RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gross total resection of neuroblastoma is associated with lymphatic leaks that can delay postoperative resumption of treatment. To prevent postoperative lymphatic leak, we introduced systematic lymphatic repair (SLR), which involved oversewing the entire edge of the disrupted lymphatic plane after neuroblastoma resection. We sought to study the impact of SLR on postoperative lymphatic leak and time to return to treatment. METHODS: We reviewed 60 neuroblastoma patients who underwent gross total resection at KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Patient, disease, and operative factors were correlated with surgical drainage, treatment delay and length of stay (LOS). Among patients with sufficient records, the interaction between variables associated with drainage, delay and LOS outcomes were compared in 14 patients who had SLR versus 35 historical controls who had targeted lymphatic repair (TLR). RESULTS: Postoperative drain duration and volume were significantly higher in tumors with ≥2 image-derived risk factors (IDRFs, P = 0.005 and P = 0.013, respectively) or vessel encasement (P = 0.031 and P = 0.024, respectively). Longer LOS was significantly associated with ≥2 IDRFs (P = 0.006). All forms of suture repair of lymphatics and use of Tachosil™ were associated with significantly longer postoperative drain duration (P < 0.05); the former was also associated with significantly higher total drain volume (P < 0.05) - indicating appropriate use of these adjuncts in patients at risk of chyle leak. In patients who had suture repair of lymphatics, SLR was significantly associated with reduced postoperative interval to chemotherapy resumption (P = 0.014, two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSION: A systematic approach to repair of lymphatic channels following neuroblastoma resection can significantly reduce time to postoperative resumption of treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical Research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of cap polyposis in the pediatric population. METHODS: All pediatric patients with histologically proven diagnosis of cap polyposis were identified from our endoscopy and histology database over a 12 year period from 2000-2012 at our tertiary pediatric center, KK Women's and Children's Hospital in Singapore. The case records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, clinical course, laboratory results, endoscopic and histopathological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. The study protocol was approved by the hospital institutional review board. The histological slides were reviewed by a pediatric histopathologist to confirm the diagnosis of cap polyposis. RESULTS: Eleven patients were diagnosed with cap polyposis. The median patient age was 13 years (range 5-17 years); the sample included 7 males and 4 females. All of the patients presented with bloody stools. Seven patients (63%) had constipation, while 4 patients (36%) had diarrhea. All of the patients underwent colonoscopy and polypectomies (excluding 1 patient who refused polypectomy). The macroscopic findings were of polypoid lesions covered by fibrinopurulent exudates with normal intervening mucosa. The rectum was the most common involvement site (n = 9, 82%), followed by the rectosigmoid colon (n = 3, 18%). Five (45%) patients had fewer than 5 polyps, and 6 patients (65%) had multiple polyps. Histological examination of these polyps showed surface ulcerations with a cap of fibrin inflammatory exudate. Four (80%) patients with fewer than 5 polyps had complete resolution of symptoms following the polypectomy. One patient who did not consent to the polypectomy had resolution of symptoms after being treated with sulphasalazine. All 6 patients with multiple polyps experienced recurrence of bloody stools on follow-up (mean = 28 mo). CONCLUSION: Cap polyposis is a rare and under-recognised cause of rectal bleeding in children. Our study has characterized the disease phenotype and treatment outcomes in a pediatric cohort.