Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurology ; 55(7): 971-5, 2000 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11061253

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of riluzole in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain conditions. BACKGROUND: Both basic and clinical research has demonstrated that drugs with sodium channel and NMDA antagonism can be effective in alleviating neuropathic pain. Riluzole, a drug currently used for treatment of ALS, possesses these properties. It was hypothesized that riluzole would be effective in reducing the pain in subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain. METHODS: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed at two sites. Study 1 compared 100 mg/day of riluzole (the currently recommended dosage for treatment of ALS) versus placebo, and Study 2 compared 200 mg/day of riluzole versus placebo. Each treatment phase (both studies) was 2 weeks long, separated by 2-week wash-out periods. Outcome measures included change in the score on a 100-mm pain intensity visual analog scale, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and preference for study treatment phase. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects completed Study 1, and 21 subjects completed Study 2. Four subjects (two from each study) discontinued the study because of intolerable side effects. No statistical difference was found for any study outcome measure between riluzole and placebo for either study. In Study 1, pain intensity was more likely to increase than decrease with riluzole (mean treatment difference 8.7 mm; 95% CI -19.5 to +2.1 mm). In Study 2, very slight pain reduction was observed with riluzole compared with placebo (mean treatment difference 1.4 mm; 95% CI -5.1 to +8.0 mm). In both studies, the majority of subjects chose "no change" in pain on the category relief scale after placebo and riluzole treatment phases. On study completion, no treatment preference was reported by 76% of the subjects in Study 1 and by 61% of the subjects in Study 2. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of riluzole at (100 mg) or above (200 mg) those used for the treatment of ALS were not effective in alleviating peripheral neuropathic pain.


Assuntos
Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/tratamento farmacológico , Riluzol/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Riluzol/administração & dosagem
2.
Neurol Clin ; 16(4): 813-32, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9767064

RESUMO

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain disorder that occurs most often in the elderly. This painful condition is uniquely suited for clinical research, resulting in an emerging understanding of the pathophysiology of the persistent pain. Until recently, only the tricyclic antidepressants proved effective for PHN. Controlled trials of a wide variety of therapeutic strategies are in progress or have been recently completed.


Assuntos
Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA