A Bottom-Up Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Method Development, Comparison With 2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods, and Evaluation of Anti-Drug Antibody Interference.

CONTEXT.­: Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize infliximab use and improve outcome in chronic inflammatory disorders. OBJECTIVE.­: To describe a simple and affordable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure infliximab in serum. DESIGN.­: Infliximab was measured using winged stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards. Linearity, lower limit of measuring interval, limit of detection, precision, accuracy, carryover, and ion suppression were evaluated. Method comparison against 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (Remsima Monitor and IDKmonitor Infliximab) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) interference were evaluated using clinical specimens from inflammatory bowel disease patients (N = 237). RESULTS.­: Analytical run time and sample preparation time were 5 minutes per sample and 3 hours per batch, respectively. Analytical measurement interval and limit of detection were 0.50 to 50.0 µg/mL (R2 = 0.998) and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday imprecision percentage coefficients of variation were less than 6.1%. Accuracy was 94.2% to 98.7%. No significant ion suppression or carryover was observed. Infliximab concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS showed good agreement with those measured by Remsima Monitor (mean percentage difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 12.6%) but were markedly lower than those measured by IDKmonitor (-32.6%; -35.8% to -29.4%), demonstrating significant bias between ELISAs. Although a good agreement between LC-MS/MS and ELISA was observed for ADA-negative samples (-3.5%; -12.8% to 5.9%), a significant bias was observed for ADA-positive samples (13.6%; 1.7% to 25.6%). CONCLUSIONS.­: This simple, fast, and affordable LC-MS/MS method for infliximab quantitation could improve standardization of infliximab quantitation and optimization of infliximab use in patients with high-titer ADA.

Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Quantification of Infliximab: Analytical and Clinical Performance Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) can improve treatment outcomes; however, the temporal gap between drug concentration monitoring and subsequent availability restricts its practical application. To address this issue, an automated monitoring method, AFIAS IFX, was developed to rapidly and accurately analyze IFX concentration in blood. The analytical and clinical performances of this method were assessed to establish its clinical utility. METHODS: The analytical performance of AFIAS IFX was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. For clinical validation, AFIAS IFX was compared with 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (LISA TRACKER, RIDASCREEN, and ImmunoGuide) using 100 consecutive samples from 28 patients treated with IFX. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the methods. RESULTS: The detection and quantification limits of AFIAS IFX were 0.12 and 0.20 mcg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, AFIAS IFX analyzed samples within 10 minutes for concentrations up to 50 mcg/mL, exhibiting reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤7.8%) and accuracy (recovery 98%-101%) with serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. Clinically, it exhibited a good correlation with the 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. For patients treated with Remicade (IFX), the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.001-1.259, with a mean difference of -1.48 to 0.28 mcg/mL. For patients treated with CT-P13, the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 0.974-1.254, with a mean difference of -2.44 to 0.15 mcg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: AFIAS IFX, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow assay, exhibited excellent performance in analyzing IFX trough levels and is a potentially powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical settings, with opportunities for further development.

Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for biliary atresia and results of policy changes: over 20 years of follow-up experience.

Objective: Biliary atresia (BA) patients develop chronic liver disease after the Kasai operation and are eventually indicated for liver transplantation (LT). The purposes of this study were to analyze long-term outcomes after LT and risk factors that affect complications to reduce graft failure. Study design: Overall, 145 pediatric patients who underwent LT between June 1996 and June 2020 after a diagnosis of BA were included. We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records and evaluated patient and graft survival, cumulative incidence of complications, risk factors, and the results of policy changes. Results: Patient and graft survival rates in over 20 years were 95.8% and 91.0%, respectively. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease was frequently observed in the early period of immunosuppression within the first 1-2 years after LT. The incidence of cholangitis and rejection steadily increased over time. Weight-to-portal vein size was evaluated as a risk factor for cholangitis and bile duct strictures (OR = 12.82, p = 0.006 and OR = 16.54, p = 0.015, respectively). When evaluated using 2013 as a reference point, the split graft indication was expanded and the group that received LT after 2013 had a significantly lower survival over time compared with that of the group that received LT before 2013 (p = 0.006). Conclusion: This study revealed time differences in prevalence of complications. The evaluation of weight-to-duct or vessel size is a more important factor in considering complications than the graft-to-recipient weight ratio. Survival outcomes may have been altered by a policy change that affects the donor type ratio in transplantation.