Safeguarding Data Security in the Era of Imaging mHealth.

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies stand poised to find broad application in the radiology space. They hold considerable promise for millions of patients in the United States, enabling at-home imaging and augmenting clinical decision-making. However, they often lie outside the ambit of FDA regulation and process vast quantities of data largely unprotected by HIPAA. This article explores features of federal mHealth policy relevant to imaging practice and advocates for greater regulatory clarity to assist radiologists, developers, and ultimately, patients.

Gadolinium Deposition Disease: A New Risk Management Threat.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have enjoyed wide use since their introduction some 30 years ago. Used in as many as 30% of MRIs performed in the United States, GBCAs have generally been associated with low rates of adverse events. However, the safety profile and attendant medicolegal liability associated with GBCAs changed in 2016 with the description of gadolinium deposition disease (GDD). Despite being unproven scientifically, a groundswell of GDD-related litigation and personal injury advertising targeting potential GDD patients has occurred. In this article, we describe what GDD is, why GDD has created medicolegal risk, and how this risk might be mitigated. This article advocates using a risk mitigation strategy focused on reducing brain gadolinium retention during the period of purported GDD development. As such, based on the currently available data, the authors recommend the preferential use of gadoteridol as the default GBCA for MRI imaging.

The national residency exchange: a proposal to restore primary care in an age of microspecialization.

Healthcare deficiencies in the United States have long been perpetuated by a shortage of primary care providers. A core purpose of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is to provide health insurance for America's approximately fifty million uninsured. Implementation of universal health insurance, however, does not mean sufficient healthcare access for all, since the supply of physicians does not and will not meet demand. For reasons reviewed in this Article, the current physician shortage mainly impacts primary care providers. This shortage is particularly troubling because increased provision of primary care relative to specialty care has been associated with improvement in health outcomes, disease prevention, cost effectiveness, and coordination of care. This Article highlights provisions in the PPACA that impact primary care physicians. Finally, this Article proposes the creation of a universal primary care loan repayment program and a national residency exchange designed to alleviate the U.S. primary care crisis by facilitating optimal distribution of resident physicians in each medical specialty based on community need.

Low-income employees' choices regarding employment benefits aimed at improving the socioeconomic determinants of health.

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic factors are associated with reduced health status in low-income populations. We sought to identify affordable employment benefit packages that might ameliorate these socioeconomic factors and would be consonant with employees' priorities. METHODS: Working in groups (n = 53), low-income employees (n = 408; 62% women, 65% Black) from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area, participated in a computerized exercise in which they expressed their preference for employment benefit packages intended to address socioeconomic determinants of health. The hypothetical costs of these benefits reflected those of the average US benefit package available to low-income employees. Questionnaires ascertained sociodemographic information and attitudes. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to examine benefit choices. RESULTS: Groups chose offered benefits in the following descending rank order: health care, retirement, vacation, disability pay, training, job flexibility, family time, dependent care, monetary advice, anxiety assistance, wellness, housing assistance, and nutrition programs. Participants varied in their personal choices, but 78% expressed willingness to abide by their groups' choices. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to design employment benefits that ameliorate socioeconomic determinants of health and are acceptable to low-income employees. These benefit packages can be provided at the cost of benefit packages currently available to some low-income employees.