The beneficial effect of probiotics in the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy: a pooled analysis of two probiotic trials (Probio-SK-003 and Probio-SK-005) led by Slovak Cooperative Oncology Group.

Background: Probiotics could decrease irinotecan-induced diarrhea due to the reduction of intestinal beta-d-glucuronidase activity. This study included a combined analysis of two clinical trials aimed to determine the effectiveness of the probiotics in the prophylaxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: This combined analysis included 46 patients with CRC enrolled in the Probio-SK-003 (NCT01410955) and 233 patients from Probio-SK-005 (NCT02819960) starting a new line of irinotecan-based therapy with identical eligibility criteria. Patients were randomized in a ratio 1:1 to probiotic formulas vs. placebo administered for 12 and 6 weeks, respectively. Due to the different durations of study treatments, only the first 6 weeks of therapy were used for analysis. Results: In total, 279 patients were randomized, including 142 patients in the placebo and 137 participants in the probiotic arm. Administration of probiotics did not significantly reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea compared to placebo (placebo 12.7% vs. probiotics 6.6%, p = 0.11). Neither the overall incidence of diarrhea (placebo 48.6% vs. probiotics 41.6%, p = 0.28) nor the incidence of enterocolitis (placebo 4.2% vs. probiotics 0.7%, p = 0.12) was different in the placebo vs. probiotic arm. However, subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a colostomy who received a placebo had a significantly higher incidence of any diarrhea (placebo 51.2% vs. probiotics 25.7%, p = 0.028) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (placebo 14.6% vs. probiotics 0.0%, p = 0.03) compared to the probiotic arm. Conclusions: This combined analysis suggests that probiotics could be beneficial in the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy.

Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase III study of prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by a probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium BB-12®Lactobacillus rhamnosus LGG® in colorectal cancer patients.

Background: The incidence of irinotecan-induced diarrhea varies between 60-90%, by which the incidence of severe diarrhea is 20-40%. The objective of this phase III trial was to determine the effectiveness of the probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium, BB-12® and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, LGG® in the prophylaxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in metastatic colorectal cancer patients due to a reduction in the activity of intestinal beta-D-glucuronidase. Methods: From March 2016 to May 2022, a total of 242 patients with colorectal cancer starting a new line of irinotecan-based therapy were registered to the study in 11 cancer centers in Slovakia. Patients were randomized in a ratio 1:1 to probiotic formula vs. placebo that was administered for 6 weeks. Each capsule of Probio-Tec® BG-Vcap-6.5 contained 2.7x109 colony-forming units (CFU) of 2 lyophilized probiotic strains Bifidobacterium, BB-12® (50%) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, LGG® (50%). Results: Administration of probiotics compared to placebo was not associated with a significant reduction of grade 3/4 diarrhea (placebo arm 11.8% vs. probiotic arm 7.9%, p=0.38). Neither the overall incidence of diarrhea (46.2% vs. 41.2%, p=0.51) nor the incidence of enterocolitis (3.4% vs. 0.9%, p=0.37) was different in the placebo vs. probiotic arm. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with colostomy had higher incidence of any diarrhea and grade 3/4 diarrhea in the placebo arm compared to the probiotic arm (48.5% vs. 22.2%, p=0.06 and 15.2% vs. 0%, p=0.06, respectively). Moreover, patients on probiotic arm had significantly better diarrhea-free survival (HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.18 - 0.95, p=0.05) and needed less loperamide (p=0.01) compared to patients on placebo arm. We did not observe any infection caused by probiotic strains used in this study. Conclusion: This study failed to achieve its primary endpoint, and results suggest a lack of benefit of administered probiotic formula for the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea. However, subgroup analysis suggests a possible benefit in patients with colostomy.

Levels of NT­proBNP in patients with cancer.

At present, it is well known that natriuretic peptides may be produced by cancer cells. Stimulation of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) synthesis may be a reaction to activity of several proinflammatory cytokines. NT-proBNP is also a marker of myocardial damage during cardiotoxic chemotherapy by anthracyclines. The present study aimed to analyze the association between NT-proBNP and patient/disease characteristics in patients without cardiac symptoms. The present clinical study included 112 patients with cancer who were undergoing anticancer therapy between December 2017 and December 2021. From each patient, peripheral blood was obtained for detection of NT-proBNP before any therapy, after therapy and 1 year after the first sample. NT-proBNP was examined using an immunochemical method. The mean ± SEM value of NT-pro-BNP in the first, second and third sample was 561.0±75.1, 1,565.4±461.1 and 1,940.7±581.1 ng/l. A total of 15 (13.4%), 27 (24.1%) and 25 (30.1%) patients had elevated levels of NT-pro-BNP in the first, second and third sample above the normal value adjusted to age. It was observed that NT-proBNP was increased in older patients and in patients with progressive metastatic disease with poor prognosis. Patients with non-elevated NT-proBNP in the second and third sample had significantly improved OS compared with patients with elevated NT-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P=0.002 for the second sample; and HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P=0.0000007, for the third sample]. The baseline NT-proBNP value was not prognostic for OS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.50-1.92; P=0.96). The present results suggest that the level of NT-proBNP was associated with the extent of oncologic disease. Higher levels were associated with progression of metastatic disease and shorter overall survival.

Levels of NT-proBNP and Troponin T in Cancer Patients - Mini-Review.

BACKGROUND: Natriuretic factors are peptidic substances produced by atrial and ventricular myocardium. Primary stimulus to the synthesis of these factors is intramural pressure of atriums by the increase of venous return during intravascular hypervolemia. They may serve as useful cardiac markers in clinical practice. The elevation of N-terminal fragment of atrial natriuretic peptide is characteristic for cardiac failure. Troponin T is a basic component of muscle and is specific for myocardial cell. It is a marker of myocardial damage, specifically of myocardial infarction. PURPOSE: This paper aims to summarize the current knowledge on levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and their associations with cancer. At present, it is well known that natriuretic peptides may be produced by cancer cells without cardiac failure. While small cell lung cancer is a known producer of natriuretic factor, all oncologic diseases may have a potential to produce these substances. ProBNP synthesis may be stimulated by several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumour necrosis factor alpha and some interleukins. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines has been proven in cancer. The influence of natriuretic factors to proto-oncogenes and cancer cells is considered and cross-reacting antibodies increasing NT-proBNP in paraproteinemias were described. Works discussing extreme elevations of NT-proBNP in terminal cancer patients without symptoms of cardiac failure were previously published. NT-proBNP and troponin T are also markers of myocardial damage during cardiotoxic chemotherapy with anthracyclines. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP and troponin T can be valuable markers of the prognosis of oncologic diseases regarding not only cardiac damage during chemotherapy but also prognosis and extension of cancer patient lives.

Thermal decomposition of mixed calcium oxalate hydrates - kinetic deconvolution of complex heterogeneous processes.

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TG) and in situ XRD were used to study dehydration and consequent decomposition reactions of mixed calcium oxalate hydrates. As the complex dehydration kinetics exhibited certain trends with respect to the applied heating rate, the modified multivariate kinetic analysis approach (based on averaged curve-by-curve optimizations) was employed to obtain a full kinetic description of the data. The Sesták-Berggren equation was used to model the two consequent dehydration reactions. Good agreement was found between the kinetic parameters calculated from the DSC and TG data - approximate values of activation energies were 68 and 81 kJ mol-1 for the trihydrate → monohydrate and monohydrate → anhydride transformations, respectively. A procedural methodology was developed to predict both dehydration kinetics and hydrate content ratios. For the calcium oxalate decomposition the TG technique provided very precise single-step prediction with an activation energy of 180 kJ mol-1. DSC on the other hand provided complex information on joint decomposition and carbon monoxide oxidation reactions - the proposed reaction mechanism includes completion of two reaction paths composed of consequent chemical reactions. A mechanistic view of the complex reaction path is discussed in terms of the diffusion barrier limiting the oxidation step.

Prevention of irinotecan induced diarrhea by probiotics: A randomized double blind, placebo controlled pilot study.

PURPOSE: Diarrhea is one of the dose limiting toxicity of irinotecan. SN-38 is main irinotecan metabolite responsible for diarrhea development, which is excreted in glucuronidated form into the intestine. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the probiotics in the prevention of irinotecan induced diarrhea due to reduction of intestinal beta-d-glucuronidase activity. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2013, 46 patients with colorectal cancer starting a new line of irinotecan based therapy were included. Patients were randomized 1:1 to probiotics (PRO) or placebo (PLA). Probiotic formula Colon Dophilus™, was administered at a dose of 10×10(9)CFU of bacteria tid, orally for 12 weeks of chemotherapy. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual, when 46 of 220 planned patients were accrued. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were randomized to PRO and 23 patients to PLA. Administration of probiotics compared to placebo led to a reduction in the incidence of severe diarrhea of grade 3 or 4 (0% for PRO vs. 17.4% for PLA, p=0.11), as well as reduction of the overall incidence of diarrhea (39.1% for PRO vs. 60.9% for PLA, p=0.24) and incidence of enterocolitis (0% for PRO vs. 8.7% for PLA). Patients on PRO used less antidiarrheal drugs compared to PLA. There was no infection caused by probiotic strains recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of probiotics in patients with colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy is safe and could lead to a reduction in the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal toxicity.