Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 41(11): 2142-2150, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965699

RESUMO

Axial spondyloarthritides (axSpA) are a group of systemic autoimmune diseases, characterised by an inflammatory involvement of the axial skeleton, which, in the earlier phases, cannot be detected by conventional radiology, but only by magnetic resonance imaging, thus defining the so-called non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). The initial osteitis then tends to complicate into bone reabsorption and aberrant bone deposition, which then determines the ankylosis of the axial skeleton in the latest phases of the disease.Peripheral joints may also be affected, enthesitis being its more characteristic manifestation. The radiographic form corresponds to ankylosing spondylitis which, with psoriatic arthritis, is the best-known subtype of SpA. AxSpA are rarely associated to laboratory abnormalities and are usually complicated by the presence of both extra-articular manifestations (particularly acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis and inflamatory bowel disease) and comorbidities, with a subsequent higher risk for patients of an impaired quality of life.In this paper we reviewed the literature on axSpA of 2021 and 2022 (Medline search of articles published from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022).


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Psoríase , Espondilartrite , Espondilite Anquilosante , Humanos , Espondilartrite/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Psoriásica/complicações
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 40(9): 1611-1619, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129799

RESUMO

Psoriatic arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease, in which a characteristic heterogeneous inflammatory involvement of entheses and both peripheral and axial joints tends to be associated with different clinical features, in particular skin or nail psoriasis, but also inflammatory bowel diseases, or acute anterior uveitis. Patients with PsA are at higher risk of developing comorbidities, in particular metabolic syndrome, with a significant impact on their quality of life. Although the advanced knowledge in the pathogenetic mechanisms of PsA helped in developing an abundant therapeutical armamentarium, the available drugs might still show a suboptimal efficacy. However, the frontier of "personalised medicine" could promote further future improvement in the quality of care of patients. In this paper we reviewed the literature on PsA of 2020 and 2021 (Medline search of articles published from 1st January 2020 to 31th December 2021).


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Psoríase , Uveíte Anterior , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Psoríase/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Pele/patologia
3.
Eur J Rheumatol ; 8(4): 190-195, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35110179

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls. RESULTS: Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline timepoint), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal. CONCLUSION: The combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA