Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Events in Fibromyalgia Patients.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that patients with fibromyalgia present with neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and coagulation features linked to cardiovascular disease development. However, the exact profile of cardiovascular risk factors and events in fibromyalgia remains to be defined. OBJECTIVES: To compare the profile of cardiovascular risk factors and events between fibromyalgia outpatients and the general population in Italy. METHODS: Cardiovascular risk factors and events in fibromyalgia females were collected using the criteria adopted in the CUORE Project. RESULTS: The study comprised 62 female fibromyalgia patients and 4093 female controls from 35 to 75 years of age. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, transient ischemic attack, and cardiovascular total burden was significantly higher in fibromyalgia females than in the general Italian population. No difference was found in blood fasting glucose, triglycerides, total and fractionated cholesterol levels, body mass index, and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The MetS rate was underestimated for methodological aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Fibromyalgia is associated with an increased cardiovascular burden, probably through a specific risk factor profile.

Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components Have a Different Presentation and Impact as Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Psoriatic and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis have a higher cardiovascular (CV) risk than the general population. Traditional CV risk factors are clearly implicated, while the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is less defined. The aim of this study was to compare MetS prevalence and impact on the CV risk in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) versus rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A retrospective analysis of real-world data of PsA and RA patients referred to a rheumatology clinic was conducted. The following data were extracted and compared: demographic data; clinical data; presence of traditional CV risk factors and MetS. Univariate and multivariate models were used to compare the impact of MetS and its components in patients with PsA versus RA. Overall, 170 patients were included (PsA: 78; RA; 92). The two groups differed significantly in mean age, disease duration, and presence of MetS, while other variables were comparable. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified distinct predictors of MetS in PsA (hypertension) and RA (dyslipidemia). The history of CV events was similar in the two groups. Predictors of CV events were MetS and most of its components in PsA, while dyslipidemia was the strongest predictor in RA. These associations were stronger in PsA than in RA. In conclusion, the impact of MetS and its components is different in PsA and RA. The association of these risk factors with CV events is stronger in PsA than in RA. This suggests the implication of different mechanisms, which may require distinct strategies for the prevention of CV events in PsA and RA.

Fibromyalgia severity according to age categories: results of a cross-sectional study from a large national database.

OBJECTIVES: The role of age in influencing the severity of fibromyalgia (FM) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to define the contribution of age in the severity of FM from data from a large national database. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adult patients with FM diagnosed according to the 2010/2011 American College of Rheumatology criteria. Disease severity was assessed with the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) and the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS 2019mod). Patients were grouped into five age categories (between 18-40 years, between 41-50 years, between 51-60 years, between 61-70 years, and ≥71 years). Differences in disease severity between groups were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The study included 2889 patients (199 males and 2690 females), mean age of 52.58 (±11.82) years, with a mean FIQR score of 59.22 (±22.98) and a mean FAS 2019mod of 25.50 (±8.66). Comparing the mean values of the various indices between age categories, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for FIQR total score and FAS 2019mod. However, the 60-70 years category showed the lowest scores for both scales. The main difference emerged for the FIQR physical function subscale, where the ≥71 years category showed significantly higher scores (p<0.05) compared the 18-40 years category. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of FM has a significant level of stationarity according to age categories. Patients between 60-70 years have a lower disease burden. Physical function is the health domain with the most significant difference between the groups.

Definition of fibromyalgia severity: findings from a cross-sectional survey of 2339 Italian patients.

OBJECTIVE: To establish optimal cut-off values for the scores of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromialgia Assessment Scale (FAS 2019mod), and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS) in order to distinguish five levels of FM disease severity. METHODS: Consecutive FM patients were evaluated with the three clinimetric indices, and each patient was required to answer the anchor question: 'In general, would you say your health is 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, or 5 = very poor?'-which represented the external criterion. Cut-off points were established through the interquartile reconciliation approach. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 2181 women (93.2%) and 158 men (6.8%), with a mean age of 51.9 (11.5) years, and mean disease duration was 7.3 (6.9) years. The overall median FIQR, FAS 2019 mod and PDS scores (25th-75th percentiles) were respectively 61.16 (41.16-77.00), 27.00 (19.00-32.00) and 19.0 (13.00-24.00). Reconciliation of the mean 75th and 25th percentiles of adjacent categories defined the severity states for FIQR: 0-23 for remission, 24-40 for mild disease, 41-63 for moderate disease, 64-82 for severe disease and >83 for very severe disease; FAS 2019 mod: 0-12 for remission, 13-20 for mild disease, 21-28 for moderate disease, 29-33 for severe disease and >33 for very severe disease; PDS: 0-5 for remission, 6-15 for mild disease, 16-20 for moderate disease, 21-25 for severe disease and >25 for very severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity cut-offs can represent an important improvement in interpreting FM.

Differences in depression, anxiety and stress disorders between fibromyalgia associated with rheumatoid arthritis and primary fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia (FM) was frequently observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the differences in psychiatric comorbidities and life adversities between patients with Rheumatoid arthritis + FM (secondary fibromyalgia [SFM]) and people with primary FM (PFM). In a cross-sectional, observational study, patients with PFM and SFM underwent a structured interview for the lifetime diagnosis of major depression (MDD), panic disorder (PD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and were assessed for childhood/adulthood adversities and FM-related symptoms severity. Thirty patients with PFM and 40 with SFM were recruited. The univariate analysis showed that the lifetime rates of MDD were significantly higher in PFM versus SFM (76.7 % and 40%, respectively, p < 0.003), as well as the rates of PD (50 % and 15%, respectively, p < 0.003), whereas there was no difference in PTSD rates. The rates of sexual abuse and physical neglect were significantly higher in PFM patients versus SFM patients (p < 0.005 and p < 0.023). Life events occurring before FM onset were different in PFM and SFM groups. In the logistic regression model, lifetime PD and physical neglect remain independent risk factors for PFM. PFM and SFM differ in psychiatric comorbidities and environmental adversities, suggesting that common pathogenesis may develop through different pathways.

Concerns about the safety of anti-TNF agents when treating rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: More than 15 years after its introduction, there is still no agreement as to whether anti-TNF treatment increases the risk of developing infections, cardiovascular or neurological diseases, or auto-antibodies. Anti-TNF drugs reduce inflammation and sub-clinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but they also alter their lipid profiles and can lead to the development of severe infections. Furthermore, as they increase the risk of developing demyelinating diseases, are not recommended in patients with multiple sclerosis or related disorders. The authors searched the Medline database for English language articles concerning the adverse events of anti-TNF drugs published between 1998 and December 2019, and have summarized their contents relating to infections, malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmunity and neurological diseases. Patients should be fully informed of the increased risks associated with anti-TNF drugs, and physicians should know how to treat them. AREAS COVERED: This review considers these safety concerns, their possible underlying causes, and other aspects that are important in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION: Growing concern about the safety of anti-TNF drugs underlines the need to ensure that all clinicians are capable of taking appropriate preventive and therapeutic action.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in fibromyalgia and the diseases involving the central nervous system.

OBJECTIVES: This paper briefly describes the therapeutic mechanisms underlying hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), and reviews data concerning its effects and efficacy in Parkinson's disease (PD) and fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: The studies included in this review all evaluated the effect of HBOT in patients with diseases involving CNS. The PubMed databases were searched from 1980 to September 2019 using the keywords: 'hyperbaric oxygen therapy', 'fibromyalgia' and 'Parkinson's disease'. RESULTS: HBOT is already indicated in various diseases and is the subject of continuous research and development. Data from models of PD show that it may play a neuroprotective role because of its ability to reduce oxidative stress and neurodegeneration, and protect against neuronal apoptosis. It is effective in improving the symptoms and quality of life of fibromyalgia patients, and rectifies abnormal brain activity in pain-related areas. Evidence from animal studies supports its use as an alternative treatment for other rheumatic diseases as it alleviates pain and reduces inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Data mainly from animal studies support the use of HBOT in the treatment of PD and rheumatic diseases, but further work is necessary to clarify its therapeutic role in patients with these chronic disorders.

Controlled-release pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disorder whose symptoms of musculo-skeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairment pervade the personal, occupational, and social aspects of a patient's life. Together with the antidepressants duloxetine and milnacipran, the anticonvulsant pregabalin (PGB) is one of the three drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of FM. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the data relating to the efficacy and safety of the controlled-release formulation of PGB (PGB-CR) in patients with FM. Areas covered: Efforts by the pharmaceutical industry have led to the introduction of new formulations of already approved drugs to enhance treatment convenience and adherence. Expert opinion: Although there are no published studies specifically comparing PGB-CR and PGB-IR formulations in FM patients, the efficacy and safety profiles of PGB-CR seem to be similar to those of the IR formulation, and the convenience of once-daily dosing potentially enhances patient compliance. However, the amount of evidence is not sufficient to draw any definite conclusions, and further studies of larger patient samples are needed.