Antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Acquired thrombophilia and in particular the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may play an important role in the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Young patients suffering from an episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE), or PE provoked by mild risk factors, should be tested for aPL. In case of a positive result, they should be closely followed up and lifelong anticoagulant treatment should be considered. Indeed, aPL-induced thrombophilia may favor PE recurrence with the consequence of possible CTEPH development. The aPL profiles play an important role in this pathway. Patients with PE and triple positivity (lupus anticoagulant, LAC, anti-cardiolipin, aCL, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I, aß2GPI) are at the highest risk of recurrence and deserve maximum protection by anticoagulant treatment with warfarin.

Arterial thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): Clinical approach and treatment. A systematic review.

Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a condition affecting young individuals in whom a thromboembolic event occurs in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). An extensive body of literature has covered the most common clinical presentation of the syndrome, venous thromboembolism. Arterial thrombosis in APS, a lesser clinical expression, is less studied. This review will concentrate on the body of literature concerning pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of arterial thrombosis in APS.

Efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in myocarditis: A 30-year systematic review and meta analysis.

AIMS: Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle, due to infectious, toxic or autoimmune causes. Literature reported controversial results in relation to the effect of immunosuppression (IS)/immunomodulation (IM). We aimed at assessing the effect of IS/IM by meta analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the P.R.I.S.M.A. approach, two researchers searched for relevant studies on PubMed, Embase, and the Central Registry of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library. Proposed MeSH terms were: "immunotherapy OR immune therapy OR immune modeling OR Immunosuppressive Agents" AND "combination OR combined with OR plus" AND "myocarditis OR cardiomyopathies OR inflammatory cardiomyopathy". The language was restricted to English. Reference lists of included articles and those relevant to the topic were hand searched for the identification of additional, potentially relevant articles. The cutoff date was from 1987 until 30th Nov 2019. Reported survival or mortality events or change of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after IS/IT were primary outcomes of the study; in addition, improvement of New York Heart Association class, follow-up biopsy (Bx) findings, viral genome clearance on Bx and recurrence of myocarditis were recorded if reported. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3; 5452 studies were screened, of these 73 were assessed for eligibility, including 8 randomized control studies, 26 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies and 1 case control study, 34 case reports and 2 case series. In prospective studies, the difference in mortality between the IS and control groups tended to be lower in the combined IS groups (12.5% vs. 18.2%) (95% CI of odds ratio 0.7(0.3, 1.64)) and the pooled difference of the increase of LVEF between the IS and control groups tended to be higher in the combined IS groups (95% CI 7.26 (-2.29, 16.81)). In retrospective studies, the difference of survival between the IS and control group was significantly in favor of IS (95%CI Hazard ratio 0.82(0.69, 0.96)). CONCLUSIONS: A tailored IS may be considered in myocarditis, depending on the phase of the disease, and the type of underlying autoimmune or immune-mediated form.