Patient and Healthcare Professional Preferences for Characteristics of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: Studies evaluating patient and healthcare professional (HCP) preferences regarding long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic agent attributes are lacking. METHODS: Surveys were administered to physicians, nurses, and patients who had at least two experiences with TV-46000, an investigational subcutaneous LAI antipsychotic agent for the treatment of schizophrenia, as part of the SHINE study (NCT03893825). Survey topics included preferences for route of administration, potential LAI dosing intervals (once-weekly, twice a month, once a month [q1m], every 2 months [q2m]), injection location, ease of use, syringe type, needle length, and need for reconstitution. RESULTS: Patients (n = 63) had a mean (SD) age of 35.6 (9.6) years, age at diagnosis of 18 (10) years, and were mostly male (75%). There were 49 HCPs: 24 physicians and 25 nurses. Patients rated "a short needle" (68%), a "choice of [q1m or q2m] dosing interval" (59%), and "injection instead of oral tablet" (59%) as the most important features. HCPs rated "single injection to initiate treatment" (61%), "flexible dosing interval" (84%), and "injection instead of oral tablet" (59%) as the most important features. Subcutaneous injections were rated "easy to [receive/administer]" by 62% of patients and 84% of HCPs. When choosing between subcutaneous injections and intramuscular injections, 65% of HCPs preferred subcutaneous injections and 57% of patients preferred intramuscular injections. It was important to most HCPs to have four dose strength options (78%), a prefilled syringe (96%), and no need for reconstitution (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients had a range of responses, and on some issues patient and HCP preferences differed. Altogether, this suggests the importance of providing patients with a range of options and the importance of patient-HCP discussions on treatment preference for LAIs.

Several medications for treating schizophrenia are available as long-acting injections. One advantage of these medications is that patients do not need to take pills daily. In this study, patients, doctors, and nurses were asked what medication characteristics they preferred. Question topics were similar to the following: "how often should it be taken?"; "what method of delivery do you prefer?"; "where on the body should it be injected?"; "how easy was it to use?"; "what physical properties do you like?"; and "do preparation steps matter?" Patients thought that being able to be given monthly or every other month was one of the most important features of an injection (59%). Patients also liked a short needle (68%) and an injection instead of an oral pill (59%). Doctors and nurses responded that it was important to have a single injection to start treatment (61%). They also liked having options for how often the medication was given (84%), and an injection instead of an oral pill (59%). An injection was "easy to [get/give]" for most patients (62%) and doctors and nurses (84%). Most doctors and nurses (65%) liked giving injections under the skin. Most patients (57%) liked injections into the muscle. Overall, patients and doctors/nurses agreed on most topics. There were, however, a range of patient responses; therefore, it is important for patients and doctors and nurses to talk about the available treatment options. Each individual patient may have their own preferences.

Shared decision-making in the management of hereditary angioedema: An analysis of patient and physician perspectives.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent, localized episodes of edema. Current treatment guidelines highlight the importance of shared decision-making (SDM) during implementation of HAE management plans. Objective: To determine what constitutes a successful SDM approach in HAE management. Method: Qualitative telephone interviews, which lasted ∼1 hour, were conducted with four HAE physicians and four patients from the APeX-S trial. The physicians were asked to describe the structure and/or content of typical HAE prophylaxis consultations and factors to consider when selecting medications for long-term treatment. Insights from these interviews were used to develop an SDM process diagram. The patients were interviewed to assess how closely the diagram fit their perspectives on the HAE consultation and their involvement in decisions that concerned their care. Interview transcripts were assessed by the interviewer to determine the degree of SDM involvement in each consultation by using qualitative criteria from the literature. Results: Two physicians followed a high-SDM format, and one physician used a "blended" approach. The fourth physician followed a standard (low SDM) format. A successful SDM approach was found to require pre-visit planning, a commitment on behalf of the physician to use SDM methods to learn more about the patient, and empowerment of the patient to reflect on and vocalize his or her preferences and/or needs. Patients engaged in SDM were more likely to proactively request a treatment switch. Conclusion: The adoption of validated HAE-specific treatment decision aids, as well as measures to change the mindsets of patients and physicians, may facilitate successful implementation of SDM in HAE.Clinical Trial Registration: The APeX-S trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03472040).

Improvements across a range of patient-reported domains with fremanezumab treatment: results from a patient survey study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term safety and efficacy of fremanezumab were evaluated in a 52-week extension study (NCT02638103). Patient satisfaction with fremanezumab, dosing preferences, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed in a subpopulation who completed the extension study and consented to a follow-up questionnaire. METHODS: In the extension study (N = 1842), adults with migraine were randomized to quarterly or monthly fremanezumab. After completing active treatment, patients answered a survey evaluating patient satisfaction, treatment and dosing preferences, and changes in patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 557 patients who could have been contacted upon completing the extension study, 302 consented and 253 completed the survey. The mean (standard deviation) satisfaction rating for fremanezumab was 6.1 (1.4; 1 = "extremely dissatisfied" to 7 = "extremely satisfied"). Most patients (175 [69.2%]) preferred quarterly over monthly fremanezumab dosing. Among patients taking antiepileptics (most common class of prior preventive medication; n = 130), 91.5% preferred fremanezumab. Patients reported improvements in anxiety (74 [67.9%]), sleep quality (143 [56.5%]), and quality of time spent with others (210 [83.0%]) with fremanezumab. CONCLUSION: In this study, treatment satisfaction with fremanezumab was high, most patients preferred quarterly fremanezumab dosing, and fremanezumab was generally preferred to prior preventive medications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02638103 (HALO LTS), registered December 22, 2015.