Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2011014, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32678453

RESUMO

Importance: Health savings accounts (HSAs) can be used by enrollees in high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) to save for health care expenses before taxes. Expansion of and encouraging contributions to HSAs have been centerpieces of recent federal legislation. Little is known about how US residents who may be eligible for HSAs are using them to save for health care. Objective: To determine which patients who may be eligible for an HSA do not have one and what decisions patients with HSAs make about contributing to them. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional national survey assessed an online survey panel representative of the US adult population. Adults aged 18 to 64 years and enrolled in an HDHP for at least 12 months were eligible to participate. Data were collected from August 26 to September 19, 2016, and analyzed from November 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of not having an HSA or not making HSA contributions in the last 12 months and reasons for not making the HSA contributions. Results: Based on data from 1637 individuals (American Association of Public Opinion Research response rate 4, 54.8%), half (50.6% [95% CI, 47.7%-53.6%]) of US adults in HDHPs were female, and most were aged 36 to 51 (35.7% [95% CI, 32.8%-38.6%]) or 52 to 64 (36.8% [95% CI, 34.1%-39.5%]) years. Approximately 1 in 3 (32.5% [95% CI, 29.8%-35.3%]) did not have an HSA. Those who obtained their health insurance through an exchange were more likely to lack an HSA (70.3% [95% CI, 61.9%-78.6%]) than those who worked for an employer that offered only 1 health insurance plan (36.5% [95% CI, 30.9%-42.1%]; P < .001). More than half of individuals with an HSA (55.0% [95% CI, 51.1%-58.8%]) had not contributed money into it in the last 12 months. Among HDHP enrollees with an HSA, those with at least a master's degree (46.1% [95% CI, 38.3%-53.9%]; P = .02) or a high level of health insurance literacy (47.3% [95% CI, 40.7%-54.0%]; P = .03) were less likely to have made no HAS contributions. Common reasons for not contributing to an HSA included not considering it (36.8% [95% CI, 30.8%-42.8%]) and being unable to afford saving for health care (31.9% [95% CI, 26.2%-37.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that many US adults enrolled in an HDHP lack an HSA, and few with an HSA saved for health care in the last year. Targeted interventions should be explored by employers, health plans, and health systems to encourage HSA uptake and contributions among individuals who could benefit from their use.


Assuntos
Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/normas , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Poupança para Cobertura de Despesas Médicas/tendências , Adulto , Custos e Análise de Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/normas , Masculino , Poupança para Cobertura de Despesas Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
4.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 35(4): 637-46, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044964

RESUMO

In 2011 Connecticut implemented the Health Enhancement Program for state employees. This voluntary program followed the principles of value-based insurance design (VBID) by lowering patient costs for certain high-value primary and chronic disease preventive services, coupled with requirements that enrollees receive these services. Nonparticipants in the program, including those removed for noncompliance with its requirements, were assessed a premium surcharge. The program was intended to curb cost growth and improve health through adherence to evidence-based preventive care. To evaluate its efficacy in doing so, we compared changes in service use and spending after implementation of the program to trends among employees of six other states. Compared to employees of other states, Connecticut employees were similar in age and sex but had a slightly higher percentage of enrollees with chronic conditions and substantially higher spending at baseline. During the program's first two years, the use of targeted services and adherence to medications for chronic conditions increased, while emergency department use decreased, relative to the situation in the comparison states. The program's impact on costs was inconclusive and requires a longer follow-up period. This novel combination of VBID principles and participation requirements may be a tool that can help plan sponsors increase the use of evidence-based preventive services.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Saúde Baseado em Valor/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Connecticut , Redução de Custos , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguro de Saúde Baseado em Valor/estatística & dados numéricos , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/economia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA