Three-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping System-Enhanced Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation: Results From a Multicenter Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation guided by an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) is an emerging technique that may reduce fluoroscopy and angiography use and provide information on coronary sinus (CS) electrical activation. We evaluated the outcome of the EAMS-guided CRT implantation technique in a multicenter registry. METHODS: During the period 2011-2014 we enrolled 125 patients (80% males, age 74 [71-77] years) who underwent CRT implantation by using the EnSite system to create geometric models of the patient's cardiac chambers, build activation mapping of the CS, and guide leads positioning. Two hundred and fifty patients undergoing traditional CRT implantation served as controls. Success and complication rates, fluoroscopy and total procedure times in the overall study population and according to center experience were collected. Centers that performed ≥10 were defined as highly experienced. RESULTS: Left ventricular lead implantation was successful in 122 (98%) cases and 242 (97%) controls (P = 0.76). Median fluoroscopy time was 4.1 (0.3-10.4) minutes in cases versus 16 (11-26) minutes in controls (P < 0.001). Coronary sinus angiography was performed in 33 (26%) cases and 208 (83%) controls (P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 5 (4%) cases and 17 (7%) controls (P = 0.28). Median fluoroscopy time (median 11 minutes vs. 3 minutes, P < 0.001) and CS angiography rate (55% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in low experienced centers, while success rate and complications rate were similar. CONCLUSIONS: EAMS-guided CRT implantation proved safe and effective in both high- and low-experienced centers and allowed to reduce fluoroscopy use by ≈75% and angiography rate by ≈70%.

Left-to-right systolic ventricular interaction in patients undergoing biventricular stimulation for dilated cardiomyopathy.

Left-to-right systolic ventricular interaction (i.e., the phenomenon by which the left ventricle contributes to most of the flow and to two-thirds of the pressure generated by the right ventricle) originates from transmission of systolic forces between the ventricles through the interventricular septum and from the mechanical effect of the common muscle fibers encircling their free walls. As a consequence, any reduction of left ventricular free wall function translates in lower right ventricular pressure or function. We investigated whether systolic ventricular interaction could be evidenced in nine patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in whom a biventricular pacemaker was implanted. Changes in right and left ventricular pressures were measured with high-fidelity catheters, before and after periods of biventricular pacing from the right atrium with different stimulation intervals to the right and left ventricles, respectively. The steady-state changes of left and right ventricular systolic pressure obtained from any single pacing interval combination were considered. We then calculated, with a two-level mixed regression analysis of the entire data set, the relation between changes in left and right systolic pressures: the presence of a statistically significant slope was assumed as evidence of ventricular interaction. The slope of the regression replaced the crude pressure ratio as an estimate of the gain of the interaction; its value compared with values observed in experimental studies. Moreover, its dependence on septal elastance and on right ventricular volume was similar to that already demonstrated for ventricular interaction gain. In conclusion, the linear relationship we found between systolic pressure changes in the two ventricles of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy during biventricular pacing could be explained in terms of ventricular interaction.

Simultaneous vs. sequential biventricular pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy: an acute hemodynamic study.

AIMS: Simultaneous biventricular pacing improves left ventricular (LV) systolic performance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay. We tested the hypothesis that further improvements can be obtained using sequential biventricular pacing by optimizing both atrioventricular and interventricular delays. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 patients, LV pressure, right ventricular (RV) pressure and respective rates of change of pressure (dP/dt) were acutely measured during biventricular pacing with different atrioventricular and interventricular (VVi) intervals ranging from -60 to +40 ms. The average increase vs. baseline in maximum LV dP/dt was higher for sequential than for simultaneous biventricular pacing (VDD mode: 35+/-20 vs. 29+/-18%, P<0.01; DDD mode: 38+/-23 vs. 34+/-25%, P<0.01), with a minority of patients accounting for most of the difference. The mean optimal VVi was -25+/-21 ms in VDD mode and -25+/-26 ms in DDD mode. With these settings, RV dP/dt was not significantly different from baseline. QRS shortening was not predictive of LV dP/dt increase. CONCLUSION: A significant increase of LV dP/dt with no change in RV dP/dt can be obtained by sequential biventricular pacing as compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing. The highest LV dP/dt is achieved when LV is stimulated before RV. The hemodynamic advantage might be of clinical significance in selected cases.