Oral bemnifosbuvir (AT-527) vs placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in an outpatient setting (MORNINGSKY).

Aim: This phase III study assessed the efficacy/safety/antiviral activity/pharmacokinetics of bemnifosbuvir, a novel, oral nucleotide analog to treat COVID-19. Patients & methods: Outpatient adults/adolescents with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomized 2:1 to bemnifosbuvir/placebo. Time to symptom alleviation/improvement (primary outcome), risk of hospitalization/death, viral load and safety were evaluated. Results: Although the study was discontinued prematurely and did not meet its primary end point, bemnifosbuvir treatment resulted in fewer hospitalizations (71% relative risk reduction), COVID-19-related medically attended hospital visits, and COVID-19-related complications compared with placebo. No reduction in viral load was observed. The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar; no deaths occurred. Conclusion: Bemnifosbuvir showed hospitalization reduction in patients with variable disease progression risk and was well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04889040 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A Phase 2 Randomized Trial Evaluating the Antiviral Activity and Safety of the Direct-Acting Antiviral Bemnifosbuvir in Ambulatory Patients with Mild or Moderate COVID-19 (MOONSONG Study).

Bemnifosbuvir is an oral antiviral drug with a dual mechanism of action targeting viral RNA polymerase, with in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a phase 2, double-blind study evaluating the antiviral activity, safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bemnifosbuvir in ambulatory patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. Patients were randomized 1:1 to bemnifosbuvir 550 mg or placebo (cohort A) and 3:1 to bemnifosbuvir 1,100 mg or placebo (cohort B); all doses were given twice daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the amount of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The modified intent-to-treat infected population comprised 100 patients (bemnifosbuvir 550 mg, n = 30; bemnifosbuvir 1,100 mg, n = 30; cohort A placebo, n = 30; cohort B placebo, n = 10). The primary endpoint was not met: the difference in viral RNA adjusted means at day 7 was -0.25 log10 copies/mL between bemnifosbuvir 550 mg and cohort A placebo (80% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to 0.16; P = 0.4260), and -0.08 log10 copies/mL between bemnifosbuvir 1,100 mg and pooled placebo (80% CI, -0.48 to 0.33; P = 0.8083). Bemnifosbuvir 550 mg was well tolerated. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher with bemnifosbuvir 1,100 mg (10.0% and 16.7% of patients, respectively) than pooled placebo (2.5% nausea, 2.5% vomiting). In the primary analysis, bemnifosbuvir did not show meaningful antiviral activity on nasopharyngeal viral load as measured by RT-PCR compared with placebo in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT04709835. IMPORTANCE COVID-19 continues to be a major global public health challenge, and there remains a need for effective and convenient direct-acting antivirals that can be administered outside health care settings. Bemnifosbuvir is an oral antiviral with a dual mechanism of action and potent in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral activity, safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bemnifosbuvir in ambulatory patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. In the primary analysis, bemnifosbuvir did not show meaningful antiviral activity compared with placebo as assessed by nasopharyngeal viral loads. The negative predictive value of nasopharyngeal viral load reduction for clinical outcomes in COVID-19 is currently unclear, and further evaluation of bemnifosbuvir for COVID-19 may be warranted despite the findings observed in this study.

Combining baloxavir marboxil with standard-of-care neuraminidase inhibitor in patients hospitalised with severe influenza (FLAGSTONE): a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are considered the standard of care for hospitalised patients with influenza. We aimed to test whether combining the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir marboxil (hereafter baloxavir) with standard-of-care NAIs would result in improved clinical outcomes compared with NAI monotherapy in hospitalised patients with severe influenza. METHODS: We did a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial. Patients aged 12 years or older who were hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed influenza (by RT-PCR or a rapid test) and had a National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) of 4 or greater were included. Recruitment took place in 124 centres across 25 countries. Using a permuted-block method and an interactive response system, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either baloxavir plus NAIs (hereafter the baloxavir group) or placebo plus NAIs (hereafter the control group). Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. Baloxavir was administered orally on day 1 and day 4 (40 mg for bodyweight <80 kg, or 80 mg for ≥80 kg), and on day 7 if no clinical improvement had occurred by day 5. The NAIs included in this study were oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir, which were selected and administered according to local standard practice. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, defined as time to a NEWS2 of 2 or lower for 24 h or hospital discharge, whichever came first, based on daily assessments over the study duration of 35 days. Secondary endpoints included safety analyses. The modified intention-to-treat infected (mITTI) population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment, received a dose of study drug, and were RT-PCR-positive for influenza at any timepoint according to the treatment assigned at randomisation) was used in all efficacy analyses. The safety population (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, according to the treatment received) was used in the safety analyses. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03684044. FINDINGS: Overall, 366 patients were enrolled between Jan 8, 2019, and March 16, 2020, of whom 241 were assigned to the baloxavir group and 125 to the control group. The mITTI population comprised 322 patients, 208 in the baloxivir group and 114 in the control group. In total, 280 (87%) of these patients had influenza A infections. Median time to clinical improvement was 97·5 h (95% CI 75·9 to 117·2) in the baloxavir group and 100·2 h (75·9 to 144·4) in the control group (median difference -2·7 h [95% CI -53·4 to 25·9], p=0·467). Baloxavir plus NAI was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed; serious adverse events occurred in 29 (12%) of 239 patients in the baloxavir group versus 19 (15%) of 124 patients in the control group, of which one was considered related to treatment (orthostatic hypotension in a patient in the control group). Overall, four deaths (2%) occurred in the baloxavir group and seven (6%) in the control group; none were considered related to treatment. INTERPRETATION: Combining baloxavir with NAIs did not result in superior clinical outcomes compared with NAIs alone. The combination of baloxavir plus NAI was well tolerated. The findings suggest that combination antivirals would not be routinely indicated in clinical practice for hospitalised patients with severe influenza. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Evaluating the fitness of PA/I38T-substituted influenza A viruses with reduced baloxavir susceptibility in a competitive mixtures ferret model.

Baloxavir is approved in several countries for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza in otherwise-healthy and high-risk patients. Treatment-emergent viruses with reduced susceptibility to baloxavir have been detected in clinical trials, but the likelihood of widespread occurrence depends on replication capacity and onward transmission. We evaluated the fitness of A/H3N2 and A/H1N1pdm09 viruses with the polymerase acidic (PA) I38T-variant conferring reduced susceptibility to baloxavir relative to wild-type (WT) viruses, using a competitive mixture ferret model, recombinant viruses and patient-derived virus isolates. The A/H3N2 PA/I38T virus showed a reduction in within-host fitness but comparable between-host fitness to the WT virus, while the A/H1N1pdm09 PA/I38T virus had broadly similar within-host fitness but substantially lower between-host fitness. Although PA/I38T viruses replicate and transmit between ferrets, our data suggest that viruses with this amino acid substitution have lower fitness relative to WT and this relative fitness cost was greater in A/H1N1pdm09 viruses than in A/H3N2 viruses.

Baloxavir Marboxil Single-dose Treatment in Influenza-infected Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Trial (miniSTONE-2).

BACKGROUND: Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a novel, cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor that has previously demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of influenza in adults and adolescents. We assessed the safety and efficacy of baloxavir in otherwise healthy children with acute influenza. METHODS: MiniSTONE-2 (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03629184) was a double-blind, randomized, active controlled trial enrolling children 1-<12 years old with a clinical diagnosis of influenza. Children were randomized 2:1 to receive either a single dose of oral baloxavir or oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint was incidence, severity and timing of adverse events (AEs); efficacy was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In total, 173 children were randomized and dosed, 115 to the baloxavir group and 58 to the oseltamivir group. Characteristics of participants were similar between treatment groups. Overall, 122 AEs were reported in 84 (48.6%) children. Incidence of AEs was similar between baloxavir and oseltamivir groups (46.1% vs. 53.4%, respectively). The most common AEs were gastrointestinal (vomiting/diarrhea) in both groups [baloxavir: 12 children (10.4%); oseltamivir: 10 children (17.2%)]. No deaths, serious AEs or hospitalizations were reported. Median time (95% confidence interval) to alleviation of signs and symptoms of influenza was similar between groups: 138.1 (116.6-163.2) hours with baloxavir versus 150.0 (115.0-165.7) hours with oseltamivir. CONCLUSIONS: Oral baloxavir is well tolerated and effective at alleviating symptoms in otherwise healthy children with acute influenza. Baloxavir provides a new therapeutic option with a simple oral dosing regimen.

Baloxavir treatment of ferrets infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus reduces onward transmission.

Influenza viruses cause seasonal outbreaks and pose a continuous pandemic threat. Although vaccines are available for influenza control, their efficacy varies each season and a vaccine for a novel pandemic virus manufactured using current technology will not be available fast enough to mitigate the effect of the first pandemic wave. Antivirals can be effective against many different influenza viruses but have not thus far been used extensively for outbreak control. Baloxavir, a recently licensed antiviral drug that targets the influenza virus endonuclease, has been shown to reduce virus shedding more effectively than oseltamivir, a widely used neuraminidase inhibitor drug. Thus it is possible that treatment with baloxavir might also interrupt onward virus transmission. To test this, we utilized the ferret model, which is the most commonly used animal model to study influenza virus transmission. We established a subcutaneous baloxavir administration method in ferrets which achieved similar pharmacokinetics to the approved human oral dose. Transmission studies were then conducted in two different locations with different experimental setups to compare the onward transmission of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus from infected ferrets treated with baloxavir, oseltamivir or placebo to naïve sentinel ferrets exposed either indirectly in adjacent cages or directly by co-housing. We found that baloxavir treatment reduced infectious viral shedding in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets compared to placebo, and reduced the frequency of transmission amongst sentinels in both experimental setups, even when treatment was delayed until 2 days post-infection. In contrast, oseltamivir treatment did not substantially affect viral shedding or transmission compared to placebo. We did not detect the emergence of baloxavir-resistant variants in treated animals or in untreated sentinels. Our results support the concept that antivirals which decrease viral shedding could also reduce influenza transmission in the community.

Glucocorticoid Dosages and Acute-Phase Reactant Levels at Giant Cell Arteritis Flare in a Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate glucocorticoid dosages and serologic findings in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) flares. METHODS: Patients with GCA were randomly assigned to receive double-blind dosing with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ) 162 mg weekly plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26), every-other-week TCZ plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-Q2W + Pred-26), placebo plus 26-week prednisone taper (PBO + Pred-26), or placebo plus 52-week prednisone taper (PBO + Pred-52). Outcome measures were prednisone dosage, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at the time of flare. RESULTS: One hundred patients received TCZ-QW + Pred-26, 49 received TCZ-Q2W + Pred-26, 50 received PBO + Pred-26, and 51 received PBO + Pred-52. Of the 149 TCZ-treated patients, 36 (24%) experienced flare, 23 (64%) of whom were still receiving prednisone (median dosage 2.0 mg/day). Among 101 PBO + Pred-treated patients, 59 (58%) experienced flare, 45 (76%) of whom were receiving prednisone (median dosage 5.0 mg/day). Many flares occurred while patients were taking >10 mg/day prednisone: 9 (25%) in the TCZ groups and 13 (22%) in the placebo groups. Thirty-three flares (92%) in TCZ-treated groups and 20 (34%) in PBO + Pred-treated groups occurred with normal CRP levels. More than half of the PBO + Pred-treated patients had elevated CRP levels without flares. Benefits of the TCZ and prednisone combination over prednisone alone for remission induction were apparent by 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Most GCA flares occurred while patients were still receiving prednisone. Acute-phase reactant levels were not reliable indicators of flare in patients treated with TCZ plus prednisone or with prednisone alone. The addition of TCZ to prednisone facilitates earlier GCA control.

Adverse Events in Giant Cell Arteritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Populations: Analyses of Tocilizumab Clinical Trials and Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: The safety profile of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well established. TCZ was approved to treat giant cell arteritis (GCA) in 2017 in the USA and Europe, and its safety profile in patients with GCA continues to be defined. The objective of this analysis was to examine incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events of special interest (AESI) occurring during the TCZ clinical development program and in healthcare claims data in patients with GCA or RA. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients with GCA or RA were identified in the MarketScan administrative healthcare claims database. TCZ-treated patients with GCA from the GiACTA trial and TCZ-treated patients with RA from pooled clinical trial data were analyzed. The IRs of AESI (AESI IRs) were calculated for all cohorts. In the claims cohorts, risks of AESI were estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: TCZ-naïve claims cohorts comprised 4804 patients with GCA [mean (standard deviation) age 73.4 (9.8) years; follow-up 3.9 (3.1) years] and 15,164 patients with RA [age 60.3 (8.2) years; follow-up, 4.5 (2.8) years]. TCZ-treated clinical trial cohorts comprised 149 patients with GCA [age 69.5 (8.4) years; exposure approx. 138 patient-years (PY)] and 7647 with RA [age 52 (12.6) years; exposure approx. 22,394 PY]. The IRs of infections, stroke, malignancies, myocardial infarction, and gastrointestinal perforations in the GCA claims cohort exceeded those in the RA claims cohort; the risk of AESI (adjusted for age and glucocorticoid use) was higher in patients with GCA than in those with RA. Similar patterns to the claims cohorts in terms of the AESI IRs were observed in clinical trial cohorts, although the number of events was limited in the GCA trial cohort. CONCLUSION: Higher IRs of AESI were observed in patients with GCA versus those with RA in both TCZ-naïve and -treated cohorts. Differences in underlying disease, age, and glucocorticoid use may influence AESI incidence, irrespective of intervention. FUNDING: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. Article processing charges were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Plain language summary is available for this article.

Health-related quality of life in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) every week or every other week and prednisone tapering achieved superior rates of sustained remission to patients treated with placebo and prednisone tapering in a randomised controlled trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients from this trial is now reported. METHODS: Exploratory analyses of SF-36 PCS and MCS and domain scores, PtGA and FACIT-Fatigue were performed in patients treated with weekly subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26) or placebo plus 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapers (PBO + Pred-26 or PBO + Pred-52). These analyses were performed on responder and non-responder patients, including those who achieved the primary outcome and those who experienced flare and received escape prednisone doses. RESULTS: Baseline SF-36 PCS, MCS and domain scores were low, indicating impaired HRQOL related to GCA. At week 52, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PCS scores improved with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 but worsened in both PBO + Pred groups (p <  0.001). LSM changes in MCS scores increased with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 versus PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.001). Treatment with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 resulted in significantly greater improvement in four of eight SF-36 domains compared with PBO + Pred-26 and six of eight domains compared with PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.01). Improvement with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in all eight domains compared with five domains with PBO + Pred-26 and none with PBO + Pred-52. Domain scores in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group at week 52 met or exceeded age- and gender-matched normative values (A/G norms). LSM changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores increased significantly with TCZ-QW + Pred-26, exceeding MCID and A/G norms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GCA receiving TCZ-QW + Pred-26 reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with those receiving prednisone only. Improvements in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group led to recovery of HRQOL to levels at least comparable to those of A/G-matched normative values at week 52 and exceeded normative values in five of eight domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153. Date of registration: February 13, 2013.

Risk Associated with Cumulative Oral Glucocorticoid Use in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis in Real-World Databases from the USA and UK.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) involves immediate initiation of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy with slow tapering of the dose over many months. Chronic exposure to glucocorticoids is associated with serious comorbidities. The objective of this analysis was to determine the glucocorticoid exposure and risk of glucocorticoid-related adverse events (AEs) in real-world patients with GCA. METHODS: Data from the Truven Healthcare MarketScan® database (from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2015) and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD; from January 1, 1995, to August 31, 2013) were used to retrospectively analyze patients aged ≥ 50 years with GCA in the USA and UK, respectively. Outcomes included oral glucocorticoid use (cumulative prednisone-equivalent exposure), glucocorticoid-related AEs and the association of AE risk with glucocorticoid exposure over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 4804 patients in the US MarketScan database and 3973 patients in the UK CPRD database included, 71.3 and 74.6% were women and mean age was 73.4 and 73.0 years, respectively. Median starting glucocorticoid dose and cumulative glucocorticoid dose at 52 weeks were 20-50 mg/day and 4000-4800 mg, respectively. The most frequent glucocorticoid-related AEs were hypertension and eye, bone health, and glucose tolerance conditions. In the first year after diagnosis, the likelihood of any glucocorticoid-related AE was significantly increased for each 1 g increase in cumulative glucocorticoid dose in the US and UK cohorts (odds ratio [95% CI], 1.170 [1.063, 1.287] and 1.06 [1.03, 1.09], respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Similar trends were observed for the risk of glucocorticoid-related AEs over full follow-up (mean, USA: 3.9 years, UK: 6.3 years). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world patients with GCA, increased cumulative glucocorticoid exposure was associated with an increased risk of glucocorticoid-related AEs. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Plain language summary available for this article.

Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Giant-cell arteritis commonly relapses when glucocorticoids are tapered, and the prolonged use of glucocorticoids is associated with side effects. The effect of the interleukin-6 receptor alpha inhibitor tocilizumab on the rates of relapse during glucocorticoid tapering was studied in patients with giant-cell arteritis. METHODS: In this 1-year trial, we randomly assigned 251 patients, in a 2:1:1:1 ratio, to receive subcutaneous tocilizumab (at a dose of 162 mg) weekly or every other week, combined with a 26-week prednisone taper, or placebo combined with a prednisone taper over a period of either 26 weeks or 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the rate of sustained glucocorticoid-free remission at week 52 in each tocilizumab group as compared with the rate in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week prednisone taper. The key secondary outcome was the rate of remission in each tocilizumab group as compared with the placebo group that underwent the 52-week prednisone taper. Dosing of prednisone and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Sustained remission at week 52 occurred in 56% of the patients treated with tocilizumab weekly and in 53% of those treated with tocilizumab every other week, as compared with 14% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week prednisone taper and 18% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week prednisone taper (P<0.001 for the comparisons of either active treatment with placebo). The cumulative median prednisone dose over the 52-week period was 1862 mg in each tocilizumab group, as compared with 3296 mg in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week taper (P<0.001 for both comparisons) and 3818 mg in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week taper (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred in 15% of the patients in the group that received tocilizumab weekly, 14% of those in the group that received tocilizumab every other week, 22% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week taper, and 25% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week taper. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy developed in one patient in the group that received tocilizumab every other week. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab, received weekly or every other week, combined with a 26-week prednisone taper was superior to either 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapering plus placebo with regard to sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the durability of remission and safety of tocilizumab. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01791153 .).

Serious adverse effects associated with glucocorticoid therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA): A nested case-control analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory vasculitis preferentially affecting large and medium-sized arteries. High-dose oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay of GCA therapy. Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), we examined the risk of oral GC-related serious adverse events (SAEs) in a UK population of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: We conducted a series of nested case-control analyses in GCA patients to examine the effect of increasing dose of prednisolone on the risk of developing diabetes, glaucoma, osteoporosis, fractures, serious infection requiring hospitalization, and death. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate the unadjusted and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for the associations between prednisolone use and the risks of all outcomes of interest. We stratified the analyses by increasing cumulative prednisolone use and average daily dose. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses, we observed a trend of increasing risk of diabetes and osteoporosis with increasing cumulative dose of oral prednisolone (ptrend < 0.05). GCA patients in the highest daily dose category (30mg/d) had an increased risk of diabetes (adjusted OR, 95% CI) (4.7, 2.8-7.8), osteoporosis (1.9, 1.2-2.9), fractures (2.6, 1.6-4.3), glaucoma (3.5, 2.0-6.1), serious infection (3.3, 2.2-5.2), and death (2.1, 1.3-3.5) compared to those with lower average daily prednisolone doses (5mg/d). CONCLUSION: Compared to lower average daily prednisolone doses, high average daily doses were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse effects.

Newly diagnosed vs. relapsing giant cell arteritis: Baseline data from the GiACTA trial.

OBJECTIVE: To report entry criteria and clinical features of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA) enrolled in a randomized trial of tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor-alpha inhibitor. METHODS: Newly diagnosed GCA was defined as diagnosis ≤6 weeks before baseline. Relapsing GCA was defined as diagnosis >6 weeks before baseline with ≥2 consecutive weeks of prednisone ≥40mg/day. All patients had active GCA within 6 weeks of baseline. All statistical results are exploratory. RESULTS: Of 251 patients, 119 (47%) had newly diagnosed and 132 (53%) had relapsing GCA. Mean age was 69 years in both subsets; 75% were women. Relapsing patients were heavier [difference in means (95% CI): women, 4.18kg (0.49-7.87, P = 0.027); men, 8.25kg (1.42-15.09, P = 0.019)] and had higher mean body mass index [difference in means (95% CI): women, 1.72kg/m2 (0.44-2.99, P = 0.009); men, 2.85kg/m2 (0.32-5.37, P = 0.028)]. Relapsers had higher baseline prevalence of depression (16% vs. 4%) and osteopenia/osteoporosis (33% vs. 23%, P = 0.002 and P = 0.062, respectively). At diagnosis, 67% had new-onset headaches; 34% had mouth pain/jaw claudication. One-fifth had polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms but no cranial manifestations; 62% had positive temporal artery biopsy findings; 37% were enrolled on the basis of cross-sectional imaging study findings. CONCLUSIONS: Demographics of the GiACTA population reflect the epidemiologic profile of GCA. Baseline comorbidities associated with glucocorticoids were more prevalent among relapsing patients than among those with newly diagnosed disease, highlighting the need for new GCA treatment options. More than one-third of patients were enrolled based on large-vessel imaging.

Incidence of outcomes potentially associated with corticosteroid therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory disorder of blood vessels that preferentially affects large- and medium-sized arteries. High-dose oral corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of GCA therapy. Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we quantified and compared the incidence of selected potentially CS-associated adverse outcomes in patients with and without GCA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of GCA and non-GCA patients to examine the incidence of adverse outcomes attributable to CS use. Eligibility criteria for the GCA group included a first-time diagnosis of GCA at age 50 years or older with receipt of ≥1 prescription(s) for prednisolone. GCA patients were matched to a GCA-free comparison group of equal size on age, sex, general practice, and calendar time. We estimated incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for diabetes, osteoporosis, glaucoma, fractures, serious infection requiring hospitalization, and death for GCA and non-GCA patients and compared all-cause hospitalizations between the two groups. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 5011 GCA and 5011 matched non-GCA patients. Approximately 74% were women, and mean age at GCA diagnosis was 72.9 years. The IR for all outcomes was greater in the GCA group than the non-GCA group. IRRs [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were as follows: diabetes 1.4 (1.2-1.7), osteoporosis 2.4 (2.1-2.8), fractures 1.4 (1.2-1.6), glaucoma 2.0 (1.6-2.5), serious infection requiring hospitalization 1.5 (1.3-1.7), and death 1.2 (1.0-1.3). CONCLUSION: Compared with age- and sex-matched non-GCA patients, patients with GCA were at increased risk for diabetes, osteoporosis, fracture, and glaucoma and at a marginally increased risk for death.

Corticosteroid-related adverse events in patients with giant cell arteritis: A claims-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids (CS) are standard treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA), but concerns persist over toxicities associated with long-term use. In this retrospective study of medical claims data, we estimated risks for adverse events (AEs) in CS-treated GCA patients. METHODS: Cox regression analyses with CS use as a time-dependent variable were conducted on data from the 2003 to 2012 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Database. Patients 50 years of age and older who had ≥2 claims of newly diagnosed GCA, ≥1 filled oral CS prescription, and no AEs before GCA diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was presence of a new CS-related AE. RESULTS: In total, 2497 patients were included. Their mean age was 71.0 years, and 71% were women. Follow-up was 9680 patient-years (PY). CS treatment continued for a mean (SD) of 1.196 (729.2) days; mean (SD) prescribed cumulative CS dose was 6983.3mg (6519.9). The overall AE rate was 0.43 events/PY; the most frequent AEs were cataract and bone disease. For each 1000-mg increase in CS exposure, the hazard ratio (HR) increased by 3% (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001). Additionally, statistically significant individual associations between increased CS exposure and AE risk were observed for bone-related AEs (P < 0.001), cataract (P < 0.001), glaucoma (P = 0.005), pneumonia (P = 0.003), and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001 in a subset of patients with no previous history of diabetes). CONCLUSION: CS exposure significantly increased risk for potentially serious AEs, emphasizing a need for new treatment options for GCA patients.

Development and implementation of a double-blind corticosteroid-tapering regimen for a clinical trial.

We describe the design and operationalization of a blinded corticosteroid-tapering regimen for a randomized trial of tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA). To our knowledge, no clinical trial in any disease has ever employed a blinded corticosteroid-tapering regimen, but this was necessary to the design of our trial which is likely to be relevant to other investigations of steroid-sparing regimens. Two standardized corticosteroid-tapering regimens are required for this GCA trial: a 6-month regimen in 3 arms (taken with tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneously weekly or every other week or with placebo) and a 12-month regimen with placebo (fourth arm). Investigators select initial prednisone doses, tapered in an open-label fashion until 20 mg/day. Doses <20 mg/day are blinded. At least 27 blinded blister packs are required to ensure blinding and encourage compliance. This permits all possible daily doses but requires ≤5 capsules/day. The number of capsules taken at any point during tapering is identical across groups. Our approach may be extrapolated to trials beyond GCA.

Incidence of giant cell arteritis and characteristics of patients: data-driven analysis of comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence of giant cell arteritis (GCA), cumulative use of prednisolone, and comorbidities most associated with GCA. METHODS: The data source was the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Selection criteria included ≥1 record of a diagnostic term for GCA between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2011, age ≥50 years, and ≥1 prescription of oral or systemic corticosteroid. Controls were selected randomly (2:1), with year of birth, practice, and followup duration (<2 or ≥2 years) as matching variables. Analysis was data driven; all comorbidities were identified in a 2-year window, with relative risk (RR) calculated and rank ordered. RESULTS: A total of 4,671 patients fulfilled the definition of GCA (incidence, 1.0 per 10,000 person-years), with highest incidence (7.4 per 10,000 person-years) in women ages 70-79 years. Of the 4,671 patients, 4,655 (99.7%) were prescribed prednisolone. In the group with ≥2 years' followup (n = 3,074), the mean number of prednisolone prescriptions was 32.1, and the mean cumulative dose was 8,640 mg; 1,034 patients (33.4%) received a cumulative dose of ≥10,000 mg. Comorbidities strongly associated with GCA were polymyalgia rheumatica (RR 14.9, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 11.9-18.7), visual disturbances (RR 4.6, 95% CI 2.7-7.8), facial pain (RR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-5.3), osteoporosis (RR 2.9, 95% 2.3-3.7), hypokalemia (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.9), and various infections such as oral/esophageal thrush (RR 3.7, 95% CI 2.2-6.0) and herpes zoster (RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.1). CONCLUSION: GCA is relatively uncommon; its incidence peaks at age 70-79 years in women. Overall, GCA patients in the UK are treated with high cumulative prednisolone doses. Many conditions are associated with GCA, including several related to corticosteroid use.

Long-term safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: 9.5-year follow-up of the global clinical trial programme with a focus on adverse events of interest in RA patients.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of long-term safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Pooled observed case analysis of data from patients with moderate-to-severe, active RA treated with rituximab in a global clinical trial programme. RESULTS: As of September 2010, 3194 patients had received up to 17 rituximab courses over 9.5 years (11 962 patient-years). Of these, 627 had >5 years' follow-up (4418 patient-years). A pooled placebo population (n=818) (placebo+methotrexate (MTX)) was also analysed. Serious adverse event and infection rates generally remained stable over time and multiple courses. The overall serious infection event (SIE) rate was 3.94/100 patient-years (3.26/100 patient-years in patients observed for >5 years) and was comparable with placebo+MTX (3.79/100 patient-years). Serious opportunistic infections were rare. Overall, 22.4% (n=717) of rituximab-treated patients developed low immunoglobulin (Ig)M and 3.5% (n=112) low IgG levels for ≥4 months after ≥1 course. SIE rates were similar before and during/after development of low Ig levels; however, in patients with low IgG, rates were higher than in patients who never developed low IgG. Rates of myocardial infarction and stroke were consistent with rates in the general RA population. No increased risk of malignancy over time was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that rituximab remains generally well tolerated over time and multiple courses, with a safety profile consistent with published data and clinical trial experience. Overall, the findings indicate that there was no evidence of an increased safety risk or increased reporting rates of any types of adverse events with prolonged exposure to rituximab during the 9.5 years of observation.

Fused tricyclic pyrrolizinones that exhibit pseudo-irreversible blockade of the NK1 receptor.

Previously, we had disclosed a novel class of hNK(1) antagonists based on the 5,5-fused pyrrolidine core. These compounds displayed subnanomolar hNK(1) affinity along with good efficacy in a gerbil foot-tapping (GFT) model, but unfortunately they had low to moderate functional antagonist (IP-1) activity. To elaborate on the SAR of this class of hNK(1) compounds and to improve functional activity, we have designed and synthesized a new class of hNK(1) antagonist with a third fused ring. Compared to the 5,5-fused pyrrolidine class, these 5,5,5-fused tricyclic hNK(1) antagonists maintain subnanomolar hNK(1) binding affinity with highly improved functional IP-1 activity (<10% SP remaining). A fused tricyclic methyl, hydroxyl geminally substituted pyrrolizinone (compound 20) had excellent functional IP (<2% SP remaining), hNK(1) binding affinity, off-target selectivity, pharmacokinetic profile and in vivo activity. Complete inhibition of agonist activity was observed at both 0 and 24h in the gerbil foot-tapping model with an ID(50) of 0.02 mpk at both 0 and 24h, respectively.