Reablement of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living for Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Reablement is a person-centered and goal-oriented rehabilitative intervention to optimize people's chances to live independently. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a reablement intervention on performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) in three aspects (i.e., actual performance, ability, and self-perceived difficulty) for patients with stroke. DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized crossover study. SETTING: Participants' home and community. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients with stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Each participant received two interventions (IADL reablement and health education). Each intervention was administered for 6 wk. All participants were randomly assigned to one intervention and then received the other intervention after a 4-wk washout period. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes of actual performance and self-perceived difficulty were derived from the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) and the difficulty dimension of the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D), respectively. Outcomes of ability were measured with the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (LIADL) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Performance score (COPM Performance). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the three aspects between the IADL reablement and health education (ps = .148-.570). Compared with the health education, the IADL reablement showed better improvements on the FAI, LIADL, COPM Performance, and difficulty dimension of the PM-3D4D with trivial to small effect sizes (ds = 0.17-0.45). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results reveal that the IADL reablement has the potential to increase the frequency of IADL administration, enhancing the capability to perform IADLs and reducing the self-perceived difficulty of carrying out IADLs. Plain-Language Summary: The results of this study showed positive outcomes for a reablement intervention that focuses on goal-oriented instrumental activities of daily living for patients with stroke. An IADL reablement intervention may be useful for improving the ability to carry out IADL tasks at home and in the community.

Test-Retest Reliability, Criterion-Related Validity, and Ecological Validity of the Test of Visual-Motor Skills, Third Edition, in Kindergarten Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

IMPORTANCE: Establishing empirical evidence on the psychometric properties of the Test of Visual-Motor Skills (3rd ed.; TVMS-3) is helpful for guiding its use as an assessment of visual-motor integration (VMI) skills in kindergarten children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and ecological validity of the TVMS-3 in Taiwanese kindergarten children with DCD. DESIGN: A nonexperimental, descriptive, correlational design. SETTING: A hospital in Central Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven kindergarten children with DCD were recruited in the study. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Intraclass correlation coefficient, percentage of minimal detectable change, and paired t test (Wilcoxon signed rank test) were used to investigate the test-retest reliability of the TVMS-3. The correlations (Pearson's r) between the TVMS-3 accuracy score and the scores of each of the four domains and the adaptive behavior composite score of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (3rd ed.; Vineland-3) were calculated, respectively, to examine criterion-related validity and ecological validity. RESULTS: The accuracy score of the TVMS-3 had excellent test-retest reliability and acceptable random measurement error. Moreover, it showed good criterion-related validity and sufficient ecological validity with the Vineland-3 in Taiwanese kindergarten children with DCD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The accuracy score of the TVMS-3 is applicable to Taiwanese kindergarten children with DCD in clinical and research settings. Plain-Language Summary: The accuracy score of the Test of Visual-Motor Skills (3rd ed.; TVMS-3) is a useful assessment tool to detect deficits in visual-motor integration for Taiwanese kindergarten children with developmental coordination disorder. The TVMS-3 has excellent test-retest reliability, good criterion-related validity, and sufficient ecological validity.

Validity of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Fourth Edition in People With Schizophrenia.

IMPORTANCE: The Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Fourth Edition (TVPS-4), which utilizes seven subscales, comprehensively assesses visual perception. OBJECTIVE: To examine the ecological, convergent, and discriminative validities of the TVPS-4 in the assessment of people with schizophrenia. DESIGN: Prospective and observational study. SETTING: Community rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty people with schizophrenia. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: To examine ecological validity, we estimated correlations (Pearson's r) between the TVPS-4 scores (i.e., overall scale and subscales) and the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale-III (ADLRS-III). To examine convergent validity, we computed the correlations (r) between the TVPS-4 scores and two cognitive measures. An analysis of variance was applied to compare the TVPS-4 scores in groups with different disease severities to examine discriminative validity. RESULTS: Moderate to strong correlations were found between TVPS-4 scores and ADLRS-III scores (rs = .33-.61) and between TVPS-4 scores and two cognitive measures (rs = .44-.70). TVPS-4 scores could discriminate among the three groups with different severities of psychiatric illnesses (p < .05), except for two subscales (Visual Memory and Spatial Relationships). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The TVPS-4 has sufficient ecological validity, good convergent validity, and acceptable discriminative validity in assessing people with schizophrenia. The Spatial Relationships subscale, which displays a strong correlation with the ADLRS-III, can reveal the status of daily living in people with schizophrenia. Two subscales showing inadequate discriminative validity should be used cautiously to discriminate people with different severities of schizophrenia. What This Article Adds: The TVPS-4 showed three sound validities (ecological, convergent, and discriminative) for assessing visual perception in people with schizophrenia.

Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.

This study aimed to examine unidimensionality of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) using Rasch analysis and estimate Rasch person reliability in people with dementia. CASI data of people with dementia was collected from medical records of one general hospital in northern Taiwan. A total of 506 people with dementia were recruited from the Department of Neurology. The confirmatory factor analysis was first conducted to verify the fitness of one-factor model of the CASI. Unidimensionality was confirmed through 2 assumptions: the infit and outfit mean square were 0.5 to 1.5, and residual variance of the first principal component in principal component analysis was ≤20%. Rasch person reliability was estimated after undimensionality was supported. The results of one-factor model had shown that the Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Means Square Error of Approximation = 0.015, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.067, representing a good fit to the model. Both the infit and outfit mean square were ranged 0.87 to 1.37 and 0.86 to 1.42, respectively, and low residual variance of the first principal component (12.3%). Rasch person reliability result of 0.58 was satisfactory. The person-item map indicated the difference between item difficulty and person ability was within the acceptable limits (0.22 logits). Differential Item Function was found between -0.48 to 0.44 logits for gender, indicating the CASI functioned similarly for both genders. The 46 items of the CASI showed a unidimensional construct. The CASI had been demonstrated as a valid and reliable screening tool for assessing overall cognitive function in people with dementia, capturing their cognitive functions effectively.

Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) has been widely used to assess memory function in people with dementia. The older adult battery of the WMS-IV includes four indices and seven subtests. The aims of this study were to examine the practice effect and test-retest reliability and calculate the reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) for the indices and subtests of the older adult battery of the WMS-IV for people with dementia. METHODS: Fifty-six participants completed the WMS-IV twice, two weeks apart. The practice effect was investigated using effect size (Cohen's d) and bootstrapping mixed design analysis of variance while considering the severity of dementia. The test-retest reliability was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The results showed non-significant practice effects with Cohen's d < 0.20 in different severities of dementia on two indices and five subtests. The ICC values of these indices and subtests were 0.82-0.85 and 0.57-1.00, respectively. The other two indices (i.e., auditory memory and immediate memory) and two subtests (i.e., logical memory delayed recall and visual reproduction immediate recall) demonstrated small to moderate practice effect (d = 0.46-0.74) for people with mild severity of dementia. CONCLUSION: On the whole, the WMS-IV has no to moderate practice effects and moderate to excellent test-retest reliability in people with dementia. The values of the RCIp with 95% confidence interval for the indices and subtests were provided in this study, which are useful to clinicians and researchers for interpreting the real score change in persons with dementia. The two indices (i.e., auditory memory and immediate memory) and two subtests (i.e., logical memory delayed recall and visual reproduction immediate recall) with noticeable practice effect should be used with caution when assessing memory function repeatedly in people with mild severity of dementia.

Gender Differences in Auditory and Visual Attentional Performance in Children with and without ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the relatively high prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the impairment of ADHD in women is underestimated due to the different ways the phenomenon manifests compared to traditional male symptoms. In order to close the gender gap in diagnosis and treatment, this study aims to explore the impact of gender on auditory and visual attention in children with and without ADHD. METHOD: A total of 220 children with and without ADHD participated in this study. Their auditory and visual attention performances were analyzed by comparative computerized auditory and visual subtests. RESULTS: Auditory and visual attention performance in children with and without ADHD did affect by gender, including typically developing (TD) boys are better than TD girls at distinguishing visual targets from non-target stimuli. When performing attention tasks, TD girls generally maintained a cautious response, which was different from TD boys, who generally adopted positive response methods. ADHD girls suffered from more serious auditory inattention problems than ADHD boys; however, ADHD boys suffered from more auditory and visual impulsive problems than ADHD girls. The internal attention problems of female ADHD children were broader than that of their male ADHD peers and were also more severe, especially in problems of auditory omission and auditory response acuity. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD children had a significant gap in auditory and visual attention performance compared to TD children. The research results support the impact of gender on the performance of auditory and visual attention in children with and without ADHD.

Test-retest reliabilities and minimal detectable changes of 5 versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale in people with dementia.

PURPOSE: To compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the commonly used versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) (the ADAS-Cog-11 (11 items), ADAS-Cog-3 (three items), ADAS-Cog-5-Subset (five items), ADAS-Cog-6-Subset (six items), and ADAS-Rasch (11 items)) in people with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A repeated-assessments design (2 weeks apart) was used to examine the ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-3, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch. Participants with dementia were recruited from one hospital, one elder care center, and two day-care centers using convenience sampling. RESULTS: Fifty-two participants finished the assessments twice in two weeks. All versions showed high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.82-0.96), minimal standardized response means (-0.07 to 0.08) and low to acceptable MDC% (9.2-28.6%). The ADAS-Rasch had the highest ICC (0.96) and the lowest MDC%. The ADAS-Cog-3 had an ICC lower than 0.90 (0.82) and the highest MDC% (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The ADAS-Rasch seems to be the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons. The ADAS-Cog-3 may be a better choice for researchers for group-level comparisons because it requires fewer items to achieve acceptable reliability. The ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch could be considered for clinical usage for individual-level comparisons.Implications for rehabilitationThe ADAS-Rasch is the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons due to its excellent test-retest reliability, lowest random measurement error and absence of a practice effect.The ADAS-Cog-5-Subset and ADAS-Cog-6-Subset might be good substitutes for the ADAS-Rasch in clinical settings because of their comparable reliability features and superior administration efficiency.

Psychometric Properties of Two Tasks in the Allen Cognitive Level Screen-Sixth Edition for Community-Dwelling People Living With Schizophrenia.

IMPORTANCE: Empirical evidence is needed on the psychometric properties of the Allen Cognitive Level Screen-Sixth Edition (ACLS-6), an instrument that assesses cognitive functions and is commonly used for people living with schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: To examine the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and test-retest reliability of two tasks, stitching and copying, in the ACLS-6 for community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Psychiatric center. PARTICIPANTS: 110 people living with schizophrenia. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: To examine convergent validity, we calculated correlations (Pearson's r) between the two tasks and between these two tasks and three cognitive measures. We checked for floor and ceiling effects and conducted independent t tests to evaluate discriminative validity. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to investigate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation (r = .88) between the two tasks and moderate correlations (rs = .32-.52) between the two tasks and the three cognitive measures. No floor or ceiling effects were observed for the two tasks, and t tests showed significant differences between two participant groups with marginal and mild clinical symptoms (p < .001). The ICC values for the two tasks were .71-.74. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The stitching and copying tasks of the ACLS-6 have good convergent validity, discriminative validity, and test-retest reliability for community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia. The copying task showed a strong correlation with the stitching task and a similar score range, so practitioners can consider using the copying task as a substitute for the stitching task. What This Article Adds: The stitching and copying tasks of the ACLS-6 have sound psychometric properties for measuring cognitive functions in community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia.

Psychometric Comparisons of Three Depression Measures for Patients With Stroke.

IMPORTANCE: Psychometric examinations for patients with stroke remain insufficient. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) are promising outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare the reliability and validity of three depression measures in a sample of patients with stroke. DESIGN: Repeated-measures design. SETTING: A hospital in southern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine outpatients, who completed three depression measures. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, of the three measures. An independent-samples t test was conducted to compare two groups of patients with different levels of disability to investigate discriminative validity. Pearson's rs were calculated among the three measures to examine concurrent validity. RESULTS: The three measures had good internal consistency (α = .85-.92) and sufficient test-retest reliability (ICC = .84-.91). The minimal detectable change (percentage of minimal detectable change) was 10.6 (63.3%), 13.5 (98.3%), and 5.8 (49.9%) for the CES-D, BDI-II, and GDS, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in CES-D score (p = .032) and no significant differences on the other two measures (p = .095-.187). The correlations among the three measures ranged from .79 to .89. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: All three depression measures had sound internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity in patients with stroke. What This Article Adds: Of the three measures, the CES-D had better discriminative validity, and the GDS demonstrated greater reliability and smaller random measurement error in patients with stroke.

Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination-Second Edition (MMSE-2) consists of three visions: a brief version (MMSE-2:BV), a standard version (MMSE-2:SV), and an expanded version (MMSE-2: EV). Each version was equipped with alternate forms (blue and red). There was a lack of evidence on the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the three versions of the MMSE-2, limiting its utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the MMSE-2 in people with dementia. METHODS: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled, of which 60 were administered with the blue form twice (i.e., the same-form group, [SF group]) and 60 were administered with the blue form first and then the red form (alternate-form group, [AF group]). The practice effect was evaluated using a paired t-test and Cohen's d. The test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the practice effects, in the SF group, no statistically significant differences were found for the MMSE-2:BV and MMSE-2: EV total scores and eight subtests (p = 0.061-1.000), except for the MMSE-2:SV total score (p = 0.029). In the AF group, no statistically significant differences were found for all three versions of the total scores and subtests (p = 0.106-1.000), except for the visual-constructional ability subtest (p = 0.010). Cohen's d of all three versions' total scores and subtests were 0.00-0.20 and 0.00-0.26 for SF group and AF group, respectively. For the test-retest reliability, ICC values for all three versions and eight subtests in SF and AF groups were 0.60-0.93 and 0.56-0.93, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the practice effect could be minimized when alternate forms of the MMSE-2 were used. The MMSE-2 had good to excellent test-retest reliability, except for three subtests (i.e., visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall). Caution should be taken when interpreting the results of visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall subtests of the MMSE-2.

Practice effect and reliability of the motor-free visual perception test-4 over multiple assessments in patients with stroke.

PURPOSE: The Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-4 (MVPT-4) is a multidimensional measure of visual perception with five subscales (visual discrimination, figure-ground, visual memory, spatial relationships, and visual closure). The purpose of this study was to examine practice effect and test-retest reliability of the MVPT-4 over four serial assessments in patients with stroke. METHODS: We recruited outpatients with stroke with age above 20 years, able to follow instructions, and able to sign informed consent. We excluded patients who had visual neglect and visual deficits (e.g., diplopia, cataract, and glaucoma). Sixty patients completed the MVPT-4 four times, one week apart. Cumulative and plateau phases of the practice effect were evaluated across four assessments. Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The MVPT-4 scale and five subscales showed cumulative phases. Only the spatial relationships subscale may have reached a plateau phase at the second assessment. The ICC values of the MVPT-4 scale and five subscales were 0.48-0.87. The minimum and maximum values of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) were: MVPT-4 scale [-5.0, 7.7]; visual discrimination [-1.7, 2.1]; figure-ground [-2.0, 2.6]; visual memory [-2.6, 3.2]; spatial relationships [-2.3, 3.0]; and visual closure [-2.5, 2.8]. CONCLUSIONS: The MVPT-4 scale and five subscales appeared increasing trends of practice effects and moderate to excellent test-retest reliability in patients with stroke. The minimum and maximum values of the 90% CI RCIp for the spatial relationships subscale which may have reached a plateau phase that can help clinicians and researchers to ascertain whether the real score change is occurred for an individual patient.Implications for rehabilitationThree multilevel regression models were conducted to evaluate the plateau phase of the practice effect over four assessments.The patterns of practice effects and evidences of test-retest reliability of the MVPT-4 scale and five subscales over four serial assessments can be used to follow the progress of patients with stroke.The minimum and maximum values of the 90% CI RCIp of the MVPT-4 can assist clinicians and researchers to explain score changes for an individual patient with stroke.

A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Saint Louis University Status Examination (SLUMS) in a single sample of people with dementia. METHODS: Sixty people with dementia were assessed twice two weeks apart, and the test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for four screening tools. The MDC95 value was calculated based on the standard error of measurement to estimate the random measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC values for screening tools were 0.86-0.90. The MDC95 values (MDC95%) were 5.0 (17.2%), 2.74 (27%), 4.71(20%), and 6.26 (24%) for the MMSE, SPMSQ, MoCA, and SLUMS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the four screening tools were similar in test-retest reliability which imply that the MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS were reliable in monitoring cognitive function in people with dementia. The results of the direct comparisons of test-retest reliability of the four screening tools provide useful information for both clinicians and researchers to select an appropriate cognitive screening tool.Implications for RehabilitationThe MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS are equally reliable and thus they could be used to monitor the cognitive function in people with dementia.The MDC values are useful in determining whether a real change has occurred between repeated assessments for people with dementia.

Reliability of the performance-based measure of executive functions in people with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The Performance-based measure of Executive Functions (PEF) with four domains is designed to assess executive functions in people with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the PEF administered by the same rater (intra-rater agreement) and by different raters (inter-rater agreement) in people with schizophrenia and to estimate the values of minimal detectable change (MDC) and MDC%. METHODS: Two convenience samples (each sample, n = 60) with schizophrenia were conducted two assessments (two weeks apart). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed to examine intra-rater and inter-rater agreements of the test-retest reliability of the PEF. The MDC was calculated through standard error of measurement. RESULTS: For the intra-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.88-0.92. The MDC (MDC%) of the four domains (volition, planning, purposive action, and perfromance effective) were 13.0 (13.0%), 12.2 (16.4%), 16.2 (16.2%), and 16.3 (18.8%), respectively. For the inter-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.82-0.89. The MDC (MDC%) were 15.8 (15.8%), 17.4 (20.0%), 20.9 (20.9%), and 18.6 (18.6%) for the volition, planning, purposive action, and performance effective domains, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PEF has good test-retest reliability, including intra-rater and inter-rater agreements, for people with schizophrenia. Clinicians and researchers can use the MDC values to verify whether an individual with schizophrenia shows any real change (improvement or deterioration) between repeated PEF assessments by the same or different raters.

Measurement Equivalence between the Original and Estimated Mini-Mental State Examination in People with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) is increasingly used to assess general cognitive function in people with dementia. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score can be converted from the CASI (i.e., the estimated MMSE). Recognizing that measurement equivalence is critical to meaningfully representing one with the other, we aimed to determine whether the estimated MMSE score obtained from the CASI was equivalent to the original MMSE in people with dementia. METHODS: We obtained 110 data points for the MMSE and CASI scores in people with dementia. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson's r, percent of standard error of measurement (SEM%), paired t-test, and effect size (Cohen's d) were used to investigate the equivalence. RESULTS: To examine the equivalence between the original and estimated MMSE score, the ICC and Pearson's r of the total score and six domains were 0.62-0.95 and 0.62-0.96, respectively. The SEM% of the total score and six domains were 0.6-8.9%. The paired t-test results showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the total score and the three domains. The Cohen's d of the total score and six domains were 0.06-0.27. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated MMSE score was found to have moderate to excellent equivalence to the original MMSE score. The three domains (i.e., registration, attention and calculation, and visual-constructional ability) with moderate equivalence should be used cautiously to interchange with the original MMSE in people with dementia.

Investigation of the home-reablement program on rehabilitation outcomes for people with stroke: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Reablement is 1 approach to conduct rehabilitation in the community (ie, home environment), which aims to enhance an individual's functional ability to perform everyday activities that individuals perceive as important. We investigated the effects of a home-reablement program on different rehabilitation outcomes in people with stroke. METHODS: A single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-six people with stroke were randomly assigned to the home-reablement group or control group. For 6 weeks, participants in the home-reablement group received training for activities of daily living (ADL) that they perceived as important but difficult to perform. Participants in the control group received conventional rehabilitation in the hospital. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper-extremity (FMA-UE) and the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS 3.0) subscales. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups were noticed in the FMA-UE and the SIS 3.0 subscales (P = .226-1.000). Small effect size (success rate difference = 0.12-0.25) were noticed in the FMA-UE and the 5 SIS 3.0 subscales. The home-reablement group exhibited a greater proportion of participants with scores greater than the minimal detectable change in the FMA-UE and the 6 SIS 3.0 subscales (ie, strength, ADL/instrumental ADL, mobility, emotion, memory, and participation). CONCLUSIONS: People with stroke that underwent the 6-week home-reablement program showed potential for improving their motor function, ADL/instrumental ADL, emotion, memory, and activity participation.

Effects of a food preparation program on dietary well-being for stroke patients with dysphagia: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is one of the common issues observed in patients with stroke. Stroke patients with dysphagia have to eat blended food or similar types of food for each meal, resulting in dietary dissatisfaction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a food preparation program on dietary well-being for stroke patients with dysphagia. METHODS: This study was a pilot randomized clinical trial. Twenty-two patients were assigned randomly into the food preparation group (n = 11) and control group (n = 11). The food preparation group received oral motor exercises, recognition of food texture and thickener, and hands-on food preparation for 6 weeks. Outcome measures included the Dietary Well-Being Scale, brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of life, Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Mini Nutritional Assessment. RESULTS: Patients in the food preparation group showed significant improvements in the Dietary Well-Being Scale, psychological and environmental domains of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of life (P = .001-.024) with small to large effect sizes (success rate difference = 0.23-0.46). The Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire and Mini Nutritional Assessment displayed non-significant differences (P = .053-.092) and revealed small to moderate effect sizes (success rate difference = 0.23-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The food preparation program showed a positive impact on dietary well-being and a potential improvement in the health-related quality of life, quality of life related to the process of swallowing, and nutritional status for stroke patients with dysphagia. We recommend that stroke patients with dysphagia receive adequate knowledge and hands-on food preparation training to increase their dietary intake and well-being.

Nutritional status as a predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function and quality of life in patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status could affect functional capacity and reduce quality of life in patients with stroke. Although the associations between nutritional status, basic activities of daily living (BADL)/Instrumental ADL, and quality of life (QOL) in older people have been identified, the relationships have not yet been examined in patients with stroke, using the full Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) or MNA-short form (MNA-SF). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the relationship between nutritional status (using full MNA and MNA-SF), comprehensive ADL function, and QOL in patients with stroke. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with ischemic stroke participated in this cross-sectional design study. Each participant was assessed with the full MNA, MNA-SF, comprehensive ADL function (including Barthel Index and Frenchay Activities Index), and WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) once. RESULTS: The MNA-SF was only significantly correlated with the comprehensive ADL function (rho = 0.27, p = 0.013), whereas, the full MNA was found to be significantly correlated with the comprehensive ADL function and WHOQOL-BREF (rho = 0.24, p = 0.029 and rho = 0.30, p = 0.005, respectively). The MNA-SF was a significant predictor of comprehensive ADL function, accounting for 44% of the variance. The full MNA was the only significant predictor of the WHOQOL-BREF, explaining 17% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed a relationship between nutritional status, comprehensive ADL function, and QOL among patients with stroke. Patients with stroke with better nutritional status had higher ADL function as well as better QOL. The MNA-SF was useful in predicting comprehensive ADL, whereas, the full MNA could be used to predict QOL. Knowledge and evidence of the association and predictive power of the MNA-SF and full MNA could guide clinicians to choose tools for assessing the nutritional status of patients with stroke more effectively.

Ecological, convergent, and discriminative validities of the cognitive abilities screening instrument in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) assesses global cognitive function in people with dementia with 9 domains (i.e., long-term memory, short-term memory, concentration, orientation, attention, abstraction and judgment, language abilities, visual construction, and category fluency). However, the ecological, convergent, and discriminant validities of the CASI have not yet been examined. PURPOSE: This study designed to investigate these 3 validities of the CASI in people with dementia. METHODS: Fifty-eight participants underwent assessments with the CASI, 3 functional measures, and 3 cognitive measures. Pearson's r was used to estimate correlations among the CASI and 3 functional measures for examining ecological validity. We computed correlations (r) among the CASI and 3 functional measures for examining convergent validity. An independent t-test was applied to compare the levels of disability, and ceiling/floor effects were analyzed for examining discriminative validity. RESULTS: The CASI total score and domains had moderate to high correlations with 3 functional measures (r = 0.42-0.80), except in 2 CASI domains (i.e., attention and language). The CASI total score and domains showed moderate to high correlations with 3 cognitive measures (r = 0.45-0.93). The t-test results revealed significant differences (P < .05) in the CASI total score and other domains except for the short-term memory domains. Four domains of the CASI showed noticeable ceiling effects (22.4-39.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The CASI has adequate ecological validity, good convergent validity, and acceptable discriminative validity in people with dementia. The 5 domains with nonsignificant differences or ceiling effects should only be used with caution to distinguish people with dementia.

Development of the CAT-FER: A Computerized Adaptive Test of Facial Emotion Recognition for Adults With Schizophrenia.

IMPORTANCE: The most frequently used measures of facial emotion recognition (FER) are insufficiently comprehensive, reliable, valid, and efficient; moreover, the impact of gender on scoring has not been controlled. OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized adaptive test of FER for adults with schizophrenia. DESIGN: First, we selected photographs from a published database. Second, items that fitted well to a Rasch model were used to form the item bank. Third and last, we determined the best administration mode for prospective users to achieve both high reliability and efficiency. SETTING: Psychiatric hospitals and the community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults living with schizophrenia (n = 351) and adults without diagnosed mental illness (n = 101). RESULTS: After removal of misfit items (infit or outfit ≥1.4), the remaining 165 items were selected to form an item bank. Among them, 39 showed severe gender bias, so the item difficulties were adjusted accordingly. On the basis of the item bank, two administration modes were recommended for prospective users. The reliable mode required approximately 128 items (nearly 20 min) to achieve reliability (.72-.81), similar to that of the entire item bank. The efficient mode required approximately 73 items (approximate 11 min) to provide acceptable reliability (.69-.73) for the seven domain scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our newly developed measure provides comprehensive, valid, and unbiased (to examinees' gender) assessments of FER in adults living with schizophrenia. In addition, the administration modes can be flexibly changed to optimize the reliability or efficiency for prospective users. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: This newly developed FER measure can help occupational therapists identify deficits in recognizing specific basic emotions and plan corresponding interventions to manage the impact on their clients' social functions.

Test-retest reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in people with schizophrenia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in people with schizophrenia. In this study, minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated and systematic measurement errors were evaluated. METHOD: Sixty-three people with schizophrenia underwent the WCST twice with a two-week interval. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient. Systematic measurement error was examined using paired t-test and effect size (Cohen's d). RESULTS: The values of intraclass correlation coefficient were >0.70, except for two indices ("nonperseverative errors" and "failure to maintain set" with intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.56 and 0.30, respectively). Seven indices showed nonsignificant differences between the two assessments (t(62)= -0.84 to 1.38, p > 0.05) and negligible effect sizes (d = 0.03-0.13). The values of MDC with 95% certainty were 32.3, 42.0, 31.2, 36.9, 40.1, 3.3, and 3.8 for the "total number correct," "perseverative responses," "perseverative errors," "nonperseverative errors," "conceptual level responses," "number of categories completed," and "failure to maintain set" indices, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The WCST has acceptable test-retest reliability. Two indices ("nonperseverative errors" and "failure to maintain set") revealed lower levels of consistency in scores over repeated assessments. Clinicians and researchers should be cautious when using these two indices to interpret of the re-assessment results in people with schizophrenia.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Wisconsin Card Sorting Test showed acceptable test-retest reliability in people with schizophrenia.Six indices of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test revealed substantial random measurement errors, which should be used cautiously to interpret executive functions over repeated assessments.