Building a pediatric neurocritical care program: The role of the clinical pharmacist practitioner on clinical practice and education. A curriculum for neuropharmacology training.

Clinical pharmacists are a part of the integrated health care team and provide valuable input on medication management for patients with acute and chronic disease states. Using epilepsy as a model, pharmacist involvement in patient care has been associated with significant reductions in monthly seizure frequency. Given differences in etiology, pediatric patients with epilepsy are likely to have higher number of treatments, with additional pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences, adding to the importance of utilizing a pediatric clinical pharmacist practitioner with neuropharmacology expertise. There is an increasing exposure to critically ill patients with epilepsy and other neurological disorders in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). These patients are more medically complex, increasing the risk for medication errors and increased health care costs. Emphasis on neurocritical care education is a vital component to improving patient outcomes. Inclusion of a clinical pharmacist practitioner in these settings yields a positive impact on major health outcomes. In 2018, the Neurocritical Care Society developed consensus recommendations on the standards for the development of adult neurocritical care units. A pharmacist-delivered pediatric critical care neuropharmacology rotation represents a novel approach to expanding physician education to improve patient outcomes. While there are sparse publications highlighting the importance of adult critical care and NCC pharmacists, no such literature exists describing the benefits of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) pharmacists. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first manuscript describing the role of clinical pharmacist practitioners in the development of PNCC program and the benefits they provide to patient care and education.

KCNA1 gain-of-function epileptic encephalopathy treated with 4-aminopyridine.

Precision medicine for Mendelian epilepsy is rapidly developing. We describe an early infant with severely pharmacoresistant multifocal epilepsy. Exome sequencing revealed the de novo variant p.(Leu296Phe) in the gene KCNA1, encoding the voltage-gated K+ channel subunit KV 1.1. So far, loss-of-function variants in KCNA1 have been associated with episodic ataxia type 1 or epilepsy. Functional studies of the mutated subunit in oocytes revealed a gain-of-function caused by a hyperpolarizing shift of voltage dependence. Leu296Phe channels are sensitive to block by 4-aminopyridine. Clinical use of 4-aminopyridine was associated with reduced seizure burden, enabled simplification of co-medication and prevented rehospitalization.

PaxlovidTM Information From FDA and Guidance for AES Members.

This American Epilepsy Society (AES) official statement provides information and preliminary guidance to Society members related to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) December 22, 2021 Emergency Use Authorization for Paxlovid™ for the oral treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults and children (≥12 years and weighing ≥40 kg). Paxlovid is likely to be widely prescribed, and important considerations for patients on antiseizure medications (ASMs) include key contraindications and potential toxicity or dose adjustments while taking Paxlovid. This statement highlights concerns and provides information about their pharmacologic basis. Of particular concern, concomitant use of Paxlovid with the ASMs carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone is contraindicated, because they are strong inducers of the CYP3A4 isozyme that metabolizes Paxlovid and thereby could cause loss of virologic response and development of resistance. Alternate oral or intravenous COVID-19 treatments should be considered. A second concern is that Paxlovid may increase the plasma concentrations of many ASMs, because it inhibits the CYP3A4 isozyme. ASMs that are metabolized, at least in part, by CYP3A4 include cannabidiol, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam, ethosuximide, everolimus, felbamate, lacosamide, midazolam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, stiripentol, tiagabine, and zonisamide. Patients receiving these medications may warrant closer monitoring while being treated with Paxlovid.

Pharmacologic and Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury in Adults and Children.

Purpose of Review: This review provides guidance for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) management through an analytical assessment of the most recent evidence on therapies available for treating SCI, including newer therapies under investigation. We present an approach to the SCI patient starting at presentation to acute rehabilitation and prognostication, with additional emphasis on the pediatric population when evidence is available. Recent Findings: Further studies since the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS) demonstrated a potential functional outcome benefit with ultra-early surgical intervention ≤ 8 h post-SCI. Subsequent analysis of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) II and NASCIS III trials have demonstrated potentially serious complications from intravenous methylprednisolone with limited benefit. Newer therapies actively being studied have demonstrated limited or no benefit in preclinical and clinical trials with insufficient evidence to support use in acute SCI treatment. Summary: Care for SCI patients requires a multi-disciplinary team. Immediate evaluation and management are focused on preventing additional injury and restoring perfusion to the affected cord. Rapid assessment and intervention involve focused neurological examination, targeted imaging, and surgical intervention when indicated. There are currently no evidence-based recommendations for pathomechanistically targeted therapies.

Trends and Costs Associated With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infantile Spasms: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE: Early treatment of infantile spasms (IS) may be imperative for improvement of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Existing studies have led to inconclusive recommendations with variation in treatment. Our objective was to determine the national average cost, initial diagnostic workup, treatments, and hospital length of stay for patients with IS. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was designed to review data of patients < 2 years from 43 non-profit institutions. Data obtained included patient demographics, length of stay, admission cost, and treatments used from 2004 to 2014. Cost data were collected and adjusted to 2014 dollars, the year data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6183 patients met study criteria (n = 3382, 55% male). Three-quarters of patients (n = 4684, 76%) had an electroencephalogram, 56.4% had brain imaging (n = 3487), and 17% (n = 1050) underwent a lumbar puncture. Medication for IS was initiated during inpatient hospital stay in two-thirds of all patients (n = 4139, 67%). Most patients were initiated on corticotropin (n = 2066, 33%) or topiramate (n = 1804, 29%). Average length of stay was 5.8 days with an average adjusted cost of $18,348. Over time there was an 86.6% increase in cost from an average $12,534.54 (2004) to $23,391.20 (2014), a significant change (p < 0.01). This correlated with an increase in average length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in diagnostic workup and pharmacotherapy initiated for IS, which may lead to differences in the cost of hospital stay. Further studies may help determine contributing factors to increased cost and improve health care utilization for IS patients.