Effect of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit on Shoulder in Baseball Pitchers during Fastball Pitching.

Previous studies have reported that pitchers with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) may increase the risk of shoulder injury. However, limited information is available regarding the specific effects of GIRD in baseball pitching. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether baseball pitchers with GIRD change their pitching mechanism. Fifteen baseball pitchers with GIRD and 15 pitchers without GIRD were recruited from university or senior high-school teams. A three-dimensional motion analysis system (Eagle System, Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) was used to capture the pitching motion while performing fastball pitches. The kinematics and kinetics of the throwing shoulder and trunk were analyzed based on motion captured data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the differences of the analyzed parameters between two groups. At the instant of ball release, the GIRD group showed lower shoulder external rotation and trunk rotation, and larger shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, the GIRD group exhibited a significantly larger shoulder inferior force in the cocking and acceleration phase, and a significantly larger internal rotation torque in the acceleration phase. The present results suggested that pitchers with GIRD need stretch training to enlarge joint range of motion, and to improve trunk strength and flexibility to alleviate potential problems associated with pitching in GIRD pitchers.

Effects of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit on baseball pitching among pitchers of different ages.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) may increase the risk of shoulder injury. However, the effects of GIRD on baseball pitching among pitchers of different age groups are still unclear. METHODS: The study participants were 24 high school and 24 university pitchers. For each age group, the pitchers were evenly divided into a GIRD group and a normal group. The pitching motion of each participant was captured using a motion analysis system at a sampling frequency of 300 Hz. The kinematics and kinetics of the throwing shoulder and trunk were quantified, and statistical differences between the groups were examined by 2-sample t tests. RESULTS: For both age groups, significant differences were observed in shoulder external rotations of the GIRD and normal groups. Compared with the university pitchers in the normal group, the university pitchers with GIRD exhibited a greater shoulder loading and did more internal rotation work in the acceleration phase. The high school pitchers with GIRD showed a larger trunk tilt and less trunk rotation than the university pitchers with GIRD. However, the university pitchers with GIRD exhibited a larger shoulder posterior force and horizontal adduction torque than the high school pitchers with GIRD. CONCLUSION: Pitchers with GIRD do change their pitching motions, and the greater resulting shoulder joint loading predisposes them to a greater risk of shoulder injury, especially among university pitchers.

Elbow joint fatigue and bench-press training.

CONTEXT: Bench-press exercises are among the most common form of training exercise for the upper extremity because they yield a notable improvement in both muscle strength and muscle endurance. The literature contains various investigations into the effects of different bench-press positions on the degree of muscle activation. However, the effects of fatigue on the muscular performance and kinetics of the elbow joint are not understood fully. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of fatigue on the kinetics and myodynamic performance of the elbow joint in bench-press training. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: Motion research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 18 physically healthy male students (age = 19.6 ± 0.8 years, height = 168.7 ± 5.5 cm, mass = 69.6 ± 8.6 kg) participated in the investigation. All participants were right-hand dominant, and none had a history of upper extremity injuries or disorders. INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed bench-press training until fatigued. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maximal possible number of repetitions, cycle time, myodynamic decline rate, elbow-joint force, and elbow-joint moment. RESULTS: We observed a difference in cycle time in the initial (2.1 ± 0.42 seconds) and fatigue (2.58 ± 0.46 seconds) stages of the bench-press exercise (P = .04). As the participants fatigued, we observed an increase in the medial-lateral force (P = .03) and internal-external moment (P ≤ .04) acting on the elbow joint. Moreover, a reduction in the elbow muscle strength was observed in the elbow extension-flexion (P ≤ .003) and forearm supination-pronation (P ≤ .001) conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that performing bench-press exercises to the point of fatigue increases elbow-joint loading and may further increase the risk of injury. Therefore, when clinicians design bench-press exercise regimens for general athletic training, muscle strengthening, or physical rehabilitation, they should control carefully the maximal number of repetitions.

Effect of forearm axially rotated posture on shoulder load and shoulder abduction / flexion angles in one-armed arrest of forward falls.

BACKGROUND: Falling onto the outstretched hand is the most common cause of upper extremity injury. This study develops an experimental model for evaluating the shoulder load during a simulated forward fall onto one hand with three different forearm axially rotated postures, and examines the shoulder abduction angle and shoulder flexion angle in each case. METHODS: Fifteen healthy young male subjects with an average age of 23.7 years performed a series of one-armed arrests from a height of 5 cm onto a force plate. The kinematics and kinetics of the upper extremity were analyzed for three different forearm postures, namely 45° externally rotated, non-rotated, and 45° internally rotated. FINDINGS: The shoulder joint load and shoulder abduction/flexion angles were significantly dependent on the rotational posture of the forearm. The shoulder medio-lateral shear forces in the externally rotated group were found to be 1.61 and 2.94 times higher than those in the non-rotated and internally rotated groups, respectively. The shoulder flexion angles in the externally rotated, non-rotated and internally rotated groups were 0.6°, 8.0° and 19.2°, respectively, while the corresponding shoulder abduction angles were 6.1°, 34.1° and 46.3°, respectively. INTERPRETATION: In falls onto the outstretched hand, an externally rotated forearm posture should be avoided in order to reduce the medio-lateral shear force acting on the shoulder joint. In falls of this type, a 45° internally rotated forearm posture represents the most effective fall strategy in terms of minimizing the risk of upper extremity injuries.

Effect of various forearm axially rotated postures on elbow load and elbow flexion angle in one-armed arrest of a forward fall.

BACKGROUND: Falling onto the outstretched hand is a major cause of upper extremity injury. The overall objectives of this study were to develop an experimental model for elbow load during a simulated fall onto one-armed arrest using three different forearm axially rotated postures as alternative fall arrest strategies. Additionally, the relationship between the elbow flexion angle and different axially rotated postures were also investigated. METHODS: Fifteen healthy young male Taiwanese graduate students with an average age of 23 years were studied. Subjects performed a one-armed arrest of a 5 cm fall onto a force plate. Each subject fell onto the force plate with his forearm 45 degrees axial externally rotated (ER), non-rotated (NR), and 45 degrees axial internally rotated (IR) postures. Kinematics and kinetics of the upper extremity were calculated and analyzed by using laboratory-developed motion analysis procedures. FINDINGS: The valgus-varus shear forces in the ER group were 1.4 times greater than the NR group, and 2.7 times greater than the IR group. The elbow joint remained at almost full extension in the ER (3.9 degrees) group, while elbow flexion angle was observed in the NR (24.6 degrees) and IR (40.3 degrees) groups. INTERPRETATION: A fall onto the outstretched hand with an externally rotated forearm should be avoided in order to reduce excessive valgus-varus shear force on the elbow joint. Knowledge of elbow kinematics and kinetics during a forward fall with various forearm axially rotated posture may be helpful in preventing injuries.