Centrifugal technique of plasma exchange and low-dose steroid to treat very severe alcoholic hepatitis patients: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low-volume plasma exchange (PLEX) and low-dose steroid improve survival in severe alcoholic hepatitis. We aimed to compare one-year survival of very severe alcoholic hepatitis (VSAH) patients treated with centrifugal PLEX (cPLEX), membrane PLEX (mPLEX) or standard medical treatment (SMT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed survival in consecutive VSAH patients treated at our department from November 2017 to September 2021. PLEX patients received low-volume PLEX along with low-dose steroid (tab. prednisolone 10 mg or 20 mg daily). To adjust for baseline differences between the three treatment (cPLEX, mPLEX or SMT) groups, propensity score (PS) matching was done. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) was defined as per European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). The primary study outcome was one-year transplant-free survival of PS-matched VSAH patients treated with cPLEX compared to SMT. RESULTS: Of 101 PLEX-eligible VSAH patients, 30 patients were treated with cPLEX, 21 with mPLEX and 50 with SMT. On comparing 30 PS-matched patients each in the cPLEX group vs. the SMT group, transplant-free survival in the cPLEX group was 86.7% at one month, 70% at three months and 52.4% at one year and in the SMT group was 33.3% at one month, 23.3% at three months and 16.7% at one year with hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]) in favor of the cPLEX group (0.29 [0.15-0.56], p < 0.001). Total 21 patients each (PS-matched) in cPLEX and mPLEX groups were compared and one-year survival was better with cPLEX (0.33 [0.16-0.69], p = 0.001). The sub-group analysis of VSAH (PS-matched cohort) patients with ACLF also showed better survival with cPLEX compared to SMT (0.38 [0.17-0.83], p = 0.003) and compared to mPLEX (0.43 [0.17-0.95], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Better one-year transplant-free survival was noted among PS-matched VSAH patients treated with cPLEX (and low-dose steroid) compared to SMT (without steroid).

Extent of transfusion support in a developing country in managing a bleeding acute myeloid leukemia patient with platelet transfusion refractoriness.

Conventional platelet transfusion may not be adequate to deal with platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR), and therefore human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or human platelet antigen (HPA) matched and platelet crossmatch compatible units are recommended. However, in developing countries, finding a unit that is HLA or HPA matched or platelet crossmatch poses a challenge. Hence, easier and cost-effective alternatives such as massive platelet transfusion and continuous platelet transfusion were attempted to manage bleeding in PTR. A 31-year-old male presented with acute myeloid leukemia relapse and chloroma in bladder underwent FLAG salvage chemotherapy. Despite almost daily platelet transfusion with single donor platelets (SDPs), patient presented with hematuria and low corrected count increment at 1 h and 24 h suggesting both immune and nonimmune refractoriness to platelet transfusion. The patient received SDP transfusion twice daily from day 19 to day 21 to maintain hemostasis. The patient had persistent hematuria, so massive platelet transfusion in the form of double adult doses of SDP given every 12th hourly for three events. Despite these measures, there was persistent hematuria and refractoriness to platelet transfusion. As HLA or HPA matched or crossmatch compatible platelets were unavailable, continuous platelet transfusion was started for this patient from day 23 to day 28. After 4 days of continuous platelet transfusion, hematuria subsided. In resource-constrained clinical settings, continuous platelet transfusion can be an effective alternative to HLA/HPA-matched platelets in the management of PTR.

A Study on Influence of Donor Hematocrit on the Procedural Parameters of Concentrated Single Donor Platelets Collected by Two Apheresis Devices.

With improvements in apheresis collection, platelet additive solution (PAS) is steadily replacing plasma as the storage medium in single donor platelets (SDP). Concentrating platelets in SDP with one-third of plasma and two-thirds of PAS is referred as Concentrated-SDP (C-SDP). We studied the influence of donor hematocrit (Hct) in C-SDP procedures. A retrospective study, consisting of 124 and 95 plateletpheresis donors in MCS+ and Trima respectively. We compared two apheresis equipments MCS+ and Trima with regard to donor hematocrit on procedural parameters such as collection efficiency (CE), collection rate (CR), yield per hour (Y/H), yield per litre (Y/L) and percentage blood volume processed (%BV) during C-SDP procedures. Donors were categorized into two groups with Group A (Hct ≤ 46%) and Group B (Hct > 46%) based on mean baseline Hct of the study population. Among the 219 procedures, the overall CE was significantly higher for Trima over MCS+ equipment (77 vs 56, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in procedural outcomes like CE, Y/L, Y/H, CR with MCS+ or Trima equipment between groups. %BV processed had a negative correlation with hematocrit in MCS+ (r = - 0.305, P = 0.001) and no difference was observed with Trima equipment. Donor Hct influences C-SDP collection only in processed blood volume with MCS+ equipment. Trima had statistically better performance over MCS+ equipments in all procedural parameters during C-SDP procedures. The data will guide apheresis centre to choose equipments based on donor characteristics.

Modeling predonation testing strategies in platelet donations - Approach from low throughput apheresis blood center from India.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based blood centers in India adopt pre-donation testing for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) before plateletpheresis donations. However, the WHO emphasizes on TTI tests be performed on samples collected during the donation process. The study objective was to determine whether cost implications by adopting product testing along with predonation testing or only product testing strategy in platelet donation in Indian blood centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study on registered plateletpheresis donors, strategy-1 with predonation testing using rapid tests and product testing using chemiluminescence (CLIA) were compared with alternate models: Strategy-2 (predonation test using CLIA and product testing with rapid test) and strategy-3 (product testing). For strategy-1 and 2, donors wait for predonation test to complete or visit blood center twice, while strategy-3 donors donate plateletpheresis immediately. The cost implications of these strategies were compared among registered plateletpheresis donors. RESULTS: Out of 560 donors registered with strategy-1, three donors were reactive in predonation tests and six platelet units were discarded at product testing. After modeling, for strategy-2, nine donors would be identified as sero-reactive at pre-donation test only, while in strategy-3, nine units would be discarded in product testing. Only 506 donations were completed in strategy 1 after donor attrition. Recoverable costs was greater for strategy-3 (INR 5,146,500) than strategy-2 (INR 5,120,000) and strategy-1 (INR 5,069,000). CONCLUSION: Strategy-3 appears cost-effective but requires regulatory changes in the Indian setting. Testing apheresis procedures using Strategy 2 had greater cost recovery, and also prevents infectious donations and thereby enhances blood safety with the present guidelines.