Australian vaccine preventable disease epidemiological review series: Hepatitis B, 2000-2019.

Introduction: Hepatitis B vaccination was nationally funded for adolescents in 1996, with inclusion of universal infant immunisation under the National Immunisation Program (NIP) in May 2000. This study describes hepatitis B epidemiology in Australia in the two decades since 2000. Methods: This article analyses newly-acquired (within the prior 24 months) and unspecified (all other) hepatitis B notifications (2000-2019) from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; acute hepatitis B hospitalisations (2001-2019) from the National Hospital Morbidity Database; and acute (2000-2019) and chronic (2006-2019) hepatitis B deaths from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Australian Coordinating Registry. Rates over the reporting period were described overall, and by age group, sex, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander versus other [neither Aboriginal nor Torres Strait Islander, unknown or not stated]). Trend analyses were performed using Poisson or negative binomial regression. Additional analyses were performed for the cohort born after May 2000. Results and discussion: The annual all-age notification rate per 100,000 per year declined (p < 0.001) from 2.13 in 2000 to 0.65 in 2019 for newly-acquired hepatitis B and from 38.3 to 22.3 for unspecified hepatitis B (likely to predominantly represent chronic hepatitis B). Newly-acquired and unspecified hepatitis B notification rates were lowest among children aged < 15 years. The most substantial reductions in notification rates of newly-acquired hepatitis B were among adolescents aged 15-19 years and young adults aged 20-24 and 25-29 years (respectively 17-, 11-, and 7-fold); these age groups also recorded the most substantial reductions in unspecified hepatitis B notifications (respectively 5-, 3.5-, and 2-fold). Newly-acquired hepatitis B notification and acute hepatitis B mortality rates were two- to threefold higher in males than females. The all-age newly-acquired hepatitis B notification rate in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people decreased twofold between 2000 and 2019, but remained threefold higher than in other people. Acute hepatitis B hospitalisations also declined over the study period (p < 0.001) and followed similar patterns. There were no acute or chronic hepatitis B deaths among people born after May 2000; this cohort featured 52 newly-acquired and 887 unspecified hepatitis B notifications. Due to lack of data on country of birth (and hence eligibility for infant vaccination under the NIP or overseas programs), vaccination status and likely transmission routes, we were unable to assess factors contributing to these potentially preventable infections. Conclusion: Adolescent and infant immunisation under the NIP has led to significant reductions in notification rates of newly-acquired hepatitis B, and in acute hepatitis B hospitalisation rates, both overall and in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Unspecified hepatitis B notification rates have also greatly decreased in children and young adults, likely largely due to the impact of overseas infant immunisation programs on prevalence in child and adolescent migrants. Work to improve completeness of variables within national datasets is crucial, along with enhanced surveillance of both newly-acquired and unspecified hepatitis B cases to investigate transmission routes, vaccination status and factors contributing to acquisition of hepatitis B, in order to optimise the impact of immunisation programs and ensure linkage with care.

Closing the vaccination coverage gap in New South Wales: the Aboriginal Immunisation Healthcare Worker Program.

OBJECTIVES: To assess vaccination coverage and timeliness among Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in New South Wales and the rest of Australia, with a particular focus on changes in the vaccination coverage gaps after the introduction of the Aboriginal Immunisation Healthcare Worker (AIHCW) Program in NSW in 2012. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Australian Immunisation Register data (2008-2016). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual estimates of full vaccination coverage at 9, 15 and 51 months of age for Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NSW and the rest of Australia; differences in coverage between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children at each milestone. RESULTS: The proportion of Indigenous and non-Indigenous children classified as fully vaccinated at 9, 15, and 51 months increased significantly in both NSW and the rest of Australia after the introduction of the AIHCW Program. The mean annual difference in full vaccination coverage between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NSW aged 9 months declined from 6.6 (95% CI, 5.2-8.0) during 2008-2011 to 3.7 percentage points (95% CI, 2.5-4.8) during 2012-2016; for those aged 15 months it declined from 4.6 (95% CI, 3.1-6.0) to 2.2 percentage points (95% CI, 1.0-3.4), and for those aged 51 months it declined from 8.5 (95% CI, 7.2-9.8) to 0.6 percentage points (95% CI, -0.6 to 1.8). Reductions in the differences in coverage were not as marked in the rest of Australia. In 2016, there was no statistically significant difference in coverage at any of the three milestones in NSW: at 9 months the difference was 1.6 percentage points (95% CI, -1.0 to 4.1); at 15 months, 0.4 percentage points (95% CI, -2.2 to 2.9); and at 51 months, -1.8 percentage points (95% CI, -4.4 to 0.8). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a dedicated program can help overcome barriers to timely vaccination and significantly improve timely vaccination rates in Indigenous Australian children.

Closing the gap in Australian Aboriginal infant immunisation rates -- the development and review of a pre-call strategy.

BACKGROUND: Improving timely immunisation is key to closing the inequitable gap in immunisation rates between Aboriginal children and non-Indigenous children. Aboriginal Immunisation Officers were employed in Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD), New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to telephone the families of all Aboriginal infants prior to the due date for their first scheduled vaccination. METHODS: Aboriginal Immunisation Officers contacted the families of Aboriginal children born in the Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) by telephone before their due immunisation date (pre-call) to provide the rationale for timely immunisation, and to facilitate contact with culturally safe local immunisation services if this was required. The impact of this strategy on immunisation coverage rates is reviewed. RESULTS: For the period March 2010 to September 2014 there was a significant increase in immunisation coverage rate for Aboriginal children at 12 months of age in HNELHD (p < 0.0001). The coverage in the rest of NSW Aboriginal children also increased but not significantly (p = 0.218). Over the full study period there was a significant decrease in the immunisation coverage gap between Aboriginal children and non-Indigenous children in HNELHD (p < 0.0001) and the rest of NSW (p = 0.004). The immunisation coverage gap between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous infants decreased at a significantly faster rate in HNELHD than the rest of NSW (p = 0.0001). By the end of the study period in 2014, immunisation coverage in HNELHD Aboriginal infants had surpassed that of non-Indigenous infants by 0.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of Aboriginal immunisation officers may be associated with closing of the gap between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous infants' immunisation coverage in HNELHD and NSW. The pre-call telephone strategy provided accelerated benefit in closing this gap in HNELHD.