Varicose vein stripping vs haemodynamic correction (CHIVA): a long term randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term results of stripping vs. haemodynamic correction (Ambulatory Conservative Haemodynamic Management of Varicose Veins, CHIVA) in the treatment of superficial venous incompetence resulting in chronic venous disease (CVD). DESIGN: Randomised comparative trial. PATIENTS: 150 patients affected by CVD, CEAP clinical class 2-6, were randomised to saphenous stripping or to CHIVA. METHODS: The clinical outcome was assessed by an independent observer who recorded the Hobbs clinical score for treated limbs. A subjective report of the outcome was provided by the patients. Recurrence of varices was assessed by both clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10 years, 26 patients were lost to follow-up. The Hobbs score similar in the stripping and CHIVA groups. However recurrence of varicose veins was significantly higher in the stripping group (CHIVA 18%; stripping 35%, P<0.04 Fisher's exact test), without significant differences in the rate of recurrences from the sapheno-femoral junction. The associated risk of recurrence at ten years was doubled in the stripping group (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1-5, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent varices occurred more frequently following saphenous stripping than after CHIVA treatment. The deliberate preservation of the saphenous trunk as a route of venous drainage in the CHIVA group may have been a factor reducing the recurrence rate.

Minimally invasive surgical management of primary venous ulcers vs. compression treatment: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: to compare minimally invasive surgical haemodynamic correction of reflux (CHIVA) with compression in the treatment of venous ulceration. DESIGN: prospective randomised study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: from a cohort of 80 patients with 87 venous leg ulcers, 47 were randomised to either surgery or compression. RESULTS: at a mean follow-up of 3 years, healing was 100% (31 days) in the surgical and 96% (63 days), in the compression group (p<0.02). The recurrence rate was 9% in the surgical and 38% in the compression group (p<0.05). In the surgical group, all plethysmographic parameters except ejection fraction, had improved significantly at 6 months in the surgical group, and at 3 years residual volume fraction remained in the normal range. Finally, quality of life significantly improved in the operated group. CONCLUSIONS: this study supports the effectiveness of surgical therapy for leg ulceration secondary to superficial venous reflux.

Reflux elimination without any ablation or disconnection of the saphenous vein. A haemodynamic model for venous surgery.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the possibility of the haemodynamic suppression of reflux in the greater saphenous vein (GSV) without any high ligation and/or stripping procedure. DESIGN: prospective study; single group of patients. MATERIALS: forty patients affected by primary chronic venous insufficiency of all clinical classes, with demonstrated duplex incompetence both of the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) and the GSV trunk, with the re-entry perforator located on a GSV tributary. The re-entry point was defined as the perforator, whose finger compression of the superficial vein above its opening eliminates reflux in the GSV. METHODS: air-plethysmographic parameters as well as duplex scanning were performed both preoperatively, and 1 and 6 months later, respectively. Operation consisted in flush ligation and division from the GSV of the tributary containing the re-entry perforating vein. RESULTS: duplex investigation demonstrated both a forward flow and reflux disappearance in the GSV in 100% and 85% of the cases after 1 and 6 months, respectively. All air-plethysmographic parameters, with the exception of Ejection Fraction, improved significantly: Venous Volume changed from 150+/-9 ml to 114+/-7 ml (p <0.0001), Venous Filling Index from 4.9+/-0.5 ml/s to 2.3+/-0.2 ml/s ( p <0.0001), and Residual Volume Fraction from 42+/-3 ml to 30+/-2 ml ( p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: this study demonstrates that reflux in the GSV system is supported by a gradient of pressure between the anatomical point of reflux and the point of re-entry in the deep veins. Disconnection of the flow to the re-entry perforator without high ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction suppresses GSV reflux.

Surgical management of ascending saphenous thrombophlebitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute saphenous vein ascending thrombophlebitis is recognised to be a dangerous condition due to the reported high incidence of deep vein thrombus involvement and possibly fatal pulmonary embolism. We assessed the accuracy of duplex scanning in determining the extent of thrombosis as well as the effectiveness of surgical treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 146 patients referred to our Vascular Laboratory for acute superficial thrombophlebitis from 1987 to 1997. Duplex scanning identified 85 cases of superficial thrombophlebitis involving at least a segment of the saphenous vein localised below the knee (58.2%); 37 of thrombophlebitis extending into both the superficial and deep venous systems (25.3%), and 24 of saphenous thrombosis extending to within 5 cm of the saphenofemoral junction (16.4%). The latter group underwent saphenofemoral disconnection. We compared the preoperative duplex with the surgical reports and evaluated the surgical results. RESULTS: We did not observe any complication. Return to work and normal activity occurred within 3-5 days. When varicose vein thrombectomy was performed concurrently, the patients had better postoperative pain control. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex scanning showed 100% accuracy both in determining the presence of thrombosis and its extent. Saphenofemoral disconnection for thrombosis involving the saphenofemoral junction is a safe procedure and can be performed on an outpatient basis.