Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 149: 110570, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542593

RESUMO

Microbial safety of recreational waters is a significant public health issue. In this study we assessed the occurrence and quantity of enteric viruses in bathing and non-bathing waters in Italy, in parallel with microbial faecal indicators, somatic coliphages and Vibrio spp. Enteric viruses (aichivirus, norovirus and enterovirus) were detected in 55% of bathing water samples, including samples with bacterial indicator concentrations compliant with the European bathing water Directive. Aichivirus was the most frequent and abundant virus. Adenovirus was detected only in non-bathing waters. Somatic coliphages were identified in 50% bathing water samples, 80% of which showed simultaneous presence of viruses. Vibrio species were ubiquitous, with 9 species identified, including potential pathogens (V. cholerae, V. parahaemoylticus and V. vulnificus). This is the first study showing the occurrence and high concentration of Aichivirus in bathing waters and provides original information, useful in view of a future revision of the European Directive.


Assuntos
Praias , Água do Mar/microbiologia , Água do Mar/virologia , Colífagos , Enterovirus , Monitoramento Ambiental , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/virologia , Humanos , Itália , Mar Mediterrâneo , Norovirus/genética , Norovirus/isolamento & purificação , Vibrio/genética , Vibrio/isolamento & purificação , Vibrio/patogenicidade , Microbiologia da Água
2.
Toxicol Lett ; 74(1): 91-7, 1994 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8085273

RESUMO

Samples of diarrhoeic shellfish poison (DSP) mussels from several parts of the Italian Adriatic coastline were extracted and tested according to a number of different methods presently available, i.e. Yasumoto's mouse biotest, Kat's biotest, the ELISA test and the HPLC method. Results were compared for toxic levels detected in each sample. While a common qualitative result (toxic/non-toxic) was given by all the methods, no clear quantitative agreement was found. The differences between methods and consequent lack of agreement in results are discussed.


Assuntos
Bivalves/química , Éteres Cíclicos/análise , Toxinas Marinhas/análise , Animais , Bioensaio , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Diarreia/etiologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Éteres Cíclicos/toxicidade , Feminino , Toxinas Marinhas/toxicidade , Camundongos , Ácido Okadáico , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA