Swipe right for surgical residency: Exploring the unconscious bias in resident selection.

BACKGROUND: Applicants provide a photo with their application through the Electronic Residency Application Service, which may introduce appearance-based bias. We evaluated whether an unconscious appearance bias exists in surgical resident selection. METHODS: After the match, applicant data from the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 application cycles were examined. Reviewers were not provided the applicant photo or self-identified race during the second cycle. Photos provided by candidates were then rated by 4 surgical subspecialty residents who had no prior exposure to applications or interview status. Photos were rated on perceived fitness level, visual appearance, and photo professionalism. An overall photo score was then calculated. RESULTS: In the study, 422 applications were reviewed and 164 received interview invitations during the 2018 to 2019 cycle. Alpha Omega Alpha membership (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.51), overall photo score (odds ratio, 2.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.43-3.66), research (odds ratio, 5.61, 95% confidence interval, 2.84-11.20), age (odds ratio, 0.86, 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.99), and step 2 (odds ratio, 1.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.09) were predictors for receiving an interview. For the 2019 to 2020 cycle, 398 applications were reviewed, and 75 applicants received an invitation. Step 2 (odds ratio, 1.07, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12), research (odds ratio, 2.78, 95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.55), age (odds ratio, 0.82, 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.95), and overall photo score (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.52) remained predictors despite reviewers being blinded to the photo during this cycle. CONCLUSION: Although objective metrics remain critical in determining interview invitations, overall perceived applicant appearance may influence the selection process. Although visual appearance was associated with receiving an interview, the Electronic Residency Application Service photo does not ultimately affect selection. This may suggest that appearance may influence other objective and subjective aspects of the application.

Vascular Reconstruction Is Not Warranted in Most Civilian Traumatic Shank Vascular Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Operative management of traumatic shank vascular injuries (SVI) evolved significantly in the past few decades, thereby leading to a dramatic decrease in amputation rates. However, there is still controversy regarding the minimum number of patent shank arteries sufficient for limb salvage. METHODS: Between January 2006 and September 2011, 191 adult trauma patients presented to an urban level I trauma center in Miami, Florida, with traumatic lower extremity vascular injuries. Variables collected included age, gender, mechanism of injury, and clinical status at presentation. Surgical data included vessel injury, technical aspects of repair, associated complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 48 (25.1%) patients were identified comprising 66 traumatic shank arterial injuries. Mean age was 38.2 ± 13.4 years, and the majority of patients were men (40 patients, 83.3%) presenting with blunt injuries (35 patients, 72.9%). Ligation was performed in 38 injured arteries (57.6%) and no vascular intervention was required in 20% of the patients. Vascular reconstruction was performed in only 6 patients (9.1%): 4 (6.1%) with concurrent popliteal trauma, 1 (1.5%) isolated anterior tibial, and 1 (1.5%) 3-vessel injury. Autogenous venous interposition conduit and polytetrafluoroethylene grafting were performed in 5 (7.6%) and 1 (1.5%) patient, respectively. All amputations (8 patients, 16.7%) occurred in blunt trauma patients presenting with unsalvageable limbs. The overall mortality rate in this series was 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Civilian shank arterial injuries are associated with acceptable rates of limb loss. Patients with a single-vessel patent inflow did not require vascular reconstruction in this series. Arterial reconstruction may no longer be determinant for successful management of isolated and double arterial SVI, whereas it is yet essential in the presence of 3-vessel or concurrent above-the-knee vascular injuries. Further investigation including larger number of patients is still warranted to define the role of conservative management in these complex injuries.