Long-Term Effects of a Stepwise, Multimodal, Non-Restrictive Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme for Reducing Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use in the ICU.

Information on the long-term effects of non-restrictive antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies is scarce. We assessed the effect of a stepwise, multimodal, non-restrictive AMS programme on broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the intensive care unit (ICU) over an 8-year period. Components of the AMS were progressively implemented. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was also assessed by monthly point-prevalence surveys from 2013 onwards. A Poisson regression model was fitted to evaluate trends in the reduction of antibiotic use and in the appropriateness of their prescription. From 2011 to 2019, a total of 12,466 patients were admitted to the ICU. Antibiotic use fell from 185.4 to 141.9 DDD per 100 PD [absolute difference, -43.5 (23%), 95% CI -100.73 to 13.73; p = 0.13] and broad-spectrum antibiotic fell from 41.2 to 36.5 [absolute difference, -4.7 (11%), 95% CI -19.58 to 10.18; p = 0.5]. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing rose by 11% per year [IRR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; p = 0.048], while broad-spectrum antibiotic use showed a dual trend, rising by 22% until 2015 and then falling by 10% per year since 2016 [IRR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; p = 0.03]. This stepwise, multimodal, non-restrictive AMS achieved a sustained reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the ICU and significantly improved appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing.

Agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the assessment of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing.

INTRODUCTION: Audits for monitoring the quality of antimicrobial prescribing are a main tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs; however, interobserver reliability has not been conclusively assessed. Our objective was to measure the level of agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals. METHODS: A national multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted of patients who were receiving antimicrobials one day of April 2021. Hospital participation was voluntary, and the study population was randomly selected. Pharmacists and physicians performed a simultaneous, independent assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions. The observers used an assessment method by which all indicators of the quality of antimicrobial use were considered. Finally, an algorithm was used to rate overall antimicrobial prescribing as appropriate, suboptimal, inappropriate, or not assessable. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was used to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS: In total, 101 hospitals participated, and 411 hospital antimicrobial prescriptions were reviewed. The strength of agreement was moderate regarding the overall quality of prescribing (AC1=0.51; 95%CI=[0.44-0.58]). A very good level of agreement (AC1>0.80) was observed between pharmacists and physicians in all indicators of the quality, except for duration of treatment, rated as good (AC1=0.79; 95%CI=[0.75-0.83]), and registration on the medical record, rated as fair (AC1=0.34; 95%CI=[0.26-0.43]). The agreement was greater in critical care, onco-hematology, and pediatric units than in medical and surgery units. CONCLUSIONS: In this point prevalence study, a moderate level of agreement was observed between pharmacists and physicians in the evaluation of the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals.

Predictive Factors of Piperacillin Exposure and the Impact on Target Attainment after Continuous Infusion Administration to Critically Ill Patients.

Critically ill patients undergo significant pathophysiological changes that affect antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Piperacillin/tazobactam administered by continuous infusion (CI) improves pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment. This study aimed to characterize piperacillin PK after CI administration of piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adult patients with preserved renal function and to determine the empirical optimal dosing regimen. A total of 218 piperacillin concentrations from 106 patients were simultaneously analyzed through the population PK approach. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) estimated by CKD-EPI was the covariate, the most predictive factor of piperacillin clearance (CL) interindividual variability. The mean (relative standard error) parameter estimates for the final model were: CL: 12.0 L/h (6.03%); central and peripheral compartment distribution volumes: 20.7 L (8.94%) and 62.4 L (50.80%), respectively; intercompartmental clearance: 4.8 L/h (26.4%). For the PK/PD target of 100% fT>1×MIC, 12 g of piperacillin provide a probability of target attainment > 90% for MIC < 16 mg/L, regardless of CLCR, but higher doses are needed for MIC = 16 mg/L when CLCR > 100 mL/min. For 100% fT>4×MIC, the highest dose (24 g/24 h) was not sufficient to ensure adequate exposure, except for MICs of 1 and 4 mg/L. Our model can be used as a support tool for initial dose guidance and during therapeutic drug monitoring.

Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Meropenem in ICU Patients Without Renal Dysfunction: Are Patients at Risk of Underexposure?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Morbidity and mortality from serious infections are common in intensive care units (ICUs). The appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment is essential to combat sepsis. We aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam administered at standard total daily dose as continuous infusion in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction and to identify risk factors of non-pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. RESULTS: We included 118 patients (149 concentrations), 47% had microorganism isolation. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [median (interquartile range, IQR) values in isolated pathogens were: meropenem: 0.05 (0.02-0.12) mg/l; piperacillin: 3 (1-4) mg/l]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments (100%fCss≥1xMIC, 100%fCss≥4xMIC and 100%fCss ≥ 8xMIC, respectively) were: 100%, 96.15%, 96.15% (meropenem) and 95.56%, 91.11%, 62.22% (piperacillin) for actual MIC; 98.11%, 71.70%, 47.17% (meropenem, MIC 2 mg/l), 95.83%, 44.79%, 6.25% (piperacillin, MIC 8 mg/l), 83.33%, 6.25%, 1.04% (piperacillin, MIC 16 mg/l) for EUCAST breakpoint of Enterobacteriaceae spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Multivariable linear analysis identified creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a predictive factor of free antibiotic concentrations (fCss) of both therapies (meropenem [ß = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to - 0.0; p = 0.043)] and piperacillin [ß = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.01, p < 0.001)]). Neurocritical status was associated with lower piperacillin fCss [ß = - 0.36 (95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.11; p = 0.005)]. CONCLUSION: Standard total daily dose of meropenem allowed achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments in ICU patients without renal dysfunction. Higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam would be needed to cover microorganisms with MIC > 8 mg/l. CrCL was the most powerful factor predictive of fCss in both therapies.

OTAC: Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically ill Patients. Using beta-lactam antibiotics by continuous infusion.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of patients given standard doses of piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem by continuous  infusion who achieved the target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic  (PK/PD) index, which was defined as free concentrations four times  more than the minimum inhibitory concentration (CMI) for 100% of the  dosing interval (100% fT≥ 4 x MIC). METHOD: Preliminary data from a larger prospective clinical study  analysing the PK/PD behaviour of ß-lactams antibiotics continuous  infusion (CI) in critical patients. The study was conducted in the  intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital for adults (June  2015-May 2017). Inclusion criteria: normal renal function (glomerular  renal function (GFR) CKD-EPI formula ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and  treatment with standard dose ß-lactams CI. Concentrations at steady  state (Css) conditions were determined using UHPLC-MS/MS. We  selected the highest susceptible MIC for all likely organisms according to  European Commitee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing's (i.e.  piperacillin/tazobactam: 8 mg/L for enterobacteriaceae and 16 mg/L for  Pseudomonas aeruginosa; meropenem: 2 mg/L for any  microorganism). In addition, a subanalysis of patients was conducted using actual MIC values. RESULTS: 61 patients were enrolled (25 to meropenem and 36 to  piperacillin/tazobactam). Average age was 59 (15) years and median  GFR rate was 95 mL/min/1.73 m2 (83-115). Median meropenem and  piperacillin free concentrations were 16 mg/L (11-29) and 40 mg/L (21- 51), respectively. 88% of patients treated with meropenem reached the  PK/PD target, without differences between both microorganisms. For  piperacillin/tazobactam, 61% and 11% of patients reached the target,  with enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas as suspected  microorganisms, respectively. The pathogen was isolated in 35 (57%)  patients: 94% reached the target PK/PD, without differences between  both antibiotic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of meropenem CI are sufficient to  achieve a PK/PD target of 100% fT≥ 4 x MIC in suspected infections  with high MICs (Pseudomonas aeruginosa or enterobacteriaceae).  However, higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam could be considered to  achieve this goal. In patients with isolated microorganisms, a  standard dose of both antibiotic therapies would be sufficient to achieve  the target. Therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended for  therapeutic optimization.

Objetivo: Determinar el porcentaje de pacientes, a los que se les  administró dosis estándar de piperacilina/tazobactam o meropenem en  perfusión continua, que alcanzaban el índice  farmacocinético/farmacodinámico diana definido como el 100% del  intervalo de administración en que las concentraciones de antibiótico  libre fueron cuatro veces iguales o superiores a la concentración mínima  inhibitoria (100% fT ≥ 4 x CMI).Método: Datos preliminares obtenidos de un estudio clínico prospectivo que analiza el comportamiento  farmacocinético/farmacodinámico de los antibióticos betalactámicos  administrados en perfusión continua en pacientes críticos. Se realizó en  unidades de cuidados intensivos de un hospital universitario de tercer  nivel, desde junio de 2015 a mayo de 2017. Criterios de inclusión:  adultos con función renal correcta (filtrado glomerular según la fórmula  CKD-EPI ≥ 60 ml/min/1,73 m2) y tratados con dosis estándar de  antibióticos betalactámicos en perfusión continua. Las concentraciones  en estado de equilibrio estacionario fueron determinadas mediante  cromatografía líquida acoplada a espectrometría de masas (UHPLC- MS/MS). Se utilizaron valores de concentración mínima  inhibitoria  teóricos para microorganismos más resistentes (piperacilina/ tazobactam: 16 mg/l para Pseudomonas aeruginosa y 8 mg/l para Enterobacteriaceae; meropenem: 2 mg/l, independientemente del  microorganismo). Además, se realizó un subanálisis de los pacientes con aislamiento microbiológico (concentraciones mínimas inhibitorias  reales).Resultados: Se incluyeron 61 pacientes (25 meropenem y 36  piperacilina/ tazobactam). Edad media 59 años (15), mediana de  filtrado glomerular 95 ml/min/1,73 m2 (83-115). Mediana de  concentraciones en estado de equilibrio estacionario libre: 16 mg/l (11- 29) meropenem y 40 mg/l (21-51) piperacilina. El 88% de los pacientes  tratados con meropenem alcanzaron el objetivo  farmacocinético/farmacodinámico, sin diferencias entre Enterobacteriaceae y Pseudomonas. En el caso de  piperacilina/tazobactam, el 61% y el 11% de los pacientes alcanzaron la  diana, considerando Enterobacteriaceae y Pseudomonas como  microorganismo sospechoso. Un total de 35 (57%) pacientes  presentaron aislamiento microbiológico. El 94% de ellos alcanzaron la  diana, sin diferencias entre los dos antibióticos.Conclusiones: Ante la sospecha de infecciones por microorganismos con concentraciones mínimas inhibitorias elevadas  (Pseudomonas aeruginosa o enterobacterias), se observa que dosis  convencionales de meropenem en perfusión continua son suficientes  para lograr la diana 100% fT≥ 4 x MIC. Sin embargo, se requerirían  dosis superiores de piperacilina/tazobactam. En casos de aislamiento  microbiológico, dosis estándar de ambos antibióticos fueron suficientes  para lograr la diana. La monitorización farmacocinética es altamente  recomendable para la optimización terapéutica.

Development and validation of a measurement procedure based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for simultaneous measurement of ß-lactam antibiotic concentration in human plasma.

BACKGROUND: The administration of ß-lactam antibiotics in continuous infusion could let optimize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, especially in the treatment of serious bacterial infections. In this context, and also due to variability in their plasmatic concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be useful to optimize dosing and, therefore, be useful for the clinicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed and validated a measurement procedure based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for simultaneous measurement of amoxicillin, ampicillin, cloxacillin, piperacillin, cefepime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, aztreonam and meropenem concentrations in plasma. The chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity®-UPLC® BEH™ (2.1×100mm id, 1.7µm) reverse-phase C18 column, with a water/acetonitrile linear gradient containing 0.1% formic acid at a 0.4mL/min flow rate. ß-Lactam antibiotics and their internal standards were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode. RESULTS: Chromatography run time was 7.0min and ß-lactam antibiotics eluted at retention times ranging between 1.08 and 1.91min. The lower limits of quantification were between 0.50 and 1.00mg/L. Coefficients of variation and relative bias absolute values were <13.3% and 14.7%, respectively. Recovery values ranged from 55.7% to 84.8%. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion enhancement for all antibiotics. No interferences or carry-over were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our measurement procedure could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of ß-lactam antibiotics in plasma, for instance in patients with bone and joint infections and critically ill patients.

Measurement of total and free docetaxel concentration in human plasma by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Docetaxel is a semi-synthetic taxane with cytotoxic anti-neoplastic activity and, currently used as anticancer agent in several types of cancer. Docetaxel is highly bound to plasma proteins, and this significantly determines its clearance and activity. Therefore, measurement of free docetaxel in plasma is pharmacologically important when pharmacokinetics is investigated. We developed and validated chromatographic methods by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure total and free docetaxel concentration in human plasma. The final validated methods involved liquid-liquid extraction followed by dryness under nitrogen evaporation. To measure free docetaxel concentration, sample preparation was preceded by ultrafiltration. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity(®) UPLC(®) BEH™ (2.1×100 mm id, 1.7 µm) reverse-phase C18 column at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min, using isocratic elution mode containing ammonium acetate/formic acid in water/methanol (30:70 v/v) as mobile phase. Docetaxel and its internal standard (paclitaxel) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode using mass-to-charge (m/z) transitions of 808.3→527.0 (quantifier) and 808.3→509.0 (qualifier); and 854.3→569.0 (quantifier) and 854,3→509,0 (qualifier), respectively. The run time per sample was 3.5 min. The limits of quantification were 1,95 and 0.42 µg/L and linearity was observed between 1.95 and 1000 and 0.42-100 µg/L for total and free docetaxel, respectively. Coefficients of variation and absolute relative biases were less than 13.8% and 10.0%. Recovery values were greater than 79.4%. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion suppression and no carry-over was observed. The validated methods could be useful for both therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies. They could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of total and free docetaxel in plasma.

Measurement of ceftazidime concentration in human plasma by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Application to critically ill patients and patients with osteoarticular infections.

Ceftazidime is an antibiotic belonging to the third generation of the cephalosporin family. It is indicated in the treatment of serious, simple or mixed bacterial infections, and its administration in continuous or intermittent infusion allows optimization of the concentration of antibiotic to keep it above the minimum inhibitory concentration. We developed and validated a chromatographic method by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure ceftazidime concentration in human plasma. Following extraction with acetonitrile and 1,2-dichloroethane, the chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity ® UPLC ® BEH(TM) (2.1 × 100 mm i.d., 1.7 µm) reverse-phase C18 column, with a water-acetonitrile linear gradient containing 0.1% formic acid at a 0.4 mL/min flow rate. Ceftazidime and its internal standard (cefotaxime) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode using mass-to-charge transitions of 547.0 → 467.9/396.1 and 456.0 → 395.8/324.1, respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.58 mg/L and linearity was observed in the range 0.58-160 mg/L. Coefficients of variation and absolute relative biases were <9.8 and 8.4%. The mean recovery for ceftazidime was 74.4 ± 8.1%. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion enhancement, and no carry-over was observed. The validated method could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of ceftazidime in plasma.