Neuropathic pain in spondyloarthritis: Decoding its prevalence, risk factors, and impact on disease activity.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain in patients with various subtypes of spondyloarthritis (SpA), including axial SpA (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and undifferentiated peripheral SpA (p-SpA). Additionally, the study sought to identify potential risk factors associated with the presence or severity of neuropathic pain and to investigate its impact on clinical disease activity assessment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at two tertiary rheumatology centers, enrolling patients diagnosed with SpA. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and current therapies were collected. Neuropathic pain was assessed using the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, and Pearson's correlations to evaluate the relationships between neuropathic pain scores and clinical disease activity indices. RESULTS: The study included 177 patients. Of these, 22.2% had a PD-Q score ≥19, showing a high likelihood of neuropathic pain, while 64.9% scored ≤12, suggesting the absence of significant neuropathic components. The mean PD-Q score was 11.5 ± 10.1. Subgroup analyses showed that females had significantly higher scores for paroxysmal and evoked pain (p < 0.05), and obese patients had significantly higher scores across all NPSI subscores (p < 0.05). Moderate positive correlations were found between neuropathic pain scores and clinical disease activity indices, such as DAPSA (r = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and ASDAS-CRP (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuropathic pain is prevalent among patients with SpA and is significantly associated with disease activity assessments and management. This study highlights the importance of integrating neuropathic pain evaluation into the clinical assessment of SpA to tailor treatment approaches effectively and improve patient outcomes.

Turning the Tide against Herpes Zoster in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of Herpes Zoster (HZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), and to predict potential risk factors for HZ development. Methods: We retrospectively analysed medical records from RA patients at our rheumatology unit who met the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA and were receiving JAKi. The incidence and course of HZ were assessed through chart review and supplementary phone interviews. Results: A total of 198 JAKi-treated patients were monitored for an average of 18.5 months. Nine subjects experienced HZ, resulting in an incidence of 2.95 per 100 patient-years. No demographic or treatment-related differences were found among patients who developed HZ and those who did not. Disease duration (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12), time on JAKi treatment (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.009-1.073), higher disease activity at JAKi initiation (OR: 4.16, 95% CI: 1.07-16.17), and at 3-month follow-up (OR: 6.0, 95% CI: 1.35-26.60) were identified as predictors of HZ occurrence. Thirty-six patients received vaccination against HZ, and none reported adverse reactions or flare-ups during a mean follow-up of 9.6 months. Conclusions: The incidence of HZ aligns with published data, suggesting that disease and treatment duration, as well as disease activity, are significant predictors of HZ in RA patients on JAKi therapy. Vaccination against HZ proved to be safe and effective, underscoring its potential protective value in this patient population.

The management of axial spondyloarthritis with cutting-edge therapies: advancements and innovations.

INTRODUCTION: Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression. AREAS COVERED: This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement. EXPERT OPINION: AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.