effusion, and experience of examining doctors. When the effusions were classified according to their location, lower zone pleural effusions and loculated pleural effusions had an error rate of 15.9% and 8.33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound is the standard of care to assess all pleural effusions and guide the best point for aspiration.

Mortality and Its Predictors in COVID-19 Patients With Pre-existing Interstitial Lung Disease.

Background The data on the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still limited. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no study from India to date to assess the impact of COVID-19 in patients with preexisting ILD. We undertook this study to assess the clinical outcome of ILD patients admitted to our hospital with COVID-19. Methods In this retrospective observational study, records of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD who were admitted to the hospital in the period from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, were obtained from the hospital database. The clinical outcomes of the patients were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to find relation between various predetermined risk factors for mortality and those with significant p values (p<0.05) were subjected to multiple logistic regression to determine independent risk factors. Results In our study of 28 patients, the overall mortality was 35.7%. On comparing the parameters associated with increased mortality, there was no effect of age, gender, comorbidities, type of ILD, CT thorax findings on diagnosis, use of corticosteroids and antifibrotics in the past, spirometric findings on mortality. On multivariate analysis, the significant parameters were interleukin 6 (IL-6), p=0.02, OR=1.020 (1.006-1.043) and D-dimer, p=0.04, OR=2.14 (5.55-1.14). Conclusion COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing ILD has a comparatively higher mortality. D-dimer and IL-6 are significant predictors of mortality in ILD patients infected with COVID-19.

Weaning of mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients by using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients frequently pose difficulty in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). Prolonged invasive ventilation brings along various complications. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is proposed to be a useful weaning modality in such cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of NIPPV in weaning COPD patients from invasive MV, and compare it with weaning by conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective randomized controlled study, we included 50 COPD patients with type II respiratory failure requiring initial invasive MV. Upon satisfying weaning criteria and failing a t-piece weaning trial, they were randomized into two groups: Group I (25 patients) weaned by NIPPV, and group II (25 patients) weaned by conventional PSV. The groups were similar in terms of disease severity, demographic, clinical and biochemical parameters. They were compared in terms of duration of MV, weaning duration, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia and outcome. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of duration of MV, weaning duration, length of ICU stay, occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia and outcome. CONCLUSION: NIPPV appears to be a promising weaning modality for mechanically ventilated COPD patients and should be tried in resource-limited settings especially in developing countries.