RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: The majority of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) are diagnosed at an early stage and undergo primary surgery, followed by observation or adjuvant therapy according to risk factors on surgical samples. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between a risk profile represented by the presence of substantial lymph-vascular space involvement (LVSI) and/or p53 overexpression and the clinical outcome of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) who received adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This investigation assessed 79 patients who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic and/o aortic lymphadenectomy or sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by hypofractionated (HDR)-vaginal BT, using 192Ir source, for stage I-II endometrioid (n=70) or non-endometrioid (n=9) EC. Thirty-four patients (43.0%) were considered to have an unfavorable risk profile defined by the presence of substantial LVSI and /or p53 overexpression. RESULTS: Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and five-year overall survival (OS) were 93.7% and 95%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between unfavorable risk-profile and pelvic recurrence rate (p=0.002) and distant recurrence rate (p=0.017). Patients with abnormal p53 had a higher risk of local relapse (p=0.041). Substantial LVSI was strongly associated with pelvic recurrence (p=0.001) and distant metastasis (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of substantial LVSI and/or p53 overexpression strictly correlated with poor outcome of patients with early-stage EC and should be taken into consideration for better planning adjuvant treatment in this clinical setting.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Irídio , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 , Excisão de Linfonodo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Histerectomia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor. This malignancy is frequently treated using brachytherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, or proton therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of large and posterior UM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to July 2021, we treated 65 patients (median age=71 years; range=31-89 years) affected by UM. Inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤2, life expectancy >6 months, tumor thickness >10 mm, diameter >16 mm or posterior UM. The treatment was delivered with a True Beam™ LINAC with arc modulation technique. All patients received 27 Gy in one fraction (biological effective dose ≈100 Gy, assuming an α/ß of 10). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 (range=3-90) months. Acute toxicities were reported in 14 patients, whereas late toxicity occurred in 45 (69.2%). Fifteen patients (23.0%) underwent enucleation: eight (12.3%) for failure of local control and seven (10.7%) for late treatment co-morbidities. The 5-year local control, and progression-free, metastasis-free, enucleation-free, and overall survival rates were 80%, 43%, 62%, 65% and 56%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumor dimensions significantly influenced survival [larger basal diameter: progression-free [hazard ratio (HR)=2.42] and overall (HR=2.61) survival; greater thickness: overall survival (HR=2.36)]. In multivariate analysis, patients without local control had a higher risk of distant metastasis (HR=3.25). CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery offers an effective and safe approach for selected cases of UM due to the satisfactory results in terms of local control, eye conservation and survival.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias Uveais , Idoso , Humanos , Melanoma/radioterapia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uveais/patologia , Neoplasias Uveais/radioterapiaRESUMO
AIM: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a life-threatening disease with a rising frequency and the fourth leading cause of cancer death. This review aimed to assess the impact of postoperative radiotherapy through a meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed to calculate the cumulative risk of death (hazard ratio) in patients affected by pancreatic cancer treated with or without radiotherapy. Higgins' index was used to determine heterogeneity in between-study variability and, subsequently, the random-effects model was applied according to DerSimonian and Laird. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-seven patients were analyzed (418 in the control arm and 419 in the treatment one), the hazard ratio for death after randomization was 0.92 (p=0.560, 95% confidence interval=0.70-1.22). When scrutinizing these studies, only one out of six showed a statistically significant benefit due to the addition of radiotherapy in the postoperative setting. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of adjuvant radiotherapy is not beneficial in treating all patients affected by pancreatic cancer but only for a subset of cases with potential residual local disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Análise de Sobrevida , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse tumour control, toxicity, and aesthetic outcome of patients affected by non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treated with 192 Ir high-dose-rate (HDR)-brachytherapy (BT) at the Division of Radiotherapy, University of Pisa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2019 we treated 37 patients (median age 79 years; range 31-91 years) affected by NMSC, with the following histological subtypes: 62.2% basal cell carcinoma and 37.8% squamous cell carcinoma. We analysed 40 lesions with a depth ≤ 5 mm, located in 40.0% scalp, 17.5% nose, 25.0% face, and 17.5% ear, all treated with 192 Ir-based HDR-BT, using tailored custom moulds, with a median of 5 catheters (range, 1-9) spaced 1 cm apart. The most common fractionation scheme was 40 Gy in 8 daily fractions; the biological effective dose was 60 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-70 months). The 2-year local control rate was 90%. Common terminology criteria for adverse event (CTCAE vs. 5.0) G1 toxicities were dermatitis (52%), pain (25%), and ulceration (22%). The only G2 acute toxicities were dermatitis and ulceration. The most common G1 late toxicities were fibrosis (17%), atrophy (15%), and hypopigmentation (12%). No G3 or higher acute or late toxicity was reported. Excellent cosmetic results were observed in 65.0% of the lesions; only 1 case (2.5%) reported a poor cosmetic result. CONCLUSIONS: Surface mould HDR-BT is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment modality for NMSC and can be considered a good alternative, especially for elderly patients who are often unfit for surgery.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze tumor control, toxicity, and aesthetic outcome of patients affected by non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and treated with iridium-192 (192Ir) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) using Valencia applicators at the Division of Radiotherapy, University of Pisa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 2015 to December 2020, 95 NMSC patients, including 61.5% basal cell carcinoma and 38.5% squamous cell carcinoma patients, with median age of 83 years (range, 32-96 years) were treated. In total, 182 lesions with a diameter ≤ 25 mm (median, 12 mm) and a depth ≤ 4 mm, located in scalp (19.2%), face (20.9%), chest (8.8%), nose (16.5%), ear (15.4%), and extremities (19.2%) were analyzed. All lesions were treated with 192Ir-based HDR afterloader using Valencia applicators. 105 lesions (57.7%) were treated with applicator of 20 mm and 77 lesions (42.3%) with applicator of 30 mm in diameter, depending on the size of lesions. Prescribed dose was 40 Gy in 8 fractions (5 Gy/fraction) delivered 2-3 times a week. Biological effective dose (BED) was ≈ 60 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 14 months (range, 3-59 months). The 2-year local control rate was 96%. According to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v. 5.0), G1-G2 acute toxicities included dermatitis (22.0%) and pain (8.2%). The most common G1 late toxicities were hypopigmentation (27.5%) and fibrosis (8.2%), and G2 late toxicity included ulceration (0.5%). No G3 or higher acute or late toxicities were reported. Excellent cosmetic results were observed in 77.5% of the lesions, with one only (0.5%) reported as a poor cosmetic result (ulceration refractory to therapy). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BT using Valencia applicators is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for NMSC, and can be considered a good alternative for treatment, especially in elderly patients who are often unfit for surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: In 2020, because of coronavirus pandemic, medical activities changed. The aim of this report is to compare the volumes of Pisa radiotherapy activities from March 9th to May 31st, 2020, with the same period in 2019. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the activity of our Unit to evaluate how logistics changes, related to the COVID-19 epidemic, impacted on volumes of radiotherapy (RT) activity and on the number of cases of COVID-19 infections observed in healthcare professionals and patients. RESULTS: The total number of first-time visits between March-May 2020 was reduced by 18%, probably due to delays in diagnosis and histological tests as well as the temporary closure of the operating rooms. None of the healthcare professionals and only two patients contracted the infection. CONCLUSION: We were able to treat all patients referred to our hospital and we were able to reduce risk of infection for both our patients and healthcare staff, guaranteeing continuum of care for our oncological patients.