Multimodal Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Elective treatment options for aortic abdominal aneurysms include open repair or the less-invasive endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Recovery from EVAR is generally considered easier and faster than open repair. Despite this, EVAR remains a major procedure, and average return to preoperative quality of life is at least 3 months. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation, a multidisciplinary preoperative optimization intervention, in patients undergoing EVAR and its impact on perioperative functional capacity and quality of life. METHODS: Candidates for EVAR with an infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm <7.5cm were invited to participate in a 6-week multimodal prehabilitation program that included (1) supervised and home-based exercise, (2) nutritional support, (3) psychosocial support, and (4) smoking cessation. Functional capacity and quality of life were assessed at baseline, before surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively. Recruitment rate, safety, and compliance were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included, 17 males (70%) and 7 females (30%). No adverse events occurred during the program. Compliance to each component of the program (median [Q1-Q3]) was 66% [67] for supervised training, 100% [67] for home-based training, and 100% [100] for nutrition. The multimodal prehabilitation program elicited a significant increase in functional capacity and quality of life preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Multimodal prehabilitation for patients awaiting EVAR is feasible and safe. Multimodal prehabilitation improves both functional capacity and quality of life preoperatively. Further research is needed to assess the impact of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative quality of life and functional capacity. CLINICAL IMPACT: Multimodal prehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients awaiting endovascular aneurysm repair. The importance of this finding is that multimodal prehabilitation can be safely delivered preoperatively in patients awaiting EVAR. Although further research is needed, multimodal prehabilitation seems to improve preoperative functional capacity and quality of life. This could have an impact for the future implementation of prehabilitation interventions in order to increase functional reserve and quality of life preoperatively so that this high-risk population can cope better with the surgical stress and return to their normal life faster postoperatively.

Multimodal Prehabilitation for Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients with Intermittent Claudication-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: To establish the feasibility and safety of multimodal prehabilitation (MP), and to obtain pilot data on the change in quality of life, functional walking capacity, and the need for surgery for a full-scale trial. METHODS: Pilot randomized controlled trial that included patients older than 50 years old suffering from moderate to severe intermittent claudication and who were candidates for endovascular revascularization (ER). Participants were excluded if they presented with ischemic rest pain, gangrene or ulceration of the index leg, significant lesions in the iliac vessels, planned surgical bypass, comorbidities in which exercise was contraindicated or if they were unable to speak English or French. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 12 weeks of MP or institutional standard of care (unsupervised walking advice). MP consisted of i)1 weekly supervised exercise session; ii) home-based exercise prescription; iii) nutritional counseling and supplementation; iv) smoking cessation therapy; and v) psychosocial support. Feasibility and safety were measured with recruitment and retention rates, as well as the occurrence of any adverse events. In addition, barriers to attend supervised sessions and compliance to each component were assessed. Change in functional walking capacity, health-related quality of life, and the rates of patients deciding not to undergo ER were collected and analyzed throughout the follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients referred for eligibility, 27 (73%) accepted to participate in the trial and were randomized. Of the 27 patients included, 24 completed the 12-week program. Adherence to each prehabilitation component was 83% interquartile range [72,93] for supervised exercise, 90% [83,96] for home-based exercise and 69% [45,93] for nutritional sessions. Fifty percent of patients were referred for and underwent psychosocial intervention and 40% of the active smokers enrolled in the smoking cessation program. No adverse events were observed during the program. The 2 main barriers for not fully adhering to the intervention were excessive pain while performing the exercises and the difficulty to keep up with the prescribed exercises. A statistically significant mean change (standard deviation (SD)) was seen in the MP group versus standard of care for functional capacity, mean (SD) 6 Min Walk Test 60 (74) vs. -11 (40) meters P < 0.05, and quality of life mean (SD) VascuQol 1.15 (0.54) vs. -0.3 (1.09) points P < 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the rates of patients deciding to undergo ER during the 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot trial demonstrate that MP is safe and feasible. A 12-week MP program seems to improve quality of life and functional walking capacity to a greater extent than unsupervised walking advice. There is a need for a large-scale trial to investigate the effectiveness of MP at improving quality of life and assessing its impact on the rates of patients deciding not to undergo or delay ER. The long-term functional and quality of life outcomes of the patients deciding to undergo ER after prehabilitation also need to be assessed.

Advances in the Management of Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Review.

Despite the millions of surgeries performed every year around the world, postoperative pain remains prevalent and is often addressed with inadequate or suboptimal treatments. Chronic postsurgical pain is surprisingly prevalent, and its rate varies with the type of surgery, as well as with certain patient characteristics. Thus, better clinical training is needed as well as patient education. As pain can be caused by more than one mechanism, multimodal or balanced postsurgical analgesia is appropriate. Pharmacological agents such as opioid and nonopioid pain relievers, as well as adjuvants and nonpharmacologic approaches, can be combined to provide better and opioid-sparing pain relief. Many specialty societies have guidelines for postoperative pain management that emphasize multimodal postoperative analgesia. These guidelines are particularly helpful when dealing with special populations such as pregnant patients or infants and children. Pediatric pain control, in particular, can be challenging as patients may be unable to communicate their pain levels. A variety of validated assessment tools are available for diagnosis. Related to therapy, most guidelines agree on the fact that codeine should be used with extreme caution in pediatric patients as some may be "rapid metabolizers" and its use may be life-threatening. Prehabilitation is a preoperative approach that prepares patients in advance of elective surgery with conditioning exercises and other interventions to optimize their health. Prehabilitation may have aerobic, strength-training, nutritional, and counseling components. Logistical considerations and degree of patient adherence represent barriers to effective prehabilitation programs. Notwithstanding all this, acute postoperative pain represents a clinical challenge that has not yet been well addressed.

Prehabilitation: Who can benefit?

Prehabilitation is an intervention that occurs between cancer diagnosis and the start of an acute treatment. It involves physical, nutritional, and psychological assessments to establish a baseline functional level and provide targeted interventions to improve a person's health and prevent future impairments. Prehabilitation has been applied to surgical oncology and has shown positive results at improving functional capacity, reducing hospital stay, decreasing complications, and enhancing health-related quality of life. The importance of collaboration between various healthcare professionals and the implementation of multimodal interventions, including exercise training, nutrition optimization, and emotional support is discussed in this manuscript. The need for screening and assessment of conditions such as sarcopenia, frailty, or low functional status in order to identify patients who would benefit the most from prehabilitation is vital and should be a part of all prehabilitation programs. Exercise and nutrition play complementary roles in prehabilitation, enhancing anabolism and performance. However, in the presence of malnutrition and sarcopenia, exercise-related energy expenditure without sufficient protein intake can lead to muscle wasting and further deterioration of functional capacity, thus special emphasis on nutrition and protein intake should be made in these cases. Finally, the challenges and the need for a paradigm shift in perioperative care are discussed to effectively implement personalized prehabilitation programs.

Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Reducing Postoperative Complications and Enhancing Functional Capacity Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The PREHAB Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Colorectal surgery is associated with substantial morbidity rates and a lowered functional capacity. Optimization of the patient's condition in the weeks prior to surgery may attenuate these unfavorable sequelae. Objective: To determine whether multimodal prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery can reduce postoperative complications and enhance functional recovery. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PREHAB randomized clinical trial was an international, multicenter trial conducted in teaching hospitals with implemented enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Adult patients with nonmetastasized colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility and randomized to either prehabilitation or standard care. Both arms received standard perioperative care. Patients were enrolled from June 2017 to December 2020, and follow-up was completed in December 2021. However, this trial was prematurely stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions: The 4-week in-hospital supervised multimodal prehabilitation program consisted of a high-intensity exercise program 3 times per week, a nutritional intervention, psychological support, and a smoking cessation program when needed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, number of patients with CCI score more than 20, and improved walking capacity expressed as the 6-minute walking distance 4 weeks postoperatively. Results: In the intention-to-treat population of 251 participants (median [IQR] age, 69 [60-76] years; 138 [55%] male), 206 (82%) had tumors located in the colon and 234 (93%) underwent laparoscopic- or robotic-assisted surgery. The number of severe complications (CCI score >20) was significantly lower favoring prehabilitation compared with standard care (21 of 123 [17.1%] vs 38 of 128 [29.7%]; odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26-0.87]; P = .02). Participants in prehabilitation encountered fewer medical complications (eg, respiratory) compared with participants receiving standard care (19 of 123 [15.4%] vs 35 of 128 [27.3%]; odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.26-0.89]; P = .02). Four weeks after surgery, 6-minute walking distance did not differ significantly between groups when compared with baseline (mean difference prehabilitation vs standard care 15.6 m [95% CI, -1.4 to 32.6]; P = .07). Secondary parameters of functional capacity in the postoperative period generally favored prehabilitation compared with standard care. Conclusions and Relevance: This PREHAB trial demonstrates the benefit of a multimodal prehabilitation program before colorectal cancer surgery as reflected by fewer severe and medical complications postoperatively and an optimized postoperative recovery compared with standard care. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR5947.

Tailoring prehabilitation to address the multifactorial nature of functional capacity for surgery.

Mounting evidence suggests that recovery begins before the surgical incision. The presurgery phase of recovery, namely the preparation for optimal surgical recovery, can be reinforced with prehabilitation. Prehabilitation is the approach of enhancing the functional capacity of the individual to enable them to withstand a stressful event. With this narrative review, we apply the Wilson and Cleary conceptual model of patient outcomes to specify the complex and integrative relationship of health factors that limit functional capacity before surgery. To have the greatest impact on patient outcomes, prehabilitation programs require individualised and coordinated care from medical, nutritional, psychosocial and exercise services.

Modification of Behavioral Habits in Prehabilitation Programs.

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence supporting the modification of behavioral habits and substance use management during cancer treatment and how to implement them as part of a multimodal optimization intervention. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of the association between cancer and behavioral habits, their impact on oncological treatment outcomes, and substance use management guidelines. CONCLUSION: There is an association between harmful habits, such as smoking and alcohol consumption, and cancer. The continuation of poor behavioral habits throughout oncological treatments is associated with poor oncological outcomes and increased complications. Prehabilitation could be an ideal setting to screen, assess, and modify these harmful habits. Prehabilitation programs should be equipped with professionals and resources to help patients achieve harmful habit cessation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: This review puts into manifest the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to substance use management. It can serve as a framework to develop a harmful habit cessation intervention in the context of multimodal prehabilitation to improve surgical and oncological outcomes in the cancer population.

Multimodal Prehabilitation to Improve Quality of Life and Functional Capacity in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and effect of multimodal prehabilitation in patients with severe life-limiting intermittent claudication and complex infrainguinal disease. DESIGN: Case series of patients who underwent a 12-week prehabilitation program. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a public tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of severe life-limiting intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage IIb and III) with complex infrainguinal disease or previous failed bypass attempts (N=5) who were referred to the prehabilitation clinic by a vascular surgeon. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent a baseline assessment that included quality of life questionnaires and functional capacity tests. After baseline assessment, they received a 12-week prehabilitation program that consisted of (1) a supervised exercise session 1 time per week; (2) home-based exercise prescription; (3) nutritional counseling; (4) smoking cessation; and (5) psychosocial intervention. Adherence to all components was recorded as well as the occurrence of any adverse event. After completion of the 12-week program, patients were reassessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Feasibility of prehabilitation measured by adherence to the different components of the program and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: All 5 patients completed the program. No serious adverse events occurred during the length of prehabiliation. Median adherence to each prehabilitation component was 91.7% (interquartile range [IQR], 33.5%) for supervised training, 91.7% (IQR, 40%) for home-based exercise, and 75% (IQR, 50%) for nutrition. Three of the 5 patients underwent psychosocial intervention and all who were active smokers enrolled in the smoking cessation program. Functional capacity measured with the 6-minute walk distance improved by 70 m (IQR, 99 m), and disease-specific quality of life measured with the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire improved by 25%. CONCLUSION: Multimodal prehabilitation appears to be a feasible tool that could be used to increase functional capacity and quality of life for patients with complex infrainguinal disease and expected poor revascularization outcome or previous failed bypass attempts.

Exercise intervention in cancer patients with sleep disturbances scheduled for elective surgery: Systematic review.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance is one of the patients' major complaints after major surgery and can impair postoperative recovery. Pre-operative exercise has been shown to increase functional capacity and resilience in cancer patients; scarce knowledge is available on the effects of pre-operative exercise on sleep disturbances. This systematic review aims to determine the impact of pre-operative exercise training alone or as part of multimodal prehabilitation on sleep disturbances and sleep quality in cancer patients. METHODS: A systematic search including Biosis, Cochrane Library and CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) was performed to identify studies involving a pre-operative exercise intervention in cancer patients awaiting surgery. Trials had to contain at least one sleep measure, assessed subjectively and objectively were included in the systematic review. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials tool and the ROBINS-I tool for evaluating the risk of bias in non-randomized studies. RESULTS: Seven studies were included (1 RCT, 2 non-RCTs and 4 single-arm design). Due to substantial heterogeneity in the interventions across studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted. The available empirical evidence on the presurgical effect of exercise on sleep outcomes is scarce and, overall, suggests that it has a limited effect. Besides, non-significant improvement of the pre-operative exercise on sleep was unique to the studies that used subjective measures to assess sleep disturbances changes during cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: There are conflicting results and a lack of quality data proving the pre-operative exercise on sleep quality and disturbances. More research is needed in the pre-operative period using clinical sleep disturbances such as insomnia as an inclusion criterion, subjectively and objectively assessed.

Combined Exercise and Nutrition Optimization for Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who suffer from claudication have a low exercise capacity, poor quality of life, and often severe disability. Exercise and healthy nutrition have been shown to be important factors to prevent disease progression. This systematic review aims to assess the evidence supporting the use of combined nutrition and structured exercise in patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: Publications that included a combination of structured exercise (SE) and a nutritional intervention and that reported quality of life, exercise capacity, pain-free walking distance, limb blood flow hemodynamics, need for revascularization surgery, or surgical outcomes were systematically searched. Publications were screened, selected, and reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Four publications were found reporting the effects of combined SE and nutrition programs. Pooled statistical analysis across trials was not performed because of the heterogeneity of study designs and type of interventions. Only 2 randomized controlled trials were found, reporting conflicting results with regard to the effects of combined SE and nutrition on exercise capacity. Only one trial reported quality of life measures. Blood flow was increased in the intervention involving inorganic nitrate in addition to SE. CONCLUSIONS: There are conflicting results and lack of quality data proving the benefit of nutrition and SE programs on patient-centered outcomes and limb blood flow. There are no data on the effects of combined nutrition and exercise on the need for revascularization surgery or postrevascularization outcomes. More randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the effects of multimodal interventions on patient-centered outcomes and clinical outcomes of PAD.

Multimodal prehabilitation as strategy for reduction of postoperative complications after cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation programmes that combine exercise training, nutritional support and emotional reinforcement (multimodal prehabilitation) have demonstrated efficacy reducing postoperative complications in the context of abdominal surgery. However, such programmes have seldom been studied in cardiac surgery, one of the surgeries associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. This trial will assess the feasibility and efficacy in terms of reduction of postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness of a multimodal prehabilitation programme comparing to the standard of care in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial with a 1:1 ratio. Consecutive 160 elective valve replacement and/or coronary revascularisation surgical patients will be randomised to either standard of care or 4-6 weeks of multimodal prehabilitation that will consist in (1) two times/week supervised endurance and strength exercise training sessions, (2) promotion of physical activity and healthy lifestyle, (3) respiratory physiotherapy, (4) nutrition counselling and supplementation if needed, and (5) weekly mindfulness sessions. Baseline, preoperative and 3-month postoperative data will be collected by an independent blinded evaluator. The primary outcome of this study will be the incidence of postoperative complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical investigation of Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (HCB/2017/0708). The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03466606.

Prehabilitation: the anesthesiologist's role and what is the evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Surgery poses major threats to functional independence. Prehabilitation is a preoperative conditioning intervention that aims to prevent or attenuate surgery-related functional decline and its consequences. The present review is to summarize most recent evidence on the effectiveness of prehabilitation on key topics in cancer care, such as perioperative functional capacity, surgical and oncologic outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies predominantly focus on functional outcomes, demonstrating a positive effect of prehabilitation on perioperative physical fitness. SUMMARY: Prehabilitation prevents functional decline associated with major cancer surgery. Evidence is still needed to support its effectiveness in relation to postoperative complication, length of hospital stay, tumor progression, response to medical treatment, and survival. Ongoing and future research is essential to prompt the role of perioperative medicine in cancer care.

Committed to be fit. The value of preoperative care in the perioperative medicine era.

In the era of perioperative medicine, important advances have been made in the perioperative care of patients, usually within those known as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. These have led to a decrease in postoperative complications and the duration of hospital stays; however, there is still a lack of preoperative care, which could make perioperative medicine more prominent. Elderly patients, malnourished, anemic and ones with a low physical function before surgery are likely to have sub-optimal recovery from surgery. More importantly, a low functional reserve, together with the inherent physiological stress of surgery, reduces the functional capacity of patients in the postoperative period, meaning that they will not reach their preoperative functional capacity. It is well established that both preoperative malnutrition and anemia worsen surgical results, however, for various reasons, their preoperative optimization is complex. Additionally, both are related to the functional capacity of patients. During the last years, prehabilitation has been incorporated into ERAS protocols. Prehabilitation consists of exercise training and nutritional and psychological support, which increases the physiological reserve before surgical stress. The integration of exercise, adequate nutrition, anemia correction and psycho-social components, with multi-modal optimization in the preoperative period leads to an improvement in the functional capacity of the patients undergoing surgery, with the consequent improvement in terms of outcomes. The present article discusses specific aspects of preoperative care which are not well defined in the ERAS protocols and which represent fundamental shifts in surgical practice, including preoperative nutrition, management of preoperative anemia and prehabilitation.