The prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor GSK1120360A reduces early brain injury, but protection is not maintained in a neonatal rat model of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in newborns is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with many babies suffering long-term neurological deficits. Currently, treatment options are limited to therapeutic hypothermia, which is not appropriate for use in all babies. Previous studies have shown protective effects of increasing the transcription factor-hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) in animal models, by using mild hypoxia or compounds that act as prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs). Here, we aimed to examine the neuroprotective actions of an orally active, small molecule PHI, GSK1120360A in a neonatal rat model of hypoxia-ischemia (HI) compared to another PHI, desferrioxamine (DFX). Sprague-Dawley rats underwent HI surgery on postnatal day 7 (P7), where unilateral carotid artery occlusion was performed followed by hypoxia (8% oxygen, 3 h). Initial testing showed that GSK1120360A and erythropoietin levels were detectable in plasma at 6 h following oral exposure to GSK1120360A. For the short-term neuroprotection study, pups were assigned to receive either saline (s.c), desferrioxamine (DFX-200 mg/kg, s.c), methylcellulose (1%, oral) or GSK1120360A (30 mg/kg, oral) immediately after HI. Histological analysis showed that GSK1120360A in this setting reduced brain injury size 7 days after HI, compared to the methylcellulose vehicle control group. DFX had no significant effect on injury size compared to saline group at the same 7 day timepoint. In the long-term neuroprotection study, pups were randomly assigned to be administered methylcellulose (1%, oral) or GSK1120360A (30 mg/kg, oral) immediately after HI. On P42, rats underwent behavioural testing using the forelimb grip strength, grid walking and novel object recognition tasks, and brains were collected for histological analysis. Long-term behavioural deficits were observed in grid walking, grip strength and novel object recognition tests after HI which were not improved in the GSK1120360A treatment group compared to the methylcellulose group. Similarly, there was no improvement in injury size on P42 in the GSK1120360A study group compared to the methylcellulose group. Here, we have shown that GSK1120360A can reduce brain injury at 7 days but that this neuroprotective benefit is not maintained when examined at 5 weeks after HI.

Intrinsic resistance to the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) is associated with weak ERK1/2 signalling and/or strong PI3K signalling in colorectal cancer cell lines.

Mutations in KRAS or BRAF frequently manifest in constitutive activation of the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signalling pathway. The MEK1/2-selective inhibitor, AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), blocks ERK1/2 activation and is currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Tumour cells can vary markedly in their response to MAPK or ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors, and the presence of a BRAF mutation is thought to predict sensitivity, with the RAS mutations being associated with intrinsic resistance. We analysed cell proliferation in a panel of 19 colorectal cancer cell lines and found no simple correlation between BRAF or KRAS mutation and sensitivity to AZD6244, though cells that harbour neither mutation tended to be resistant. Cells that were sensitive arrested in G(1) and/or underwent apoptosis and the presence of BRAF or KRAS mutation was not sufficient to predict either fate. Cell lines that were resistant to AZD6244 exhibited low or no ERK1/2 activation or exhibited coincident activation of ERK1/2 and protein kinase B (PKB), the latter indicative of activation of the PI3K pathway. In cell lines with coincident ERK1/2 and PKB activation, sensitivity to AZD6244 could be re-imposed by any of the 3 distinct PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. We conclude that AZD6244 is effective in colorectal cancer cell lines with BRAF or KRAS mutations. Sensitivity to MEK1/2 inhibition correlates with a biochemical signature; those cells with high ERK1/2 activity (whether mutant for BRAF or KRAS) evolve a dependency upon that pathway and tend to be sensitive to AZD6244 but this can be offset by high PI3K-dependent signalling. This may have implications for the use of MEK inhibitors in combination with PI3K inhibitors.

Prostaglandin F(2alpha) stimulates motility and invasion in colorectal tumor cells.

Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and subsequent prostaglandin production is an important event in several human malignancies, including colorectal cancer. COX-2 mediated prostanoid synthesis has been shown to play a key role in tumor progression with prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) being shown to promote tumor growth, invasion and angiogenesis. The role of the other prostaglandins produced by COX-2 in tumors remains poorly understood. We have shown that colorectal tumor cells produce prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) and provide evidence that PGF(2alpha) may play an important role in colorectal tumorigenesis. Our data show that PGF(2alpha) is secreted by both colorectal adenoma and carcinoma-derived cell lines at levels in excess of those detected for PGE(2). These cell lines were also found to express the PGF(2alpha) receptor (FP) indicating potential autocrine effects of PGF(2alpha). This finding is further supported by an in vivo immunohistochemical study of FP expression in resected colon tissue. These data show epithelial expression of FP in normal colorectal mucosa and also in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. We compared the relative abilities of PGF(2alpha) and PGE(2) to induce cell motility in vitro in colorectal tumor cell lines and show the first evidence of prostaglandin-induced cell motility in colorectal adenoma cell lines. PGF(2alpha) induced cell motility with equivalent potency to PGE(2) in all the cell lines tested and was also shown to increase the invasion of carcinoma-derived cells into reconstituted basement membrane. These data show that PGF(2alpha) may play an important role in the malignant progression of colorectal tumors.

Mediators of PGE2 synthesis and signalling downstream of COX-2 represent potential targets for the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of mortality and whilst up to 80% of sporadic colorectal tumours are considered preventable, trends toward increasing obesity suggest the potential for a further increase in its worldwide incidence. Novel methods of colorectal cancer prevention and therapy are therefore of considerable importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are chemopreventive against colorectal cancer, mainly through their inhibitory effects on the cyclooxygenase isoform COX-2. COX enzymes represent the committed step in prostaglandin biosynthesis and it is predominantly increased COX-2-mediated prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) production that has a strong association with colorectal neoplasia, by promoting cell survival, cell growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition by traditional NSAIDs (for example, aspirin) although chemopreventive have some side effects due to the role of COX-1 in maintaining the integrity of the gastric mucosa. Interestingly, the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs has also shown promise in the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer while having a reduced impact on the gastric mucosa. However, the prolonged use of high dose COX-2 selective inhibitors is associated with a risk of cardiovascular side effects. Whilst COX-2 inhibitors may still represent viable adjuvants to current colorectal cancer therapy, there is an urgent need to further our understanding of the downstream mechanisms by which PGE2 promotes tumorigenesis and hence identify safer, more effective strategies for the prevention of colorectal cancer. In particular, PGE2 synthases and E-prostanoid receptors (EP1-4) have recently attracted considerable interest in this area. It is hoped that at the appropriate stage, selective (and possibly combinatorial) inhibition of the synthesis and signalling of those prostaglandins most highly associated with colorectal tumorigenesis, such as PGE2, may have advantages over COX-2 selective inhibition and therefore represent more suitable targets for long-term chemoprevention. Furthermore, as COX-2 is found to be overexpressed in cancers such as breast, gastric, lung and pancreatic, these investigations may also have broad implications for the prevention/treatment of a number of other malignancies.

Increased EP4 receptor expression in colorectal cancer progression promotes cell growth and anchorage independence.

Cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) levels are increased in colorectal cancers and a subset of adenomas. PGE(2) signaling through the EP4 receptor has previously been associated with colorectal tumorigenesis. However, changes in EP4 expression during adenoma to carcinoma progression have not been investigated, neither has whether levels of EP4 influence important markers of malignant potential, such as anchorage-independent growth or the tumors growth response to PGE(2). We report using immunohistochemistry that in vivo EP4 receptor protein expression was increased in colorectal cancers (100%) as well as adenomas (36%) when compared with normal colonic epithelium. EP4 expression was also higher in colorectal carcinoma compared with adenoma cell lines and increased with in vitro models of tumor progression. Adenoma (PC/AA/C1 and RG/C2) and carcinoma cell lines (HT29) were growth stimulated by PGE(2) up to 0.5 micromol/L. However, although carcinoma and transformed adenoma (PC/AA/C1SB10C, a transformed derivative of PC/AA/C1) cells remain stimulated by higher doses of PGE(2) (10 micromol/L), the adenoma cell lines were inhibited. Interestingly, enforced expression of EP4 in the adenoma cell line, RG/C2, resulted in stimulation of growth by 10 micromol/L PGE(2) and promoted anchorage-independent growth. Both in vivo and in vitro data from this study suggest that increased EP4 receptor expression is important during colorectal carcinogenesis. We propose that high levels of PGE(2) in a tumor microenvironment would select for cells with increased EP4 expression, and that the EP4 receptor may therefore represent an important target for colorectal cancer prevention and treatment.