RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 40%-50% of this septic arthritis occurs in the knee, despite rapid medical surgical treatment, 24%-50% will have a poor clinical outcome. It is not clear which debridement technique, by arthrotomy or arthroscopy, is more effective in controlling infection, or whether or not previous osteoarthritis worsens the outcome. The objective of this study on septic arthritis of the osteoarthritic knee was to analyse which surgical debridement technique, arthroscopy or arthrotomy, is more effective, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the patients, and how many go on to require a TKR after the infection has healed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 27 patients with native septic arthritis of the knee. Eighteen were men and the mean age was 64.8 years (30-89years). Fifteen patients were debrided by arthrotomy and 12 by arthroscopy. The effectiveness of debridement in controlling infection, the radiographic progression of the osteoarthritis on the Ahlbäch scale, the need for subsequent replacement, and pain and functional status were analysed using the VAS and WOMAC scales at 52.8±11.2-month follow-up. RESULTS: The infection was controlled in 93% and 92% of the patients, 13% and 42% required 2 or more surgeries for infection control, 18% and 44.4% showed progression of arthritis in the arthrotomy and arthroscopy groups, respectively. One patient in each group required a knee replacement. The VAS score was superior in the arthrotomy group and there were no differences in WOMAC score. CONCLUSION: Debridement by arthrotomy in the emergency department by non-sub-specialist knee surgeons is more effective than arthroscopic debridement in controlling septic arthritis of the knee. Surgical debridement of septic arthritis in knees with previous osteoarthritis enabled control of the infection with no pain despite the progression of the osteoarthritis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological evolution of the total knee revision arthroplasty with cemented stems in patients over 75 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in all the subjects who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty with cemented stems between 2008 and 2014 in our center. Twenty-seven individuals over 75 years met the inclusion criteria. We assessed the Knee Society Score and range of motion for clinical outcome. We evaluated the implant stability with radiographs through radiolucent lines according to the modified radiological scale of the Knee Society; we registered the complications and prosthetic survival. RESULTS: With an average age of our participants of 82.6 ± 4.4 years and a follow-up of 43 ± 14.4 months, we did not find any mechanical failure of the components. The functional average score was 115 ± 32 in the total KSS, of which 77 ± 17.5 points were in the KSS knee and 42 ± 24 in the KSS function. The average range of motion was 98º ± 17. Radiologically, 18 patients presented radiolucent lines, but only three needed follow-up using the modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that cemented stems are a good method for fixation in the revision of total knee arthroplasty in people over 75 years. We observed acceptable medium-term clinical results with a low risk of radiological failure, despite the high number of radiolucencies.
Analizar la evolución funcional y radiológica de los pacientes mayores de 75 años intervenidos de cirugía de revisión de rodilla con vástagos cementados.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Reoperação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho , Falha de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Resumen: Antecedentes: Analizar la evolución funcional y radiológica de los pacientes mayores de 75 años intervenidos de cirugía de revisión de rodilla con vástagos cementados. Material y métodos: Mediante análisis retrospectivo, hemos revisado a 27 individuos mayores de 75 años a quienes se les ha implantado una prótesis total de rodilla de revisión con vástagos cementados en nuestro centro entre 2008-2014. Durante el seguimiento, se realizó un análisis clínico mediante la escala Knee Society Score y de movilidad de la rodilla, un análisis radiológico de la estabilidad de los implantes por medio de la escala radiológica modificada de la Knee Society, el registro de las complicaciones y la supervivencia protésica. Resultados: Con una edad media de los participantes de 82.6 ± 4.4 años y un seguimiento medio de 43 ± 14.4 meses, no hemos observado ningún caso de aflojamiento mecánico de los componentes. La valoración funcional ha sido de 115 ± 32 puntos en la escala total KSS, de los cuales 77 ± 17.5 puntos pertenecen al KSS rodilla y 42 ± 24 puntos al KSS función. El rango medio de movilidad fue de 98o ± 17. A nivel radiológico, 18 sujetos mostraron radiolucencias periprotésicas; según los criterios de la escala radiológica de la Knee Society, solo tres requirieron seguimiento clínico-radiológico estricto. Conclusiones: La cementación de los vástagos en prótesis totales de rodilla de revisión se trata de un buen sistema de fijación en personas mayores de 75 años, con elevada supervivencia del implante, buen resultado funcional y bajo porcentaje de aflojamiento radiológico a pesar de la aparición frecuente de radiolucencias.
Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological evolution of the total knee revision arthroplasty with cemented stems in patients over 75 years. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in all the subjects who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty with cemented stems between 2008 and 2014 in our center. Twenty-seven individuals over 75 years met the inclusion criteria. We assessed the Knee Society Score and range of motion for clinical outcome. We evaluated the implant stability with radiographs through radiolucent lines according to the modified radiological scale of the Knee Society; we registered the complications and prosthetic survival. Results: With an average age of our participants of 82.6 ± 4.4 years and a follow-up of 43 ± 14.4 months, we did not find any mechanical failure of the components. The functional average score was 115 ± 32 in the total KSS, of which 77 ± 17.5 points were in the KSS knee and 42 ± 24 in the KSS function. The average range of motion was 98o ± 17. Radiologically, 18 patients presented radiolucent lines, but only three needed follow-up using the modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system. Conclusions: The results revealed that cemented stems are a good method for fixation in the revision of total knee arthroplasty in people over 75 years. We observed acceptable medium-term clinical results with a low risk of radiological failure, despite the high number of radiolucencies.
Assuntos
Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Reoperação , Artroplastia do Joelho , Falha de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Prótese do JoelhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of proximal tarso-metatarsal joint resection is to provide early weight-loading for biomechanical realignment and correct weight imbalance across the MTP joint. Therefore, its main indications are all those metatarsalgia in which previous orthopaedic treatment has failed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report our experience in metatarsalgia management with proximal metatarsal resection. This is a retrospective study between April 1997 and December 2005. 40 feet underwent this procedure (36 patients), with a total report of 86 osteotomies. Clinical results were evaluated with American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Lesser Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale Score (maximum score: 100 points). RESULTS: A 10-15-grade correction was achieved with a mean resection of 2mm. Assessment with AOFAS' scale disclosed previous average 35.75+/-4.2 with a final score reported of 88.4+/-6.9 (range 65-100). An overall mean increase of 52.65 points was achieved. No case had major complications that required further surgery. Pain improved in 39 patients (97.5%), and persisted in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal metatarsal resection is a simple technique that provides adequate correction of the abnormal pressure distribution across the MTP joint without internal fixation.