Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender to Disparities in Functional Recovery and Social Health After Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if evidence of disparities exists in functional recovery and social health post-lower limb amputation. DESIGN: Race-ethnicity, gender, and income-based group comparisons of functioning and social health in a convenience sample of lower limb prosthetic users. SETTING: Prosthetic clinics in 4 states. PARTICIPANTS: A geographically diverse cohort of 56 English and Spanish speaking community-dwelling individuals with dysvascular lower limb amputation, between 18-80 years old. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Primary outcomes included 2 physical performance measures, the Timed Up and Go test and 2-minute walk test, and thirdly, the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities survey measured social health. RESULTS: Of the study participants, 45% identified as persons of color, and 39% were women (mean ± SD age, 61.6 (9.8) years). People identifying as non-Hispanic White men exhibited better physical performance than men of color, White women, and women of color by -7.86 (95% CI, -16.26 to 0.53, P=.07), -10.34 (95% CI, -19.23 to -1.45, P=.02), and -11.63 (95% CI, -21.61 to -1.66, P=.02) seconds, respectively, on the TUG, and by 22.6 (95% CI, -2.31 to 47.50, P=.09), 38.92 (95% CI, 12.53 to 65.30, P<.01), 47.53 (95% CI, 17.93 to 77.13, P<.01) meters, respectively, on the 2-minute walk test. Income level explained 14% and 11% of the variance in perceived mobility and social health measures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that sociodemographic factors of race-ethnicity, gender, and income level are associated with functioning and social health post-lower limb amputation. The clinical effect of this new knowledge lies in what it offers to health care practitioners who treat this patient population, in recognizing potential barriers to optimal recovery and quality of life. More work is required to assess lived experiences after amputation and provide better understanding of amputation-related health disparities.

Disparities in functional recovery after dysvascular lower limb amputation are associated with employment status and self-efficacy.

PURPOSE: Employment status is considered a determinant of health, yet returning to work is frequently a challenge after lower limb amputation. No studies have documented if working after lower limb amputation is associated with functional recovery. The study's purpose was to examine the influence of full-time employment on functioning after lower limb amputation. METHODS: Multisite, cross-sectional study of 49 people with dysvascular lower limb amputation. Outcomes of interest included performance-based measures, the Component Timed-Up-and-Go test, the 2-min walk test, and self-reported measures of prosthetic mobility and activity participation. RESULTS: Average participant age was 62.1 ± 9.7 years, 39% were female and 45% were persons of color. Results indicated that 80% of participants were not employed full-time. Accounting for age, people lacking full-time employment exhibited significantly poorer outcomes of mobility and activity participation. Per regression analyses, primary contributors to better prosthetic mobility were working full-time (R2 ranging from 0.06 to 0.24) and greater self-efficacy (R2 ranging from 0.32 to 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers novel evidence of associations between employment and performance-based mobility outcomes after dysvascular lower limb amputation. Further research is required to determine cause-effect directionalities. These results provide the foundation for future patient-centered research into how work affects outcomes after lower limb amputation. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLower limb amputation can pose barriers to employment and activity participation, potentially affecting the quality of life.This study found that the majority of people living with lower limb amputation due to dysvascular causes were not employed full-time and were exhibiting poorer prosthetic outcomes.Healthcare practitioners should consider the modifiable variable of employment when evaluating factors that may affect prosthetic mobility.The modifiable variable of self-efficacy should be assessed by healthcare professionals when evaluating factors that may affect prosthetic mobility.

Temporal-Spatial Values During a 180° Step Turn in People with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Daily ambulation with a prosthesis often involves turning to negotiate within the home and community environments, however how people with lower limb loss perform turns is infrequently studied. Administering a common clinical outcome measure to capture turn performance data provides a convenient means of assessing this ubiquitous activity. RESEARCH QUESTION: What temporal-spatial parameters are exhibited by people with unilateral lower limb amputation while performing a 180˚ turn task? METHODS: Forty community-ambulating subjects with unilateral lower limb amputation (20 transtibial amputees, 20 transfemoral amputees) performed the Component Timed-Up-and-Go (cTUG) test turning once in each direction, both toward the intact and toward the prosthetic limb. An instrumented walkway captured temporal-spatial parameters during performance of the 180˚ turn task of the cTUG, while a custom iPad application recorded time and number of steps to perform the turn. Comparisons between turn direction and level of amputation during the cTUG and temporal-spatial results were assessed. RESULTS: People with lower limb amputation spent more time on their intact limb while turning than their prosthetic limb regardless of the position of the intact limb, and those with transfemoral amputation spent significantly more time over the intact limb than those with transtibial amputation. Additionally, subjects with transfemoral amputation performed the turn significantly faster when turning with an inner intact limb. SIGNIFICANCE: Amputees use different movement strategies with altered temporal-spatial characteristics to turn depending on the direction of the turn and the level of amputation. Clinical use of the cTUG could provide evidence supporting prosthetic prescription practice and introduction of novel physical therapy interventions for individuals with lower limb amputation.

The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: the utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations.

OBJECTIVE: Using a custom mobile application to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Component Timed-Up-and-Go test to assess prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: National conference for people with limb loss. SUBJECTS: A total of 118 people with non-vascular cause of lower limb amputation participated. Subjects had a mean age of 48 (±13.7) years and were an average of 10 years post amputation. Of them, 54% ( n = 64) of subjects were male. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN MEASURE: The Component Timed-Up-and-Go was administered using a mobile iPad application, generating a total time to complete the test and five component times capturing each subtask (sit to stand transitions, linear gait, turning) of the standard timed-up-and-go test. The outcome underwent test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and convergent validity analyses through correlation with self-report measures of balance and mobility. RESULTS: The Component Timed-Up-and-Go exhibited excellent test-retest reliability with ICCs ranging from .98 to .86 for total and component times. Evidence of discriminative validity resulted from significant differences in mean total times between people with transtibial (10.1 (SD: ±2.3)) and transfemoral (12.76 (SD: ±5.1) amputation, as well as significant differences in all five component times ( P < .05). Convergent validity of the Component Timed-Up-and-Go was demonstrated through moderate correlations with the PLUS-M ( rs = -.56). CONCLUSION: The Component Timed-Up-and-Go is a reliable and valid clinical tool for detailed assessment of prosthetic mobility in people with non-vascular lower limb amputation. The iPad application provided a means to easily record data, contributing to clinical utility.