Invasive Aggregatibacter infection: shedding light on a rare pathogen in a retrospective cohort analysis.

Introduction. Aggregatibacter are Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic rods or coccobacilli that are infrequently encountered as pathogens causing infection.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. The range of invasive infection that Aggregatibacter cause is poorly described. The pathogenicity of species such as Aggregatibacter segnis is debated.Aim. To identify invasive infection due to Aggregatibacter species in a large healthcare organization and to characterize clinical syndromes, co-morbidities and risk factors.Methodology. All microbiological samples positive for Aggregatibacter species were identified by conventional culture or 16S rRNA PCR between October 2017 and March 2021. Electronic records for all patients with positive samples were reviewed and the infection syndrome classified for patients with invasive disease.Results. Twenty-seven patients with invasive infection were identified, with a statistically significant difference in species-specific patterns of invasive infection (P=0.02) and a statistically significant association with residence in the 30 % most deprived households in the UK by postcode (P<0.01). The three most common co-morbidities were periodontitis or recent dental work (29.6%), cardiovascular disease (25.9%) and diabetes (18.5 %).Conclusion. We describe a novel association of Aggregatibacter segnis with skin and soft tissue infection. The propensity of the Aggregatibacter species to cause invasive infection at different body sites and be associated with deprivation is reported. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans bacteraemia was associated with infective endocarditis, and Aggregatibacter aphrophilus was implicated in severe appendicitis and noted to cause brain abscess. Areas warranting future research include exploring the risk-factors required for invasive infection and those that may determine the species-specific differences in patterns of invasive disease.

Clinical utility of 16S rRNA PCR in pleural infection.

Pleural infections cause major morbidity and mortality, particularly amongst paediatric and elderly populations. The aetiology is broad, but pleural culture fails to yield a causative pathogen in approximately 40 % of cases. Alternative pathogen identification methods are therefore required. The aim of the study was to investigate the yield from and impact on patient care when performing 16S rRNA PCR on culture-negative pleural fluid specimens and to determine whether any individual laboratory parameters were associated with a positive 16S rRNA PCR result. We conducted a study on 90 patients with suspected pleural infection, who had a culture-negative pleural fluid specimen, which underwent 16S rRNA PCR analysis between August 2017 and June 2019. This study was undertaken at a large NHS Trust in London, UK. Thirty-one per cent of culture-negative pleural fluid specimens tested by 16S rRNA PCR yielded a positive PCR result. Our data demonstrated that 16S rRNA PCR detected a significantly higher proportion of Streptococcus pneumoniae (P<0.0001) and fastidious, slow-growing and anaerobic pathogens (P=0.0025) compared with culture-based methods. Of the 25 16S rRNA PCR results that were positive for a causative pathogen, 76 % had a direct impact on clinical management. No single laboratory variable was found to be associated with a positive 16S rRNA PCR result. The findings from our real-world evaluation highlight the importance of 16S rRNA PCR in confirming pleural infection when the aetiology is unknown, and its direct, positive impact on clinical management.

Shigellosis and toxic megacolon secondary to Shigella flexneri serotype 3a: The challenges of laboratory diagnosis.

We present a rare case of Shigella flexneri bacteraemia and toxic megacolon, and discuss the challenges of conventional laboratory techniques versus molecular PCR platforms in differentiating between Shigella species and Escherichia coli.

Prevalence of carbapenem resistance and carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine in the UK: results of the UK infection-Carbapenem Resistance Evaluation Surveillance Trial (iCREST-UK).

Objectives: Although carbapenem susceptibility testing has been recommended for all Enterobacteriaceae from clinical specimens, for practical reasons a carbapenem is not included in many primary antibiotic panels for urine specimens. The 'iCREST' study sought carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in routine urine specimens yielding Gram-negative growth in five diagnostic laboratories in the UK. We sought also to compare locally and centrally determined MICs of meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam. Methods: Positive growth from up to 2000 urine specimens per laboratory was plated onto chromID® CARBA SMART agar. Suspected CPE colonies were tested locally by Etest for susceptibility to meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam, and referred to central laboratories for PCR confirmation of CPE status and microbroth MIC determination. Results: Twenty-two suspected CPE were identified from 7504 urine specimens. Ten were confirmed by PCR to have NDM (5), IMP (2), KPC (2) or OXA-48-like (1) carbapenemases. Locally determined ceftazidime/avibactam MICs showed complete categorical agreement with those determined centrally by microbroth methodology. The seven ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates (MICs ≥256 mg/L) had NDM or IMP metallo-carbapenemases. Conclusions: The frequency of confirmed CPE among Gram-negative urinary isolates was low, at 0.13% (10/7504), but CPE were found in urines at all five participating sites and the diversity of carbapenemase genes detected reflected the complex epidemiology of CPE in the UK. These data can inform local policies about the cost-effectiveness and clinical value of testing Gram-negative bacteria from urine specimens routinely against a carbapenem as part of patient management and/or infection prevention and control strategies.

Identification of microorganisms grown on chromogenic media by MALDI-TOF MS.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and chromogenic media are widely used in clinical microbiology laboratories to facilitate the rapid selection and identification of pathogens. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether usage of chromogenic media limits the diagnostic performance of MALDI-TOF MS for microbial identification. A total of 386 microorganisms collected and analyzed at five laboratories were included. Isolates were cultured on relevant chromogenic media and non-selective agar plates in parallel and identified using the Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. Among the tested isolates, no misidentification was recorded and there was no medium-related difference in the identification level. However, score values were overall slightly but significantly lower for isolates grown on chromogenic media. In conclusion, the use of chromogenic culture media tested here had no relevant impact on MALDI-TOF MS performance for diagnostic purposes.

Comparative virulence of urinary and bloodstream isolates of extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in a Galleria mellonella model.

Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) are a significant cause of urinary tract infections and bacteraemia worldwide. Currently no single virulence factor or ExPEC lineage has been identified as the sole contributor to severe extra-intestinal infection and/or urosepsis. Galleria mellonella has recently been established as a simple model for studying the comparative virulence of ExPEC. In this study we investigated the virulence of 40 well-characterized ExPEC strains, in G. mellonella, by measuring mortality (larvae survival), immune recognition/response (melanin production) and cell damage (lactate dehydrogenase production). Although mortality was similar between urinary and bloodstream isolates, it was heightened for community-associated infections, complicated UTIs and urinary-source bacteraemia. Isolates of ST131 and those possessing afa/dra, ompT and serogroup O6 were also associated with heightened virulence.

Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae identification by pherotype: a method to assist understanding of a potentially emerging or overlooked pathogen.

The recent identification of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (pseudopneumococcus) has complicated classification schemes within members of the "mitis" streptococcal group. Accurate differentiation of this species is necessary for understanding its disease potential and identification in clinical settings. This work described the use of the competence-stimulatory peptide ComC sequence for identification of S. pseudopneumoniae. ComC sequences from clinical sources were determined for 17 strains of S. pseudopneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus oralis. An additional 58 ComC sequences from a range of sources were included to understand the diversity and suitability of this protein as a diagnostic marker for species identification. We identified three pherotypes for this species, delineated CSP6.1 (10/14, 79%), CSP6.3 (3/14, 21%), and SK674 (1/14, 7%). Pseudopneumococcal ComC sequences formed a discrete cluster within those of other oral streptococci. This suggests that the comC sequence could be used to identify S. pseudopneumoniae, thus simplifying the study of the pathogenic potential of this organism. To avoid confusion between pneumococcal and pseudopneumococcal pherotypes, we have renamed the competence pherotype CSP6.1, formerly reported as an "atypical" pneumococcus, CSPps1 to reflect its occurrence in S. pseudopneumoniae.

Detection and identification of bacteria in clinical samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing: comparison of two different approaches in clinical practice.

Amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene can be applied to detect and identify bacteria in clinical samples. We examined 75 clinical samples (17 culture-positive, 58 culture-negative) prospectively by two different PCR protocols, amplifying either a single fragment (1343 bp) or two fragments (762/598 bp) of the 16S rRNA gene. The 1343 bp PCR and 762/598 bp PCRs detected and identified the bacterial 16S rRNA gene in 23 (31 %) and 38 (51 %) of the 75 samples, respectively. The 1343 bp PCR identified 19 of 23 (83 %) PCR-positive samples to species level while the 762/598 bp PCR identified 14 of 38 (37 %) bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments to species level and 24 to the genus level only. Amplification of shorter fragments of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (762 and 598 bp) resulted in a more sensitive assay; however, analysis of a large fragment (1343 bp) improved species discrimination. Although not statistically significant, the 762/598 bp PCR detected the bacterial 16S rRNA gene in more samples than the 1343 bp PCR, making it more likely to be a more suitable method for the primary detection of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene in the clinical setting. The 1343 bp PCR may be used in combination with the 762/598 bp PCR when identification of the bacterial rRNA gene to species level is required.