A Comparative Study of a Small Series of Patients (50 Patients) with Pelvic Varicose Veins Treated with Plugs Alone or Plugs and Polidocanol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of vascular plug (VP) and vascular plug and polidocanol foam (VPPF) treatments for embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative, prospective, two-center study enrolled 50 women with PCS from January 2019 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups, and embolization was performed with VP (n = 25) and VPPF (n = 25) treatments. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 years ± 6.9. Three clinical parameters were assessed: abdominal pain, dyspareunia, and lower limb pain. The primary outcome (clinical success at 1 yr using a VAS), number of devices, procedure and fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, costs, and complications were compared. The participants were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up, clinical success did not significantly differ between the two groups (VP vs. VPPF) regarding the improvement of the symptoms analyzed (pelvic pain, dyspareunia, lower extremity pain, and other symptoms (p < 0.05)). The mean number of devices per case was 4 ± 1.1 for the VP group and 2 ± 0.31 for the VPPF group (p < 0.001). No major complications were recorded in either group. The VPPF group had a significantly longer fluoroscopy time (42.8 min ± 14.2 vs. 25.4 min ± 7) and longer radiation dose (VPPF air kerma 839.4 ± 513 vs. VP air kerma 658.4 mGy ± 355 (all p < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: Embolization for PCS resulted in pain relief in 90% of patients; the use of polidocanol did not demonstrate changes in the clinical outcome. The use of a VP alone was associated with decreased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

Catheter-directed hemorrhoidal embolization for rectal bleeding due to hemorrhoids (Goligher grade I-III): prospective outcomes from a Spanish emborrhoid registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed hemorrhoidal embolization (CDHE) by microcoil embolization for rectal bleeding due to hemorrhoids classified as Goligher grade I-III. METHODS: Eighty patients (62.5% males) with a mean age of 48 ± 9 years were recruited prospectively. All patients had symptomatic bleeding hemorrhoids. All patients were classified according to Goligher classification: grade I (13.7%), grade II (71.1%), grade III (15%), and no grade IV were recruited in this study. In all cases, microcoils were used to embolize the superior rectal artery(SRA), and microspheres if recurrence of bleeding occurred. Follow-up evaluation (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included clinical examination and anoscopy. A questionnaire was conducted to determine improvement regarding bleeding, quality of life before, and the degree of patient satisfaction of each participant. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases. Fifty-five (68.7%) participants had the absence of rectal bleeding after 12 months of embolization. VAS and QL improved 4 points and 1.5 respectively after embolization. A total of 25/80 (31.3%) had a recurrence in rectal bleeding. Seventeen (21.3%) patients underwent a second embolization, and four patients (5%) were treated with open hemorrhoidectomy. No major complications were observed. Sixteen participants had minor complications. Subjective post-treatment symptom and QL surveys showed significant differences from the baseline survey. Likewise, the degree of satisfaction in the telephone survey at 12 months revealed a high degree of patient satisfaction (8.3±1.1). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that CDHE is a feasible, well-tolerated, ambulatory, anal sphincter-sparing procedure for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CDHE is a simple procedure, well tolerated and accepted by patients, that preserves the anal sphincter and presents few complications when metal devices or microspheres are used as embolic agents. KEY POINTS: • The technical success rate of CDHE, defined as the closure of all the SRA in their distal segment, was achieved 100% of all patients. However, a second embolization treatment was required since 21.25% of the patients experienced rectal bleeding. • Overall, CDHE's safety profile is acceptable. After the procedure and 1 year of follow-up, no significant complications were observed. • Encouraging clinical outcomes have demonstrated CDHE in individuals with hemorrhoids and mild prolapse Goligher grades I-III with persistent rectal bleeding.

Safety and Effectiveness of a New Electrical Detachable Microcoil for Embolization of Hemorrhoidal Disease, November 2020-December 2021: Results of a Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new, bare platinum, detachable microcoil as a metallic embolization agent in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective single-center study evaluated a new, bare platinum, electrical, detachable microcoil (Prestige plus coil (Balt Montmorency France)) for use in vascular embolization in patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Between January 2020 and January 2021, 24 embolization procedures were performed in 21 patients (12 males, 9 females; mean age 44.3 ± 7.3). The inclusion criteria were: (a) participants with grade I, II and III hemorrhoidal disease on the Goligher classification; (b) patients older than 18 years of age with a score of greater than 4 on the French bleeding score (FBS) scale; (c) patients with scores greater than 2 on the scale of discomfort proposed by Tradi and Farfallah. (d) patients who underwent treatment that included the use of the new novel coil (Prestige plus coil (Balt)) as an embolic material. The exclusion criteria were participants who failed to provide informed consent and participants diagnosed with rectal bleeding due to other causes (cancer, fissures or others). Participants with severe renal insufficiency, non-correctable coagulation abnormalities and adverse reactions to the contrast medium not correctable with medication were also excluded. The symptoms, technical aspects, the transarterial approach, clinical and technical success complications and short-term outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Technical success was obtained in 100% of the cases. Seventeen (80.9%) patients experienced improvements in their hemorrhoidal disease. The VAS and QL scores improved by 4 and 1.5 points (81.2% and 87.5%), respectively, after embolization (pV: 0001). Three (14.2%) patients underwent a second embolization due to rebleeding. One patient (4.7%) underwent surgery. No major complications were observed. Three patients had minor complications. The assessment of subjective post-treatment symptoms and QL surveys showed significant differences from the baseline survey. Likewise, the measurement of the degree of satisfaction using a telephone survey at 12 months revealed a high degree of patient satisfaction over 10 points (mean 8.3 ± 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the use of the new, platinum, detachable, electrical microcoil is safe and well-tolerated in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. KEY POINTS: Catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization (CDHD) is the procedure of embolization with embolic agents for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. CDHD is a simple and safe procedure that is accepted by patients and preserves the anal sphincter; it presents few complications when metal devices or microspheres are used as embolic agents. As the recommended embolization agent in treatments, the Prestige electrical, detachable coil is a safe, easy-to-use and effective arterial embolic device.

[Aspiration thrombectomy for acute pulmonary embolism with an intermediate-high risk]. / Trombectomía mecánica en la tromboembolia pulmonar aguda de riesgo intermedio-alto.

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: The treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with an intermediate-high risk of mortality at 30 days is still not well defined, recommending the latest clinical guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology 2019 exclusively anticoagulant treatment, reducing the indication for mechanical thrombectomy to high-risk patients or intermediate-high risk patients with poor hemodynamic evolution. Our purpose is to determine the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy in intermediate-high risk patients with PE and to analyze possible differences in these results between hemodynamically unstable patients (massive PE) and hemodynamically stable patients (submassive PE). METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent aspiration thrombectomy for PE at our tertiary university hospital during a 34-month period. We compared echocardiographic parameters (right ventricular diameter, tricuspid plane annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), S' wave, and pulmonary hypertension), respiratory parameters (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), and clinical parameters recorded before and 24h after the procedure. We also analyzed bleeding complications and mortality. RESULTS: In the 42 patients included (16 with massive PE and 26 with submassive PE), aspiration thrombectomy resulted in significant improvements in right ventricular diameter, TAPSE, S' wave, andPaO2/FiO2 ratio. Of the 8 patients administered fibrinolysis, 4 developed bleeding complications. Only one direct complication of the procedure was observed (pulmonary artery rupture). Eight patients died in the acute phase. CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration thrombectomy for PE is safe and effective, significantly improving respiratory and hemodynamic parameters in the first 24h after the procedure with a low rate of complications compared to fibrinolysis.

Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVES: to present an interventional radiology standard of practice on the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients with or at risk to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) from the Iberoamerican Interventional Society (SIDI) and Spanish Vascular and Interventional Radiology Society (SERVEI). METHODS: a group of twenty-two interventional radiologist experts, from the SIDI and SERVEI societies, attended online meetings to develop a current clinical practice guideline on the proper indication for the placement and retrieval of IVCFs. A broad review was undertaken to determine the participation of interventional radiologists in the current guidelines and a consensus on inferior vena cava filters. Twenty-two experts from both societies worked on a common draft and received a questionnaire where they had to assess, for IVCF placement, the absolute, relative, and prophylactic indications. The experts voted on the different indications and reasoned their decision. RESULTS: a total of two-hundred-thirty-three articles were reviewed. Interventional radiologists participated in the development of just two of the eight guidelines. The threshold for inclusion was 100% agreement. Three absolute and four relative indications for the IVCF placement were identified. No indications for the prophylactic filter placement reached the threshold. CONCLUSION: interventional radiologists are highly involved in the management of IVCFs but have limited participation in the development of multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines.

Aspiration Thrombectomy for Treatment of Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Initial Single-Center Prospective Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute massive or submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study analyzed patient demographic data, procedural details, and outcomes in 18 consecutive patients (8 men and 10 women; mean age, 60.1 y; range, 36-80 y), 10 with acute submassive PE and 8 with massive PE, treated with an Indigo Continuous Aspiration Mechanical Thrombectomy Catheter between January 2016 and February 2017. Three patients underwent concomitant systemic fibrinolytic treatment with 100 mg tissue plasminogen activator. Technical success was defined as successful placement of devices and initiation of aspiration thrombectomy. Clinical success was defined as stabilization of hemodynamic parameters; improvement in pulmonary hypertension, right heart strain, or both; and survival to hospital discharge. Complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: The procedure was considered a technical success in 17 patients (94.4%) and a clinical success in 15 (83.3%). Echocardiography showed significant improvements in right ventricle size (46.36 mm ± 2.2 before treatment vs 41.79 mm ± 7.4 after; P = .041), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (16 ± 3 before treatment vs 18.57 ± 3.9 after; P = .011), and systolic wave (10 ± 2.1 before treatment vs 13.1 ± 3.8 after; P = .020). Two patients died of massive PE, and 1 died of submassive PE. Two patients who received systemic fibrinolytic agents experienced intracranial bleeding, and abdominal bleeding developed in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration thrombectomy is a feasible option for the treatment of acute massive or submassive PE in patients with hemodynamic compromise or right ventricular dysfunction.

[Spontaneous recanalization after embolization of the renal artery with an Amplatzer vascular plug 4]. / Recanalización espontánea tras la embolización de una arteria renal con un tapón vascular Amplatzer tipo 4.

The Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) is an occluding device used in vascular embolizations. Thanks to its excellent maneuverability and effectiveness, it is being used more and more often. The latest version, the AVP 4, enables access to smaller and more tortuous vessels. To date, the only cases of spontaneous recanalization published occurred with earlier versions of the AVP. We present a case of recanalization after renal artery embolization with an AVP 4.

The value of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer and alpha-fetoprotein in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: presently, the reference staging system to evaluate the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is "The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer" (BCLC) system. The value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has not been properly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the BCLC classification in our clinical practice and to know what the prognostic value of AFP is. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 136 consecutive HCC patients were prospectively included in this study. The diagnosis of HCC was based on the recommendation of international guidelines. The patients were studied and managed according to usual clinical practice. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and predictors of survival were identified using the Cox model. RESULTS: 110 patients (80.9%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 66.62 + or - 11.68 years. Liver cirrhosis was present in 91.2%. The most frequent cause of liver disease was hepatitis C infection (38.97%). Serum AFP was - or = 20 ng/mL in the 57%, > 20-200 ng/mL in the 20%, and > 200 ng/mL in 23%. According to the BCLC staging system, 79 patients were classified as stage A (58.09%), 29 (21.32%) stage B, 17 (12.50%) stage C and 11 patients (8.09%) as stage D. The overall median survival time was 26.52 months (95% CI 16.7-36.3). The median survival according to BCLC system was: BCLC A 62.27, BCLC B 12.72, BCLC C 4.83, and BCLC D 0.62 months (p < 0.0001); and according to serum AFP was: AFP - or = 20: 62.27 months, > 20-200: 22.08 months, and > 200 ng/mL: 5.39 months (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that AFP, BCLC classification and treatment were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: our results confirm that the BCLC is a good prognostic system. The AFP has prognosis value in HCC patients. The addition of AFP could improve the BCLC system. Future studies are needed to confirm our results and also the best way to combine BCLC and AFP properly.

[Clinical characteristics, staging and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice. Prospective study of 136 patients]. / Características clínicas, estadificación y tratamiento de los pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular en la práctica clínica. Estudio prospectivo de una serie de 136 pacientes.

UNLABELLED: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent cause of mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. There are no prospective series from a single tertiary hospital in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients with HCC in our center. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic method, staging according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system and treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included (80.9% men). The mean age was 66.62 ± 11.68 years and 91.2% were cirrhotic. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was the leading cause of liver disease (38.97%). The suspected diagnosis was established by a surveillance program in 63.2%. Noninvasive American Association criteria for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) were the main diagnostic method (73.5%). According to the BCLC, 58.1% were in the early stage (0-A), 21.3% in stage B, 12.5% in stage C and 8.1% in stage D. Early stage patients had followed a surveillance program more frequently than those with non-early stages (79.75% versus 44.35%, p <0.001). Potentially curative initial treatment was used in 45.58%, the most common treatment being percutaneous ethanol injection (23.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HCC in our hospital have cirrhosis, the most frequent cause being HCV. HCC surveillance in at-risk patients could increase diagnosis of HCC at an early stage. We achieved an early diagnosis in more than half of cases. The most common initial treatment was percutaneous therapy.