Primary Rectal Syphilis Mimicking Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Primary rectal syphilis is a rare disease that can be misdiagnosed as lymphoma or other rectal cancers on sigmoidoscopy or CT. Here, we report a case of primary rectal syphilis mimicking rectal malignancy in a 23-year-old male who presented with a rectal mass and multiple lymphadenopathies. In this case report and literature review, we focused on the CT findings and endoscopic observations of primary rectal syphilis. Infectious diseases, such as rectal syphilis, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of young patients with unusual rectal lesions and disproportionately extensive lymphadenopathies.

Clinical feasibility of deep learning based synthetic contrast enhanced abdominal CT in patients undergoing non enhanced CT scans.

Our objective was to develop and evaluate the clinical feasibility of deep-learning-based synthetic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DL-SynCCT) in patients designated for nonenhanced CT (NECT). We proposed a weakly supervised learning with the utilization of virtual non-contrast CT (VNC) for the development of DL-SynCCT. Training and internal validations were performed with 2202 pairs of retrospectively collected contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images with the corresponding VNC images acquired from dual-energy CT. Clinical validation was performed using an external validation set including 398 patients designated for true nonenhanced CT (NECT), from multiple vendors at three institutes. Detection of lesions was performed by three radiologists with only NECT in the first session and an additionally provided DL-SynCCT in the second session. The mean peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index map (SSIM) of the DL-SynCCT compared to CECT were 43.25 ± 0.41 and 0.92 ± 0.01, respectively. With DL-SynCCT, the pooled sensitivity for lesion detection (72.0% to 76.4%, P < 0.001) and level of diagnostic confidence (3.0 to 3.6, P < 0.001) significantly increased. In conclusion, DL-SynCCT generated by weakly supervised learning showed significant benefit in terms of sensitivity in detecting abnormal findings when added to NECT in patients designated for nonenhanced CT scans.

Utility of abbreviated MRI in the post-treatment evaluation of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Post-treatment evaluation of patients with rectal cancer (RC) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) burdens medical resources, necessitating an exploration of abbreviated protocols. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI (A-MRI) for the post-treatment evaluation of RC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included RC patients who underwent non-contrast rectal MRI and standard liver MRI, as well as abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for post-treatment evaluation. A-MRI comprised diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging of the upper abdomen and the pelvic cavity. Three radiologists independently reviewed A-MRI, CECT, and standard liver MRI in the detection of viable disease. The diagnostic performances were compared using a reference standard considering all available information, including pathology, FDG-PET, endoscopic results, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: We included 78 patients (50 men, 28 women; mean age=60.9 ± 10.2 years) and observed viable disease in 34 (43.6%). On a per-patient-basis analysis, A-MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (95% vs. 81%, P = 0.04) and higher accuracy (93% vs. 82%, P < 0.01), compared to those of CECT, while A-MRI showed comparable sensitivity (91% vs. 91%, P = 0.42) and accuracy (97% vs. 98%, P = 0.06) to that of standard liver MRI. On a per-lesion-based analysis, A-MRI exhibited significantly superior lesion detectability than that of CECT (figure of merit 0.91 vs. 0.77, P < 0.01) and comparable to that of standard liver MRI (figure of merit 0.91 vs. 0.92, P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: A-MRI exhibited higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy than those of CECT in the post-treatment evaluation of RC, while it showed comparable performances with standard liver MRI. A-MRI provides diagnostic added value in the follow-up of RC patients.

Diagnostic performance and image quality of an image-based denoising algorithm applied to radiation dose-reduced CT in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic performance and image quality of ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) in diagnosing acute appendicitis with an image-based deep-learning denoising algorithm (IDLDA). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 180 patients (mean ± standard deviation, 29 ± 9 years; 91 female) who underwent contrast-enhanced 2-mSv CT for suspected appendicitis from February 2014 to August 2016. We simulated ULDCT from 2-mSv CT, reducing the dose by at least 50%. Then we applied an IDLDA on ULDCT to produce denoised ULDCT (D-ULDCT). Six radiologists with different experience levels (three board-certified radiologists and three residents) independently reviewed the ULDCT and D-ULDCT. They rated the likelihood of appendicitis and subjective image qualities (subjective image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artificial sensation). One radiologist measured image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests, and paired t-tests. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curves (AUC) for diagnosing appendicitis ranged 0.90-0.97 for ULDCT and 0.94-0.97 for D-ULDCT. The AUCs of two residents were significantly higher on D-ULDCT (AUC difference = 0.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.11; p = .022] and 0.05 [0.00-0.10; p = .046], respectively). D-ULDCT provided better subjective image noise and diagnostic acceptability to all six readers. However, the response of board-certified radiologists and residents differed in artificial sensation (all p ≤ .003). D-ULDCT showed significantly lower image noise, higher SNR, and higher CNR (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: An IDLDA can provide better ULDCT image quality and enhance diagnostic performance for less-experienced radiologists.

Risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms from head CT radiation in children and adolescents presenting with minor head trauma: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The carcinogenic risks of CT radiation in children and adolescents remain debated. We aimed to assess the carcinogenic risk of CTs performed in children and adolescents with minor head trauma. METHODS: In this nationwide population-based cohort study, we included 2,411,715 patients of age 0-19 with minor head trauma from 2009 to 2017. We excluded patients with elevated cancer risks or substantial past medical radiation exposure. Patients were categorized into CT-exposed or CT-unexposed group according to claim codes for head CT. The primary outcome was development of hematologic malignant neoplasms. Secondary outcomes included development of malignant solid neoplasms and benign neoplasms in the brain. We measured the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and incidence rate difference (IRD) using G-computation with Poisson regression adjusting for age, sex, hospital setting, and the type of head trauma. RESULTS: Hematologic malignant neoplasms developed in 100 of 216,826 patients during 1,303,680 person-years in the CT-exposed group and in 808 of 2,194,889 patients during 13,501,227 person-years in the CT-unexposed group. For hematologic malignant neoplasms, the IRR was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.03-1.60) and the IRD was 1.71 (95% CI, 0.04-3.37) per 100,000 person-years at risk. The majority of excess hematologic malignant neoplasms were leukemia (IRR, 1.40 [98.3% CI, 1.05-1.87]; IRD, 1.59 [98.3% CI, 0.02-3.16] per 100,000 person-years at risk). There were no between-group differences for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure from head CTs in children and adolescents with minor head trauma was associated with an increased incidence of hematologic malignant neoplasms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study provides a quantitative grasp of the risk conferred by CT examinations in children and adolescents, thereby providing the basis for cost-benefit analyses and evidence-driven guidelines for patient triaging in head trauma. KEY POINTS: • This nationwide population-based cohort study showed that radiation exposure from head CTs in children and adolescents was associated with a higher incidence of hematologic malignant neoplasms. • The incidence rate of hematologic malignant neoplasms in the CT-exposed group was 29% higher than that in the CT-unexposed group (IRR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.03-1.60]), and there were approximately 1.7 excess neoplasms per 100,000 person-years at risk in the CT-exposed group (IRD, 1.71 [0.04-3.37]). • Our study provides a quantified grasp of the risk conferred by CT examinations in children and adolescents, while controlling for biases observed in previous studies via specifying CT indication and excluding patients with predisposing conditions for cancer development.

Improving radiomics reproducibility using deep learning-based image conversion of CT reconstruction algorithms in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVES: CT reconstruction algorithms affect radiomics reproducibility. In this study, we evaluate the effect of deep learning-based image conversion on CT reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: This study included 78 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent four-phase liver CTs comprising non-contrast, late arterial (LAP), portal venous (PVP), and delayed phase (DP), reconstructed using both filtered back projection (FBP) and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE). PVP images were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to convert images from FBP to ADMIRE and vice versa. LAP, PVP, and DP images were used for validation and testing. Radiomic features were extracted for each patient with a semi-automatic segmentation tool. We used concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) to evaluate the radiomics reproducibility for original FBP (oFBP) vs. original ADMIRE (oADMIRE), oFBP vs. converted FBP (cFBP), and oADMIRE vs. converted ADMIRE (cADMIRE). RESULTS: In the test group including 30 patients, the CCC and proportion of reproducible features (CCC ≥ 0.85) for oFBP vs. oADMIRE were 0.65 and 32.9% (524/1595) for LAP, 0.65 and 35.9% (573/1595) for PVP, and 0.69 and 43.8% (699/1595) for DP. For oFBP vs. cFBP, the values increased to 0.92 and 83.9% (1339/1595) for LAP, 0.89 and 71.0% (1133/1595) for PVP, and 0.90 and 79.7% (1271/1595) for DP. Similarly, for oADMIRE vs. cADMIRE, the values increased to 0.87 and 68.1% (1086/1595) for LAP, 0.91 and 82.1% (1309/1595) for PVP, and 0.89 and 76.2% (1216/1595) for DP. CONCLUSIONS: CNN-based image conversion between CT reconstruction algorithms improved the radiomics reproducibility of HCCs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that using a CNN-based image conversion technique significantly improves the reproducibility of radiomic features in HCCs, highlighting its potential for enhancing radiomics research in HCC patients. KEY POINTS: Radiomics reproducibility of HCC was improved via CNN-based image conversion between two different CT reconstruction algorithms. This is the first clinical study to demonstrate improvements across a range of radiomic features in HCC patients. This study promotes the reproducibility and generalizability of different CT reconstruction algorithms in radiomics research.

Radiology Residents' Independent Diagnosis of Appendicitis Using 2-mSv Computed Tomography: A Secondary Analysis of a Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance and clinical outcomes of 2-mSv computed tomography (CT) and conventional-dose CT (CDCT), following radiology residents' interpretation of CT examinations for suspected appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether, 3074 patients with suspected appendicitis aged 15-44 years (28 ± 9 years, 1672 females) from 20 hospitals were randomly assigned to the 2-mSv CT (n = 1535) or CDCT (n = 1539) groups in a pragmatic trial from December 2013 and August 2016. Overall, 107 radiology residents participated in the trial as readers in the form of daily practice after online training for 2-mSv CT. They made preliminary CT reports, which were later finalized by attending radiologists via addendum reports, for 640 and 657 patients in the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups, respectively. We compared the diagnostic performance of the residents, discrepancies between preliminary and addendum reports, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the 640 and 657 patients. Residents' diagnostic performance was not significantly different between the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups, with a sensitivity of 96.0% and 97.1%, respectively (difference [95% confidence interval {CI}], -1.1% [-4.9%, 2.6%]; P = 0.69) and specificity of 93.2% and 93.1%, respectively (0.1% [-3.6%, 3.7%]; P > 0.99). The 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups did not significantly differ in discrepancies between the preliminary and addendum reports regarding the presence of appendicitis (3.3% vs. 5.2%; -1.9% [-4.2%, 0.4%]; P = 0.12) and alternative diagnosis (5.5% vs. 6.4%; -0.9% [-3.6%, 1.8%]; P = 0.56). The rates of perforated appendicitis (12.0% vs. 12.6%; -0.6% [-4.3%, 3.1%]; P = 0.81) and negative appendectomies (1.9% vs. 1.1%; 0.8% [-0.7%, 2.3%]; P = 0.33) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance and clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups following radiology residents' CT readings for suspected appendicitis.

A rabbit model for embolic infarct potentials of injectables using ultrasound-guided carotid artery puncture.

In order to evaluate the in vivo thrombogenicity of injectable agents, a suitable animal model is needed. We introduce an ultrasound-guided non-selective cerebral artery occlusion model via the common carotid arteries of rabbits. A total of 30 rabbits were assigned to an experimental group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 10). Each group received 2 mL suspension of embolic agent or 2 mL of normal saline, respectively, under ultrasound guidance. The animals were observed for immediate reaction and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Follow-up neurologic examination was conducted 24 h following the procedure. In 7 of the 30 rabbits, 2 in the control group and 5 in the experimental group, the administration of either normal saline or the embolic agent failed. Among the successfully injected 15 experimental animals, 14 showed neurologic impairment or deceased, whereas 1 animal did not show significant neurologic deficit. The MRI of 4 experimental animals showed detectable cerebral infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging. None of the 8 control animals showed neurologic abnormality and their brain MRI was normal. Our minimally invasive model is technically feasible and competent to show thrombogenecity of an injectable agent and consequent in vivo neurologic outcome.

Extramural venous invasion and depth of extramural invasion on preoperative CT as prognostic imaging biomarkers in patients with locally advanced ascending colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the prognostic significance of EMVI and DEMI on preoperative CT in patients with ascending colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with T3 ascending colon cancer from January 2012 to December 2016 in a tertiary center. Two radiologists independently reviewed EMVI, DEMI, and nodal status on preoperative CT. We assessed the association of age, sex, mucinous adenocarcinoma, EMVI, and DEMI with metastasis on preoperative CT using univariable and multivariable analysis. We also compared disease-free survival (DFS) with and without variables (age, sex, mucinous adenocarcinoma, EMVI, DEMI and adjuvant chemotherapy) using Cox's proportional hazards models. We assessed interobserver agreements on imaging features using the Cohen's weighted kappa. RESULTS: Of 237 patients [107 men; mean (standard deviation) age, 66 (13) years], 24 had metastases on preoperative CT. Positive EMVI was associated with metastasis (odds ratio 16.9; P < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. Of 194 patients [83 men; 65 (13) years] included for DFS analysis, recurrence was observed in 31 (16%) with median follow-up of 53 months. Positive EMVI [hazard ratio (HR) 4.8; P < 0.001] and DEMI > 5 mm (HR 5.5; P < 0.001) were associated with worse DFS. Interobserver agreements were good (kappa = 0.64-0.67). CONCLUSION: Positive EMVI and DEMI > 5 mm on preoperative CT were associated with a worse T3 ascending colon cancer prognosis. Thus, these CT findings could be used as imaging biomarkers for T3 ascending colon cancer risk stratification.

Local retention efficacy of steroid-loaded PLGA microspheres in epidural injection.

Long-term effects of epidural steroid injections for pain management require novel drug formulations that increase tissue retention time. Present study aimed to investigate the local retention of steroid-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres in epidural injection using a rabbit model. Twenty rabbits were randomly assigned to a PLGA group (n = 10) and a triamcinolone acetonide (TA) group (n = 10). Each animal was injected with either TA-loaded PLGA microspheres or conventional TA suspension into the lumbar epidural space. The lumbar segments were then harvested from the sacrificed rabbits on day 1, week 1, 2, and 4 after the injection. On day 1, the residual steroid concentration (RSC) was lower in the PLGA group than in the TA group (5.03 ppm vs. 13.01 ppm). However, after a week, more steroids remained in the PLGA group (3.29 ppm vs. 0.58 ppm). After 2 weeks, fewer steroids remained in the PLGA group than in the TA group, although both contained less than 10% of the initial retention dose. This study shows that steroid-loaded PLGA tended to have higher steroid retention in tissue than the steroid itself at the first week after epidural injection. However, most of the steroids disappeared after 2 weeks in both groups.

Incidence of malignancy in adrenal nodules detected on staging CTs of patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of adrenal nodules detected on staging CT in patients with resectable colorectal cancer, and the proportion of patients with malignant nodules among them. METHODS: This retrospective study included 6474 patients (median age, 65; interquartile range, 56-73; 3902 men) who underwent staging CT for colorectal cancer between May 2003 and December 2018. The patients had potentially resectable colorectal cancer, including resectable hepatic or pulmonary metastases. Through retrospective CT image review, patients with adrenal nodules were identified for the prevalence of adrenal nodule. Among patients with adrenal nodules, per-patient proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer, and additional adrenal examinations (biopsy or imaging tests) were measured. A secondary analysis was performed using data from the official CT reports. RESULTS: The prevalence of adrenal nodules was 5.6% (363 of 6474; 95% CI: 5.1, 6.2). The proportions of malignant nodules and adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer were 0.8% (3 of 363; 0.2, 2.4) and 0.3% (1 of 363; 0.0, 1.5), respectively. 6.1% (22 of 363; 3.8, 9.0) of the patients underwent additional adrenal examination. According to official CT reports, the prevalence of adrenal nodules and proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer, and additional adrenal examination were 1.9% (125 of 6474; 1.6, 2.3), 1.6% (2 of 125; 0.2, 5.7), 0% (0 of 125; 0.0, 2.9), and 10.4% (1 of 125; 5.7, 17.1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adrenal nodules detected in staging CTs in patients with otherwise resectable colorectal cancers are rarely malignant. KEY POINTS: • Among 6474 patients who underwent staging CT and had potentially resectable colorectal cancer, 363 had adrenal nodules (≥ 10 mm) detected in retrospective CT image review. • Three out of the 363 patients with adrenal nodules detected on staging CT had malignant adrenal nodules, one of whom had metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Appendiceal Visualization on 2-mSv CT vs. Conventional-Dose CT in Adolescents and Young Adults with Suspected Appendicitis: An Analysis of Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial Data.

OBJECTIVE: We compared appendiceal visualization on 2-mSv CT vs. conventional-dose CT (median 7 mSv) in adolescents and young adults and analyzed the undesirable clinical and diagnostic outcomes that followed appendiceal nonvisualization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3074 patients aged 15-44 years (mean ± standard deviation, 28 ± 9 years; 1672 female) from 20 hospitals were randomized to the 2-mSv CT or conventional-dose CT group (1535 vs. 1539) from December 2013 through August 2016. A total of 161 radiologists from 20 institutions prospectively rated appendiceal visualization (grade 0, not identified; grade 1, unsure or partly visualized; and grade 2, clearly and entirely visualized) and the presence of appendicitis in these patients. The final diagnosis was based on CT imaging and surgical, pathologic, and clinical findings. We analyzed undesirable clinical or diagnostic outcomes, such as negative appendectomy, perforated appendicitis, more extensive than simple appendectomy, delay in patient management, or incorrect CT diagnosis, which followed appendiceal nonvisualization (defined as grade 0 or 1) and compared the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: In the 2-mSv CT and conventional-dose CT groups, appendiceal visualization was rated as grade 0 in 41 (2.7%) and 18 (1.2%) patients, respectively; grade 1 in 181 (11.8%) and 81 (5.3%) patients, respectively; and grade 2 in 1304 (85.0%) and 1421 (92.3%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, undesirable outcomes were rare in both groups. Compared to the conventional-dose CT group, the 2-mSv CT group had slightly higher rates of perforated appendicitis (1.1% [17] vs. 0.5% [7], p = 0.06) and false-negative diagnoses (0.4% [6] vs. 0.0% [0], p = 0.01) following appendiceal nonvisualization. Otherwise, these two groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: The use of 2-mSv CT instead of conventional-dose CT impairs appendiceal visualization in more patients. However, appendiceal nonvisualization on 2-mSv CT rarely leads to undesirable clinical or diagnostic outcomes.

Tumor resectability and response on CT following neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: inter-observer agreement study.

OBJECTIVES: First, to measure inter-observer agreement regarding tumor resectability and response, and second, to measure diagnostic performance in predicting negative resection margin, on re-staging CTs of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer from 2017 to 2020. Six readers independently evaluated initial staging and re-staging CT images. They categorized the resectability on re-staging CT based on the NCCN guideline, and evaluated tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy according to our proposed criteria on a 5-grade scale. For inter-observer agreement, Gwet's agreement coefficients were used. A crossed random effect model was used to pool the sensitivity and specificity of six readers in predicting negative resection margin. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with the median age of 66 (59-70) were included. The pooled agreement for tumor resectability was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.56-0.71) for differentiating the three categories, and 0.84 (0.77-0.91) for differentiating resectable or borderline resectable cancer vs. unresectable cancer. Agreement for tumor response grade was 0.89 (0.85-0.92). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting negative resection margin were 48% (43-52%) and 61% (57-64%), respectively, when only "resectable" on re-staging CT was considered as index test positive. When either "resectable"' or "borderline resectable" was considered as positive, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 91% (89-94%) and 5% (4-6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: CT can be used reliably with a high inter-observer agreement in selecting candidates for surgery after neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer. KEY POINTS: • On CT following neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer, six readers showed high agreement in differentiating resectable or borderline resectable vs. unresectable cancer (Gwet's coefficient, 0.84). • Inter-observer agreement was also high for our proposed tumor response grade (Gwet's coefficient, 0.89). • Specificity was very low (5%) while sensitivity was high (91%) when either resectable or borderline resectable cancer on re-staging CT was considered as predictive of negative resection margin status.

Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d') (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; -895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d' equivalent to that of FBP at full dose. RESULTS: The DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81-88%), 60% (46-67%), 76% (60-81%), and 87% (78-92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58-86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%). CONCLUSION: The dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths. KEY POINTS: • DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP.

Adrenal Nodules Detected at Staging CT in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancers Have a Low Incidence of Malignancy.

Background Guidelines recommending additional imaging for adrenal nodules lack relevant epidemiologic evidence. Purpose To measure the prevalence of adrenal nodules detected at staging CT in patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer and the proportion of patients with malignant nodules among them. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 10 250 consecutive patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 53-71 years; 6884 men) who underwent staging CT and had potentially resectable gastric cancer in a tertiary center (May 2003 to December 2018). All 10 250 CT studies were retrospectively reviewed, and patients with adrenal nodules (or thickening ≥10 mm) were identified to measure the prevalence of adrenal nodules. Among patients with adrenal nodules, the per-patient proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastasis from gastric cancer, and additional adrenal examinations were measured. A secondary analysis was performed by using data from the original CT reports. The same metrics that were used in the retrospective review were assessed. Results The prevalence of adrenal nodules was 4.5% (95% CI: 4.1, 4.9; 462 of 10 250). The proportions of malignant nodules and adrenal metastasis from gastric cancer were 0.4% ( 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6; two of 462) and 0% (95% CI: 0.0, 0.8; 0 of 462), respectively. A total of 27% of the patients (95% CI: 23, 31; 123 of 462) underwent additional adrenal examination. According to original CT reports, the prevalence of adrenal nodules and the proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastases from gastric cancer, and additional adrenal examination were 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4, 3.0; 272 of 10 250), 0.7% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; two of 272), 0% (95% CI: 0.0, 1.4; 0 of 272), and 42.6% (95% CI: 36.7, 48.8; 116 of 272), respectively. Conclusion Although adrenal nodules were detected frequently on staging CT images of patients with otherwise resectable gastric cancer, these nodules were rarely malignant. ©RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Baumgarten in this issue.

Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Treatment Response Assessment of Brain Metastases on 3D MRI.

BACKGROUND: Although accurate treatment response assessment for brain metastases (BMs) is crucial, it is highly labor intensive. This retrospective study aimed to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for automated BM detection and treatment response evaluation using deep learning. METHODS: We included 214 consecutive MRI examinations of 147 patients with BM obtained between January 2015 and August 2016. These were divided into the training (174 MR images from 127 patients) and test datasets according to temporal separation (temporal test set #1; 40 MR images from 20 patients). For external validation, 24 patients with BM and 11 patients without BM from other institutions were included (geographic test set). In addition, we included 12 MRIs from BM patients obtained between August 2017 and March 2020 (temporal test set #2). Detection sensitivity, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation, and agreements in one-dimensional and volumetric Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria between CAD and radiologists were assessed. RESULTS: In the temporal test set #1, the sensitivity was 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.6%, 79.9%), mean DSC was 0.69 ± 0.22, and false-positive (FP) rate per scan was 0.8 for BM ≥ 5 mm. Agreements in the RANO-BM criteria were moderate (κ, 0.52) and substantial (κ, 0.68) for one-dimensional and volumetric, respectively. In the geographic test set, sensitivity was 87.7% (95% CI: 77.2%, 94.5%), mean DSC was 0.68 ± 0.20, and FP rate per scan was 1.9 for BM ≥ 5 mm. In the temporal test set #2, sensitivity was 94.7% (95% CI: 74.0%, 99.9%), mean DSC was 0.82 ± 0.20, and FP per scan was 0.5 (6/12) for BM ≥ 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our CAD showed potential for automated treatment response assessment of BM ≥ 5 mm.

Diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of image-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy for subsolid pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) for subsolid pulmonary nodules and sources of heterogeneity among reported results. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries (until November 7, 2020) for studies measuring the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Bivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Pooled overall and major complication rates were calculated. RESULTS: We included 744 biopsies from 685 patients (12 studies). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB for subsolid nodules were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85-94%) and 99% (95% CI: 92-100%), respectively. Mean age above 65 years was the only covariate significantly associated with higher sensitivity (93% vs 85%, p = 0.04). Core needle biopsy showed marginally higher sensitivity than fine-needle aspiration (93% vs 83%, p = 0.07). Pooled overall and major complication rate of PTNB were 43% (95% CI: 25-62%) and 0.1% (95% CI: 0-0.4%), respectively. Major complication rate was not different between fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy groups (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: PTNB had acceptable performance and a low major complication rate in diagnosing subsolid pulmonary nodules. The only significant source of heterogeneity in reported sensitivities was a mean age above 65 years. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first meta-analysis attempting to systemically determine the cause of heterogeneity in the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules.

The feasibility of deep learning-based synthetic contrast-enhanced CT from nonenhanced CT in emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain.

Our objective was to investigate the feasibility of deep learning-based synthetic contrast-enhanced CT (DL-SCE-CT) from nonenhanced CT (NECT) in patients who visited the emergency department (ED) with acute abdominal pain (AAP). We trained an algorithm generating DL-SCE-CT using NECT with paired precontrast/postcontrast images. For clinical application, 353 patients from three institutions who visited the ED with AAP were included. Six reviewers (experienced radiologists, ER1-3; training radiologists, TR1-3) made diagnostic and disposition decisions using NECT alone and then with NECT and DL-SCE-CT together. The radiologists' confidence in decisions was graded using a 5-point scale. The diagnostic accuracy using DL-SCE-CT improved in three radiologists (50%, P = 0.023, 0.012, < 0.001, especially in 2/3 of TRs). The confidence of diagnosis and disposition improved significantly in five radiologists (83.3%, P < 0.001). Particularly, in subgroups with underlying malignancy and miscellaneous medical conditions (MMCs) and in CT-negative cases, more radiologists reported increased confidence in diagnosis (83.3% [5/6], 100.0% [6/6], and 83.3% [5/6], respectively) and disposition (66.7% [4/6], 83.3% [5/6] and 100% [6/6], respectively). In conclusion, DL-SCE-CT enhances the accuracy and confidence of diagnosis and disposition regarding patients with AAP in the ED, especially for less experienced radiologists, in CT-negative cases, and in certain disease subgroups with underlying malignancy and MMCs.

Erratum: Correction of Text in the Article "The Impact of COVID-19 on the Use of Radiology Resources in a Tertiary Hospital".

This corrects the article on p. e368 in vol. 35, PMID: 33075859.

Final diagnosis and patient disposition following equivocal results on 2-mSv CT vs. conventional-dose CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: a post hoc analysis of large pragmatic randomized trial data.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2-mSv CT and conventional-dose CT (CDCT, typically 7-8 mSv) regarding final diagnosis and patient disposition following equivocal CT results in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis. METHODS: In total, 3074 patients of 15-44 years (28 ± 9 years, 1672 women) from 20 hospitals were randomized to undergo contrast-enhanced 2-mSv CT (n = 1535) or CDCT (n = 1539) from December 2013 through August 2016. One hundred sixty-one radiologists prospectively rated the likelihood of appendicitis in a Likert scale (i.e., grades 1-5). The final diagnosis was based on CT image, surgical, pathologic, and clinical findings. Post hoc analysis was performed for final diagnosis, surgical procedure, and delay in patient management following equivocal results (i.e., grade 3). RESULTS: The 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups were comparable for final diagnosis following equivocal results, including confirmed appendicitis (1.2% [18 patients] vs. 1.2% [19], p > 0.99), negative appendectomy (0.1% [2] vs. 0.3% [4], p = 0.53), and perforated appendicitis (0.1% [1] vs. 0.2% [3], p = 0.53). More patients were confirmed as not having appendicitis following equivocal results in the CDCT group than in the 2-mSv CT group (2.2% [34] vs. 1.0% [16], p = 0.016). The two groups were comparable for the need of appendectomy (1.4% [22] vs. 1.5% [23], p > 0.99), need of additional imaging tests (0.7% [11] vs. 1.1% [17], p = 0.35), and delay in patient management following equivocal results. CONCLUSION: 2-mSv CT is comparable to CDCT regarding final diagnosis and patient disposition following equivocal CT results. KEY POINTS: • Our results strengthen evidence justifying the use of low-dose CT instead of conventional-dose CT (CDCT) in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis. • The 2-mSv CT and CDCT groups were comparable for final diagnosis following equivocal CT results, including confirmed appendicitis (1.2% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.99), negative appendectomy (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.53), and perforated appendicitis (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.53). • The two groups were comparable for the need for appendectomy (1.4% vs. 1.5%, p > 0.99), need for additional imaging tests (0.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.35), and delay in patient management, following equivocal CT results.