Monitoring, management, and outcome of hypotension in Intensive Care Unit patients, an international survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Hypotension in the ICU is common, yet management is challenging and variable. Insight in management by ICU physicians and nurses may improve patient care and guide future hypotension treatment trials and guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an international survey among ICU personnel to provide insight in monitoring, management, and perceived consequences of hypotension. RESULTS: Out of 1464 respondents, 1197 (81.7%) were included (928 physicians (77.5%) and 269 nurses (22.5%)). The majority indicated that hypotension is underdiagnosed (55.4%) and largely preventable (58.8%). Nurses are primarily in charge of monitoring changes in blood pressure, physicians are in charge of hypotension treatment. Balanced crystalloids, dobutamine, norepinephrine, and Trendelenburg position were the most frequently reported fluid, inotrope, vasopressor, and positional maneuver used to treat hypotension. Reported complications believed to be related to hypotension were AKI and myocardial injury. Most ICUs do not have a specific hypotension treatment guideline or protocol (70.6%), but the majority would like to have one in the future (58.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Both physicians and nurses report that hypotension in ICU patients is underdiagnosed, preventable, and believe that hypotension influences morbidity. Hypotension management is generally not protocolized, but the majority of respondents would like to have a specific hypotension management protocol.

Definition and incidence of hypotension in intensive care unit patients, an international survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Although hypotension in ICU patients is associated with adverse outcome, currently used definitions are unknown and no universally accepted definition exists. METHODS: We conducted an international, peer-reviewed survey among ICU physicians and nurses to provide insight in currently used definitions, estimations of incidence, and duration of hypotension. RESULTS: Out of 1394 respondents (1055 physicians (76%) and 339 nurses (24%)), 1207 (82%) completed the questionnaire. In all patient categories, hypotension definitions were predominantly based on an absolute MAP of 65 mmHg, except for the neuro(trauma) category (75 mmHg, p < 0.001), without differences between answers from physicians and nurses. Hypotension incidence was estimated at 55%, and time per day spent in hypotension at 15%, both with nurses reporting higher percentages than physicians (estimated mean difference 5%, p = 0.01; and 4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An absolute MAP threshold of 65 mmHg is most frequently used to define hypotension in ICU patients. In neuro(trauma) patients a higher threshold was reported. The majority of ICU patients are estimated to endure hypotension during their ICU admission for a considerable amount of time, with nurses reporting a higher estimated incidence and time spent in hypotension than physicians.

How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care doctors have to find the right balance between sharing crucial decisions with families of patients on the one hand and not overburdening them on the other hand. This requires a tailored approach instead of a model based approach. AIM: To explore how doctors involve families in the decision-making process regarding life-sustaining treatment on the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care. DESIGN: Exploratory inductive thematic analysis of 101 audio-recorded conversations. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred four family members (61% female, 39% male) and 71 doctors (60% female, 40% male) of 36 patients (53% female, 47% male) from the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care of a large university medical center participated. RESULTS: We identified eight relevant and distinct communicative behaviors. Doctors' sequential communicative behaviors either reflected consistent approaches-a shared approach or a physician-driven approach-or reflected vacillating between both approaches. Doctors more often displayed a physician-driven or a vacillating approach than a shared approach, especially in the adult intensive care. Doctors did not verify whether their chosen approach matched the families' decision-making preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Even though tailoring doctors' communication to families' preferences is advocated, it does not seem to be integrated into actual practice. To allow for true tailoring, doctors' awareness regarding the impact of their communicative behaviors is key. Educational initiatives should focus especially on improving doctors' skills in tactfully exploring families' decision-making preferences and in mutually sharing knowledge, values, and treatment preferences.

Ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-induced dynamic hemodynamic parameters such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) have been shown to predict fluid responsiveness in contrast to static hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure (CVP). We hypothesized that the ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation (CVPV) could predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Twenty-two elective cardiac surgery patients were studied post-operatively on the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 ml/kg without spontaneous breathing efforts or cardiac arrhythmia. Before and after administration of 500mL hydroxyethyl starch, SVV and PPV were measured using pulse contour analysis by modified Modelflow® , while CVP was obtained from a central venous catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. CVPV was calculated as 100 × (CVPmax -CVPmin )/[(CVPmax + CVPmin) /2]. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (86%) were fluid responders defined as an increase in cardiac output of ≥ 15% after fluid administration. CVPV decreased upon fluid loading in responders, but not in non-responders. Baseline CVP values showed no correlation with a change in cardiac output in contrast to baseline SVV (r = 0.60, P = 0.003), PPV (r = 0.58, P = 0.005), and CVPV (r = 0.63, P = 0.002). Baseline values of SVV > 9% and PPV > 8% could predict fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 89% and 95%, respectively, both with a specificity of 100%. Baseline CVPV could identify all fluid responders and non-responders correctly at a cut-off value of 12%. There was no difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of SVV, PPV, and CVPV. CONCLUSION: The use of ventilator-induced CVPV could predict fluid responsiveness similar to SVV and PPV in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.

Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness.

Predicting fluid responsiveness, the response of stroke volume to fluid loading, is a relatively novel concept that aims to optimise circulation, and as such organ perfusion, while avoiding futile and potentially deleterious fluid administrations in critically ill patients. Dynamic parameters have shown to be superior in predicting the response to fluid loading compared with static cardiac filling pressures. However, in routine clinical practice the conditions necessary for dynamic parameters to predict fluid responsiveness are frequently not met. Passive leg raising as a means to alter biventricular preload in combination with subsequent measurement of the change in stroke volume can provide a fast and accurate way to guide fluid management in a broad population of critically ill patients.

Cardiopulmonary interactions during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.

Cardiopulmonary interactions induced by mechanical ventilation are complex and only partly understood. Applied tidal volumes and/or airway pressures largely mediate changes in right ventricular preload and afterload. Effects on left ventricular function are mostly secondary to changes in right ventricular loading conditions. It is imperative to dissect the several causes of haemodynamic compromise during mechanical ventilation as undiagnosed ventricular dysfunction may contribute to morbidity and mortality.

[Suicide attempt with sotalol: a proarrhythmic intoxication]. / Tentamen suicidii met sotalol: een proaritmische intoxicatie.

A 62-year-old man was brought into the intensive care unit because of a cardiac arrest. After extensive resuscitation, including defibrillation, sinus bradycardia occurred with marked QT prolongation, followed by recurrent episodes of torsade de pointes. Hetero-anamnestic data revealed a suicide attempt with sotalol. Treatment consisted largely of temporary pacing using an external transvenous overdrive pacemaker and administration of glucagon, milrinon and norepinephrine. Eventually, the patient was discharged in good condition. A suicide attempt with sotalol is a rare intoxication with considerable morbidity and mortality. Treatment is primarily based upon counteracting the proarrhythmic effects of sotalol. However, even when therapeutic levels of this drug are used, proarrhythmic effects can occur.

Cardiac complications in type 2 diabetic patients with mild anginal symptoms and documented reversible myocardial perfusion defects: Results of the MERIDIAN trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To compare early invasive treatment with continued pharmacological treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, mild anginal symptoms and documented myocardial ischaemia. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild anginal symptoms underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). Patients with myocardial ischaemia were randomly assigned to early invasive or continued pharmacological treatment. All patients were followed for the occurrence of MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for unstable angina pectoris). RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were randomised when the sponsor (ZonMW) prematurely terminated the study because of a slow recruitment rate. With a mean follow-up of 2.1±0.6 years, 9 of 79 patients assigned to early invasive treatment developed MACE compared with 10 of 77 patients randomised to continued pharmacological treatment, annual event rate 5.4 vs. 6.3%, hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.20, p=0.34. Due to the limited number of included patients and the low event rate, the study did not have sufficient power for the study objective. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, mild anginal symptoms and documented myocardial ischaemia, under appropriate medical treatment, have a lower than anticipated annual event rate of MACE of ±5 to 6% which questions the beneficial effect of early revascularisation.