Adjunct Preceptor Perceptions of Motivation, Understanding, and Support for the Precepting Role.

OBJECTIVE: To determine adjunct pharmacist preceptor perceptions of their precepting role related to three domains: motivation to precept, understanding the precepting role, and support for precepting. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey of 2429 adjunct preceptors for four schools of pharmacy was conducted. Participants ranked their agreement with 81 statements regarding the three domains, including eleven subdomains. RESULTS: Mean scores for the three domains were slightly below the positive response level, with lower scores found for the subdomains of workload, precepting norms, and extrinsic benefits/rewards. Individual statements indicated increased workload due to precepting, need for more preceptor recognition and appreciation, perceptions that precepting was stressful or draining, and a preference for one concurrent learner. More frequent need for extra coaching for APPE students negatively impacted all domains, including nine subdomains. CONCLUSION: This study provides a formal evaluation of adjunct preceptor perceptions of their precepting role. Compared to previous studies, these results may indicate lower satisfaction with precepting, suggesting opportunities exist to improve the adjunct precepting experience. Actions by schools/colleges of pharmacy are necessary to ensure experiential education capacity including addressing workload concerns, increasing preceptor recognition and appreciation, and supporting preceptors when students need extra coaching.

Impact of a Simulation Exercise on Student Perceptions of Poverty and Interprofessional Socialization.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an interprofessional poverty simulation exercise by determining if participating students demonstrated changes in attitude toward poverty (ATP) and perceptions of interprofessional socialization. METHODS: The Community Action Poverty Simulation from the Missouri Community Action Network was provided to 512 interprofessional health care students during 9 simulation exercises over a 3-year period. Primary participating professions were pharmacy, occupational therapy, and nursing. Student simulation roles were assigned to ensure a mix of professions in simulated families and debriefing groups. Debriefing sessions included questions related to interprofessional interactions. Students completed surveys before and following participation in the simulation, which included the ATP Short Form scale and the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale-9A. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in ATP were demonstrated for the overall score and 15 items of the 21-item ATP Short Form scale. The domains of stigma and structural perspective showed statistically significant improvement, while the personal deficiency domain did not. Statistically significant improvements in student perceptions related to interprofessional socialization were demonstrated for the overall score and 7 items of the 9-item Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale-9A scale. CONCLUSION: This interprofessional poverty simulation positively altered student ATP and enhanced interprofessional socialization. The Community Action Poverty Simulation augmented with debriefing questions related to interprofessional interactions served as an effective interprofessional education experience for pharmacy, occupational therapy, and nursing students.

Impact of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences on Residency Interview Invitations.

Objective. To determine how postgraduate year one (PGY1) pharmacy residency program directors perceive factors related to advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) when selecting candidates for residency interviews. Methods. An online cross-sectional nationwide survey of 1,280 PGY1 residency program directors was conducted. Participants were asked to rank the overall influence of five APPE categories, including location, structure, elective type, timing, and preceptor references, as well as the desirability and necessity of APPE-related variables representing the five categories, in their assessment of residency candidates. Results. Program demographics and survey data were collected from 375 participants (29% response rate). The category most influential to program directors' decisions was APPE preceptor reference letters, while the category that was the least influential was APPE timing factors. An APPE's location, structure, and elective type ranked second, third, and fourth, respectively, as the most influential categories. Respondents perceived factors similar to their own residency environment as desirable, supporting the study's conceptual framework of person-environment fit. The variables that the majority of residency directors specifically desired were two reference letters from APPE preceptors and letter grades for each APPE completed. Completion of inpatient elective APPEs was considered more desirable than completion of a balanced mix of elective APPEs. Participants rarely indicated that a specific APPE variable was a necessity for a candidate to be considered. Conclusion. Applicants to pharmacy residency programs should consider the importance of person-environment fit when selecting APPEs and preparing applications as program directors desire candidates who possess attributes compatible with their organization and complete APPEs in settings similar to that of their organization. Conversely, the absence of desired APPE-related variables does not necessarily exclude an applicant from consideration.

Preceptor Perceptions of Virtual Quality Assurance Experiential Site Visits.

Objective. To determine preceptor perceptions of the value of experiential quality assurance site visits between virtual and onsite visits, and to gauge preceptor opinions of the optimal method of site visits based on the type of visit received. Methods. Site visits (12 virtual and 17 onsite) were conducted with 29 APPE sites located at least 200 miles from campus. Participating preceptors were invited to complete an online post-visit survey adapted from a previously validated and published survey tool measuring preceptor perceptions of the value of traditional onsite visits. Results. Likert-type score averages for survey questions ranged from 4.2 to 4.6 in the virtual group and from 4.3 to 4.7 in the onsite group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Preceptors were more inclined to prefer the type of visit they received. Preceptors receiving onsite visits were also more likely to indicate no visit type preference. Conclusion. Preceptors perceived value from both onsite and virtual site visits. Preceptors who experienced virtual site visits highly preferred that methodology. This study suggests that virtual site visits may be a viable alternative for providing experiential quality assurance site visits from a preceptor's perspective.