RESUMO
Background: Excessive fear of dental procedures leads to disruptive behavior during dental examinations and treatments. Dental examinations and treatments of these patients usually require additional techniques, such as sedation. The most commonly used techniques are inhalation of nitrous oxide, infusion of propofol with fentanyl, and premedication and infusion of midazolam. Methods: A prospective observational epidemiological study was conducted on patients who required sedoanalgesia techniques for dental exploration and procedures. The reasons for the inability of patients to cooperate (excessive fear or intellectual disability), age, sex, weight, systemic pathology, oral pathology, treatment performed, time of intervention, anesthetic technique performed, and occurrence of complications were recorded. Results: In total, 218 patients were studied. Sixty-five patients came for fear of dental treatment and 153 for presenting with a diagnosis of intellectual disability and not collaborating in the treatment with local anesthesia. The average age of all patients was 30.54 ± 17.30 years. The most frequent oral pathologies found in patients with excessive fear were tartar (6.8%) and wisdom teeth (6.4%), followed by missing teeth (5%). In patients with disabilities, a combination of tartar and cavities appeared most frequently (41.3%), followed by cavities (15.6%). The most frequently used sedoanalgesia technique was the infusion of propofol with fentanyl in both groups of patients, followed by nitrous oxide. Conclusion: The combination of propofol and fentanyl was the most frequently used alternative in patients who were unable to collaborate because of intellectual disability or carry out longer or more complex treatments. Inhaled nitrous oxide and midazolam were the sedative techniques of choice for simpler oral treatments, such as tartrectomies, shallow obturations, and shorter interventions, or in younger patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There is a high demand for dental treatment in a hospital setting for patients with severe intellectual disability (ID), due to their inability to cooperate. The objective was to determine the types of dental treatment carried out on patients with severe ID, as well as the possibility of performing clinical and radiographic examinations prior to treatment and to identify their characteristics. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A retrospective observational study was performed, based on the medical histories of patients with severe ID or a disability included in the portfolio of dental services of Community of Madrid, who underwent dental treatment at the Stomatology Service of the Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital from the year 2009 to 2019. Data on age, sex, etiology of disability, and dental treatment were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 1,845 patients were included. The type of disability in the majority of cases was unknown, followed by encephalopathy, cerebral paralysis, and Down syndrome. In total, 8,439 dental extractions were performed on 1,548 patients (83.9%). Clinical and radiographic exploration were carried out on 874 patients (47.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic scaling was the most frequently performed treatment in patients. Dental extractions were the next most common treatment. An increase in age showed a higher demand for surgical procedures and extractions. Over half of the patients (52.6%) did not tolerate clinical or radiographic examinations.
Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária , Assistência Odontológica para a Pessoa com Deficiência , Deficiência Intelectual , Humanos , Deficiência Intelectual/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anestesia Geral/métodos , HospitaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Odontogenic infections can spread through different routes to more remote anatomical areas, such as the brain. Brain abscesses have an incidence of 0.3-1.3 / 100,000 population and only 2-5% are of dental origin. The main objective is to research brain complications derived from odontogenic infections. Secondary objectives were to identify the most common symptoms in brain abscess, to describe the microbiology involved in these infectious processes, report which parts of the brain complex are most commonly affected and report the sequelae of this patients. METHODS: A systematic review following the PRISMA Guide and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The search terms were: Brain infection, brain abscess, oral health oral origin, odont* infect*. RESULTS: The database search identified a total of 1000 articles. A total of 18 publications were identified after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 38 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 49.64±18.80 years. CONCLUSION: The most common symptoms of patients with brain abscess are neurological affectations first and then fever and headache second, without necessarily presenting as a symptomatological triad. Microbiological diagnosis is key to determining the origin of the infection. Anaerobic pathogens such as Streptococcus (F. Milleri), Fusobacterium Nucleatum and Porfiromonas Gingivalis families are common bacterial agents. The frontal lobe is the most frequently affected, followed by the parietal and temporal lobe. The most frequent brain complications are neurological disorders. However, most patients with brain abscesses recover without sequelae.