Biocompatibility evaluation of a novel hydroxyapatite-polymer coating for medical implants (in vitro tests).

Nanocomposites consisting of hydroxyapatite (HA) and a sodium maleate copolymer (maleic polyelectrolyte), synthesized by hydrothermal method and deposited on titanium substrates by Matrix Assisted Pulsed Laser Evaporation (MAPLE) technique were tested for the biological properties. Coating bioanalysis was carried out by triple staining of actin, microtubules and nuclei followed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Within 24 h cells that occupied the biomaterial surface displayed the morphology and cytoskeleton pattern similar to the controls. Cells grown on nanocomposite coated surfaces had a higher proliferation rate than their counterparts grown on Ti coated with HA alone, indicating that maleic polyelectrolyte improved surface bio-adhesive characteristics. The capacity to induce cell attachment, spreading and proliferation demonstrated the potential of Ti coated with HA-polymer nanocomposites to be used as scaffolds in dental or orthopedic implantology.

Association of cationic surfactants with maleic acid copolymers: dependence of binding on the nature of the neutral comonomer unit.

Isotherms of binding of dodecylpyridinium chloride (DPC) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) by copolymers of maleic acid (MA; degree of neutralization=1) with methyl methacrylate (MMA), styrene (St), and vinyl acetate (VA) were determined at various salt concentrations by using the potentiometric technique. The average composition of copolymers corresponds to designations MA(MMA)3, MASt, and MAVA. Very different binding behavior has been found. The cooperativity parameter, u, for binding to MA(MMA)3 is the lowest and displays no dependence on ionic strength, which is a consequence of significant hydrophobic polymer-surfactant interactions. Isotherms for the DPC/MASt system display a two-step binding mechanism, which could not be clearly identified in the CPC/MASt case, presumably due to interference of surfactant micellization with the second step. It is proposed that the first step of binding in DPC/MA(MMA)3 and in DPC/MASt solutions is of electrostatic origin, as is the second step in DPC/MASt. On the contrary, the second step in DPC/MA(MMA)3 is mostly due to hydrophobic interactions of surfactant hydrocarbon tails with the predominantly uncharged DPC/MA(MMA)3 complex. MAVA solutions display the highest critical aggregation concentration (cac) values, which show a slight decreasing trend with increasing ionic strength. The very compact form of the MAVA copolymer at high salt content was responsible for this.