Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 51(3): 249-262, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25869743

RESUMO

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that requires a manifold approach to therapy. The goal of therapy is to restore the function of the epidermal barrier and to reduce skin inflammation. This can be achieved with skin moisturization and topical anti-inflammatory agents, such as topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Furthermore, proactive therapy with twice weekly use of both topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors in previously affected areas has been found to reduce the time to the next eczematous flare. Adjunctive treatment options include wet wrap therapy, anti-histamines, and vitamin D supplementation. Bacterial colonization, in particular Staphylococcus aureus, can contribute to eczematous flares and overt infection. Use of systemic antibiotics in infected lesions is warranted; however, empiric antibiotics use in uninfected lesions is controversial. Local antiseptic measures (i.e., bleach baths) and topical antimicrobial therapies can be considered in patients with high bacterial colonization. Difficult-to-treat AD is a complex clinical problem that may require re-evaluation of the initial diagnosis of AD, especially if the onset of disease occurs in adulthood. It may also necessitate evaluation for contact, food, and inhaled allergens that may exacerbate the underlying AD. There are a host of systemic therapies that have been successful in patients with difficult-to-treat AD, however, these agents are limited by their side effect profiles. Lastly, with further insight into the pathophysiology of AD, new biological agents have been investigated with promising results.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Eczema/terapia , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Calcineurina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite de Contato/terapia , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Gerenciamento Clínico , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/etiologia , Eczema/metabolismo , Epiderme/efeitos dos fármacos , Epiderme/imunologia , Epiderme/patologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Fototerapia/métodos
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol ; 26(4): 181-186, 2013 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24380018

RESUMO

The use of cellular phones has risen exponentially with over 300 million subscribers. Nickel has been detected in cell phones and reports of contact dermatitis attributable to metals are present in the literature. We determined nickel and cobalt content in popular cell phones in the United States. Adults (>18 years) who owned a flip phone, Blackberry®, or iPhone® were eligible. Seventy-two cell phones were tested using SmartPractice's® commercially available nickel and cobalt spot tests. Test areas included buttons, keypad, speakers, camera, and metal panels. Of the 72 cell phones tested, no iPhones or Droids® tested positive for nickel or cobalt. About 29.4% of Blackberrys [95% confidence interval (CI), 13%-53%] tested positive for nickel; none were positive for cobalt. About 90.5% of flip phones (95% CI, 70%-99%) tested positive for nickel and 52.4% of flip phones (95% CI, 32%-72%) tested positive for cobalt. Our study indicates that nickel and cobalt are present in popular cell phones. Patients with known nickel or cobalt allergy may consider their cellular phones as a potential source of exposure. Further studies are needed to examine whether there is a direct association with metal content in cell phones and the manifestation of metal allergy.

4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(12): 1213-5, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080661

RESUMO

We validated population-based hospital, emergency room, and physician claim databases for the detection of surgical site infections against the reference standard of clinical surveillance. Although these data sets are highly specific and could be used to define research cohorts, their low sensitivity and positive predictive value make them inadequate for use as quality indicators.


Assuntos
Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Registros Hospitalares/normas , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Algoritmos , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA