Agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance claims data on healthcare utilization in patients with mental disorders.

BACKGROUND: Data on resource use are frequently required for healthcare assessments. Studies on healthcare utilization (HCU) in individuals with mental disorders have analyzed both self-reports and administrative data. Source of data may affect the quality of analysis and compromise the accuracy of results. We sought to ascertain the degree of agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance (SHI) fund claims data from patients with mental disorders. METHODS: Claims data from six German SHI and self-reports were obtained along with a cost-effectiveness analysis performed as a part of a controlled prospective multicenter cohort study conducted in 18 psychiatric hospitals in Germany (PsychCare), including patients with pre-defined psychiatric disorders. Self-reports were collected using the German adaption of the Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI) questionnaire with a 6-month recall period. Data linkage was performed using a unique pseudonymized identifier. Missing responses were coded as non-use for all analyses. HCU was calculated for inpatient and outpatient care, day-care services, home treatment, and pharmaceuticals. Concordance was measured using Cohen's Kappa (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Regression approaches were used to investigate the effect of independent variables on the agreements. RESULTS: In total 274 participants (mean age 47.8 [SD = 14.2] years; 47.08% women) were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed between the linked and unlinked patients in terms of baseline characteristics. Total agreements values were 63.9% (κ = 0.03; PABAK = 0.28) for outpatient contacts, 69.3% (κ = 0.25; PABAK = 0.39) for medication use, 81.0% (κ = 0.56; PABAK = 0.62) for inpatient days and 86.1% (κ = 0.67; PABAK = 0.72) for day-care services. There was varied quantitative agreement between data sources, with the poorest agreement for outpatient care (ICC [95% CI] = 0.22 [0.10-0.33]) and the best for psychiatric day-care services (ICC [95% CI] = 0.72 [0.66-0.78]). Marital status and time since first treatment positively affected the chance of agreement on utilization of outpatient services. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were high levels of absolute agreement, the measures of concordance between administrative records and self-reports were generally minimal to moderate. Healthcare investigations should consider using linked or at least different data sources to estimate HCU for specific utilization areas, where unbiased information can be expected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was part of the multi-center controlled PsychCare trial (German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00022535; Date of registration: 2020-10-02).

Versorgung geriatrischer Krankheitsbilder unter ausgewählten ambulanten Facharztgruppen: Kombination von Befragungs- und GKV-Routinedaten zur Abbildung des Leistungsgeschehens.

BACKGROUND: In light of an aging population, the German health system faces the challenge of adapting regional health care structures to the changing care needs of geriatric patients. Since geriatric care is interprofessional, a structural analysis of the service providers involved is required. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the primary and joint care responsibilities for geriatric patients with specific characteristics, to estimate the associated effort for selected outpatient medical service providers and to identify resulting care concentrations. METHODS: The analysis includes six selected specialist disciplines in the outpatient sector and is based on two databases: 1) A representative survey among outpatient physicians related to geriatric care (n = 400) to examine both the primary geriatric care needs that professionals treat regularly and aggravating geriatric morbidity. 2) A claims data analysis determines services and efforts for approximately 300,000 geriatric patients for every year from 2014 to 2018. For the specialists included in the analysis, care concentration was determined by association analysis comparing the care efforts of outpatient physicians for patients with different geriatric characteristics. RESULTS: General practitioners, in particular, serve as primary care providers for all geriatric characteristics; there is no concentration of care on specific patient groups. Concentrations associated with care efforts and joint care responsibilities for patients with certain geriatric characteristics are found among the more specialized physician groups. Across all professions, the physicians surveyed believe that geriatric-specific immobility, depression, anxiety disorders and cognitive deficits make the provision of care more difficult. DISCUSSION: The results contribute to the understanding of primary and interdisciplinary care responsibilities of outpatient physicians related to the treatment of geriatric conditions and can thus represent an important basis for the structural planning of geriatric care. Nevertheless, it should be noted that within the scope of the analysis presented, only general practitioners and five specialist disciplines could be taken into account. Therefore, the considerations primarily allow initial conclusions about the care responsibility of outpatient physicians with regard to geriatric morbidity. To enable comprehensive structural planning, however, the analyses would have to be expanded to include all specialists involved in geriatric care. CONCLUSION: The joint care responsibility of outpatient physicians for specific geriatric patients underlines the relevance for interdisciplinary care models and the need for expansion of geriatric expertise in the outpatient sector. In view of the ageing population and an increase in morbidity, the planning of care structures should be based on the needs of geriatric patients and the associated expenses incurred by the various health care providers.

The patients` perspective on home-based infusion: A longitudinal observational study in the German healthcare setting for patients with lysosomal storage disorders treated with enzyme replacement therapy.

Background: Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), metabolic disorders resulting in build-up of endogenous waste and progressive organ damage, can be treated with intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). ERT can be administered either in specialized clinics, at a physician's office or in the home care setting. Legislative goals in Germany strive to shift to more outpatient care while maintaining treatment objectives. This study investigates the patient perspective on home-based ERT in terms of acceptance, safety, and treatment satisfaction in LSD patients. Methods: This was a longitudinal observational study, carried out under real-world conditions in patients' home environment, covering 30 months from January 2019 to June 2021. Patients with LSDs who were deemed suitable for home-based ERT by their physicians were recruited to the study. Patients were interviewed before the start of the first home-based ERT and then at regular intervals thereafter using standardized questionnaires. Results: Data from 30 patients were analyzed: 18 with Fabry disease, 5 with Gaucher disease, 6 with Pompe disease and 1 with Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I). Age ranged from 8 to 77 years (mean age 40). The reported average waiting time prior to infusion of more than half an hour decreased from 30% of the patients affected at baseline to 5% across all follow-up time points. All patients felt adequately informed about home-based ERT throughout follow-ups and reported that they would choose home-based ERT again. At almost each time point, patients indicated that home-based ERT had improved their ability to cope with the disease. All but one patient indicated feeling safe at each follow-up time point. Compared to 36.7% at baseline, only 6.9% of patients reported a need for improvement in their care after 6 months of home-based ERT. Mean treatment satisfaction increased by approximately 1.6 scale points after 6 months of home-based ERT compared to baseline, and by another 0.2 scale points after 18 months. In terms of quality of care, all but one patient rated home-based ERT as an equivalent alternative throughout follow-ups. Patients would recommend home-based ERT to other suitable LSD-patients. Conclusion: Home-based ERT increases patients' treatment satisfaction, and patients perceive the quality of care as an equivalent alternative, compared to ERT in a center, clinic, or at a physician's office.

Cost analysis of hospitalized Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).

AIM: Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) causes heavy financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. As with all hospital-acquired infections, prolonged hospital stays are the main cost driver. Previous cost studies only include hospital billing data and compare the length of stay in contrast to non-infected patients. To date, a survey of actual cost has not yet been conducted. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of data for patients with nosocomial CDAD was carried out over a 1-year period at the University Hospital of Greifswald. Based on identification of CDAD related treatment processes, cost of hygienic measures, antibiotics and laboratory as well as revenue losses due to bed blockage and increased length of stay were calculated. RESULTS: 19 patients were included in the analysis. On average, a CDAD patient causes additional costs of € 5,262.96. Revenue losses due to extended length of stay take the highest proportion with € 2,555.59 per case, followed by loss in revenue due to bed blockage during isolation with € 2,413.08 per case. Overall, these opportunity costs accounted for 94.41% of total costs. In contrast, costs for hygienic measures (€ 253.98), pharmaceuticals (€ 22.88) and laboratory (€ 17.44) are quite low. CONCLUSION: CDAD results in significant additional costs for the hospital. This survey of actual costs confirms previous study results.

Improving hospital hygiene to reduce the impact of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care--a prospective controlled multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections are the most common complication during inpatient hospital care. An increasing proportion of these infections are caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This report describes an intervention study which was designed to address the practical problems encountered in trying to avoid and treat infections caused by MDROs. The aim of the HARMONIC (Harmonized Approach to avert Multidrug-resistant Organisms and Nosocomial Infections) study is to provide comprehensive support to hospitals in a defined study area in north-east Germany, to meet statutory requirements. To this end, a multimodal system of hygiene management was implemented in the participating hospitals. METHODS/DESIGN: HARMONIC is a controlled intervention study conducted in eight acute care hospitals in the 'Health Region Baltic Sea Coast' in Germany. The intervention measures include the provision of written recommendations on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRGN), supplemented by regional recommendations for antibiotic prescriptions. In addition, there is theoretical and practical training of health care workers (HCWs) in the prevention and handling of MDROs, as well as targeted and critically gauged applications of antibiotics. The main outcomes of the implementation and analysis of the HARMONIC study are: (i) screening rates for MRSA, VRE and MRGN in high-risk patients, (ii) the frequency of MRSA decolonization, (iii) the level of knowledge of HCWs concerning MDROs, and (iv) specific types and amounts of antibiotics used. The data are predominantly obtained by paper-based questionnaires and documentation sheets. A computer-assisted workflow-based documentation system was developed in order to provide support to the participating facilities. The investigation includes three nested studies on risk profiles of MDROs, health-related quality of life, and cost analysis. A six-month follow-up study investigates the quality of life after discharge, the long-term costs of the treatment of infections caused by MDROs, and the sustainability of MRSA eradication. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate an area-wide harmonized hygiene program to control the nosocomial spreading of MDROs. Comparability between the intervention and control group is ensured by matching the hospitals according to size (number of discharges per year/number of beds) and level of care (standard or maximum). The results of the study may provide important indications for the implementation of regional MDRO management programs.