No differences in knee kinematics between active and passive flexion-extension movement: an intra-operative kinematic analysis performed during total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to acquire and compare by the use of a navigation system the intra-operative flexion-extension movement of the knee performed actively by the patient and passively by the surgeon before and after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implantation. METHODS: A cohort of 31 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (OA), candidate for TKA underwent intra-operative kinematics assessment with a commercial navigation system before and after the definitive implant positioning of a Cruciate Retaining (CR) Mobile Bearing (MB) prostheses. The kinematical data were acquired while surgeon performed the flexion-extension movement (passive ROM - pROM), and while the patient performed it (active ROM - aROM). Differences between pre- and post- implantation and between active and passive motions, were statistically analyzed using paired Student t-tests (p = 0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference were found between aROM and pROM with paired Student t-test regarding internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation of the femoral component with respect to the tibia during flexion-extension movement before and after TKA implant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Active muscle contraction seems to not significantly affect TKA kinematics. The ROM performed by the surgeon during operation resemble the movement actively performed by the patient. The clinical relevance of this study further supports the use of CAS system in performing intra-operative analysis concerning knee biomechanics.

Changes in the orientation of knee functional flexion axis during passive flexion and extension movements in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Recently, the functional flexion axis has been considered to provide a proper rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Several factors could influence the identification of the functional flexion axis. The purpose of this study was to analyse the estimation of the functional flexion axis by separately focusing on passive flexion and extension movements and specifically assessing its orientation compared to the transepicondylar axis, in both the axial plane and the frontal plane. METHODS: Anatomical and kinematic acquisitions were performed using a commercial navigation system on 79 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with cruciate substituting prosthesis design. The functional flexion axis was estimated from passive movements, between 0° and 120° of flexion and back. Intra-observer agreement and reliability, internal-external rotation and the angle with the surgical transepicondylar axis, in axial and frontal planes, were separately analysed for flexion and extension, in pre- and post-implant conditions. RESULTS: The analysis of reliability and agreement showed good results. The identification of the functional flexion axis showed statistically significant differences both in relation to flexion and extension and to pre- and post-implant conditions, both in frontal plane and in axial plane. The analysis of internal-external rotation confirmed these differences in kinematics (p < 0.05, between 25° and 35° of flexion). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of the functional flexion axis changed in relation to passive flexion and extension movements, above all in frontal plane, while it resulted more stable and reliable in axial plane. These findings supported the possible clinical application of the functional flexion axis in the surgical practice by implementing navigated procedures. However, further analyses are required to better understand the factors affecting the identification of the functional flexion axis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of three formal methods used to estimate the functional axis of rotation: an extensive in-vivo analysis performed on the knee joint.

Estimating the main axis of rotation (AoR) of a human joint represents an important issue in biomechanics. This study compared three formal methods used to estimate functional AoR, namely a cylindrical fitting method, a mean helical axis transformation, and a symmetrical axis approach. These methods were tested on 106 subjects undergoing navigated total knee arthroplasty. AoR orientation in 3D and in the frontal and coronal planes provided by each method was compared to the transepicondylar axis direction. Although all the methods resulted effective, significant differences were identified among them, relatively to the orientation in 3D and in the frontal plane projection. This was probably due to the presence of secondary rotations during the first degrees of knee flexion.

Does patellofemoral geometry in TKA affect patellar position in mid-flexion?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the position of the patella at 90° of flexion before and after implantation of two TKA models with identical tibiofemoral geometry but different trochlear and patellar designs. The hypothesis was that the design with the deeper 'anatomic' trochlea could produce more natural patellar positions. METHODS: Intra-operative navigation data were collected from 22 consecutive cases that received two TKA designs (9 HLS Noetos(®) and 13 HLS KneeTec(®)). Both implants were cemented postero-stabilised TKAs with mobile tibial inserts and patellar resurfacing. Operations were guided by a non-image-based system that recorded relative femoral, tibial and patellar positions pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: The two groups exhibited little difference in femoral internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation during knee flexion. The two groups exhibited significant differences in patellar position at 90° of flexion. Post-operatively, the patella was similarly shifted medially relative to the femur (Noetos 6.9 mm, KneeTec 6.0 mm, n.s.). Patellar flexion was equivalent in native knees (Noetos 18.3°, KneeTec 20.5°, n.s.), but in implanted knees, it was considerably different (Noetos 6.3°, KneeTec 23.5°, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The present study compared intra-operative navigation data from two patient series that received TKA implants with identical tibiofemoral articular geometry but different patellofemoral designs. The results confirm that tibiofemoral kinematics are unchanged, but that patellar positions at 90° of flexion offer greater mechanical advantage to the quadriceps using the KneeTec than using the Noetos. The findings raise awareness of influence of patellofemoral geometry on mid-flexion kinematics and help surgeons select the most suitable implant for patients with weak quadriceps muscles or with history of patellar instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Comparative study, Level III.

Deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert in CR-TKA does not prevent patellar tendon angle increase and patellar anterior translation.

PURPOSE: Starting from the hypothesis that a deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty would prevent the increase in patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation by reducing the paradoxical anterior femoral translation, the main purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of this prosthesis design, and secondary to assess the clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with navigation technique were enrolled and prospectively followed up at 6 months. The median value of age was 71 years (57-83). Before and after surgery, the following parameters were calculated: patellar tendon angle, anterior-posterior and medio-lateral patellar translation, patellar height and range of motion. All patients were assessed with the SF-36 Physical Functioning and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ADL scores. RESULTS: Patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation significantly increased in post-operative conditions (p < 0.0001); a statistically significant medial patellar translation was found (p < 0.0001), while patellar height did not show any difference between pre- and post-operative conditions (n.s). A significant correlation was found between patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation and the clinical scores (p < 0.0417). There was a significant post-operative decrease (p < 0.0033) in the range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate that deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert prevents the anterior translation of the patella in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, thus causing inferior clinical scores. It provided useful information about the biomechanical role of the patella in total knee arthroplasty, allowing to choose the most appropriate surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Three different cruciate-sacrificing TKA designs: minor intraoperative kinematic differences and negligible clinical differences.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare three types of mobile-bearing posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-sacrificing TKA. The hypothesis was that the three designs provide differences in flexion stability and femoral rollback and improved clinical score at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Three groups of patients, divided according to implant design, were analysed retrospectively. All operations were guided by a non-image-based navigation system that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during: passive range of motion and anterior drawer test at 90° flexion. WOMAC, KSS and SF36 scores were collected pre-operatively and at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: There are no differences in kinematic or clinical performance of the three implants, except for the antero-posterior translation during stress test in flexion: only Cohort B had comparable pre- and post-operative laxity test values (p < 0.001). All three TKA designs allowed to maintain pre-operative tibial rotation pattern through all range of knee flexion. All clinical scores of the three patient cohorts were significantly improved post-operatively compared to the pre-operative values (p < 0.001). Moreover, we found no differences among post-operative results of the three designs. CONCLUSION: Despite design variations, mobile-bearing PCL-sacrificing TKA reproduces femoral rollback and screw-home with little or no difference in clinical or functional scores at a follow-up of 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison of stability and kinematics of the natural knee versus a PS TKA with a 'third condyle'.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the kinematics of knees before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that relies on an inter-condylar 'third condyle'. The hypothesis was that the 'third condyle' provides sufficient flexion stability and induces a close to normal femoral rollback, thus granting natural joint kinematics. METHODS: Intra-operative navigation data were collected from 29 consecutive cases that received a cemented TKA (HLS Noetos, Tornier SA, France) designed with an inter-condylar 'third condyle' that engages within the tibial insert beyond 35° flexion. Operations were guided by a non-image-based system (BLU-IGS, Orthokey Italia srl, Italy) that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during: passive range of motion, anterior drawer test at 90° flexion, and varus-valgus stress tests at full extension and at 30° flexion. RESULTS: The total internal tibial rotation during flexion was similar for native (8.2 ± 4.2°) and implanted knees (8.0 ± 5.4°). The lateral femoral condyle was more posterior in implanted knees (1.2 ± 9.4 mm) than in native knees (9.5 ± 3.6 mm) throughout early flexion (p < 0.01), but this difference diminished beyond 100° flexion (n.s.). The implanted knees did not exhibit paradoxical external tibial rotation. Varus-valgus laxity in full extension was lower for implanted knees than for native knees (p = 0.0221), but at 30° flexion was almost identical for both native and implanted knees. Anteroposterior laxity was similar in implanted and native knees. CONCLUSIONS: The 'third condyle' TKA provides similar anteroposterior and mediolateral stability to the natural knee. This feature granted an adequate balance between laxity and constraint to reproduce natural joint kinematics, including smooth femoral rollback, without causing paradoxical external tibial rotation.

Analysis of knee functional flexion axis in navigated TKA: identification and repeatability before and after implant positioning.

PURPOSE: Providing correct rotational alignment of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is mandatory to achieve correct kinematics, good ligament balance and patellar tracking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential clinical applications of functional flexion axis (FFA) by analysing the differences between pre- and post-implant placement. This evaluation was supported by the analysis of repeatability, assessing the robustness of the proposed method. METHODS: Anatomical acquisitions and passive kinematics were acquired on 87 patients undergoing TKA using a commercial navigation system. Knee FFA was estimated, before and after implant positioning, from three flexion-extension movements between 0 and 120°. The angle between FFA and transepicondylar axis was analysed in frontal and axial planes. Repeatability coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to analyse the reliability and the agreement in identifying the axis. RESULTS: The analysed angle presented differences between pre- and post-operative conditions only in the frontal plane (from -8.3 ± 5.5° to -2.8 ± 5.3°) (p < 0.0001). There was good intraobserver reliability and agreement. Repeatability coefficient ranged between 4.4° (3.7-4.9°) and 3.4° (2.9-3.8°), the ICC between 0.87 (0.83-0.91) and 0.93 (0.90-0.95) and the standard deviation ranged between 1.3 and 1.0°. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that TKA affected the estimation of FFA only in the frontal plane. This method reported good repeatability, demonstrating its usefulness for clinical purposes particularly to evaluate rotational positioning of the femoral component in the axial plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical results from the in vitro reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) using a navigation-assisted technique on a cadaveric model and its effects on patellar stability and kinematics. The authors investigated the hypothesis that patellar kinematics after reconstruction with a tubular graft are not optimal when compared with the original fan-shaped MPFL. METHODS: In six fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, lateral loads (25 N) were applied on the patella at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion in three different MPFL states: intact, cut and reconstructed. The arrangement allowed positional measurements of patellar motion to be tracked in six degrees of freedom. Medial to lateral patellar translation and patellar tilt were recorded. The kinematics after a technique of MPFL reconstruction, performed with a gracilis tendon in a blind femoral tunnel guided by navigation, were compared against kinematics recorded in the MPFL intact state. A temporary fixation of adequate tension to engage the lateral patellar facet in extension was applied to the MPFL and, after graft cycling, the final fixation was done at 70° knee flexion with an interference screw. RESULTS: There was a comparable medial to lateral patellar translation and tilting of the patella in the MPFL-intact and the MPFL-reconstructed state. Static patellar translation in the MPFL-reconstructed state, with and without the application of load, was comparable to patellar translation in the MPFL-intact state. The dynamic patellofemoral shift kinematics recorded an under-constraint in early flexion and over-constraint in late flexion, while an opposite effect was recorded in patellar tilt. However, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the major role of the MPFL in case of medial loading between 0° and 60°, by focusing on the importance of kinematically identifying the proper femoral point for fixation. While the study demonstrates the importance of kinematic determination of the proper femoral point of fixation, as the anatomical insertion remains difficult to identify. Even in dissected cadavers, the authors recorded a slightly anterior placement than native MPFL. After reconstruction, patellar stability in terms of lateral translation and tilt was similar to the intact MPFL, but patellar kinematics were not optimal with the use of a smaller and tubular graft than the native wider and fan-shaped MPFL.

The influence of medial patellofemoral ligament on patellofemoral joint kinematics and patellar stability.

PURPOSE: Retinacular restraints have a critical role in patellar tracking, limiting the movement of the patella in the trochlear groove. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is probably the main stabilizer against lateral displacement; few studies are focused on MPFL role on patellofemoral kinematics and patellar stability. The main goal of this in vitro study was to analyse the influence of the MPFL on the kinematics of the patellofemoral joint and patellar stability. METHODS: Using a non-image-based navigation system, kinematics and anatomical data of six fresh-frozen specimens were collected. A passive flexion-extension from 0° to 90° and static acquisitions at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, with and without 25 N of lateral load, were performed with intact and resected MPFL with a 60 N axial force applied to the isolated quadriceps tendon. Patellar tilt and shift were analysed. RESULTS: The MPFL intact state showed a shift in medial direction during the first degrees of knee flexion-that disappeared in MPFL resected condition-followed by a lateral shift, similar to that of MPFL resected condition. Tilt analysis showed that patella rotated laterally until 85° of knee flexion for intact MPFL condition and until 70° for resected MPFL condition and after rotated medially. Static tests showed that patellar stability was significantly affected by MPFL resected condition in particular at 30° and 60°. CONCLUSIONS: The MPFL has an aponeurotic nature. It works as a restraint during motion, with an active role under high stress on lateral side, but with a small contribution during neutral knee flexion. Its biomechanical behaviour under loading conditions should be kept into account when performing surgical reconstruction of this ligamentous structure.

Patellofemoral anatomy and biomechanics: current concepts.

The patellofemoral joint, due to its particular bone anatomy and the numerous capsuloligamentous structures and muscles that act dynamically on the patella, is considered one of the most complex joints in the human body from the biomechanical point of view. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been demonstrated to contribute 60% of the force that opposes lateral displacement of the patella, and MPFL injury results in an approximately 50% reduction in the force needed to dislocate the patella laterally with the knee extended. For this reason, recent years have seen a growing interest in the study of this important anatomical structure, whose aponeurotic nature has thus been demonstrated. The MPFL acts as a restraint during motion, playing an active role under conditions of laterally applied stress, but an only marginal role during natural knee flexion. However, it remains extremely difficult to clearly define the anatomy of the MPFL and its relationships with other anatomical structures.