Massachusetts Medicaid ACO Program May Have Improved Care Use And Quality For Pregnant And Postpartum Enrollees.

Value-based care models, such as Medicaid accountable care organizations (ACOs), have the potential to improve access to and quality of care for pregnant and postpartum Medicaid enrollees. We leveraged a natural experiment in Massachusetts to evaluate the effects of Medicaid ACOs on quality-of-care-sensitive measures and care use across the prenatal, delivery, and postpartum periods. Using all-payer claims data on Medicaid-covered live deliveries in Massachusetts, we used a difference-in-differences approach to compare measures before (the first quarter of 2016 through the fourth quarter of 2017) and after (the third quarter of 2018 through the fourth quarter of 2020) Medicaid ACO implementation among ACO and non-ACO patients. After three years of implementation, the Medicaid ACO was associated with statistically significant increases in the probability of a timely postpartum visit, postpartum depression screening, and number of all-cause office visits in the prenatal and postpartum periods, with no changes in severe maternal morbidity, preterm birth, postpartum glucose screening, or prenatal or postpartum emergency department visits. Changes in cesarean deliveries were inconclusive. Results suggest that implementing Medicaid ACOs in the thirty-eight states without them could improve maternal health care outpatient engagement, but alone it may be insufficient to improve maternal health outcomes.

COVID-19 Federal Funding To Health Centers: Tracking Distribution, Locations, And Patient Characteristics.

In 2020 and 2021, health centers received federal funding to support their COVID-19 pandemic response, yet little is known about how the funds were distributed. This study identified ten sources of funding distributed to 1,352 centers, ranging from $19 to $1.22 billion per center. When we examined patient and organizational characteristics by quartiles of funding per patient, health centers in the highest-funded quartile (quartile 4) were more likely rural and in the South; employed lower percentages of physicians; and had the highest percentages of sicker, uninsured, and unhoused patients. Centers in the lowest-funded quartile (quartile 1) were more likely urban, employed lower percentages of nurse practitioners, and had the highest percentages of Medicaid enrollees. With the end of pandemic-related funding in 2023, combined with Medicaid unwinding concerns, targeted investment is needed to mitigate a financial cliff and help maintain health centers' capacity to provide high-quality services to those most in need.

Inequities in medicaid home- and community-based services waiver enrollment among people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: A nationwide claims-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: States use Medicaid 1915(c) waiver programs to enable access to home- and community-based services for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (I/DD). However, enrollment rates and potential inequities are not well documented, impeding efforts to improve care access and quality for waiver program enrollees, especially for racially minoritized beneficiaries experiencing compounded barriers to services and supports. OBJECTIVE: To characterize year-by-year 1915(c) waiver program enrollment among Medicaid-enrolled adults with I/DD from 2016 to 2019 and to analyze population-level inequities by type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group. METHODS: Our data source was 2016-2019 Medicaid Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files Demographic and Eligibility files for beneficiaries with Down syndrome, autism, and intellectual disability. We used generalized estimating equation linear models to estimate the associations of type of I/DD and racial/ethnic group with the probability of 1915(c) waiver program enrollment and reported (1) unadjusted estimates and (2) estimates adjusted for demographics with state and year fixed effects. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, across all types of I/DD and racial/ethnic groups, unadjusted 1915(c) waiver program enrollment rates ranged from 40 to 60 % nationwide. We found modest growth in 1915(c) I/DD waiver program enrollment but persistent inequities over time. Compared to beneficiaries with intellectual disabilities, beneficiaries with autism were less likely to enroll while beneficiaries with Down syndrome were more likely. While some racial/ethnic groups had higher unadjusted mean enrollment, after adjustment, racially minoritized beneficiaries were 3.66-12.0 percentage points less likely to enroll compared to white non-Hispanic beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Given extensive waiting lists for 1915(c) waiver programs, Medicaid programs should evaluate existing enrollment and authorization processes and consider alternative HCBS program authorities.

Association of Federal COVID-19 Funding Distributions With Workforce and Capacity in Health Centers.

Using novel national data, we examined the association between 2020 federal COVID-related funding targeted to health centers (i.e., H8 funding) and health center workforce and operational capacity measures that may be important for preserving patient access to care and staff safety. We assigned health centers to quartiles based on federal funding distribution per patient and used adjusted linear probability models to estimate differences in workforce and operational capacity outcomes across quartiles from April 2020 to June 2022. We found a nearly 6-fold difference in 2020 H8 funding per patient when comparing health centers in the lowest versus highest quartiles. Despite this difference, health centers' outcomes improved similarly across quartiles over time, with the lowest-funded health centers having the greatest staffing and service capacity challenges. Our findings suggest that COVID-related health center funding may have contributed to stabilization of health centers' workforce and operations. Amid concerns about staff turnover, sustained investments targeted to supporting workforce retention at health centers can help to ensure ongoing delivery of critical services.

Provision of Behavioral Health Services at Community Health Centers and Hospital Emergency Department Visits.

BACKGROUND: Numerous US patients seek the hospital emergency department (ED) for behavioral health care. Community Health Centers (CHCs) offer a potential channel for redirecting many to a more patient-centered, lower cost setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify unique market areas serviced by CHCs and to examine whether CHCs are effective in offsetting behavioral health ED visits. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified CHC-year specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated random effects models applied to 42 federally qualified CHCs operating in New York State during 2013-2020. The dependent variables were numbers of ED mental health (substance use disorder) visits per capita in a CHC's service area, drawn from HCUP State Emergency Department Databases. Key explanatory variables measured CHC number of mental health (substance use disorder) visits, number of unique mental health (substance use disorder) patients, and mental health (substance use disorder) intensity, obtained from the HRSA Uniform Data System. RESULTS: Controlling for population, we observed small negative effects of CHC behavioral health integration in explaining ED behavioral health utilization. Measures of mental health utilization in CHCs were associated with 1.3%-9.3% fewer mental health emergency department visits per capita in Community Health Centers' service areas. Measures of substance use disorder utilization in Community Health Centers were associated with 1.3%-3.0% fewer emergency department visits per capita. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that behavioral health integration in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, but that policymakers explore more avenues for regional coordination strategies that align services between CHCs and local hospitals.

National Prevalence of Social Risk Factors at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

This cross-sectional study estimates positive screening rates for 4 social risk factors and assesses federally qualified health center characteristics associated with higher positive screening rates.

The Association Between Hospital-Based Food Pantry Use and Subsequent Emergency Department Utilization Among Medicaid Patients With Diabetes.

We explored the association between the use of a hospital-based food pantry and subsequent emergency department (ED) utilization among Medicaid patients with diabetes in a large safety-net health system. Leveraging 2015-2019 electronic health record data, we used a staggered difference-in-differences approach to measure changes in ED use before vs after food pantry use. Food pantry use was associated with a 7.3 percentage point decrease per patient per quarter (95% confidence interval, -13.8 to -0.8) in the probability of subsequent ED utilization ( P = .03). Addressing food insecurity through hospital-based food pantries may be one mechanism for reducing ED use among low-income patients with diabetes.

Access to perinatal doula services in Medicaid: a case analysis of 2 states.

Doula services support maternal and child health, but few Medicaid programs reimburse for them. Through qualitative interviews with key policy informants (n = 20), this study explored facilitators and barriers to Medicaid reimbursement through perceptions of doula-related policies in 2 states: Oregon, where doula care is reimbursed, and Massachusetts, where reimbursement is pending. Five themes characterize the inclusion of doula services in Medicaid. In Theme 1, stakeholders recognized an imperative to expand access to doula services. Subsequent themes represent complications in accomplishing that imperative. In Theme 2, perceptions that doula services were not valued by health care providers resulted in conflict between doulas and the health care system. In Theme 3, complex billing processes created friction and impeded reimbursement. In Theme 4, internal conflict presented barriers to policymaking. In Theme 5, structural fragmentation between state government and doula communities was prominent in Massachusetts, presenting tensions during policymaking. Informants reported on problems demanding resolution to establish equitable and robust doula care policies. Medicaid coverage of doula services requires ongoing collaboration with doulas, providers, and health care advocates.

Medicaid Expansion and Preventable Emergency Department Use by Race/Ethnicity.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine changes in emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) among uninsured or Medicaid-covered Black, Hispanic, and White adults aged 26-64 in the first 5 years of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. METHODS: Using 2010-2018 inpatient and ED discharge data from nine expansion and five nonexpansion states, an event study difference-in-differences regression model was used to estimate changes in number of annual ACSC ED visits per 100 adults ("ACSC ED rate") associated with the 2014 Medicaid expansion, overall and by race/ethnicity. A secondary outcome was the proportion of ACSC ED visits out of all ED visits ("ACSC ED share"). Analyses were conducted in 2022-2023. RESULTS: Medicaid expansion was associated with no change in ACSC ED rates among all, Black, Hispanic, or White adults. When excluding California, where most counties expanded Medicaid before 2014, expansion was associated with a decrease in ACSC ED rate among all, Black, Hispanic, and White adults. Expansion was also associated with a decrease in ACSC ED share among all, Black, and White adults. White adults experienced the largest reductions in ACSC ED rate and share. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with reductions in ACSC ED rates in some expansion states and reductions in ACSC ED share in all expansion states combined, with some heterogeneity by race/ethnicity. Expansion should be coupled with policy efforts to better link newly insured Black and Hispanic patients to non-ED outpatient care, alongside targeted outreach and expanded primary care capacity, which may reduce disparities in ACSC ED visits.

The relationship of age and comorbid conditions to hospital and nursing home days in Medicaid recipients with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how aging impacts healthcare utilization in persons with HIV (PWH) compared with persons without HIV (PWoH). DESIGN: Matched case-control study. METHODS: We studied Medicaid recipients in the United States, aged 18-64 years, from 2001 to 2012. We matched each of 270 074 PWH to three PWoH by baseline year, age, gender, and zip code. Outcomes were hospital and nursing home days per month (DPM). Comorbid condition groups were cardiovascular disease, diabetes, liver disease, mental health conditions, pulmonary disease, and renal disease. We used linear regression to examine the joint relationships of age and comorbid conditions on the two outcomes, stratified by sex at birth. RESULTS: We found small excesses in hospital DPM for PWH compared with PWoH. There were 0.03 and 0.07 extra hospital DPM for female and male individuals, respectively, and no increases with age. In contrast, excess nursing home DPM for PWH compared with PWoH rose linearly with age, peaking at 0.35 extra days for female individuals and 0.4 extra days for male individuals. HIV-associated excess nursing home DPM were greatest for persons with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, mental health conditions, and renal disease. For PWH at age 55 years, this represents an 81% increase in the nursing home DPM for male individuals, and a 110% increase for female individuals, compared PWoH. CONCLUSION: Efforts to understand and interrupt this pronounced excess pattern of nursing home DPM among PWH compared with PWoH are needed and may new insights into how HIV and comorbid conditions jointly impact aging with HIV.

Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether community health centers (CHCs) are effective in offsetting mental health emergency department (ED) visits. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: The HRSA Uniform Data System and the HCUP State ED Databases for Florida patients during 2012-2019. STUDY DESIGN: We identified CHC-year-specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated panel data models for number of ED mental health visits per capita in a CHC's service area. Models measured CHC mental health utilization as number of visits, unique patients, and intensity (visits per patient). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: CHC mental health utilization increased approximately 100% during 2012-2019. Increased CHC mental health provision was associated with small reductions in ED mental health utilization. An annual increase of 1000 CHC mental health care visits (5%) was associated with 0.44% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.153), and an increase of 1000 CHC mental health care patients (15%) with 1.9% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.123). An increase of 1 annual mental health visit per patient was associated with 16% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that mental health provision in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, albeit minimally. Policies that promote alignment of services between CHCs and local hospitals may accelerate this effect.

Assessing the Impact of the 340B Drug Pricing Program: A Scoping Review of the Empirical, Peer-Reviewed Literature.

Policy Points The 340B Drug Pricing Program accounts for roughly 1 out of every 100 dollars spent in the $4.3 trillion US health care industry. Decisions affecting the program will have wide-ranging consequences throughout the US safety net. Our scoping review provides a roadmap of the questions being asked about the 340B program and an initial synthesis of the answers. The highest-quality evidence indicates that nonprofit, disproportionate share hospitals may be using the 340B program in margin-motivated ways, with inconsistent evidence for increased safety net engagement; however, this finding is not consistent across other hospital types and public health clinics, which face different incentive structures and reporting requirements. CONTEXT: Despite remarkable growth and relevance of the 340B Drug Pricing Program to current health care practice and policy debate, academic literature examining 340B has lagged. The objectives of this scoping review were to summarize i) common research questions published about 340B, ii) what is empirically known about 340B and its implications, and iii) remaining knowledge gaps, all organized in a way that is informative to practitioners, researchers, and decision makers. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed, empirical 340B literature (database inception to March 2023). We categorized studies by suitability of their design for internal validity, type of covered entity studied, and motivation-by-scope category. FINDINGS: The final yield included 44 peer-reviewed, empirical studies published between 2003 and 2023. We identified 15 frequently asked research questions in the literature, across 6 categories of inquiry-motivation (margin or mission) and scope (external, covered entity, and care delivery interface). Literature with greatest internal validity leaned toward evidence of margin-motivated behavior at the external environment and covered entity levels, with inconsistent findings supporting mission-motivated behavior at these levels; this was particularly the case among participating disproportionate share hospitals (DSHs). However, included case studies were unanimous in demonstrating positive effects of the 340B program for carrying out a provider's safety net mission. CONCLUSIONS: In our scoping review of the 340B program, the highest-quality evidence indicates nonprofit, DSHs may be using the 340B program in margin-motivated ways, with inconsistent evidence for increased safety net engagement; however, this finding is not consistent across other hospital types and public health clinics, which face different incentive structures and reporting requirements. Future studies should examine heterogeneity by covered entity types (i.e., hospitals vs. public health clinics), characteristics, and time period of 340B enrollment. Our findings provide additional context to current health policy discussion regarding the 340B program.

Use of and barriers to adopting standardized social risk screening tools in federally qualified health centers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the national rate of social risk factor screening adoption among federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examine organizational factors associated with social risk screening adoption, and identify barriers to utilizing a standardized screening tool in 2020. DATA SOURCE: 2020 Uniform Data System, a 100% sample of all US FQHCs (N = 1375). STUDY DESIGN: We used multivariable linear probability models to assess the association between social risk screening adoption and key FQHC characteristics. We used descriptive statistics to describe variations in screening tool types and barriers to utilizing standardized tools. We thematically categorized open-ended responses about tools and barriers. DATA COLLECTION: None. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2020, 68.9% of FQHCs screened patients for any social risk factors. Characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of screening adoption included having high proportions of patients best served in a language other than English (18.8 percentage point [PP] increase, 95% CI: 6.0, 31.6) and being larger in size (10.3 PP increase, 95% CI: 0.7, 20.0). Having higher proportions of uninsured patients (14.2 PP decrease, 95% CI: -25.5, -0.3) and participating in Medicaid-managed care contracts (7.3 PP decrease, 95% CI: -14.2, -0.3) were associated with lower screening likelihood. Among screening FQHCs, the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) was the most common tool (47.1%). Among non-screening FQHCs, common barriers to using a standardized tool included lack of staff training to discuss social issues (25.2%), inability to include screening in patient intake (21.7%), and lack of funding for addressing social needs (19.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Though most FQHCs screened for social risk factors in 2020, various barriers have prevented nearly 1 in 3 FQHCs from adopting a screening tool. Policies that provide FQHCs with resources to support training and workflow changes may increase screening uptake and facilitate engagement with other sectors.

National and State-Level Trends in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers, 2012-2019.

INTRODUCTION: A disproportionate share of Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) users have a behavioral health condition, but there exists limited research examining changes in behavioral health provision in FQHCs. The objectives of this study were to describe how the provision of behavioral health services by FQHCs to the population of people with behavioral health conditions has changed over time in the US, how these trends varied across states, and whether the proportion of total delivered services that are behavioral health services has changed within FQHCs over time. METHODS: Descriptive analysis using the Uniform Data System and Global Burden of Disease Datasets from years 2012 to 2019. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, FQHC behavioral health visits per 1,000 population with any behavioral health condition grew 103%, with a 26-fold difference in average rates across states during the study period. Annual behavioral health visits per patient increased from 3.2 to 2012 to 3.4 in 2019. From 2012 to 2019, the number of behavioral health visits per 1,000 FQHC patients grew by 51%, whereas the rate of asthma visits declined by 14%, heart disease visits declined by 4%, and hypertension and diabetes related visits remained stable (changing < 1% for both). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Behavioral health visit growth at FQHCs outpaced national prevalence of behavioral health conditions. This growth was driven by FQHCs serving an increasing number of patients with behavioral health conditions, without sacrificing the frequency of visits for individual patients with behavioral health conditions.

Medicaid Reimbursement for Doula Care: Policy Considerations From a Scoping Review.

Evidence suggests that perinatal doula care can support maternal health and reduce racial inequities among low-income pregnant and postpartum people, prompting growing interest by state Medicaid agencies to reimburse for doula services. Emerging peer-reviewed and gray literature document factors facilitating or impeding that reimbursement. We conducted a scoping review of that literature (2012-2022) to distill key policy considerations for policymakers and advocates in the inclusion of doula care as a Medicaid-covered benefit. Fifty-three reports met the inclusion criteria. Most (53%) were published in 2021 or 2022. Their stated objectives were advocating for expanded access to doula care (17%), describing barriers to policy implementation, and/or offering recommendations to overcome the barriers (17%). A primary policy consideration among states was prioritizing partnership with doulas and doula advocates to inform robust and equitable policymaking to sustain the doula profession.

Georgia Pathways-Partial Medicaid Expansion With Work Requirements and Premiums.

This Viewpoint discusses the Georgia Pathways to Coverage program, which is the first state program that partially expands Medicaid eligibility to low-income adults with work requirements.

Spatial availability of federally qualified health centers and disparities in health services utilization in medically underserved areas.

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) improve access to care for important health services (e.g., preventive care), particularly among marginalized and underserved communities. However, whether spatial availability of FQHCs influences care-seeking behavior for medically underserved residents is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the relationships of present-day zip-code level availability of FQHCs, historic redlining, and health services utilization (i.e., at FQHCs and any health clinic/facility) in six large states. We further examined these associations by states, FQHC availability (i.e., 1, 2-4 and ≥5 FQHC sites per zip code) and geographic areas (i.e., urbanized vs. rural, redlined vs. non-redlined sections of urban areas). Using Poisson and multivariate regression models, we found that in medically underserved areas, having at least one FQHC site was associated with greater likelihood of patients seeking health services at FQHCs [rate ratio (RR) = 3.27, 95%CI: 2.27-4.70] than areas with no FQHCs available, varying across states (RRs = 1.12 to 6.33). Relationships were stronger in zip codes with ≥5 FQHC sites, small towns, metropolitan areas, and redlined sections of urban areas (HOLC D-grade vs. C-grade: RR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.21-1.27). However, these relationships did not remain true for routine care visits at any health clinic or facility (ß = -0.122; p = 0.008) or with worsening HOLC grades (ß = -0.082; p = 0.750), potentially due to the contextual factors associated with FQHC locations. Findings suggest that efforts to expand FQHCs may be most impactful for medically underserved residents living in small towns, metropolitan areas and redlined sections of urban areas. Because FQHCs can provide high quality, culturally competent, cost-effective access to important primary care, behavioral health, and enabling services that uniquely benefit low-income and marginalized patient populations, particularly those who have been historically denied access to health care, improving availability of FQHCs may be an important mechanism for improving health care access and reducing subsequent inequities for these underserved groups.

Medicaid expansion associated with no change in emergency department use across racial and ethnic groups.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate changes in the emergency department (ED) visit rate, hospitalization share of ED visits, and ED visit volumes associated with Medicaid expansion among Hispanic, Black, and White adults. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: For the population of adults aged 26-64 with no insurance or Medicaid coverage, we obtained census population and ED visit counts during 2010-2018 in nine expansion and five nonexpansion states. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the annual number of ED visits per 100 adults ("ED rate"). The secondary outcomes were the share of ED visits leading to hospitalization, total number ("volumes") of all ED visits, ED visits leading to discharge ("treat-and-release") and ED visits leading to hospitalization ("transfer-to-inpatient"), and the share of the study population with Medicaid ("Medicaid share"). STUDY DESIGN: An event-study difference in differences design that contrasts pre- versus post-expansion changes in outcomes in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2013, the ED rate was 92.6, 34.4, and 59.2 ED visits among Black, Hispanic, and White adults, respectively. The expansion was associated with no change in ED rate in all three groups in each of the five post-expansion years. We found that expansion was associated with no change in the hospitalization share of ED visits and the volume of all ED visits, treat-and-release ED visits, and transfer-to-inpatient ED visits. The expansion was associated with an 11.7% annual increase (95% CI, 2.7%-21.2%) in the Medicaid share of Hispanic adults, but no significant change among Black adults (3.8%; 95% CI, -0.04% to 7.7%). CONCLUSION: ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with no changes in the rate of ED visits among Black, Hispanic, and White adults. Expanding Medicaid eligibility may not change ED use, including among Black and Hispanic subgroups.

Changes in Performance Measures and Service Volume at US Federally Qualified Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: Stay-at-home orders, site closures, staffing shortages, and competing COVID-19 testing and treatment needs all potentially decreased primary care access and quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. These challenges may have especially affected federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which serve patients with low income nationwide. Objective: To examine changes in FQHCs' quality-of-care measures and visit volumes in 2020 to 2021 vs prepandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a census of US FQHCs to calculate changes in outcomes between 2016 and 2021 using generalized estimating equations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Twelve quality-of-care measures and 41 visit types based on diagnoses and services rendered, measured at the FQHC-year level. Results: A total of 1037 FQHCs were included, representing 26.6 million patients (63% 18-64 years old; 56% female) in 2021. Despite upward trajectories for most measures prepandemic, the percentage of patients served by FQHCs receiving recommended care or achieving recommended clinical thresholds showed a statistically significant decrease between 2019 and 2020 for 10 of 12 quality measures. For example, declines were observed for cervical cancer screening (-3.8 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -4.3 to -3.2 pp), depression screening (-7.0 pp; 95% CI, -8.0 to -5.9 pp), and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension (-6.5 pp; 95% CI, -7.0 to -6.0 pp). By 2021, only 1 of these 10 measures returned to 2019 levels. From 2019 to 2020, 28 of 41 visit types showed a statistically significant decrease, including immunizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.78), oral examinations (IRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59-0.63), and supervision of infant or child health (IRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89); 11 of these 28 visits approximated or exceeded prepandemic rates by 2021, while 17 remained below prepandemic rates. Five visit types increased in 2020, including substance use disorder (IRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11), depression (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09), and anxiety (IRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14-1.19); all 5 continued to increase in 2021. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US FQHCs, nearly all quality measures declined during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with most declines persisting through 2021. Similarly, most visit types declined in 2020; 60% of these remained below prepandemic levels in 2021. By contrast, mental health and substance use visits increased in both years. The pandemic led to forgone care and likely exacerbated behavioral health needs. As such, FQHCs need sustained federal funding to expand service capacity, staffing, and patient outreach. Quality reporting and value-based care models must also adapt to the pandemic's influence on quality measures.