Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 371: 160-166, 2023 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36220506

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden may increase the risk of left ventricular dysfunction and all-cause mortality. We aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with structurally normal heart having PVC burden ≥1%. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Chang Gung Research Database. Pregnancies from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2020, with documented maternal PVC burden ≥1% by 24-h Holter monitor were identified. Pregnant women with a diagnosis of structural heart disease or arrhythmias other than PVC were excluded. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the covariates between the PVC group and normal control group. The PVC group was classified into low-PVC (<10%) and high-PVC burden subgroups. The maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed through 6 months after delivery or termination. RESULTS: After PSM, there were 214, 61, and 46 pregnant women enrolled in the normal control group, low-PVC burden, and high-PVC burden subgroups, respectively. The high-PVC and low-PVC burden subgroups had composite adverse maternal and neonatal events similar to the control group without use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), but a higher proportion of placental abruption was observed in the high-PVC burden subgroup. Maternal age, diabetes, and overweight were significant predictors of composite adverse maternal events, whereas only maternal age was a significant predictor of composite adverse neonatal events. CONCLUSIONS: High PVC burden was not associated with poor composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes with no need of AADs therapy in pregnant women with structurally normal heart.


Assuntos
Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/diagnóstico , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/epidemiologia , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Placenta , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/efeitos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico
2.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 934193, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148062

RESUMO

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors has been shown with cardiovascular benefit in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. However, its osmotic diuresis still concern physicians who may look for possible electrolyte imbalance. We therefore aimed to investigate electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with SGLT2 inhibitors. Methods: Electronic medical records from Chang Gung Research Database between January 1, 2001 and January 31, 2019 were searched for patients with ECG reports and patients on an oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA). We then separate these T2DM patients with EKG into those taking either SGLT2 inhibitors or non-SGLT2 inhibitors. We excluded patients with OHA use <28 days, age <18 years, baseline ECG QTc > 500 ms, and ECG showing atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between groups by age, sex, comorbidities, and medications (including QT prolonging medications). Conditional logistic regression and Firth's logistic regression for rare events were employed to compare the difference between SGLT2 and non-SGLT2 inhibitor patients. Results: After exclusion criteria and PSM, there remained 1,056 patients with ECG on SGLT2 inhibitors and 2,119 patients with ECG on non-SGLT2 inhibitors in the study. There were no differences in PR intervals, QT prolongations by Bazett's or Fridericia's formulas, new onset ST-T changes, new onset CRBBB or CLBBB, and ventricular arrhythmia between the group of patients on SGLT2 inhibitors and the group of patients on non-SGLT2 inhibitors. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of cardiovascular death and sudden cardiac death. In addition, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of electrolytes. Conclusions: Compared with T2DM patients on non-SGLT2 inhibitors, there were no differences in PR interval, QT interval, ST-T changes, bundle-branch block, or ventricular arrhythmia in the patients on SGLT2 inhibitors. There were no differences in cardiovascular mortality between these two groups. In addition, there were no electrolyte differences between groups. SGLT2 inhibitors appeared to be well-tolerated in terms of cardiovascular safety.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA