Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Feline Med Surg ; 16(2): 99-108, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23847300

RESUMO

In order to describe the signs of acromegaly in cats, a case-control study was done based on computed tomography (CT) scans of the heads of 68 cats with hypersomatotropism and 36 control cats. All cats with a diagnosis of hypersomatotropism had diabetes mellitus, serum insulin-like growth factor-1 >1000 ng/ml and a pituitary mass. Measurements of bones and soft tissues were done by two independent observers without knowledge of the diagnosis. Pituitary masses were identified in CT images of 64 (94%) cats with hypersomatotropism. Analysis of variance found a moderate effect of gender on the size of bones and a large effect of hypersomatotropism on the size of bones and thickness of soft tissues. In cats with hypersomatotropism the frontal and parietal bones were, on average, 0.8 mm thicker (P <0.001); the distance between the zygomatic arches was, on average, 5.4 mm greater (P <0.001); and the mandibular rami were, on average, 1.1 mm thicker (P <0.001) than in control cats. The skin and subcutis dorsal to the frontal bone were, on average, 0.4 mm thicker (P = 0.001); lateral to the zygomatic arch were, on average, 0.7 mm thicker (P <0.001); and ventral to the mandibular rami were, on average, 1.1 mm thicker (P = 0.002) in cats with hypersomatotropism than in control cats. The cross-sectional area of the nasopharynx was, on average, 11.1 mm(2) smaller in cats with hypersomatotropism than in control cats (P = 0.02). Prognathia inferior and signs of temporomandibular joint malformation were both observed more frequently in cats with hypersomatotropism than in control cats (P = 0.03). Overall, differences between affected and unaffected cats were small. Recognising feline acromegaly on the basis of facial features is difficult.


Assuntos
Acromegalia/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico por imagem , Diabetes Mellitus/veterinária , Hormônio do Crescimento/metabolismo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/veterinária , Acromegalia/diagnóstico por imagem , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doenças do Gato/patologia , Gatos , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Feminino , Masculino
3.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 54(3): 207-11, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490240

RESUMO

The ratio between maximal small intestinal (SI) diameter and the height of the body of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) in radiographs has been reported as a diagnostic test in dogs with suspected intestinal obstruction. In order to assess the effect of the SI/L5 ratio on the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of intestinal obstruction, lateral abdominal radiographs of 37 dogs with small intestinal obstruction and 48 nonobstructed dogs were mixed and examined independently by six observers who were unaware of the final diagnosis and who represented a range of experience. Observers first examined radiographs subjectively and stated the likelihood of obstruction (definitely not, probably not, equivocal, probably, definitely). Observers subsequently reexamined the radiographs, determined the SI/L5 ratio, and again stated the likelihood of obstruction. The most frequent cause of obstruction was foreign body (29/37, 78%). Dogs with SI obstruction had a significantly larger median SI/L5 ratio than nonobstructed dogs (P = 0.0002). Using an SI/L5 ratio of 1.7 for diagnosis of intestinal obstruction, sensitivity and specificity were 66%. Use of the SI/L5 ratio was not associated with increased accuracy of diagnosis for any observer, regardless of experience, hence this test may have no diagnostic impact.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Obstrução Intestinal/veterinária , Intestino Delgado/anatomia & histologia , Vértebras Lombares/anatomia & histologia , Radiografia Abdominal/métodos , Animais , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico por imagem , Cães , Inglaterra , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/veterinária , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Probabilidade , Radiografia Abdominal/veterinária , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA