The cost-effectiveness of an early interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome based on the RITA 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that an early interventional strategy for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) can improve health outcomes but also increase costs when compared with a conservative strategy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an early interventional strategy in different risk groups from a UK health-service perspective. DESIGN: Decision-analytic model based on randomised clinical trial data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs in UK Sterling at 2003/2004 prices and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) combined into an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. METHODS: Data from the third Randomised Intervention Trial of unstable Angina (RITA 3) was employed to estimate rates of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, costs and health-related quality of life. Cost-effectiveness was estimated over patients' lifetimes within the decision-analytic model. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost per QALY gained for an early interventional strategy was approximately 55,000 pounds sterling, 22,000 pounds sterling and 12,000 pounds sterling for patients at low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. The early interventional strategy is approximately 1%, 35% and 95% likely to be cost-effective for patients at low, intermediate and high risk, respectively, at a threshold of 20,000 pounds sterling per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of early intervention in low-risk patients is sensitive to assumptions about the duration of the treatment effect. CONCLUSION: An early interventional strategy in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS is likely to be considered cost-effective for patients at high and intermediate risk, but this is less likely to be the case for patients at low risk.

Interventional versus conservative treatment in acute non-ST elevation coronary syndrome: time course of patient management and disease events over one year in the RITA 3 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in acute non-ST elevation coronary syndrome, the benefit from early invasive coronary intervention compared with a conservative strategy of later symptom-guided intervention varies over time. METHODS: In RITA 3 (Randomised Intervention Trial of unstable Angina 3) patients were randomly assigned to coronary angiography (median 2 days after randomisation) and appropriate intervention (n = 895) or to a symptom-guided conservative strategy (n = 915). RESULTS: In the first week patients in both groups were at highest risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or refractory angina (incidence rate 40 times higher than in months 5-12 of follow up). There were 22 MIs and 6 deaths in the intervention group (largely due to procedure-related events, 14 MIs and 3 deaths) versus 17 MIs and 3 deaths in the conservative group. In the rest of the year there were an additional 12 versus 27 MIs, respectively (treatment-time interaction p = 0.021). Over one year in the intervention group there was a 43% reduction in refractory angina; 22% of patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and 35% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention only, which reduced refractory angina but provoked some early MIs; and 43% were still treated medically, mostly because of a favourable initial angiogram. CONCLUSION: Any intervention policy needs to recognise the high risk of events in the first week and the substantial minority of patients not needing intervention. Intervention may be best targeted at higher risk patients, as the early hazards of the procedure are then offset by reduced subsequent events.

Management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome with minimal myocardial necrosis: analysis of a large prospective registry from a non-interventional centre.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical risk of minimal myonecrosis below the cut-off for acute myocardial infarction (MI) in comparison with other grades of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). One-thousand four hundred and sixty seven consecutive patients with ACS admitted between May 2001 and April 2002 were studied in a non-interventional centre. Patients were divided into unstable angina (UA) (cTnT < 0.01 microg/l), non-ST elevation ACS with minimal myonecrosis (0.01 or= 0.1 microg/L) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). UA (n = 638) was associated with the fewest events at 6 months (2% cardiac death or MI). Patients with any myonecrosis (n = 829) had worse outcomes (6-month cardiac death or MI 18.3-23.3%). Compared with ACS patients with minimal myonecrosis, UA patients were at significantly lower risk (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.45, p < 0.001), NSTEMI patients were at similar risk (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.89-2.35, p = 0.13), and STEMI patients were at higher risk (OR 2.12 95% CI 1.26-3.85, p = 0.008) in adjusted analyses. Nearly 85% of cardiac deaths occurred within 6 months. The risk of adverse events was higher among patients managed by non-cardiologists (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1-2.75, p = 0.049). Patients with non-ST elevation ACS and minimal myonecrosis are a high-risk group more comparable with NSTEMI and clearly distinguishable from patients with UA.

5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome of an interventional strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome is unknown. We tested whether an interventional strategy (routine angiography followed by revascularisation) was better than a conservative strategy (ischaemia-driven or symptom-driven angiography) over 5 years' follow-up. METHODS: In a multicentre randomised trial, 1810 patients (from 45 hospitals in England and Scotland, UK) with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to receive an early intervention (n=895) or a conservative strategy (n=915) within 48 h of the index episode of cardiac pain. In each group, the aim was to provide the best medical treatment, and also to undertake coronary arteriography within 72 h in the interventional strategy with subsequent management guided by the angiographic findings. Analysis was by intention to treat and the primary outcome (composite of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction) had masked independent adjudication. RITA 3 has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Control Trial Number ISRCTN07752711. FINDINGS: At 1-year follow-up, rates of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction were similar. However, at a median of 5 years' follow-up (IQR 4.6-5.0), 142 (16.6%) patients with intervention treatment and 178 (20.0%) with conservative treatment died or had non-fatal myocardial infarction (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, p=0.044), with a similar benefit for cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.74, 0.56-0.97, p=0.030). 234 (102 [12%] intervention, 132 [15%] conservative) patients died during follow-up (0.76, 0.58-1.00, p=0.054). The benefits of an intervention strategy were mainly seen in patients at high risk of death or myocardial infarction (p=0.004), and for the highest risk group, the odds ratio of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction was 0.44 (0.25-0.76). INTERPRETATION: In patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, a routine invasive strategy leads to long-term reduction in risk of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction, and this benefit is mainly in high-risk patients. The findings provide support for national and international guidelines in the need for more robust risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome.

Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial.

AIMS: The RITA 3 trial randomized patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina to strategies of early intervention (angiography followed by revascularization) or conservative care (ischaemia or symptom driven angiography). The aim of this analysis was to investigate the impact of gender on the effect of these two strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 1810 patients (682 women and 1128 men) were randomized. The risk factor profile of women at presentation was markedly different to men. There was evidence that men benefited more from an early intervention strategy for death or non-fatal myocardial infarction at 1 year (adjusted odds ratios 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.98 for men and 1.79, 95% confidence interval 0.95-3.35 for women; interaction p-value=0.007). Men who underwent the assigned angiogram were more likely to be put forward for coronary artery bypass surgery, even after allowing for differences in disease severity. CONCLUSION: An early intervention strategy resulted in a beneficial effect in men which was not seen in women although caution is needed in interpretation. Further research is needed to evaluate why women do not appear to benefit from early intervention and to identify treatments that improve the prognosis of women.

Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest that, for patients at moderate risk of death from unstable coronary-artery disease, either an interventional strategy (angiography followed by revascularisation) or a conservative strategy (ischaemia-driven or symptom-driven angiography) is appropriate. We aimed to test the hypothesis that an interventional strategy is better than a conservative strategy in such patients. METHODS: We did a randomised multicentre trial of 1810 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (mean age 62 years, 38% women). Patients were assigned an early intervention or conservative strategy. The antithrombin agent in both groups was enoxaparin. The co-primary endpoints were a combined rate of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or refractory angina at 4 months; and a combined rate of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction at 1 year. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: At 4 months, 86 (9.6%) of 895 patients in the intervention group had died or had a myocardial infarction or refractory angina, compared with 133 (14.5%) of 915 patients in the conservative group (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85, p=0.001). This difference was mainly due to a halving of refractory angina in the intervention group. Death or myocardial infarction was similar in both treatment groups at 1 year (68 [7.6%] vs 76 [8.3%], respectively; risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.67-1.25, p=0.58). Symptoms of angina were improved and use of antianginal medications significantly reduced with the interventional strategy (p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: In patients presenting with unstable coronary-artery disease, an interventional strategy is preferable to a conservative strategy, mainly because of the halving of refractory or severe angina, and with no increased risk of death or myocardial infarction.

HIV infection and silicosis: the impact of two potent risk factors on the incidence of mycobacterial disease in South African miners.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the combined effects of HIV infection and silicosis on mycobacterial disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort of 1374 HIV-positive and 2648 HIV-negative miners who attended a South African gold mining hospital and primary health clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Miners who had been tested for HIV, with consent, at primary health clinics during 1991-1996, predominantly because of a symptomatic sexually transmitted disease. RESULTS: Tuberculosis (TB) incidence was 4.9 and 1.1 per 100 person-years in HIV-positive and HIV-negative miners respectively. The incidence of Mycobacterium kansasii disease was also high (0.32 and 0.10 per 100 person-years, respectively). Silicosis was highly prevalent, implying inadequate dust control, and was a significant TB risk factor among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men (adjusted incidence rate ratios 1.4-2.5 according to radiological severity). The data were consistent with the risks of silicosis and HIV combining multiplicatively, but did not fit an additive model. The incidence of HIV-associated TB increased significantly during the study, with no corresponding change in HIV-negative rates, to reach 16.1 per 100 person-years among HIV-positive silicotics. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of silicosis and HIV infection combine multiplicatively, so that TB remains as much a silica-related occupational disease in HIV-positive as in HIV-negative miners, and HIV-positive silicotics have considerably higher TB incidence rates than those reported from other HIV-positive Africans. The increasing impact of HIV over time may indicate epidemic TB transmission with rapid disease development in HIV-infected miners. Similar but currently unrecognized interactions may be contributing to TB control problems in other industrializing countries affected by the HIV epidemic.

Use of miniradiographs to detect silicosis. Comparison of radiological with autopsy findings.

Radiological and routine autopsy findings from 241 South African gold miners were compared, using pathology as the "gold standard." Previous annual screening miniradiographs were read independently by two readers, using the International Labor Office (ILO) grading system, without reference to personal identifiers. Individual and consensus silicosis grades were recorded for each subject. When pathological and radiological silicosis were defined as any abnormal grade, the sensitivity and specificity of the radiological diagnosis was 67.5% and 80%, with positive and negative predictive values of 63% and 83%. Most undetected autopsy silicosis was early-grade. Using higher pathological and radiological grades to define silicosis (5 nodules or more and ILO grades 1/1 and above), sensitivity and specificity increased to 71% and 96%, and positive and negative predictive values increased to 76% and 95%, respectively. Use of a consensus grade made little difference to results from individual readers. For each radiological definition, sensitivity was considerably higher than, but specificity was similar to, that found in a previous study of South African gold miners which used the same pathology source and standard sized films. The difference between these two study findings, and unexpected demonstration of higher sensitivity from miniradiographs, suggests that further research is required into factors affecting radiological interpretation before silicosis grading can be considered to be adequately standardized.

Social characteristics and their importance in reducing inequalities in health in the Armed Forces.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether there was a difference in social characteristics in different garrison towns of the British Forces Germany and to ascertain whether the health visitor workload was different in these towns. DESIGN: Self completed questionnaires administered to mothers by health visitors on first contact after delivery of their baby, and prospective follow up by health visitors recording subsequent contacts for the first three months after birth. SETTING: 97 mothers based in Bruggen, Fallingbostel and Rheindahlen who had just delivered their new-born baby. RESULTS: Response rates for Bruggen, Fallingbostel and Rheindahlen were 54.8%, 70.2% and 69.9% respectively. There was a significant difference between parents in Fallingbostel and Rheindahlen with higher levels of maternal smoking during pregnancy (p = 0.04), more fathers aged under 25 years (p = 0.004), lower paternal military rank (p = 0.003), and increased paternal absence of more than one month during the pregnancy (p = 0.001) in Fallingbostel. The characteristics in Bruggen were similar to those in Rheindahlen. The workload of the health visitors, was significantly increased in Fallingbostel in comparison to Rheindahlen (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The use of social characteristics as an assessment of need would allow appropriate targeted health promotion and education resulting in a reduction in the inequalities of health in the Armed Forces.

Side effects of mefloquine prophylaxis for malaria: an independent randomized controlled trial.

A prospective randomized double-'blind' trial was undertaken during a military exercise in East Africa to determine whether there was a significant difference in the incidence of side effects experienced by soldiers taking mefloquine 250 mg weekly compared with those taking chloroquine 300 mg weekly and proguanil 200 mg daily as chemoprophylaxis for malaria. Subject to their informed voluntary consent, male soldiers who were not aviators were included in the study. Identical questionnaires were completed voluntarily at the end of 2 and 8 weeks. Symptoms were classified by nature into-'all', 'neuropsychological', 'enteric' and 'other', and by severity into 'severe' and 'very severe'. The proportions of respondents experiencing side effects were compared to seek statistically significant differences between the chemoprophylactic groups. Questionnaire 1 was completed after 2 weeks by 183 of 317 subjects (58%) randomly assigned mefloquine and by 176 of 307 subjects (57%) randomly assigned chloroquine-proguanil. The incidence of putative side effects was not significantly different between the groups (71/183 vs. 70/176), odds ratio 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 1.47). Questionnaire 2 was completed after 8 weeks by 145 of 317 subjects (46%) randomly assigned mefloquine and by 142 of 307 subjects (46%) randomly assigned chloroquine-proguanil. The incidence of putative side effects was still not significantly different between the groups (95/145 vs. 103/142), odds ratio 0.72 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.19). None of the subjects developed a serious neuropsychological reaction. Among respondents, 12.8% and 38% admitted lack of full compliance at 2 and 8 weeks, respectively. Exclusion of these subjects during a secondary analysis did not affect the results. None of the subjects developed malaria in the 12 months following return to the UK. Subject to the limitations of a response rate that was smaller than desired and the fact that the study was conducted in fit male military personnel, these results support evidence which indicates that mefloquine is no more toxic than chloroquine-proguanil.

A British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of coronary disease: ASPIRE (Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events).

OBJECTIVE: To measure the potential for secondary prevention of coronary disease in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of a representative sample of coronary patients from a retrospective review of hospital medical records and patient interview and examination. SETTING: Stratified random sample of 12 specialist cardiac centres and 12 district general hospitals drawn from 34 specialist cardiac centres and 261 district general hospitals in 12 geographic areas in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 2583 patients < or = 70 yr; 25 consecutive males and 25 consecutive females identified retrospectively in each of four diagnostic categories: coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, acute myocardial infarction, and acute myocardial ischaemia without evidence of infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factor recording and management in medical records; the prevalence and control of risk factors at interview six months after the procedure or event. RESULTS: Recording of coronary risk factors in patient's records was incomplete and this varied by risk factor. Smoking habit and blood pressure were most completely recorded, whereas a history of hyperlipidaemia and blood cholesterol concentrations were least complete. Risk factor records were more likely to be complete in cardiac centres than in district hospitals. At interview 10% to 27% of patients were still smoking cigarettes and 75% remained overweight, females more severely so. Up to a quarter of patients remained hypertensive, males more severely so than females. Over three quarters had a total cholesterol > 5.2 mmol/l. In patients on medication for blood pressure, cholesterol or glucose, risk factor profiles were little better than in those who were not. Only about one patient in three was taking a beta blocker after infarction. Up to a fifth of patients who had had acute myocardial ischaemia were not taking aspirin at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential to reduce the risk of a further major ischaemic event in patients with established coronary disease. This can be achieved by effective lifestyle intervention, the rigorous management of blood pressure and cholesterol, and the appropriate use of prophylactic drugs.