RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The prognosis for stroke patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains poorly understood. We examined the risk of mortality and stroke recurrence in stroke patients with T2DM and stroke patients without diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study including all patients diagnosed with a first-time ischemic stroke (n = 131,594) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH, n = 15,492) in Denmark, 2005-2021. Patients with T2DM were identified using hospital diagnosis codes and glucose-lowering drug prescriptions. We calculated risks, risk differences, and risk ratios, standardized by age, sex, and calendar year of stroke admission. RESULTS: Following ischemic stroke, the 5-year standardized mortality was 46.1% for patients with T2DM and 35.4% for patients without diabetes (standardized risk difference: 10.7% [95% CI 9.9-11.6]; risk ratio: 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.3]). The 5-year risk of recurrence following ischemic stroke was 12.7% for patients with T2DM and 11.3% for those without diabetes (risk difference: 1.4% [95% CI 0.9-2.0]; risk ratio: 1.1 [95% CI 1.1-1.2]). Following ICH, the 5-year mortality was 62.8% for patients with T2DM and 53.0% for patients without diabetes (risk difference: 9.8% [95% CI 7.2-12.4)]; risk ratio: 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.2]). The 5-year risk of recurrence after ICH was 9.1% for patients with T2DM and 9.7% for patients without diabetes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Stroke patients with T2DM were at increased risk of mortality. The risk of stroke recurrence was slightly higher for ischemic stroke patients with T2DM than patients without diabetes, while no difference was observed among ICH patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elevated triglyceride levels are a clinically useful marker of remnant cholesterol. It is unknown whether triglycerides are associated with residual cardiovascular risk in CVD-naïve patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), who are already on statin therapy. We aimed to assess the association between triglyceride levels and risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in statin-treated patients with newly diagnosed T2DM managed in routine clinical care. METHODS: This cohort study included newly diagnosed T2DM patients without a previous diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in Northern Denmark during 2005-2017. Individual triglyceride levels while on statin treatment were assessed within 1 year after T2DM diagnosis. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiac death (MACE). Patients were followed from one year after T2DM diagnosis until 30 April 2021, MACE, emigration, or death. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 27,080 statin-treated patients with T2DM (median age 63 years; 53% males), triglyceride levels were < 1.0 mmol/L in 17%, 1.0-1.9 mmol/L in 52%, 2.0-2.9 mmol/L in 20%, and ≥ 3.0 mmol/L in 11%. During follow-up, 1,957 incident MACE events occurred (11.0 per 1000 person-years). Compared with triglyceride levels < 1.0 mmol/L, confounder-adjusted HRs for incident MACE were 1.14 (95% CI 1.00-1.29) for levels between 1.0 and 1.9 mmol/L, 1.30 (95% CI 1.12-1.51) for levels between 2.0 and 2.9 mmol/L, and 1.44 (95% CI 1.20-1.73) for levels ≥ 3.0 mmol/L. This association was primarily driven by higher rates of myocardial infarction and cardiac death and attenuated only slightly after additional adjustment for LDL cholesterol. Spline analyses confirmed a linearly increasing risk of MACE with higher triglyceride levels. Stratified analyses showed that the associations between triglyceride levels and MACE were stronger among women. CONCLUSIONS: In statin-treated patients with newly diagnosed T2DM, triglyceride levels are associated with MACE already from 1.0 mmol/L. This suggests that high triglyceride levels are a predictor of residual cardiovascular risk in early T2DM and could be used to guide allocation of additional lipid-lowering therapies for CVD prevention.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Infarto do Miocárdio , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Triglicerídeos , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Morte , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome components may cumulatively increase the risk of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, driven by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. We investigated the prevalence of DPN in three T2DM subgroups based on indices of ß-cell function and insulin sensitivity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We estimated ß-cell function (HOMA2-B) and insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-S) in 4,388 Danish patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. Patients were categorized into subgroups of hyperinsulinemic (high HOMA2-B, low HOMA2-S), classical (low HOMA2-B, low HOMA2-S), and insulinopenic (low HOMA2-B, high HOMA2-S) T2DM. After a median follow-up of 3 years, patients filled the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq) to identify DPN (score ≥ 4). We used Poisson regression to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for DPN, and spline models to examine the association with HOMA2-B and HOMA2-S. RESULTS: A total of 3,397 (77%) patients filled in the MNSIq. The prevalence of DPN was 23% among hyperinsulinemic, 16% among classical, and 14% among insulinopenic patients. After adjusting for demographics, diabetes duration and therapy, lifestyle behaviors, and metabolic syndrome components (waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and HbA1c), the PR of DPN was 1.35 (95% CI 1.15-1.57) for the hyperinsulinemic compared with the classical patients. In spline analyses, we observed a linear relation of higher DPN prevalence with increasing HOMA2-B, independent of both metabolic syndrome components and HOMA2-S. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperinsulinemia marked by high HOMA2-B is likely an important risk factor for DPN beyond metabolic syndrome components and insulin resistance. This should be considered when developing interventions to prevent DPN.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatias Diabéticas , Resistência à Insulina , Síndrome Metabólica , Polineuropatias , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , Prevalência , Neuropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/complicaçõesRESUMO
Objective: Hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes is caused by varying degrees of two defects: low insulin sensitivity and beta-cell dysfunction. We assessed if subgrouping of patients into three pathophysiological phenotypes according to these defects could identify individuals with high or low risk of future cardiovascular events. Design: This is a prospective cohort study. Methods: We assessed estimates of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function from the homeostasis model assessment-2 in 4209 individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes enrolled from general practitioners and outpatient clinics in Denmark. Individuals were followed for a composite cardiovascular endpoint (either atherosclerotic outcomes (myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke, coronary or peripheral revascularization), heart failure, or cardiovascular death) and all-cause mortality. Results: Totally 417 individuals with the insulinopenic phenotype (high insulin sensitivity and low beta-cell function) had substantially lower risk of cardiovascular events (5-year cumulative incidence: 4.6% vs 10.1%; age-/sex-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.82) compared with 2685 individuals with the classical phenotype (low insulin sensitivity and low beta-cell function), driven by atherosclerotic events. Conversely, 1107 individuals with the hyperinsulinaemic phenotype (low insulin sensitivity and high beta-cell function) had more cardiovascular events (5-year cumulative incidence: 12.6%; aHR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05-1.69), primarily driven by increased heart failure and cardiovascular death and increased all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Simple phenotyping based on insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function predicts distinct future risks of cardiovascular events and death in patients with type 2 diabetes. These results suggest that precision medicine according to underlying type 2 pathophysiology potentially can reduce diabetes complications.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Resistência à Insulina , Infarto do Miocárdio , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fenótipo , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A Swedish data-driven cluster study identified four distinct type 2 diabetes (T2D) clusters, based on age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and homeostatic model assessment 2 (HOMA2) estimates of insulin resistance and beta-cell function. A Danish study proposed three T2D phenotypes (insulinopenic, hyperinsulinemic, and classical) based on HOMA2 measures only. We examined these two new T2D classifications using the Danish Centre for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 3529 individuals, we first performed a k-means cluster analysis with a forced k-value of four to replicate the Swedish clusters: severe insulin deficient (SIDD), severe insulin resistant (SIRD), mild age-related (MARD), and mild obesity-related (MOD) diabetes. Next, we did an analysis open to alternative k-values (ie, data determined the optimal number of clusters). Finally, we compared the data-driven clusters with the three Danish phenotypes. RESULTS: Compared with the Swedish findings, the replicated Danish SIDD cluster included patients with lower mean HbA1c (86 mmol/mol vs 101 mmol/mol), and the Danish MOD cluster patients were less obese (mean BMI 32 kg/m2 vs 36 kg/m2). Our data-driven alternative k-value analysis suggested the optimal number of T2D clusters in our data to be three, rather than four. When comparing the four replicated Swedish clusters with the three proposed Danish phenotypes, 81%, 79%, and 69% of the SIDD, MOD, and MARD patients, respectively, fitted the classical T2D phenotype, whereas 70% of SIRD patients fitted the hyperinsulinemic phenotype. Among the three alternative data-driven clusters, 60% of patients in the most insulin-resistant cluster constituted 76% of patients with a hyperinsulinemic phenotype. CONCLUSION: Different HOMA2-based approaches did not classify patients with T2D in a consistent manner. The T2D classes characterized by high insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia appeared most distinct.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Resistência à Insulina , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Insulina , Insulina Regular HumanaRESUMO
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To examine the prevalence of falls and fractures, and the association with symptoms of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed questionnaire on neuropathy symptoms and falls was sent to 6,726 patients enrolled in the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort (median age 65 years, diabetes duration 4.6 years). Complete data on fractures and patient characteristics were ascertained from population-based health registries. We defined possible DPN as a score ≥4 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instruments questionnaire. Using Poisson regression analyses, we estimated the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of falls and fractures, comparing patients with and without DPN. RESULTS: In total, 5,359 patients (80%) answered the questions on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instruments questionnaire and falls. Within the year preceding the questionnaire response, 17% (n = 933) reported at least one fall and 1.4% (n = 76) suffered from a fracture. The prevalence ratio of falls was substantially increased in patients with possible DPN compared with those without (aPR 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-2.63). The prevalence ratio increased with the number of falls from aPR 1.51 (95% CI 1.22-1.89) for one fall to aPR 5.89 (95% CI 3.84-9.05) for four or more falls within the preceding year. Possible DPN was associated with a slightly although non-significantly increased risk of fractures (aPR 1.32, 95% CI 0.75-2.33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes and symptoms of DPN had a highly increased risk of falling. These results emphasize the need for preventive interventions to reduce fall risk among patients with type 2 diabetes and possible DPN.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Neuropatias Diabéticas/complicações , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) can be classified based on fiber diameter into three subtypes: small fiber neuropathy (SFN), large fiber neuropathy (LFN), and mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN). We examined the effect of different diagnostic models on the frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes in type 2 diabetes patients with DPN. This study was based on patients from the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort. We defined DPN as probable or definite DPN according to the Toronto Consensus Criteria. DPN was then subtyped according to four distinct diagnostic models. A total of 277 diabetes patients (214 with DPN and 63 with no DPN) were included in the study. We found a considerable variation in polyneuropathy subtypes by applying different diagnostic models independent of the degree of certainty of DPN diagnosis. For probable and definite DPN, the frequency of subtypes across diagnostic models varied from: 1.4% to 13.1% for SFN, 9.3% to 21.5% for LFN, 51.4% to 83.2% for MFN, and 0.5% to 14.5% for non-classifiable neuropathy (NCN). For the definite DPN group, the frequency of subtypes varied from: 1.6% to 13.5% for SFN, 5.6% to 20.6% for LFN, 61.9% to 89.7% for MFN, and 0.0% to 6.3% for NCN. The frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes depends on the type and number of criteria applied in a diagnostic model. Future consensus criteria should clearly define sensory functions to be tested, methods of testing, and how findings should be interpreted for both clinical practice and research purpose.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico , Polineuropatias/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neuropatia de Pequenas Fibras/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca , Neuropatias Diabéticas/classificação , Neuropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Humanos , Polineuropatias/classificação , Polineuropatias/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Neuropatia de Pequenas Fibras/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome is the most common cause of acute flaccid paresis in childhood. Few validated large-scale population-based data are available concerning pediatric Guillain-Barré syndrome, including incidence, risk factors, and initial clinical characteristics. METHODS: In the Danish National Patient Registry, we identified all children aged below 16 years (N = 212) diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome and admitted to any Danish department of pediatrics between 1987 and 2016. A total of 145 (68%) medical files could be retrieved and reviewed, enabling classification of patients with true Guillain-Barré syndrome. The nationwide Guillain-Barré syndrome incidence rate was calculated and stratified by age, gender, time periods, and season. Risk factors and initial Guillain-Barré syndrome characteristics were assessed by medical record review. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of Guillain-Barré syndrome diagnosis codes was 86%. The crude Guillain-Barré syndrome incidence rate was 0.69 per 100,000 person years and peaked at two years of age. The incidence rate was higher among men (0.80) than women (0.58) and was relatively stable over the 30-year period. No seasonal difference of the incidence rate was found. Of the 125 Guillain-Barré syndrome cases, 63% were preceded by infection, whereas none were preceded by surgery or malignant disease. Medically treated pain was documented in 70%, mainly confined to the lower extremities. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric Guillain-Barré syndrome diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry have high validity, the incidence peaks at age two years, and is preceded by infection in two-thirds of children. Lower extremity pain is a common clinical presentation in the acute setting.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiologia , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Most studies of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and painful DPN are conducted in persons with longstanding diabetes. This cross-sectional study aimed to estimate the prevalence of DPN and painful DPN, important risk factors, and the association with mental health in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. A total of 5514 (82%) patients (median diabetes duration 4.6 years) enrolled in the Danish Centre for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort responded to a detailed questionnaire on neuropathy and pain. A score ≥4 on the MNSI questionnaire determined possible DPN, whereas pain presence in both feet together with a score ≥3 on the DN4 questionnaire determined possible painful DPN. The prevalence of possible DPN and possible painful DPN was 18% and 10%, respectively. Female sex, age, diabetes duration, body mass index, and smoking were associated with possible DPN, whereas only smoking showed a clear association with possible painful DPN (odds ratio 1.52 [95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.93]). Possible DPN and painful DPN were independently and additively associated with lower quality of life, poorer sleep, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Possible DPN itself had greater impact on mental health than neuropathic pain. This large study emphasizes the importance of careful screening for DPN and pain early in the course of type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Neuralgia/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/psicologia , Medição da Dor/psicologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Purpose: We examined whether diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and diabetic foot ulcers in type 2 diabetes can be accurately identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision discharge diagnosis codes, surgery codes, and drug prescription codes. Methods: We identified all type 2 diabetes patients in the Central Denmark region, 2009-2016, who had ≥1 primary/secondary diagnosis code of "diabetes with neurological complication" (E10.4-E14.4), "diabetic polyneuropathy" (G63.2), or "polyneuropathy, unspecified" (G62.9). Patients with potential painful DPN and non-painful DPN were identified based on prescription history for serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, or gabapentinoids. Likewise, type 2 diabetes patients with potential foot ulcers were identified based on diagnosis or surgery codes. We used medical record review as the reference standard and calculated positive predictive values (PPVs). Results: Of 53 randomly selected patients with potential painful DPN, 38 were classified as having DPN when validated against medical records; of these, 18 also had neuropathic pain, yielding a PPV of 72% (95% CI: 58-83%) for DPN and 34% (95% CI: 22-48%) for painful DPN. Likewise, among 54 randomly selected patients with potential non-painful DPN, 30 had DPN based on medical record data; of these, 27 had non-painful DPN, yielding PPVs of 56% (95% CI: 41-69%) and 50% (95% CI: 36-64%), respectively. Secondary E-chapter codes often denoted stroke or mononeuropathies, rather than DPN. Excluding secondary E-chapter codes from the algorithm increased the PPV for DPN to 78% (95% CI: 63-89%) for the painful DPN cohort and to 74% (95% CI: 56-87%) for the non-painful DPN cohort. Of 53 randomly selected patients with potential diabetic foot ulcer, only 18 diagnoses were confirmed; PPV=34% (95% CI: 22-48%). Conclusion: G-chapter and primary E-chapter diagnosis codes can detect type 2 diabetes patients with hospital-diagnosed DPN, and may be useful in epidemiological research. In contrast, our diabetic foot ulcer algorithm did not perform well.
RESUMO
Purpose: To validate the diagnostic codes for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Secondly, to examine 30-year trends in the incidence of GBS in Denmark. Patients and methods: We used the DNPR to identify all patients aged 16 and above diagnosed with a primary GBS diagnosis at any Danish department of neurology between 1987 and 2016. Medical files were reviewed according to the clinical criteria of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Committee and classified according to the Brighton criteria. The incidence rate (IR) was calculated based on data from 1987 to 2016 and stratified by season, gender, and age. Results: Over 30 years, we identified 2,319 patients aged 16 and above in the DNPR. From a validation cohort of 573 patients, we were able to retrieve 425 (74.2%) medical files; 356 GBS diagnoses were confirmed. The overall positive predictive value was 83.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.0-87.0). In 99% of the confirmed patients, the Brighton criteria level 1-3 for GBS were met. The IR was fairly stable over 30 years at 1.77 per 100,000 person years (95% CI: 1.70-1.84). The incidence was higher in the winter season (IR ratio compared with summer: 1.18 (95% CI: 1.09-1.29)), and was strongly associated with male gender (IR ratio vs females: 1.44 (95% CI: 1.33-1.57)). IRs rose with age at diagnosis, particularly after the age of 50 in both men and women and a minor peak was observed for total IR in young adults. Conclusion: Primary diagnostic codes for GBS at Danish departments of neurology have high validity. The DNPR is a well-suited data source for epidemiological research on GBS. The Danish nationwide 30-year GBS IR is stable over time and similar to GBS IRs reported in other European and North American populations.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to provide a detailed description of the ongoing nationwide Danish Centre for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes (DD2) project cohort and biobank. The DD2 cohort continuously enrols newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) throughout Denmark. The overall goal of the DD2 project is to establish a large and data-rich T2D cohort that can serve as a platform for exhaustive T2D research including (1) improved genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of T2D, (2) intervention studies of more individualised T2D treatment, (3) pharmacoepidemiological studies and (4) long-term follow-up studies on predictors of T2D complications and prognosis. PARTICIPANTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 7011 individuals with T2D have been enrolled and assessed at baseline. Information collected include interview data (eg, body weight at age 20 years, physical activity and alcohol consumption), clinical examination data (eg, hip-waist ratio and resting heart rate) and biological samples (whole blood, DNA, plasma and urine) stored at -80°C and currently analysed for a range of biomarkers and genotypes. FINDINGS TO DATE: Registry linkage has provided extensive supplemental continuous data on glycosylated haemoglobin A, lipids, albuminuria, blood pressure, smoking habits, body mass index, primary care contacts, hospital diagnoses and procedures, medication use, cancer and mortality. Cross-sectional associations between biomarkers, family history, anthropometric and lifestyle measures and presence of complications at baseline have been reported. FUTURE PLANS: During 2016, a detailed follow-up questionnaire has been answered by 85% of initial participants, providing follow-up information on baseline variables and on presence of diabetic neuropathy. The DD2 cohort has now been followed for a total of 18 862 person-years, and nested intervention trials and follow-up studies are ongoing. In the future, the cohort will serve as a strong national and international resource for recruiting patients to nested case studies, clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance, large-scale genome studies and follow-up studies of T2D complications.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine nationwide population-based time trends in the utilization of all glucose-lowering drugs in Denmark from 1999 to 2014. METHODS: Based on nationwide data from the Register of Medicinal Products Statistics, we retrieved sales statistics on glucose-lowering drugs and reported the total number of users and the prevalence of users per 1,000 inhabitants in 1-year intervals for all glucose-lowering drug classes. RESULTS: The annual prevalence of glucose-lowering drug users increased more than twofold from 19 per 1,000 inhabitants in 1999 (n=98,362) to 41 per 1,000 in 2014 (n=233,230). Metformin use increased more than sevenfold during the period and was used by 30 of 1,000 inhabitants in 2014, while the prevalence of insulin use increased 1.8-fold to 13 per 1,000 in 2014. After peaking in 2007, use of sulfonylurea halved to 6 per 1,000 in 2014. Newer drug classes including the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors, and the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors had reached a considerable position by 2014, with 4 per 1,000, 6 per 1,000, and 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitants, respectively; however, the use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in elderly people remained low. Thiazolidinediones decreased to virtually no use (0.03 per 1,000) in 2014. CONCLUSION: The use of glucose-lowering drugs has doubled during 1999-2014. The pattern of glucose-lowering drug use has changed substantially reflecting the recommendations of metformin as first-line treatment. The newer glucose-lowering drug classes have been well received.
RESUMO
AIM: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has long been regarded as a marker of underlying malignancy in the general population. Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of developing VTE, but it is unclear whether VTE in diabetes patients is also a harbinger of occult cancer. METHODS: From Danish medical health databases, we identified all diabetes patients (N=8783) with a first-time diagnosis of VTE during 1978-2011. We followed the patients until a first-time diagnosis of cancer, emigration, death, or study end, whichever came first. We calculated one-year absolute cancer risk and overall and site-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancer based on national cancer incidence. RESULTS: During the total study period 878 cancers were observed. The one-year absolute cancer risk was 4.1% and the corresponding SIR was 3.28 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.94-3.64). The highest SIRs were observed for cancers of the gallbladder and biliary tract (SIR 13.59; 6.77-24.31), the pancreas (SIR 10.16; 6.85-14.50), the ovary (SIR 9.85; 5.63-16.00), and the liver (SIR 9.39; 4.30-17.84). After the first year of follow-up, the overall cancer SIR associated with VTE and diabetes decreased to 1.05 (95% CI: 0.97-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: VTE may be a marker of underlying cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Angiopatias Diabéticas/complicações , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/complicações , Neoplasias das Glândulas Endócrinas/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/epidemiologia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Endócrinas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Bisphosphonate use has been associated with increased risk of fatal stroke. We examined the association between preadmission use of oral bisphosphonates and 30-day mortality following hospitalization for stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using medical databases and identified all patients in Denmark with a first-time hospitalization for stroke between 1 July 2004 and 31 December 2012 (N=100,043). Cox regression was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios as a measure of 30-day mortality rate ratios (MRRs) associated with bisphosphonate current use (prescription filled within 90 days prior to the stroke) or recent use (prescription filled in the 90-180 days prior to the stroke). Current use was further classified as new or long-term use. RESULTS: We found 51,982 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), 11,779 with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), 4,528 with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and 31,754 with unspecified stroke. Absolute 30-day mortality risks were increased among current vs nonusers of bisphosphonates for AIS (11.9% vs 8.5%), ICH (43.2% vs 34.5%), SAH (40.3% vs 23.2%), and unspecified strokes (18.8% vs 14.0%). However, in adjusted analyses, current bisphosphonate use did not increase 30-day mortality from AIS (MRR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 1.01); ICH (MRR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.23); SAH (MRR, 1.15; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.61); or unspecified stroke (MRR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09). Likewise, no association with mortality was found for recent use. Adjusted analyses by type of bisphosphonate showed increased mortality following stroke among new users of etidronate (MRR, 1.40; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.93) and reduced mortality after AIS among current users of alendronate (MRR, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.02). CONCLUSION: We found no overall evidence that preadmission bisphosphonate use increases 30-day mortality following stroke.